AzTrials
AzTrials

Premature Birth of NewbornSENSENCT03316547

Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences (SENSE)

A study testing SENSE Program in people with Premature Birth of Newborn, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Seventy preterm infants born less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation were put into either the sensory-based intervention (experiment) group or traditional care (control) group. Consecutive admissions at St. Louis Children's Hospital (SLCH) who were hospitalized in a private NICU room were recruited. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 32 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Premature Birth of Newborn
What is being tested?
SENSE Program
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 Aug 2017to 1 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 32 weeks
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Preterm Infants:
  • A prospective cohort very preterm infants (VPT) born less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation at the St. Louis Children's Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Infant is less than or equal to 7 days old when approached about the study.
  • Parents:
  • -Parents (including emancipated minors age 12-17) of very preterm infants (VPT) born less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation at the St. Louis Children's Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri.

Who cannot join

  • Preterm Infants:
  • Known or suspected congenital anomaly, congenital infection (e.g., syphilis, HIV, TORCH), or known prenatal brain lesions (e.g., cysts or infarctions)
  • Infants that are wards of the state, or become wards of the state after enrolling in the study. Any data collected beginning at the time the state obtains custody onward will not be used in the research study.
  • Infants who are in the open ward area/bed spaces of the SLCH NICU (due to the significant variation in sensory exposure among those infants, and also to provide consistency during the hospital's impending transition to strictly private rooms in the very near future).
  • Parents:
  • -Parents with limited or no understanding of the English Language

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • St. Louis Children's Hospital

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Supporting and Enhancing NICU Sensory Experiences to Optimize Developmental Outcomes in Preterm Infants

Seventy preterm infants born less than or equal to 32 weeks gestation were put into either the sensory-based intervention (experiment) group or traditional care (control) group. Consecutive admissions at St. Louis Children's Hospital (SLCH) who were hospitalized in a private NICU room were recruited. The parents of infants in the sensory-based intervention group were educated and supported by trained therapists to give different positive sensory experiences to their infants while hospitalized. The traditional care group received normal, standard care while hospitalized. For both care groups, infant neurobehavior, sensory processing, and parent mental health were measured at term age prior to hospital discharge. Child development, sensory processing, and parent mental health were measured again at age one year (corrected). Differences between the two groups were explored.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 12%, or 500,000 infants, are born preterm each year in the United States alone. Although survival rates of preterm infants have increased with advances in medical care, the risk of developmental delay and disability has remained constant. Very preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation) necessitate care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for an average of three months after birth, which is a significant period of time coinciding with a critical window of brain development. While medical factors, such as brain injury, can heighten the risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome, the NICU environment may also have deleterious effects on early brain structure and function.

The Influence of Early Environment: Maternal deprivation and isolation from positive sensory experiences are prominent features of orphan studies. Consequences of language and human deprivation include emotional disturbances, delayed cognitive and language skills, and abnormalities evident on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although the preterm infant differs from a child who has been institutionalized or deprived of caregiving attention after full term birth, there are similarities, such as the altered temporal lobe structures, and the pattern of developmental impairments. There is growing evidence supporting the importance of parents in the NICU. Low frequency visits between parents and their hospitalized preterm infants have been associated with suboptimal outcomes, like child abuse and abandonment and adverse emotional functioning. NICU's in Sweden have been successful with engaging parents in care from admission to discharge and have reported shorter hospitalizations. There is also a growing body of evidence supporting positive sensory exposures for preterm infants, including maternal voice recordings, massage, skin-to-skin holding, and vestibular and kinesthetic interventions. In addition, my team has made important research findings pointing to the potential need for developmentally-appropriate sensory exposures in the NICU.

Outcomes Associated with Preterm Birth: While advances in medical technologies have improved the rates of survival among preterm infants, the risk of long-term morbidities remains high, with 50-70% of very preterm infants exhibiting developmental problems. In addition to motor problems, language and communication problems are common in former preterm infants when studied at school age, and recent evidence suggests that language deficits persist through childhood. Language difficulties have also been shown to affect a broad range of factors important for social prowess and academic achievement. In addition, preterm infants have a heightened risk of attachment disorders and other social-emotional problems.

Outcomes Associated with Parenting a Preterm Infant: Many negative psychological sequelae are associated with parenting a preterm infant, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress. Such negative parental mental health outcomes proceed to influence the parent-child relationship, leading to a parent's inability to recognize infant cues as well as increased negativity and intrusiveness. Negative maternal-child interactions continue into the first several months of life if stress remains high. Forming such a foundation may then lead to negative child outcomes associated with social-emotional development, including attachment insecurity, and mental health issues.

Sensory Stimuli and Current Practice in the NICU: High-risk infants who receive care in the NICU are exposed to significant stressors that include painful procedures, disruption of normal sensory experiences, and stress related to parent-infant separation. In addition to the loss of parental nurturing, there is growing concern that stress during a period of extensive brain development may result in permanent and deleterious developmental outcomes.

