Tooth SensitivityPhase 2NCT03323372
Different Concentrations of Potassium Nitrate in In-office Tooth Bleaching Sensitivity
A Phase 2 study testing 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride and 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride in people with Tooth Sensitivity, run by Universidade Federal do Amazonas.
Trial summary
The aim of this randomized, double-blind controlled clinical study was to evaluate the absolute risk and intensity of sensitivity to dental bleaching in adults on the application of two different gels based on potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride from a prospective randomized clinical study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Tooth Sensitivity
- What is being tested?
- 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride and 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 21 Dec 2016to 20 May 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 18 years and older, of both sexes, who had to present at least six upper anterior teeth free of caries and restorations on the vestibular face, and at least one central or canine incisor showing coloration A2 or darker, evaluated in comparison to a visual value-oriented color scale of the teeth (Vita Classical®, Vita-Zahnfabrik- Germany).
- Prior to the interventions, the signing of each participant's free and informed consent form (Appendix I) was obtained after due explanations about the nature of the study and the possible risks of the proposed treatments.
Who cannot join
- The individuals excluded from the study were: users of fixed orthodontic appliances, patients with periodontal disease, pregnant or lactating, with severe intrinsic stains on the teeth (spots on the use of tetracycline, fluorosis and depolluted teeth), consuming any Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant drugs, using desensitizing dentifrice and participants with previous history of SD or any associated pathology (bruxism, gingival recession, non-carious lesion with dentin exposure).
About this study
Official title: Different Concentrations of Potassium Nitrate in In-office Tooth Bleaching Sensitivity: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The aim of this randomized, double-blind controlled clinical study was to evaluate the absolute risk and intensity of sensitivity to dental bleaching in adults on the application of two different gels based on potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride from a prospective randomized clinical study.
Read the detailed description
For this study, 56 volunteers who had an equal allocation rate between the groups (G1-control and G2-experimental) were selected for this study. Both gels act in the same way, the difference between them is the concentration. In both groups, the different desensitizing gels were applied to the vestibular surface of the anterior superior teeth with the aid of a tray, remaining in position according to the time specified by the manufacturers. In the control group, a gel based on 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride was used, while in the experimental group, the gel was based on 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride. After removal of the desensitizing gel, both groups were subjected to bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide gel for 40 minutes. Patients recorded an occurrence or not of dental sensitivity (SD) in a sensitivity diary for 48 hours. A Verbal Evaluation Scale (VRS) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used for pain assessment. The values were organized into two categories: percentage of patients who presented SD at some time of treatment (absolute risk of sensitivity) and SD intensity. To evaluate the color before the first bleaching session, and after 7, 14 and 28 days, two methods were used: objective evaluation using the spectrophotometer and subjective evaluation using two color scales: Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER. An analysis of the data followed the intent-to-treat protocol and involved all randomly allocated participants. The absolute risk of SD was compared using Fisher's exact test (α = 5%). The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the intensity of SD.
Student's t test was used to compare the color change. The level of significance adopted in all tests was 5%.
- Conditions
- Tooth Sensitivity
- Being tested
- 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride, 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride
- Medical subject headings
- Dentin Sensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluorideDrug
Also called Ultra EZ
5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluorideDrug
Also called Desensibilize KF 2%
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Active comparator | In group 1 (G1-control), the operator applied a desensitizing gel based on 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride (Desensibilize KF 2% ®, FGM , Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil) with the aid of a custom silicone tray, which was made from a model obtained from the patient, with a vacuum plasticizer. A small layer of the gel was placed on the surface of the tray that was in contact with the vestibular face of the upper anterior teeth of the participants. The tray remained in position in the mouth for 10 minutes, according to the manufacturer's specifications. Receives: Drug: 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride |
| experimental group | Experimental | In group 2 (G2-intervention group), the operator applied a desensitizing gel containing 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride (Ultra EZ®, Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT, Estados Unidos) with the help of a tray in which the material is stored on the vestibular surfaces of the upper anterior teeth of the participants. The tray remained in position in the mouth for 15 minutes, according to the manufacturer's specifications. Receives: Drug: 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
absolute risk of tooth sensibility
Patients recorded the occurrence or not of tooth sensitivity (TS) in a sensitivity diary. Participants were asked to register if they experienced DS during treatment and up to 48 hours after bleaching. The Analogic Visual Scale (AVS) was used to assess pain. Each item was scored 0-10 (0- no pain and 10- pain as bad as can be).
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
sensitivity intensity
Patients were asked to record their perception of tooth sensitivity (TS) during the first and second bleaching sessions using the five-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = considerable, and 4 = severe]. Subjects were asked to record their experience with TS during the treatment, up to 1 h after bleaching, from 1 h to 24 h, and from 24 to 48 h after bleaching. They were also asked to record whether their experienced or not TS during the 30-day period after bleaching. As two bleaching sessions were performed, the highest score obtained in both bleaching sessions was considered for statistical purposes.
Measured: 28 days
effectiveness of tooth whitening - objective
Color was recorded before the bleaching procedure, 7 days and 30 days after the end of the bleaching treatment using an objective method (Easyshade spectrophotometer, Vident, Brea, CA, USA). For each evaluation, three readings were performed using the CIELab system parameters, in which: L * indicates luminosity, a * represents color and saturation on the red-green axis and b * means color and saturation on the yellow-blue axis. Color evaluation was done in a room under artificial lightning conditions without interference from outside light. The color was checked at the middle third of the canine.
