AzTrials
AzTrials

DepressionPhase 4NCT03328052

MYnd Analytics Directed Therapy in Depression

A Phase 4 study testing MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy and Conventional antidepressant therapy in people with Depression, run by Cota Inc. at 16 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The MYnd Analytics PEER Online strategy utilizes EEG diagnostics to direct patients with psychiatric illnesses to the best medication treatments. This trial will evaluate patients with a diagnosis of depression who will either receive (1) PEER Online directed therapy or (2) conventional treatment without EEG guidance… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Depression
What is being tested?
MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy and Conventional antidepressant therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
600 participants
Where
16 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2017to 1 Oct 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a clinical diagnosis of depression who in the judgement of their physician require medication management may be eligible for enrollment. A score of 10 or more on the PHQ-9 instrument will be required for enrollment.
  • Some practices utilize the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 are part of routine screening for depression. If the tests are performed routinely, they do not need to be repeated for study eligibility, and may be performed prior to informed consent for this study. If, however, the PHQ-9 is not routinely performed, informed consent must be performed prior to administration. Patients with a score below 10 will be considered screen failures and will not be enrolled or offered the MYnd testing.
  • Patients with non-psychotic comorbid conditions may be included.
  • Patients must be either medication treatment naïve for behavioral illnesses or have no active medication treatments for at least 1 month prior to enrollment. Prohibited medications at the time of enrollment will include stimulants, benzodiazepines and THC. Prior therapy with these agents is permitted with a washout of >30 days.
  • Patients must have private medical insurance coverage through Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield. This is limited to insured commercial members, including HMO, and excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, members of self-insured customers or Medicare or Medicaid programs.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder.
  • History of, or current, open head brain trauma. Candidates with any metal, shrapnel or other similar objects in the head that could affect the QEEG
  • History of: craniotomy, cerebral metastases, cerebrovascular accident; current diagnosis of seizure disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, dementia, mental retardation, or major depression with psychotic features; or use of depot neuroleptics in last 12 months.
  • Uncontrolled thyroid disorders.
  • Known pregnancy and/or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during this study.
  • Chronic or acute pain requiring prescription pain medication(s) (narcotic or synthetic narcotic)
  • Participation in any other therapeutic drug study within 60 days preceding inclusion.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

United States16 sites, 16 recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Brick, New Jersey, 08723

    Richard Reisher, DO, 732-477-5600

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Brick, New Jersey, 08724

    Jay Vida, DO, 732-892-4548

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

    Timothy Kowal, DO, 201-343-2434

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

    Arthur Chaney, MD, 201-881-0721

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Holmdel, New Jersey, 07733

    Anthony DeTulio, MD, 732-264-8484

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Jackson, New Jersey, 08527

    Scott Druckman, DO, 732-987-5780

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Lodi, New Jersey, 07644

    Lisa Raacke, MD, 551-996-8111

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Lodi, New Jersey, 07644

    Aurora Andreescu, MD, 973-473-3896

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753

    Richard Abramowitz, MD, 732-897-3990

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Oakhurst, New Jersey, 07755

    John Ciciarelli, MD, 732-663-0900

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Old Bridge, New Jersey, 08857

    James Demos, MD, 732-753-9890

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Paramus, New Jersey, 07652

    Morey Menacker, DO, 201-986-1881

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Point Pleasant, New Jersey, 08742

    Richard Murachanian, MD, 732-899-2353

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Saddle Brook, New Jersey, 07653

    Mathew Silverman, DO, 201-845-4048

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Tinton Falls, New Jersey, 07724

    Robert Carracino, MD, 732-450-0961

    Recruiting
  • Hackensack Meridian Health Network

    Toms River, New Jersey, 08753

    Brenard Wayman, MD, 732-349-8866

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of MYnd Analytics Directed Therapy in Depression

The MYnd Analytics PEER Online strategy utilizes EEG diagnostics to direct patients with psychiatric illnesses to the best medication treatments. This trial will evaluate patients with a diagnosis of depression who will either receive (1) PEER Online directed therapy or (2) conventional treatment without EEG guidance and will compare 6 month clinical and economic outcomes between these groups.

Read the detailed description

Mynd Analytics has developed the Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluation Registry (PEER) Online® clinical decision support database that uses a combination of software, analytics, and clinical outcomes to provide objective, adjunctive medication response information to physicians treating patients with non-psychotic behavioral disorders. PEER Online uses a statistical analysis of EEG outputs and other patient information to generate a report that indicates the statistical likelihood of the patient's responsiveness to classes of central nervous system (CNS) medications (i.e. antidepressants), groups (i.e. SSRI) and individual agents (i.e. fluoxetine). A discriminant analysis compares neurophysiologic abnormalities of the patient to patterns of abnormalities of known responders to CNS drugs in the company's outcomes database of symptomatic patients. This provides a probability estimate of the similarity of the patient's profile with the profile of groups of individuals constituting the normative and clinical (symptomatic) database, which provides the treating physician guidance to which treatments the patient will most likely respond to, and those treatments to which the patient is least likely to respond.

