HypertensionNCT03325426
Activity Trackers for Improving BP
A study testing FitBit in people with Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Factor, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study aims to determine if use of physical activity trackers coupled with provider feedback will increase awareness of young adults of their physical fitness and improve blood pressure levels. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 8 to 30 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Physical Activity
- What is being tested?
- FitBit
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 1 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 8 to 30 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- ages 8-30 receiving anti-hypertensive therapy at the time of recruitment.
- diabetes, non-dialysis requiring chronic kidney disease, kidney transplant, or other etiologies of hypertension
- have phones compatible for wireless device (FitBits©) data transmission
Who cannot join
- history of decompensated congestive heart failure
- pregnant
- cognitive impairment
- unable to perform physical activity
- BP >180/110 mm Hg
- prisoners
Show all 9Show fewer
- contraindication to use or wear of home activity tracker (such as allergy to activity tracker band)
- presence of any co-morbidity that would preclude physical activity
- actively using physical activity tracking devices prior to the study will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
Official title: ACtivity Trackers to ImproVe Blood Pressure: a Pilot Study
The study aims to determine if use of physical activity trackers coupled with provider feedback will increase awareness of young adults of their physical fitness and improve blood pressure levels. The goal of this pilot study is feasibility, with a secondary goal of examining potential effect sizes for planning purposes for a larger randomized controlled trial.
Read the detailed description
Increasing physical activity levels may improve cardiovascular health and BP levels in young individuals, especially if such strategies promote healthy lifestyles. Physical activity is currently recommended for adults CV health, but physical activity levels are known to be low in populations with diabetes or chronic kidney disease. One prior study of the use of pedometers (not associated with wireless technology or provider feedback) in children with CKD did not significantly improve physical activity levels. Supervised walking appeared to provide some benefit in individuals with type II diabetes, but overall compliance was poor. Interview of adolescents and young adults with chronic illnesses has shown preference for the use of electronic devices and online tools for disease management.Thus, use of sophisticated electronic devices such as FitBits© (wireless pedometers worn on the wrist that sync with cell phones) may improve disease control by engaging young patients in self-monitoring of their own health and lifestyle behaviors. This pilot study aims to determine if use of FitBits© coupled with provider feedback will increase awareness of young adults of their physical fitness and improve blood pressure levels.
- Being tested
- FitBit
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Motor Activity, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FitBitDevice
Also called physical activity tracker
Daily use of physical activity tracker coupled with biweekly provider telemonitoring and feedback for 6 months and then additionally without feedback for an additional 6 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No intervention | No physical activity tracker or feedback x 6 months, then crossover to physical activity tracker x 6 months |
| Physical activity tracker | Experimental | Physical activity tracker x 12 months (6 months with study feedback and 6 months without) Receives: Device: FitBit |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Mean Office Systolic BP
Change in mean systolic BP is modeled using all blood pressure data points collected between baseline and month 12 to provide an average change over time, accounting for repeated values from patients using a mixed linear regression approach.
Measured: Between baseline and month 12
Change in Mean Office Systolic BP
Change in mean systolic BP using blood pressure data points collected between baseline and month 6 to provide an average change over time
Measured: Between baseline and month 6
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Participants Retained
Rate of study participant retention
Measured: Months 0-12
Change in Weight (Z-score)
Weights were measured in clinic using a standardized scale. Z score of 0 represents the population mean. A z-score of +1.96 represents the 95th percentile of weight and -1.96 represents the 5th percentile of weight. Change in weight (z-score) is modeled using all weight data points collected between baseline and month 12 to provide an average change over time accounting for repeated values from patients using a mixed linear regression approach.
Measured: Months 0-12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Oct 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion1 Jan 2021
- Study completion1 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Elaine Ku, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03325426
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-18605
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cohen DL, Huan Y, Townsend RR. Home blood pressure monitoring in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):835-42. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
PubMed 24529535Logan AG, McIsaac WJ, Tisler A, Irvine MJ, Saunders A, Dunai A, Rizo CA, Feig DS, Hamill M, Trudel M, Cafazzo JA. Mobile phone-based remote patient monitoring system for management of hypertension in diabetic patients. Am J Hypertens. 2007 Sep;20(9):942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.020.
