Myofascial Pain SyndromeNCT03327545
Latent Myofascial Trigger Points in the Craniocervical Region
A study testing Neural mobilization and Soft tissue techniques and Stretching in people with Myofascial Pain Syndrome, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS.
Trial summary
Myofascial pain is a clinical problem that has generated interest, debate and confusion for decades. According to studies anywhere between 33 and 97 % of patients with musculoskeletal pain visiting physicians and manual therapists are diagnosed with Myofascial Trigger Points (MTrPs). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Neural mobilization and Soft tissue techniques and Stretching
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2017to Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Neck pain
Who cannot join
- myelopathy
- fracture
- infection
- dystonia
- tumor
- inflammatory disease
- fibromyalgia
- or osteoporosis
About this study
Official title: Clinical Efficacy of Mobilization of the Nervous System Compared to Soft Tissue Techniques Intervention in Asymptomatic Subjects With Latent Myofascial Trigger Points in the Craniocervical Region: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Myofascial pain is a clinical problem that has generated interest, debate and confusion for decades. According to studies anywhere between 33 and 97 % of patients with musculoskeletal pain visiting physicians and manual therapists are diagnosed with Myofascial Trigger Points (MTrPs). MTrPs are localized, hyperirritable points that are associated with palpable nodules in taut bands (TB) of muscle fibres. MTrPs can be classified into active and latent. Latent MTrPs demonstrate the same clinical characteristics as active MTrPs but they do not provoke spontaneous pain. The myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are common in healthy subjects and in patients with musculoskeletal pain, and could produce sensitive disturbances and motor dysfunctions
- Conditions
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Being tested
- Neural mobilization, Soft tissue techniques and Stretching, Control group
- Keywords
- Trigger points, Trigegeminal nerve, Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neural mobilizationDevice
Neural mobilization on the right side of the craniocervical region for a total of 12 minutes.
Soft tissue techniques and StretchingDevice
Soft tissue techniques and Stretching on the right side of the craniocervical region for a total of 12 minutes
Control groupDevice
Did not receive any treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group 1 | Experimental | Neural mobilization for a total of 12 minutes Receives: Device: Neural mobilization |
| Experimental Group 2 | Experimental | Soft tissue techniques and Stretching right side of the craniocervical for a total of 12 minutes Receives: Device: Soft tissue techniques and Stretching |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | Control group Receives: Device: Control group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Pain intensity at 24 hours
Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) will be assessed bilaterally over the masseter, temporalis, trapezius and suboccipital muscles by an assessor blinded to the subjects condition.
Measured: 24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatment
Maximum mouth opening without pain at 24 hours
Is the ability to open the mouth so widely as you could without pain.
Measured: 24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at 24 hours
Will be used to measure PCS
Measured: 24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2017
- Study startJan 2017
- Primary completionFeb 2017
- Study completionJul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Myofascial Pain SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jorge Hugo Villafañe, PhD, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
- Investigators
- JORGE H VILLAFAÑE, Principal investigator, IRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03327545
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LMTrP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Efficacy of Mobilization of the Nervous System Compared to Soft Tissue Techniques Intervention in Asymptomatic Subjects With Latent Myofascial Trigger Points in the Craniocervical Region: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03327545
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LMTrP
- Conditions
- Myofascial Pain Syndrome
- Keywords
- Trigger points, Trigegeminal nerve, Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETSUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Myofascial pain is a clinical problem that has generated interest, debate and confusion for decades. According to studies anywhere between 33 and 97 % of patients with musculoskeletal pain visiting physicians and manual therapists are diagnosed with Myofascial Trigger Points (MTrPs). MTrPs are localized, hyperirritable points that are associated with palpable nodules in taut bands (TB) of muscle fibres. MTrPs can be classified into active and latent. Latent MTrPs demonstrate the same clinical characteristics as active MTrPs but they do not provoke spontaneous pain. The myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are common in healthy subjects and in patients with musculoskeletal pain, and could produce sensitive disturbances and motor dysfunctions
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group 1 | Experimental | Device: Neural mobilizationNeural mobilization for a total of 12 minutes |
| Experimental Group 2 | Experimental | Device: Soft tissue techniques and StretchingSoft tissue techniques and Stretching right side of the craniocervical for a total of 12 minutes |
| Control group | Placebo comparator | Device: Control groupControl group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Neck pain
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- myelopathy
- fracture
- infection
- dystonia
- tumor
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neural mobilizationNeural mobilization on the right side of the craniocervical region for a total of 12 minutes. | Device | Experimental Group 1 |
| Soft tissue techniques and StretchingSoft tissue techniques and Stretching on the right side of the craniocervical region for a total of 12 minutes | Device | Experimental Group 2 |
| Control groupDid not receive any treatment. | Device | Control group |
Primary outcome
Change from Pain intensity at 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatment
Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPT) will be assessed bilaterally over the masseter, temporalis, trapezius and suboccipital muscles by an assessor blinded to the subjects condition.
Maximum mouth opening without pain at 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatment
Is the ability to open the mouth so widely as you could without pain.
1 secondary outcome
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) at 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Active, not recruiting
Objective Measurement of Pain Regulation in Individuals Who Have Received Internet-delivered Exposure-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Fibromyalgia
Not yet recruiting
Effects of IASTM, Deep Friction Massage, and Sham Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Electromyographical Activation, Pain and Function in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Open-Label Safety Study of AXS-14 in Subjects With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia
Recruiting
Exercise Interventions and Dietary Advice in Fibromyalgia and IBS
Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Recruiting
Whole-body Cryotherapy in Those With Chronic Fatigue: A Feasibility Study
ME/CFS, Fibromyalgia (FM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
JORGE H VILLAFAÑE principal investigator
IRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neural mobilization and Soft tissue techniques and Stretching in people with Myofascial Pain Syndrome, run by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Pain intensity at 24 hours (time frame: 24 hours, 5 minutes after the treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2017.