Developmental care, which includes sensory minimization, has been the predominant model of care in the NICU since the 1980s, because the bright and noisy environment, which exceeds sensory standards set by the American Academy of Pediatrics, is understood to adversely affect growth and development of the preterm infant. In support of developmental care principles, NICU staff makes efforts to reduce modifiable stimuli to the high-risk infant in the NICU. However, there is emerging research on the positive effects of sensory stimulation for preterm infants in the NICU.

Positive sensory exposures in the NICU are critical, as they can have life-long implications on learning, memory, emotions, and developmental progression. In an environment where stimuli are primarily negative, it is especially important to define and implement positive sensory exposures in the NICU. Further, it is well understood that multi-dimensional sensory exposures are present in utero in the final months and weeks of pregnancy, but the preterm infant misses potentially important, timed exposures that may be absent or altered in the NICU environment. Positive forms of sensory exposure during periods of infant readiness may be important to facilitate appropriate neural pathways and enable positive experiences.

Results from a rigorous systematic review, benchmarking, and expert opinion were used to develop a clinical practice guideline for sensory-based interventions for hospitalized, very preterm infants using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. The manualized intervention (from the integrative review and development of the implementation plan) includes evidenced-based interventions that can be conducted by parents with their preterm infants across postmenstrual age while hospitalized. The sensory-based intervention includes the provision of specific amounts of auditory, tactile, vestibular, kinesthetic, olfactory, and visual exposure to be conducted daily through hospitalization. The intervention plan is intended to be implemented by parents (when available) and by surrogates when the parents are unable to be present in the hospital. Surveys, focus groups of a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals and parents of preterm infants in the NICU, and a pilot/feasibility study were conducted to assess acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the sensory-based intervention plan. The investigators enrolled 30 very preterm infants within the first week of life and implemented the sensory-based program. Logging sheets were placed at the infant's bedside to document the execution of sensory-based interventions, who conducted the intervention (parent, member of research team or other caregiver), and infant responses and consequences of the intervention. Physiological (such as heart rate and oxygen saturation fluctuations), state (levels of arousal) and behavioral (such as crying, changes in motoric tone) responses were recorded by caregivers during interventions on the bedside logs. Negative sequelae of the intervention resulted in stopping the intervention and modifying the criteria for sensory-based interventions accordingly. A licensed therapist provided guidance as to when infants can and cannot tolerate sensory exposures. From clinical documentation and bedside logging, implementation factors were assessed. Adaptations to the sensory-based program were made until it was deemed appropriate by the investigative team. This occurred after the model for an enhanced sensory environment could be documented 75% of the time on at least 3 consecutive participants.

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess the effect of a sensory-based intervention in the NICU on outcomes of preterm infants and their families.

After obtaining informed consent, 70 preterm infants were randomized to 2 levels of sensory exposure: the sensory-based intervention or traditional care group. The parents of infants in the sensory-based intervention group were educated and supported to conduct sensory interventions with their infants using the systematized protocol. The traditional care group had therapists and nurses provide and educate parents about sensory exposures as standard of care. For both care groups, infant neurobehavior, sensory processing, mother-infant interaction, and parent mental health were assessed at term age prior to hospital discharge. Child development, sensory processing, and parent mental health were measured again at age one year corrected using standardized measures. Differences between groups were explored.

Being tested
SENSE Program
Keywords
preterm
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SENSE ProgramOther

    Also called Sensory-Based Intervention

    Specific amounts of auditory, tactile, vestibular, kinesthetic, and visual exposure conducted daily through hospitalization. This includes specifically timed and set amounts of reading/talking/singing, cycled lighting, skin-to-skin (kangaroo) care or gentle human touch, rocking, and therapeutic exercises [passive range of motion (PROM), gentle stretching]. The intervention plan is intended to be implemented by parents when available, and by surrogates when the parents are unable to be present in the hospital. Specific amounts and timing of interventions will be tailored to the current medical status and age of each infant.

Study groups in NCT03316547
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionThe control group received standard hospital care.
InterventionExperimentalParents in the sensory-based intervention group were educated to provide daily sensory-based interventions across the length of hospitalization as outlined in the manualized intervention (the SENSE Program). A sensory support team completed the doses of sensory exposures when parents were unable.
Receives: Other: SENSE Program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) - Communication at 1 Year

    Parents completed the parent-report measure of child development, the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ), at 1 year corrected age. The ASQ The Communication subscore is the primary variable of interest, which looks at the child's language and communication skills at time of assessment. Higher scores on the ASQ Communication subsection indicate more positive outcomes. A child can score a minimum of 0 points and a maximum of 60 points on the Communication subscale.

