HIV/AIDSNCT03330522
Reducing HIV Risk in Urban Women: Soap Opera Videos on Video-Capable Cell Phones
A study testing Love, Sex, & Choices video series and Messages in text in people with HIV/AIDS and Sexual Behavior, run by Northeastern University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Background: Love, Sex, and Choices (LSC) is a soap opera video series created to reduce HIV sex risk in women. Methods: LSC was compared to text messages in a randomized trial in 238 high-risk mostly Black young urban women. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 29 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV/AIDS, Sexual Behavior, Woman's Role
- What is being tested?
- Love, Sex, & Choices video series and Messages in text
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 295 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Nov 2008to 28 Feb 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 29 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women 18-29 years old
- Unprotected vaginal or anal sex with at least one man that they perceive as engaging in risky behavior OR
- Unprotected vaginal or anal sex with more than 1 man regardless of perceived partner risk
- Can understand written and spoken English
Who cannot join
- Women younger than 18 years old
- Women older than 29 years old
- Cannot understand written or spoken English
- Previously participated in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Northeastern University
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Background: Love, Sex, and Choices (LSC) is a soap opera video series created to reduce HIV sex risk in women.
Methods: LSC was compared to text messages in a randomized trial in 238 high-risk mostly Black young urban women. 117 received 12-weekly LSC videos, 121 received 12-weekly HIV prevention messages on smartphones. Changes in unprotected sex with high risk partners were compared by mixed models.
Read the detailed description
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate "Love, Sex, \& Choices" (LSC), a video-based intervention to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) sex risk behaviors in young adult urban women. Consisting of 12-weekly soap opera videos lasting up to 20 minutes each, messages about reducing HIV sexual risk are communicated through the drama and context of relationships, a strength of the soap opera modality. Based on true stories analyzed from focus groups, viewers can identify with the heroines in the videos who suffer tragedy and heartbreak and transform their behavior through a new awareness of their value as women, their choices, and their potential. Women watch a new video sequel weekly for 12 weeks on smartphones. A control group receives text/audio messages concerning HIV risk reduction. If successful, the public health impact is that women at risk for HIV will be able to access video interventions to reduce HIV risk on personal mobile devices.
Prior to this work, a 43-minute soap opera video, "A Story about Toni, Mike, and Valerie" had been produced and pilot tested by the Principal Investigator (PI) on handheld computers (RO3 NR009349). Findings had indicated the video was highly appealing and there was a statistically significant short-term reduction in stereotypical gender views about the need to engage in unprotected sex in the video intervention arm that was not observed in the control arm.
The current RCT seeks to test the effect of the LSC series on sex risk behavior as compared to a control receiving HIV prevention text messages. Analysis and story development had been guided by Sex Script Theory and the Theory of Power as Knowing Participation in Change; as well as, content analysis of focus groups with urban young adult African American and Latina women. Consistent with the theories and focus group analyses, the new LSC series elaborates on the original story weaving in the stories of four women. In both the RO3 pilot study and the related National Library of Medicine funded study (1 G08 LM008349-01), the use of small handheld computers to watch the video was found to be enjoyable and promoted a sense of privacy. Based on these promising findings concerning the experience of viewing videos on small handheld devices, the popularity of cell phones in this age group, and that the use of cell phones to watch videos is growing as cell phone technology, multimedia, and Internet connections improve, the present study seeks to deliver the weekly series of videos on smartphones.
There are several advantages of viewing videos on smartphones, in particular the freedom to watch the intervention videos often and in privacy. This study is also consistent with several NINR objectives stated in its strategic plan. These are: to apply findings concerning the social and cultural context of health behavior to health promotion, to develop and test interactive web-based and wireless technologies to eliminate health disparities, and to refine methods in the delivery of health promotion. The overall aim of this study is to conduct a RCT to determine whether the 12-week series of theory-based urban soap operas will reduce HIV sexual risk behavior. The specific aims of this study are:
Aim1. Complete final editing phase of LSC, a series of 12, 20-minute soap opera videos, and 12 HIV health promotion text/audio messages that will be released weekly and viewed on smartphones.