Procedurally, PEER Online utilizes standard 21-lead digital electroencephalographic equipment measuring the patient in a resting (but awake) state. The recording generally takes 30-60 minutes. Patients are classified based upon the 1,142 variables calculated in the recording (FDA-approved neurometric system) and categorized based on the outcome history in treating patients with similar neurophysiologic outputs. From these outputs and the correlation to the outcome database, reports may indicate single or multiple medications based on the nature of the physiologic abnormality discovered. The entire procedure is rapid, non-invasive, devoid of radiation or high strength magnetic fields, and results in a report, the PEER Outcome Report that is provided to clinicians in a format similar to antibiotic sensitivity testing.

Study Design (summary)

  1. The patient population will consist of individuals with depression who in the opinion of their physician require medication management. A score of 10 or more on the PHQ-9 instrument will be required for enrollment. Non-psychotic co-morbid illnesses will be permitted. Patients must not currently be receiving psychotropic medications (including stimulants, benzodiazepines, or THC). Patients previously on these medications but off treatment for >30 days are permitted.
  2. The physician will declare whether they wish to treat the depression or refer to a participating psychiatrist. Individual physicians (prior to enrolling any patients) will be assigned to either agree to utilize MYnd Analytic directed care or to be part of the control cohort. This will minimize any physician learning effect.
  3. The patient will sign informed consent to participate.
  4. All patients will undergo a study related EEG and MYnd Analytics will develop a PEER Online report. The report will be released to the treating physicians in the directed care group but will not be released to the control physicians.
  5. All patients will complete a disease specific assessment tool (QIDS-SR16) at every office visit (at a minimum assessments at baseline, 3 months into treatment, and 6 months into treatment). Patients choosing to withdraw from the study or from treatment will also be offered the assessment at participation endpoint. COTA will score each patient based on the standardized tools as either improved, stable, or worsened. The primary endpoint for this study is QIDS-SR16 percent mean change from baseline, with response being defined as a reduction of >50% from baseline. Physicians may know the results of these tests and may alter therapy per their usual practice.
  6. Medication management will be at the final discretion of the treating physician. Physicians assigned to the MYnd Analytics directed care cohort will be encouraged, but not required, to follow the PEER Online report. Any change in therapy will be documented by the physician with reason (lack of efficacy, toxicity, patient preference).
Conditions
Depression
Being tested
MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy, Conventional antidepressant therapy
Medical subject headings
Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapyDevice

    PEER Online is similar to a standard QEEG in that it uses QEEG output variables, but differs from a standard QEEG in that it references the QEEG to a normative and then symptomatic database. By comparing a given patient's QEEG to a database of QEEGs of subjects who have tried and responded to a specific medication, PEER Online can provide useful information regarding the response of neuro-physiologically similar patients to a wide number of medications. PEER Online may thus have the advantage of providing physicians with useful information as to medication outcomes before a medication regime is started. It has also been used to help select the medication that best matches the QEEG brainwave pattern, regardless of "symptom clusters," currently used for diagnostic nomenclature. Patients will receive anti-depressant therapy guide by the results of the PEER Online algorithm.

  • Conventional antidepressant therapyOther

    Anti-depressant therapy chosen based on physician best judgement.

Study groups in NCT03328052
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed therapyExperimentalPatients in this arm will receive anti-depressants as recommended by the PEER Online algorithm as described below.
Receives: Device: MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy
Conventional therapySham comparatorPatients in this arm will receive anti-depressants as chosen by the physician without guidance by the PEER Online algorithm.
Receives: Other: Conventional antidepressant therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 50% Reduction From Baseline in Self-rated Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated 16-item Scale (QIDS-SR-16)

    QIDS-SR-16 is a 16-question self-report inventory that includes the 9 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria symptom domains: sad mood, concentration, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, involvement, energy/fatigability, sleep disturbance (4 items: initial, middle, late insomnia, and hypersomnia), appetite/weight increased or decrease (4 items), and psychomotor agitation/retardation (2 items). The QIDS-SR-16 total scores range from 0 (least severe) to 27 (most severe). This study will examine the percentage of patients with improvement in depression as assessed by the QIDS-SR-16 at the 6 month treatment visit [repeated measures from all visits - for patients who received the intervention ie. MD followed PEER recommended therapy]. Response will be defined as a >50% reduction in QIDS-SR-16 score from baseline.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Clinical improvement based on physician access to MyND Analytic PEER Online report.

    Percentage of patients improving on the standardized assessments stratified by whether the physician had access to the MyND Analytic PEER Online report.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Persistence of PEER recommended therapy.

    Percentage of patients remaining on PEER Online concordant therapy vs discordant therapy at the 3 month visit. Sub-analysis will include whether the patient was on the original therapy or whether changes were made due to lack of efficacy or toxicity. Switches in medications from a PEER recommended therapy to another recommended therapy based on a physician assessment of lack of efficacy will be counted as a failure, however a switch for toxicity will not be counted as failure.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2017
  2. Study start1 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03328052
Sponsor's protocol ID
MYnd 001
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
27 Oct 2017
Last updated
6 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy and Conventional antidepressant therapy in people with Depression, run by Cota Inc. at 16 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ramon Solhkhah, MD (732-776-4930, ramon.solhkhah@hackensackmeridian.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

50% Reduction From Baseline in Self-rated Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated 16-item Scale (QIDS-SR-16) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in