    Measured: One year corrected age

  2. Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) Excitability Score at Term Equivalent Age

    Infants were assessed using the NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale (NNNS) by a blinded evaluator. The Excitability subscore, which measures state-related level of arousal over the course of the whole examination, is the primary variable of interest, and ranges from 1-8. An average response falls in the moderate, midpoint range (4-5), and describes an infant who could be brought to respond to stimuli in spite of a high degree of upset or excitement, but then can return to moderate state. Thus, a midpoint range score (4-5) would indicate a better outcome on the Excitability sub scale, whereas a lower (<4) or higher (>5) score would indicate a worse outcome.

    Measured: At term equivalent age (35-41 weeks PMA)

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Language Environmental Acquisition Device (LENA)

    Audio recordings of a single 16 hour period to capture language and sound exposure occurred at 34 weeks using the Language Environmental Acquisition Device (LENA). The LENA device is a digital language processor that captures environmental sound for up to 16 hours and quantifies: % of the recording with meaningful word exposure, % of the recording with electronic noise, % of the recording with noise, % of the recording with silence, and % of the recording with distant word exposure.

    Measured: Single 16 hour period to capture language and sound exposure will occur at 34 weeks to assess treatment fidelity/differentiation.

  2. Sensory Exposures Provided During Hospitalization

    During each day of hospitalization (from day of consent, often within 1 week of birth, to day of discharge, often near term-equivalent age; an average of about 2 months), parents, health care professionals and the sensory support team documented the type and amount of tactile and auditory exposures conducted. The proportion of the SENSE program doses, whether parents conducted the majority of the sensory exposures and whether the doses were met were defined after hospital discharge was complete.

    Measured: Sensory exposures were documented every day of hospitalization (from birth to term-equivalent age; an average of about 2 months).

  3. Dubowitz/Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Evaluation

    At the NICU bedside, infant neurobehavior was assessed by a blinded evaluator using the Dubowitz/Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Evaluation (HNNE). The HNNE is an assessment of neonatal neurological status. The total score is used as an outcome variable and ranges from 0-78. A higher score indicates a better outcome, whereas a lower score indicates a worse outcome.

    Measured: At term equivalent age (between 35-41 weeks post menstrual age), just prior to discharge from the hospital.

  4. General Movement Assessment (GMA)

    A video recording was conducted to enable scoring of general movements and infant neurological/motor status using the General Movements Assessment. However, video quality was deemed insufficient for analysis.

    Measured: At term equivalent age (between 35-41 weeks post menstrual age), just prior to discharge from the hospital.

  5. Discharge Questionnaire

    Prior to discharge from the hospital, the infant's mother completed a questionnaire. Measures included the Sensory Profile-2 (SP-2), the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the Parent Stress Index (PSI), The Parental Stress Scale: NICU (PSS), the Maternal Confidence Questionnaire, and the Infant Care Questionnaire (ICQ). The SP-2 assesses infant sensory processing skills with summary scores for tactile, auditory, visual, movement, oral, and general processing. The STAI measures maternal anxiety separated into state-related and trait-related anxiety. The PSI includes subscales to measure defensive responding, parental distress, parent-child dysfunctional interaction, \& difficult child behaviors. The ICQ measures maternal connection, emotionality, and responsiveness. Possible score ranges and directions of scores listed with each variable below.

    Measured: Just prior to discharge from the hospital (between 35-41 weeks post menstrual age).

  6. 1 Year Follow-Up Questionnaire

    The infant's mother completed a questionnaire with the following measures: the ASQ, SP-2, STAI, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), PSI, Maternal Confidence Questionnaire (MCQ), ICQ, Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool (Pedi-eat), and Behavioral Pediatrics Feeding Assessment Scale (BPFAS). ASQ, SP-2, STAI, PSI, MCQ, and ICQ are previously described in discharge questionnaire outcome data. The BDI was used to measure maternal depression at time of follow-up. The Pedi-eat and BPFAS were used to assess infant feeding skills. Possible score ranges and directions of scores are reported below under each individual variable.

    Measured: One year corrected age.

  7. Mother-Infant Interaction (at 1 Year Follow-up)

    At one year follow-up, mother-infant interaction will be assessed through the interaction subscale of the Parental Stress Index (PSI). A score in this subscale can range from 12-60, with higher scores indicating a greater degree of dysfunction.

    Measured: One year corrected age.

  8. Parent Engagement During Hospitalization

    On each day of hospitalization (from birth to discharge, which often occurred close to term equivalent age; for an average of about 2 months), parents, health care professionals and the sensory support team documented the frequency of parent visitation, holding, and skin-to-skin care.

    Measured: Every day of hospitalization (from birth through discharge, often close to term equivalent age; on average about 2 months).

