DepressionPhase 4NCT03328052
MYnd Analytics Directed Therapy in Depression
A Phase 4 study testing MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy and Conventional antidepressant therapy in people with Depression, run by Cota Inc. at 16 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The MYnd Analytics PEER Online strategy utilizes EEG diagnostics to direct patients with psychiatric illnesses to the best medication treatments. This trial will evaluate patients with a diagnosis of depression who will either receive (1) PEER Online directed therapy or (2) conventional treatment without EEG guidance… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression
- What is being tested?
- MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy and Conventional antidepressant therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2017to 1 Oct 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of depression who in the judgement of their physician require medication management may be eligible for enrollment. A score of 10 or more on the PHQ-9 instrument will be required for enrollment.
- Some practices utilize the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 are part of routine screening for depression. If the tests are performed routinely, they do not need to be repeated for study eligibility, and may be performed prior to informed consent for this study. If, however, the PHQ-9 is not routinely performed, informed consent must be performed prior to administration. Patients with a score below 10 will be considered screen failures and will not be enrolled or offered the MYnd testing.
- Patients with non-psychotic comorbid conditions may be included.
- Patients must be either medication treatment naïve for behavioral illnesses or have no active medication treatments for at least 1 month prior to enrollment. Prohibited medications at the time of enrollment will include stimulants, benzodiazepines and THC. Prior therapy with these agents is permitted with a washout of >30 days.
- Patients must have private medical insurance coverage through Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield. This is limited to insured commercial members, including HMO, and excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, members of self-insured customers or Medicare or Medicaid programs.
Who cannot join
- Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder.
- History of, or current, open head brain trauma. Candidates with any metal, shrapnel or other similar objects in the head that could affect the QEEG
- History of: craniotomy, cerebral metastases, cerebrovascular accident; current diagnosis of seizure disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, dementia, mental retardation, or major depression with psychotic features; or use of depot neuroleptics in last 12 months.
- Uncontrolled thyroid disorders.
- Known pregnancy and/or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during this study.
- Chronic or acute pain requiring prescription pain medication(s) (narcotic or synthetic narcotic)
- Participation in any other therapeutic drug study within 60 days preceding inclusion.
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 1 country.
16 sites in 1 country
United States16 sites, 16 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Brick, New Jersey, 08723
Richard Reisher, DO, 732-477-5600
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Brick, New Jersey, 08724
Jay Vida, DO, 732-892-4548
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Timothy Kowal, DO, 201-343-2434
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Arthur Chaney, MD, 201-881-0721
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Holmdel, New Jersey, 07733
Anthony DeTulio, MD, 732-264-8484
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Jackson, New Jersey, 08527
Scott Druckman, DO, 732-987-5780
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Lodi, New Jersey, 07644
Lisa Raacke, MD, 551-996-8111
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Lodi, New Jersey, 07644
Aurora Andreescu, MD, 973-473-3896
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753
Richard Abramowitz, MD, 732-897-3990
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Oakhurst, New Jersey, 07755
John Ciciarelli, MD, 732-663-0900
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Old Bridge, New Jersey, 08857
James Demos, MD, 732-753-9890
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Paramus, New Jersey, 07652
Morey Menacker, DO, 201-986-1881
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Point Pleasant, New Jersey, 08742
Richard Murachanian, MD, 732-899-2353
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Saddle Brook, New Jersey, 07653
Mathew Silverman, DO, 201-845-4048
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Tinton Falls, New Jersey, 07724
Robert Carracino, MD, 732-450-0961
- Recruiting
Hackensack Meridian Health Network
Toms River, New Jersey, 08753
Brenard Wayman, MD, 732-349-8866
About this study
Official title: Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of MYnd Analytics Directed Therapy in Depression
The MYnd Analytics PEER Online strategy utilizes EEG diagnostics to direct patients with psychiatric illnesses to the best medication treatments. This trial will evaluate patients with a diagnosis of depression who will either receive (1) PEER Online directed therapy or (2) conventional treatment without EEG guidance and will compare 6 month clinical and economic outcomes between these groups.
Read the detailed description
Mynd Analytics has developed the Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluation Registry (PEER) Online® clinical decision support database that uses a combination of software, analytics, and clinical outcomes to provide objective, adjunctive medication response information to physicians treating patients with non-psychotic behavioral disorders. PEER Online uses a statistical analysis of EEG outputs and other patient information to generate a report that indicates the statistical likelihood of the patient's responsiveness to classes of central nervous system (CNS) medications (i.e. antidepressants), groups (i.e. SSRI) and individual agents (i.e. fluoxetine). A discriminant analysis compares neurophysiologic abnormalities of the patient to patterns of abnormalities of known responders to CNS drugs in the company's outcomes database of symptomatic patients. This provides a probability estimate of the similarity of the patient's profile with the profile of groups of individuals constituting the normative and clinical (symptomatic) database, which provides the treating physician guidance to which treatments the patient will most likely respond to, and those treatments to which the patient is least likely to respond.