Measured: 28 days
effectiveness of tooth whitening - subjective
Color was recorded before the bleaching procedure, 7 days and 30 days after the end of the bleaching treatment using a subjective (value-oriented shade guide Vita Classic). For subjective evaluation, the 16 color guides of the Vita Classical scale (Vita Zahnfabrik®, Bad Säckingen, Germany) were organized from the highest value (B1) to the lowest value (C4). Although the scale is not linear, it was organized by value representing a ranking for analysis purposes. Color evaluation was done in a room under artificial lightning conditions without interference from outside light. The color was checked at the middle third of the canine.
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2017
- Study start21 Dec 2016
- Primary completion5 May 2017
- Study completion20 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tooth SensitivityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The design of this randomized, double blind, intervention study was structured based on the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) standards.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do Amazonas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, larissa alves de lima e souza, Universidade Federal do Amazonas
- Investigators
- Leandro M Martins, doctorate, Study chair, amazon federal university
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03323372
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UFAmazonas
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Different Concentrations of Potassium Nitrate in In-office Tooth Bleaching Sensitivity: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03323372
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UFAmazonas
- Conditions
- Tooth Sensitivity
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidade Federal do AmazonasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Dec 2016
- Primary completion
- 5 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this randomized, double-blind controlled clinical study was to evaluate the absolute risk and intensity of sensitivity to dental bleaching in adults on the application of two different gels based on potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride from a prospective randomized clinical study.
Detailed description
For this study, 56 volunteers who had an equal allocation rate between the groups (G1-control and G2-experimental) were selected for this study. Both gels act in the same way, the difference between them is the concentration. In both groups, the different desensitizing gels were applied to the vestibular surface of the anterior superior teeth with the aid of a tray, remaining in position according to the time specified by the manufacturers. In the control group, a gel based on 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride was used, while in the experimental group, the gel was based on 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride. After removal of the desensitizing gel, both groups were subjected to bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide gel for 40 minutes. Patients recorded an occurrence or not of dental sensitivity (SD) in a sensitivity diary for 48 hours. A Verbal Evaluation Scale (VRS) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used for pain assessment. The values were organized into two categories: percentage of patients who presented SD at some time of treatment (absolute risk of sensitivity) and SD intensity. To evaluate the color before the first bleaching session, and after 7, 14 and 28 days, two methods were used: objective evaluation using the spectrophotometer and subjective evaluation using two color scales: Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER. An analysis of the data followed the intent-to-treat protocol and involved all randomly allocated participants. The absolute risk of SD was compared using Fisher's exact test (α = 5%). The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the intensity of SD.
Student's t test was used to compare the color change. The level of significance adopted in all tests was 5%.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The design of this randomized, double blind, intervention study was structured based on the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) standards.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Active comparator | Drug: 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluorideIn group 1 (G1-control), the operator applied a desensitizing gel based on 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride (Desensibilize KF 2% ®, FGM , Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil) with the aid of a custom silicone tray, which was made from a model obtained from the patient, with a vacuum plasticizer. A small layer of the gel was placed on the surface of the tray that was in contact with the vestibular face of the upper anterior teeth of the participants. The tray remained in position in the mouth for 10 minutes, according to the manufacturer's specifications. |
| experimental group | Experimental | Drug: 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluorideIn group 2 (G2-intervention group), the operator applied a desensitizing gel containing 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride (Ultra EZ®, Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT, Estados Unidos) with the help of a tray in which the material is stored on the vestibular surfaces of the upper anterior teeth of the participants. The tray remained in position in the mouth for 15 minutes, according to the manufacturer's specifications. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients aged 18 years and older, of both sexes, who had to present at least six upper anterior teeth free of caries and restorations on the vestibular face, and at least one central or canine incisor showing coloration A2 or darker, evaluated in comparison to a visual value-oriented color scale of the teeth (Vita Classical®, Vita-Zahnfabrik- Germany).
- Prior to the interventions, the signing of each participant's free and informed consent form (Appendix I) was obtained after due explanations about the nature of the study and the possible risks of the proposed treatments.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The individuals excluded from the study were: users of fixed orthodontic appliances, patients with periodontal disease, pregnant or lactating, with severe intrinsic stains on the teeth (spots on the use of tetracycline, fluorosis and depolluted teeth), consuming any Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant drugs, using desensitizing dentifrice and participants with previous history of SD or any associated pathology (bruxism, gingival recession, non-carious lesion with dentin exposure).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluorideAlso: Ultra EZ | Drug | experimental group |
| 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluorideAlso: Desensibilize KF 2% | Drug | control group |
Primary outcome
absolute risk of tooth sensibility
Time frame: 28 days
Patients recorded the occurrence or not of tooth sensitivity (TS) in a sensitivity diary. Participants were asked to register if they experienced DS during treatment and up to 48 hours after bleaching. The Analogic Visual Scale (AVS) was used to assess pain. Each item was scored 0-10 (0- no pain and 10- pain as bad as can be).
3 secondary outcomes
sensitivity intensity
Time frame: 28 days
effectiveness of tooth whitening - objective
Time frame: 28 days
effectiveness of tooth whitening - subjective
Time frame: 28 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tooth Sensitivity
Recruiting
A Study to Assess the Efficacy of a Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate Toothpaste for the Relief of Dentine Hypersensitivity
Dentin Sensitivity
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of Short Dentin Etching
Hypersensitivity Dentin, Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity
Recruiting
Peroxide Versus Non-Peroxide In-Office Tooth Bleaching
Tooth Discoloration, Tooth Staining
Recruiting
Dentine Hypersensitivity Using Dentine Adhesive With Strontium-doped Bioactive Glass-Ceramic
Dentine Hypersensitivity
Not yet recruiting
Nano Silver Fluoride and Photobiomodulation Therapy for Hypersensitivity and Pain in MIH-Affected Molars
Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Leandro M Martins, doctorate study chair
amazon federal university
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride and 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride in people with Tooth Sensitivity, run by Universidade Federal do Amazonas.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
absolute risk of tooth sensibility (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2017.