  9. Language Environmental Acquisition Device (LENA) Adult Word Count

    Audio recordings of a single 16 hour period to capture language and sound exposure occurred at 34 weeks using the Language Environmental Acquisition Device (LENA). The LENA device is a digital language processor that captures environmental sound for up to 16 hours and can quantify the number of adult words spoken during the 16 hour recording.

    Measured: Single 16 hour period to capture language and sound exposure will occur at 34 weeks to assess treatment fidelity/differentiation.

  10. Percentage of Sensory Interventions Received

    Throughout hospitalization, parents, health care professionals and the sensory support team documented the type and amount of tactile and auditory exposures conducted. The percentage of recommended sensory doses that were received were documented.

    Measured: Sensory exposures were documented every day of hospitalization (birth through discharge, often close to term) equivalent age).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2017
  2. Study start16 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
SENSE program-treatment; standard-of-care-control
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03316547
Sponsor's protocol ID
201601057
Acronym
SENSE
Status last verified
Jun 2021
First submitted
15 Aug 2017
Last updated
7 Jul 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Volpe, J., Neurology of the Newborn 2008, Saunders: Philadelphia.

  • Seay B, Harlow HF. Maternal separation in the rhesus monkey. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1965 Jun;140(6):434-41. doi: 10.1097/00005053-196506000-00006. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4953280
  • Tottenham N, Hare TA, Quinn BT, McCarry TW, Nurse M, Gilhooly T, Millner A, Galvan A, Davidson MC, Eigsti IM, Thomas KM, Freed PJ, Booma ES, Gunnar MR, Altemus M, Aronson J, Casey BJ. Prolonged institutional rearing is associated with atypically large amygdala volume and difficulties in emotion regulation. Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):46-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00852.x.

    PubMed 20121862
  • Tottenham N, Sheridan MA. A review of adversity, the amygdala and the hippocampus: a consideration of developmental timing. Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Jan 8;3:68. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.068.2009. eCollection 2009.

    PubMed 20161700
  • BRODBECK AJ, IRWIN OC. The speech behaviour of infants without families. Child Dev. 1946 Sep;17(3):145-56. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20285787
  • Govindan RM, Behen ME, Helder E, Makki MI, Chugani HT. Altered water diffusivity in cortical association tracts in children with early deprivation identified with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS). Cereb Cortex. 2010 Mar;20(3):561-9. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp122. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

    PubMed 19546156
  • Aeby A, Van Bogaert P, David P, Baleriaux D, Vermeylen D, Metens T, De Tiege X. Nonlinear microstructural changes in the right superior temporal sulcus and lateral occipitotemporal gyrus between 35 and 43 weeks in the preterm brain. Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.013. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

    PubMed 22713672
  • Barre N, Morgan A, Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Language abilities in children who were very preterm and/or very low birth weight: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr. 2011 May;158(5):766-774.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.10.032. Epub 2010 Dec 10.

    PubMed 21146182
  • Reynolds LC, Duncan MM, Smith GC, Mathur A, Neil J, Inder T, Pineda RG. Parental presence and holding in the neonatal intensive care unit and associations with early neurobehavior. J Perinatol. 2013 Aug;33(8):636-41. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.4. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

    PubMed 23412640
  • Fanaroff AA, Kennell JH, Klaus MH. Follow-up of low birth weight infants--the predictive value of maternal visiting patterns. Pediatrics. 1972 Feb;49(2):287-90. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5059535
  • Latva R, Lehtonen L, Salmelin RK, Tamminen T. Visiting less than every day: a marker for later behavioral problems in Finnish preterm infants. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004 Dec;158(12):1153-7. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.158.12.1153.

    PubMed 15583100
  • Ortenstrand A, Westrup B, Brostrom EB, Sarman I, Akerstrom S, Brune T, Lindberg L, Waldenstrom U. The Stockholm Neonatal Family Centered Care Study: effects on length of stay and infant morbidity. Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):e278-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1511. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

    PubMed 20100748
  • Krueger C, Parker L, Chiu SH, Theriaque D. Maternal voice and short-term outcomes in preterm infants. Dev Psychobiol. 2010 Mar;52(2):205-12. doi: 10.1002/dev.20426.

    PubMed 20112262
  • Diego MA, Field T, Hernandez-Reif M. Preterm infant weight gain is increased by massage therapy and exercise via different underlying mechanisms. Early Hum Dev. 2014 Mar;90(3):137-40. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

    PubMed 24480603
  • Hernandez-Reif M, Diego M, Field T. Preterm infants show reduced stress behaviors and activity after 5 days of massage therapy. Infant Behav Dev. 2007 Dec;30(4):557-61. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.04.002. Epub 2007 Jun 4.

    PubMed 17548111

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SENSE Program in people with Premature Birth of Newborn, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Jul 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) - Communication at 1 Year (time frame: One year corrected age). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03316547, which also lists 89 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jul 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in