PubMed 17765133Agarwal R, Bills JE, Hecht TJ, Light RP. Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2011 Jan;57(1):29-38. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.160911. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
PubMed 21115879Uhlig K, Balk EM, Patel K, Ip S, Kitsios GD, Obadan NO, Haynes SM, Stefan M, Rao M, Kong Win Chang L, Gaylor J, Iovin RC. Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring: Comparative Effectiveness [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jan. Report No.: 12-EHC002-EF. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK84604/
PubMed 22439158Akber A, Portale AA, Johansen KL. Pedometer-assessed physical activity in children and young adults with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 May;7(5):720-6. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06330611. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
PubMed 22422539Mohammed J, Deda L, Clarson CL, Stein RI, Cuerden MS, Mahmud FH. Assessment of habitual physical activity in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2014 Aug;38(4):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.05.010.
PubMed 25092645Akber A, Portale AA, Johansen KL. Use of pedometers to increase physical activity among children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Aug;29(8):1395-402. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2787-6. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
PubMed 24648129Negri C, Bacchi E, Morgante S, Soave D, Marques A, Menghini E, Muggeo M, Bonora E, Moghetti P. Supervised walking groups to increase physical activity in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2333-5. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0877.
PubMed 20980426Applebaum MA, Lawson EF, von Scheven E. Perception of transition readiness and preferences for use of technology in transition programs: teens' ideas for the future. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013;25(2):119-25. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2013-0019.
PubMed 23740658Ting TV, Kudalkar D, Nelson S, Cortina S, Pendl J, Budhani S, Neville J, Taylor J, Huggins J, Drotar D, Brunner HI. Usefulness of cellular text messaging for improving adherence among adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):174-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110771. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
PubMed 22089460Takacs J, Pollock CL, Guenther JR, Bahar M, Napier C, Hunt MA. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Sep;17(5):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.241. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
PubMed 24268570James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, Lackland DT, LeFevre ML, MacKenzie TD, Ogedegbe O, Smith SC Jr, Svetkey LP, Taler SJ, Townsend RR, Wright JT Jr, Narva AS, Ortiz E. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
PubMed 24352797Tudor-Locke C, Pangrazi RP, Corbin CB, Rutherford WJ, Vincent SD, Raustorp A, Tomson LM, Cuddihy TF. BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children. Prev Med. 2004 Jun;38(6):857-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.12.018.
PubMed 15193909Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, Jones DW, Kurtz T, Sheps SG, Roccella EJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005 Feb 8;111(5):697-716. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000154900.76284.F6.
PubMed 15699287Flynn JT, Daniels SR, Hayman LL, Maahs DM, McCrindle BW, Mitsnefes M, Zachariah JP, Urbina EM; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension and Obesity in Youth Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Update: ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2014 May;63(5):1116-35. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000007. Epub 2014 Mar 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 24591341
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ACtivity Trackers to ImproVe Blood Pressure: a Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03325426
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16-18605
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jul 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to determine if use of physical activity trackers coupled with provider feedback will increase awareness of young adults of their physical fitness and improve blood pressure levels. The goal of this pilot study is feasibility, with a secondary goal of examining potential effect sizes for planning purposes for a larger randomized controlled trial.
Detailed description
Increasing physical activity levels may improve cardiovascular health and BP levels in young individuals, especially if such strategies promote healthy lifestyles. Physical activity is currently recommended for adults CV health, but physical activity levels are known to be low in populations with diabetes or chronic kidney disease. One prior study of the use of pedometers (not associated with wireless technology or provider feedback) in children with CKD did not significantly improve physical activity levels. Supervised walking appeared to provide some benefit in individuals with type II diabetes, but overall compliance was poor. Interview of adolescents and young adults with chronic illnesses has shown preference for the use of electronic devices and online tools for disease management.Thus, use of sophisticated electronic devices such as FitBits© (wireless pedometers worn on the wrist that sync with cell phones) may improve disease control by engaging young patients in self-monitoring of their own health and lifestyle behaviors. This pilot study aims to determine if use of FitBits© coupled with provider feedback will increase awareness of young adults of their physical fitness and improve blood pressure levels.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual care | No intervention | –No physical activity tracker or feedback x 6 months, then crossover to physical activity tracker x 6 months |
| Physical activity tracker | Experimental | Device: FitBitPhysical activity tracker x 12 months (6 months with study feedback and 6 months without) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 8 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ages 8-30 receiving anti-hypertensive therapy at the time of recruitment.
