AzTrials
AzTrials

PediatricsSTARSNCT03320122

School-Based Tele-Physiatry Assistance for Rehabilitative and Therapeutic Services

A study testing Telemedicine, In-Person Pediatric Physiatrist and In-Person Non-Pediatric Physiatrist in people with Pediatrics and Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Using a randomized trial design, the goal of this project is to prospectively compare outcomes from a telemedicine-based model of care to two cohorts: patients who receive in-person pediatric physiatrist medical direction (the "gold standard"), and those who receive medical oversight from non-specialist community… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 21 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Telemedicine, In-Person Pediatric Physiatrist and In-Person Non-Pediatric Physiatrist
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2017to 31 Jul 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants will include children with special health care needs enrolled in the CCS Medical Therapy Program receiving care at one of the participating sites during the study period.

Who cannot join

  • Children with special health care needs not enrolled in the CCS Medical Therapy Program.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California, Davis, Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: School-Based Tele-Physiatry Assistance for Rehabilitative and Therapeutic Services for Children With Special Health Care Needs Living in Rural and Underserved Communities

Using a randomized trial design, the goal of this project is to prospectively compare outcomes from a telemedicine-based model of care to two cohorts: patients who receive in-person pediatric physiatrist medical direction (the "gold standard"), and those who receive medical oversight from non-specialist community providers. This project will determine the impact of this new model of care using telemedicine on parent/guardian satisfaction, adherence rates to an evidence-based hip surveillance program, and economic efficiency.

Read the detailed description

During this study, a novel model of care will be developed and tested using telehealth technologies to bring necessary medical expertise to children with special health care needs living in rural and underserved communities. This model of care will be implemented in eight school-based Medical Therapy Units (MTUs) in northern California using a randomized design. The investigators hypothesize that this model of care will result in 1) equal satisfaction of the care received in-person from pediatric physiatrists and increased satisfaction of the care received from non-pediatric specialists; 2) equal adherence rates to an evidence-based hip surveillance program when compared to children who receive care from in-person pediatric physiatry care and better adherence than children who receive care from non-pediatric specialists; and 3) cost savings when compared to medical direction provided in-person by pediatric physiatrists and non-pediatric specialist providers.

The first 6 months of the project will be a "ramp-up" period during which the protocol will be re-reviewed during MTU site visits and necessary contracts and approvals will be in place. The last 6 months will be reserved for data analysis, study closeout, and manuscript preparation. The intervention phase will include various designs of implementation. For those schools currently without pediatric physiatry services, the investigators will provide MTU services using telemedicine and add in-person clinics. For those schools where medical direction is provided by non-pediatric physiatrists, the investigators will augment current services using telemedicine to provide medical direction to some children using pediatric physiatrists. For those schools where pediatric physiatrists travel long distances to provide medical direction during scheduled clinics, the investigators will similarly add additional telemedicine services such that an augmented mixed model of in-person and telemedicine pediatric physiatrist medical direction will be provided.

Being tested
Telemedicine, In-Person Pediatric Physiatrist, In-Person Non-Pediatric Physiatrist
Keywords
Telemedicine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TelemedicineOther

    Medical direction will be provided to MTUs through a video-based conferencing unit. Each telemedicine unit includes a Rubbermaid medical grade cart with a Polycom RealPresence 500 Series high-resolution video-conferencing unit flat screen to display video. Each cart also comes with an Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) to make the unit mobile if needed or to properly shut it down in the event of power failure.

  • In-Person Pediatric PhysiatristOther

    UC Davis pediatric physiatrists will drive out to the school-based MTUs to provide medical direction in person.

  • In-Person Non-Pediatric PhysiatristOther

    A contracted physician (i.e., a non pediatric physiatrist) would provide medical direction in person.

Study groups in NCT03320122
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TelemedicineExperimentalMedical Direction will be provided by pediatric physiatrists using telemedicine.
Receives: Other: Telemedicine
In-Person Pediatric PhysiatristActive comparatorMedical Direction will be provided by pediatric physiatrists in-person.
Receives: Other: In-Person Pediatric Physiatrist
In-Person Non-Pediatric PhysiatristActive comparatorMedical Direction will be provided by contracted physicians (i.e., non-pediatric physiatrists) in-person care.
Receives: Other: In-Person Non-Pediatric Physiatrist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Parent/Guardian Satisfaction Survey

    The effect of providing pediatric physiatrist medical direction across groups will be measured through satisfaction surveys that will be distributed to participating parents and guardians. Satisfaction surveys will utilize a seven-point Likert scale and the investigators will assess the inter-item reliability, dimensionality and construct validity of satisfaction scales using standard multivariable analysis techniques. A higher score represents a higher satisfaction rate. The investigators postulate that a minimally important clinically significant difference is approximately 0.50 points, while a difference of 0.30 is tolerably close for purposes of non-inferiority.

    Measured: Over 1 day for each patient

  2. Evidence-Based Hip Surveillance Program Survey

    The hip surveillance survey utilizes several Yes/No responses to compare guideline adherence between the three cohorts and the questions are directly linked to the clinical expectations and explicit guidelines for the appropriate timing and frequency of x-rays and exams. Adherence rates will be compared by adjusted odds ratios.

    Measured: Over 1 day for each patient

  3. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Survey

    The EQ-5D is a quality of life assessment tool for measuring "utility." The "utility" is a comprehensive health measure, ranging from 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health), based on an individual's health state in five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The utility for a certain health condition is calculated by applying an established formula that assigns weights to each of the levels in each dimension determined by this health condition. These data on a quality of life will be used in a cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Measured: Over 1 day for each patient

  4. Economic Efficiency

    Cost analysis will estimate cost changes resulting from the introduction of this new model of care from the perspectives of patients and families, physicians and healthcare providers, and payers. The proposed economic evaluative methods will integrate all of the effectiveness results from patient encounter data and EQ-5D survey data. Cost analysis will estimate return-on-investment indicating the cost-saving amount per $1 investment in telemedicine compared to MTUs without telemedicine.

    Measured: Up to 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Oct 2017
  2. Study start1 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The proposed program will target MTUs and patients in counties were pediatric physiatrists and other multidisciplinary team members are underrepresented. In this proposed model, the investigators will randomly select at least 350 patient encounters: approximately 175 children will receive care using tele-physiatrist medical direction; 101 children will receive care from a pediatric physiatrist who travels to the MTU to provide in-person care; and 74 children will receive care under a non-pediatric specialist's medical directorship. Once the care model has been created at each site, patients from each cohort will be selected using a clustered, clinic based randomization scheme.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
350 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03320122
Sponsor's protocol ID
994055
Acronym
STARS
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
20 Oct 2017
Last updated
18 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Telemedicine, In-Person Pediatric Physiatrist and In-Person Non-Pediatric Physiatrist in people with Pediatrics and Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Parent/Guardian Satisfaction Survey (time frame: Over 1 day for each patient). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in