Procedurally, PEER Online utilizes standard 21-lead digital electroencephalographic equipment measuring the patient in a resting (but awake) state. The recording generally takes 30-60 minutes. Patients are classified based upon the 1,142 variables calculated in the recording (FDA-approved neurometric system) and categorized based on the outcome history in treating patients with similar neurophysiologic outputs. From these outputs and the correlation to the outcome database, reports may indicate single or multiple medications based on the nature of the physiologic abnormality discovered. The entire procedure is rapid, non-invasive, devoid of radiation or high strength magnetic fields, and results in a report, the PEER Outcome Report that is provided to clinicians in a format similar to antibiotic sensitivity testing.
Study Design (summary)
- The patient population will consist of individuals with depression who in the opinion of their physician require medication management. A score of 10 or more on the PHQ-9 instrument will be required for enrollment. Non-psychotic co-morbid illnesses will be permitted. Patients must not currently be receiving psychotropic medications (including stimulants, benzodiazepines, or THC). Patients previously on these medications but off treatment for >30 days are permitted.
- The physician will declare whether they wish to treat the depression or refer to a participating psychiatrist. Individual physicians (prior to enrolling any patients) will be assigned to either agree to utilize MYnd Analytic directed care or to be part of the control cohort. This will minimize any physician learning effect.
- The patient will sign informed consent to participate.
- All patients will undergo a study related EEG and MYnd Analytics will develop a PEER Online report. The report will be released to the treating physicians in the directed care group but will not be released to the control physicians.
- All patients will complete a disease specific assessment tool (QIDS-SR16) at every office visit (at a minimum assessments at baseline, 3 months into treatment, and 6 months into treatment). Patients choosing to withdraw from the study or from treatment will also be offered the assessment at participation endpoint. COTA will score each patient based on the standardized tools as either improved, stable, or worsened. The primary endpoint for this study is QIDS-SR16 percent mean change from baseline, with response being defined as a reduction of >50% from baseline. Physicians may know the results of these tests and may alter therapy per their usual practice.
- Medication management will be at the final discretion of the treating physician. Physicians assigned to the MYnd Analytics directed care cohort will be encouraged, but not required, to follow the PEER Online report. Any change in therapy will be documented by the physician with reason (lack of efficacy, toxicity, patient preference).
- Conditions
- Depression
- Being tested
- MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy, Conventional antidepressant therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapyDevice
PEER Online is similar to a standard QEEG in that it uses QEEG output variables, but differs from a standard QEEG in that it references the QEEG to a normative and then symptomatic database. By comparing a given patient's QEEG to a database of QEEGs of subjects who have tried and responded to a specific medication, PEER Online can provide useful information regarding the response of neuro-physiologically similar patients to a wide number of medications. PEER Online may thus have the advantage of providing physicians with useful information as to medication outcomes before a medication regime is started. It has also been used to help select the medication that best matches the QEEG brainwave pattern, regardless of "symptom clusters," currently used for diagnostic nomenclature. Patients will receive anti-depressant therapy guide by the results of the PEER Online algorithm.
Conventional antidepressant therapyOther
Anti-depressant therapy chosen based on physician best judgement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed therapy | Experimental | Patients in this arm will receive anti-depressants as recommended by the PEER Online algorithm as described below. Receives: Device: MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy |
| Conventional therapy | Sham comparator | Patients in this arm will receive anti-depressants as chosen by the physician without guidance by the PEER Online algorithm. Receives: Other: Conventional antidepressant therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
50% Reduction From Baseline in Self-rated Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated 16-item Scale (QIDS-SR-16)
QIDS-SR-16 is a 16-question self-report inventory that includes the 9 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria symptom domains: sad mood, concentration, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, involvement, energy/fatigability, sleep disturbance (4 items: initial, middle, late insomnia, and hypersomnia), appetite/weight increased or decrease (4 items), and psychomotor agitation/retardation (2 items). The QIDS-SR-16 total scores range from 0 (least severe) to 27 (most severe). This study will examine the percentage of patients with improvement in depression as assessed by the QIDS-SR-16 at the 6 month treatment visit [repeated measures from all visits - for patients who received the intervention ie. MD followed PEER recommended therapy]. Response will be defined as a >50% reduction in QIDS-SR-16 score from baseline.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Clinical improvement based on physician access to MyND Analytic PEER Online report.