- diabetes, non-dialysis requiring chronic kidney disease, kidney transplant, or other etiologies of hypertension
- have phones compatible for wireless device (FitBits©) data transmission
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- history of decompensated congestive heart failure
- pregnant
- cognitive impairment
- unable to perform physical activity
- BP >180/110 mm Hg
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FitBitAlso: physical activity trackerDaily use of physical activity tracker coupled with biweekly provider telemonitoring and feedback for 6 months and then additionally without feedback for an additional 6 months | Device | Physical activity tracker |
Primary outcome
Change in Mean Office Systolic BP
Time frame: Between baseline and month 12
Change in mean systolic BP is modeled using all blood pressure data points collected between baseline and month 12 to provide an average change over time, accounting for repeated values from patients using a mixed linear regression approach.
Change in Mean Office Systolic BP
Time frame: Between baseline and month 6
Change in mean systolic BP using blood pressure data points collected between baseline and month 6 to provide an average change over time
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Retained
Time frame: Months 0-12
Change in Weight (Z-score)
Time frame: Months 0-12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 24529535Cohen DL, Huan Y, Townsend RR. Home blood pressure monitoring in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014 May;63(5):835-42. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.015. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 17765133Logan AG, McIsaac WJ, Tisler A, Irvine MJ, Saunders A, Dunai A, Rizo CA, Feig DS, Hamill M, Trudel M, Cafazzo JA. Mobile phone-based remote patient monitoring system for management of hypertension in diabetic patients. Am J Hypertens. 2007 Sep;20(9):942-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.020.
- Background: PubMed 21115879Agarwal R, Bills JE, Hecht TJ, Light RP. Role of home blood pressure monitoring in overcoming therapeutic inertia and improving hypertension control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. 2011 Jan;57(1):29-38. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.160911. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
- Background: PubMed 22439158Uhlig K, Balk EM, Patel K, Ip S, Kitsios GD, Obadan NO, Haynes SM, Stefan M, Rao M, Kong Win Chang L, Gaylor J, Iovin RC. Self-Measured Blood Pressure Monitoring: Comparative Effectiveness [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jan. Report No.: 12-EHC002-EF. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK84604/
- Background: PubMed 22422539Akber A, Portale AA, Johansen KL. Pedometer-assessed physical activity in children and young adults with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 May;7(5):720-6. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06330611. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
- Background: PubMed 25092645Mohammed J, Deda L, Clarson CL, Stein RI, Cuerden MS, Mahmud FH. Assessment of habitual physical activity in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2014 Aug;38(4):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.05.010.
- Background: PubMed 24648129Akber A, Portale AA, Johansen KL. Use of pedometers to increase physical activity among children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Aug;29(8):1395-402. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2787-6. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 20980426Negri C, Bacchi E, Morgante S, Soave D, Marques A, Menghini E, Muggeo M, Bonora E, Moghetti P. Supervised walking groups to increase physical activity in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2333-5. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0877.
- Background: PubMed 23740658Applebaum MA, Lawson EF, von Scheven E. Perception of transition readiness and preferences for use of technology in transition programs: teens' ideas for the future. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013;25(2):119-25. doi: 10.1515/ijamh-2013-0019.
- Background: PubMed 22089460Ting TV, Kudalkar D, Nelson S, Cortina S, Pendl J, Budhani S, Neville J, Taylor J, Huggins J, Drotar D, Brunner HI. Usefulness of cellular text messaging for improving adherence among adolescents and young adults with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2012 Jan;39(1):174-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110771. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
- Background: PubMed 24268570Takacs J, Pollock CL, Guenther JR, Bahar M, Napier C, Hunt MA. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking. J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Sep;17(5):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.241. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
- Background: PubMed 24352797James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, Lackland DT, LeFevre ML, MacKenzie TD, Ogedegbe O, Smith SC Jr, Svetkey LP, Taler SJ, Townsend RR, Wright JT Jr, Narva AS, Ortiz E. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hypertension
RecruitingPhase 4
Initial Triple Therapy Including Parenteral Treprostinil vs Initial Double Oral Therapy in PAH Group I Patients
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Smartphone Use and Television Viewing on Standardized BP Measurement: The SCREENS-BP Study
Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Care COMPASS Study
Diabetes Mellitus ( Type 1 and Type 2), Hypertension
RecruitingPhase 4
De-implementing Inhaled Nitric Oxide for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
RecruitingPhase 2
Spironolactone for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elaine Ku principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FitBit in people with Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Factor, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Mean Office Systolic BP (time frame: Between baseline and month 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03325426, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2024.