Percentage of patients improving on the standardized assessments stratified by whether the physician had access to the MyND Analytic PEER Online report.
Measured: 6 months
Persistence of PEER recommended therapy.
Percentage of patients remaining on PEER Online concordant therapy vs discordant therapy at the 3 month visit. Sub-analysis will include whether the patient was on the original therapy or whether changes were made due to lack of efficacy or toxicity. Switches in medications from a PEER recommended therapy to another recommended therapy based on a physician assessment of lack of efficacy will be counted as a failure, however a switch for toxicity will not be counted as failure.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Nov 2017
- Study start1 Oct 2017
- Primary completion1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cota Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Hackensack Meridian Health, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, MYnd Analytics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ramon Solhkhah, MD, Principal investigator, Hackensack Meridian Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03328052
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MYnd 001
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of MYnd Analytics Directed Therapy in Depression
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03328052
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MYnd 001
- Conditions
- Depression
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cota Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Hackensack Meridian Health, Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, MYnd Analytics
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The MYnd Analytics PEER Online strategy utilizes EEG diagnostics to direct patients with psychiatric illnesses to the best medication treatments. This trial will evaluate patients with a diagnosis of depression who will either receive (1) PEER Online directed therapy or (2) conventional treatment without EEG guidance and will compare 6 month clinical and economic outcomes between these groups.
Detailed description
Mynd Analytics has developed the Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluation Registry (PEER) Online® clinical decision support database that uses a combination of software, analytics, and clinical outcomes to provide objective, adjunctive medication response information to physicians treating patients with non-psychotic behavioral disorders. PEER Online uses a statistical analysis of EEG outputs and other patient information to generate a report that indicates the statistical likelihood of the patient's responsiveness to classes of central nervous system (CNS) medications (i.e. antidepressants), groups (i.e. SSRI) and individual agents (i.e. fluoxetine). A discriminant analysis compares neurophysiologic abnormalities of the patient to patterns of abnormalities of known responders to CNS drugs in the company's outcomes database of symptomatic patients. This provides a probability estimate of the similarity of the patient's profile with the profile of groups of individuals constituting the normative and clinical (symptomatic) database, which provides the treating physician guidance to which treatments the patient will most likely respond to, and those treatments to which the patient is least likely to respond.
Procedurally, PEER Online utilizes standard 21-lead digital electroencephalographic equipment measuring the patient in a resting (but awake) state. The recording generally takes 30-60 minutes. Patients are classified based upon the 1,142 variables calculated in the recording (FDA-approved neurometric system) and categorized based on the outcome history in treating patients with similar neurophysiologic outputs. From these outputs and the correlation to the outcome database, reports may indicate single or multiple medications based on the nature of the physiologic abnormality discovered. The entire procedure is rapid, non-invasive, devoid of radiation or high strength magnetic fields, and results in a report, the PEER Outcome Report that is provided to clinicians in a format similar to antibiotic sensitivity testing.
Study Design (summary)
- The patient population will consist of individuals with depression who in the opinion of their physician require medication management. A score of 10 or more on the PHQ-9 instrument will be required for enrollment. Non-psychotic co-morbid illnesses will be permitted. Patients must not currently be receiving psychotropic medications (including stimulants, benzodiazepines, or THC). Patients previously on these medications but off treatment for >30 days are permitted.
- The physician will declare whether they wish to treat the depression or refer to a participating psychiatrist. Individual physicians (prior to enrolling any patients) will be assigned to either agree to utilize MYnd Analytic directed care or to be part of the control cohort. This will minimize any physician learning effect.
- The patient will sign informed consent to participate.
- All patients will undergo a study related EEG and MYnd Analytics will develop a PEER Online report. The report will be released to the treating physicians in the directed care group but will not be released to the control physicians.
- All patients will complete a disease specific assessment tool (QIDS-SR16) at every office visit (at a minimum assessments at baseline, 3 months into treatment, and 6 months into treatment). Patients choosing to withdraw from the study or from treatment will also be offered the assessment at participation endpoint. COTA will score each patient based on the standardized tools as either improved, stable, or worsened. The primary endpoint for this study is QIDS-SR16 percent mean change from baseline, with response being defined as a reduction of >50% from baseline. Physicians may know the results of these tests and may alter therapy per their usual practice.
- Medication management will be at the final discretion of the treating physician. Physicians assigned to the MYnd Analytics directed care cohort will be encouraged, but not required, to follow the PEER Online report. Any change in therapy will be documented by the physician with reason (lack of efficacy, toxicity, patient preference).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed therapy | Experimental | Device: MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapyPatients in this arm will receive anti-depressants as recommended by the PEER Online algorithm as described below. |
| Conventional therapy | Sham comparator | Other: Conventional antidepressant therapyPatients in this arm will receive anti-depressants as chosen by the physician without guidance by the PEER Online algorithm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with a clinical diagnosis of depression who in the judgement of their physician require medication management may be eligible for enrollment. A score of 10 or more on the PHQ-9 instrument will be required for enrollment.
- Some practices utilize the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 are part of routine screening for depression. If the tests are performed routinely, they do not need to be repeated for study eligibility, and may be performed prior to informed consent for this study. If, however, the PHQ-9 is not routinely performed, informed consent must be performed prior to administration. Patients with a score below 10 will be considered screen failures and will not be enrolled or offered the MYnd testing.
- Patients with non-psychotic comorbid conditions may be included.
- Patients must be either medication treatment naïve for behavioral illnesses or have no active medication treatments for at least 1 month prior to enrollment. Prohibited medications at the time of enrollment will include stimulants, benzodiazepines and THC. Prior therapy with these agents is permitted with a washout of >30 days.
- Patients must have private medical insurance coverage through Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield. This is limited to insured commercial members, including HMO, and excluding, for the avoidance of doubt, members of self-insured customers or Medicare or Medicaid programs.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder.
- History of, or current, open head brain trauma. Candidates with any metal, shrapnel or other similar objects in the head that could affect the QEEG
- History of: craniotomy, cerebral metastases, cerebrovascular accident; current diagnosis of seizure disorder, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, dementia, mental retardation, or major depression with psychotic features; or use of depot neuroleptics in last 12 months.
- Uncontrolled thyroid disorders.
- Known pregnancy and/or lactation, or intent to become pregnant during this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapyPEER Online is similar to a standard QEEG in that it uses QEEG output variables, but differs from a standard QEEG in that it references the QEEG to a normative and then symptomatic database. By comparing a given patient's QEEG to a database of QEEGs of subjects who have tried and responded to a specific medication, PEER Online can provide useful information regarding the response of neuro-physiologically similar patients to a wide number of medications. PEER Online may thus have the advantage of providing physicians with useful information as to medication outcomes before a medication regime is started. It has also been used to help select the medication that best matches the QEEG brainwave pattern, regardless of "symptom clusters," currently used for diagnostic nomenclature. Patients will receive anti-depressant therapy guide by the results of the PEER Online algorithm. | Device | MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed therapy |
| Conventional antidepressant therapyAnti-depressant therapy chosen based on physician best judgement. | Other | Conventional therapy |
Primary outcome
50% Reduction From Baseline in Self-rated Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated 16-item Scale (QIDS-SR-16)
Time frame: 6 months
QIDS-SR-16 is a 16-question self-report inventory that includes the 9 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria symptom domains: sad mood, concentration, self-outlook, suicidal ideation, involvement, energy/fatigability, sleep disturbance (4 items: initial, middle, late insomnia, and hypersomnia), appetite/weight increased or decrease (4 items), and psychomotor agitation/retardation (2 items). The QIDS-SR-16 total scores range from 0 (least severe) to 27 (most severe). This study will examine the percentage of patients with improvement in depression as assessed by the QIDS-SR-16 at the 6 month treatment visit [repeated measures from all visits - for patients who received the intervention ie. MD followed PEER recommended therapy]. Response will be defined as a >50% reduction in QIDS-SR-16 score from baseline.
2 secondary outcomes
Clinical improvement based on physician access to MyND Analytic PEER Online report.
Time frame: 6 months
Persistence of PEER recommended therapy.
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2017.
- MYnd AnalyticsLink provided by the sponsor.
- COTA HealthcareLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Depression
Recruiting
Regulated Stimulation for Optimized Network Activity and Therapeutic Equilibrium
Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Metacognitive Bibliotherapy for Anxiety, Depression, and Metacognitions in University Students
Anxiety, Depression
Enrolling by invitation
Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Electroencephalogram (EEG) Protocol Supplement
Treatment Resistant Depression
Active, not recruiting
NYUCI-ES: Psychosocial Intervention to Improve Health Outcomes for Chinese and Korean ADRD Caregivers
Dementia Caregivers, Diabetes
Enrolling by invitation
Intervention to Reduce HIV Related Stigma Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women
HIV, HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ramon Solhkhah, MD principal investigator
Hackensack Meridian Health
16 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing MYnd Analytics PEER Online directed antidepressant therapy and Conventional antidepressant therapy in people with Depression, run by Cota Inc. at 16 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ramon Solhkhah, MD (732-776-4930, ramon.solhkhah@hackensackmeridian.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
50% Reduction From Baseline in Self-rated Severity of Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated 16-item Scale (QIDS-SR-16) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2017.