Aim 2. Deploy the web-based applications, specifically: a) integrate voice and text files into the audio computer assisted self-interview (ACASI) for access on desk top computers b) stream the videos to the video intervention group and send text/audio messages to the control group for viewing on smartphones c) maintain password protected availability so the video intervention group can watch the videos (or control group view text messages) anytime during the 12-weeks d) track how often and how long each video(or text) is viewed, and e) secure hardware and networks.
Aim 3. Conduct a RCT with 250 urban women aged 18 to 29 in two adjacent cities with a high incidence of HIV/AIDS. Inclusion criteria are women with high sex risk behavior. Eligibility screening will be accomplished by utilizing a previously developed ACASI that functions as a decision support system (DSS) to assign a level of risk based on responses to the screening interview. If supported by results, promote public access to the videos on the study dedicated web site.
The following hypotheses were tested in the RCT:
Primary hypotheses 1) The video group will have greater reductions in unprotected sex with all high risk sex partners (as measured by the USR score) from baseline to 3 and 6 months than will the control group. 2) The video group will have greater reduction in sexual pressure scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months than will the control group.
Secondary hypotheses: Compared to the control group, the video group will have 1) greater reductions in USR with high risk main partner/s from baseline to 3 and 6 months, 2) greater reductions in USR with non-main and secondary partners at 3 and 6 months, and, 3) The video group will have fewer high risk sex partners at 3 and 6 months.
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS, Sexual Behavior, Woman's Role, Risk Behavior
- Being tested
- Love, Sex, & Choices video series, Messages in text
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Sexual Behavior, Risk-Taking
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Love, Sex, & Choices video seriesOther
Love, Sex, and Choices was written and scripted by the study team and underwent pilot testing in the target population. The series was divided into 15-to-20 minute episodes that were streamed weekly. The principles of reducing HIV risk were communicated through the characters and high risk situations. The lead characters model how women become more powerful, meaning more aware of themselves as worthy of respect, making choices intentionally, feeling free to pursue their intentions, and involving themselves in creating change. This process leads to higher power sex scripts in the characters, meaning pursuing intentional choices and health promoting behaviors. The lead characters model open communication about HIV testing with a resistant partner, and initiating condom use.
Messages in textOther
The comparison group received 12 weekly HIV health promotion written messages over the smartphone. The messages were based on prevailing CDC recommendations and the theoretical framework. An example is: "Sexual health means respecting your own rights and feelings. Feeling pressured to have sex means limiting your choices and your freedom to love safely. …. If he doesn't like you being you, it may be time to walk." Other messages provided instructions on the correct condom use and the importance of HIV testing. The 12 messages were reviewed by ten African American and Latina undergraduate nursing students for ease of comprehension.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | The active intervention is "Love, Sex, \& Choices," a 12-episode, online HIV prevention intervention video series accessed on study provided smartphones. Each episode is up to 20 minutes in length. Study participants receive one episode per week for 12 weeks on study provided smartphones. Receives: Other: Love, Sex, & Choices video series |
| Control Comparison Group | Active comparator | The control comparison intervention is twelve messages in text that promote HIV prevention behaviors and open communication with male sex partners. Study participants receive one message per week for 12 weeks on study provided smartphones. Receives: Other: Messages in text |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in unprotected sex risk with high risk partners from baseline to 6 months post-intervention
Sex risk is measured by the Vaginal Episode Equivalent (VEE) score (Susser, Desvarieux, \& Wittkowski, 1998) with high risk partners. The VEE is the sum of all unprotected vaginal anal sex acts weighted by the relative HIV transmission risk (vaginal 1 and anal 2). A high risk partner is defined as the likelihood the male partner had sex with another woman, sex with men, or injected drugs in the past 3 months. Partner risk could range from 0 to 9; main or non-main partners with scores > 0 were considered to engage in risk behavior. Multiple partners were considered high-risk. An HIV positive partner is high risk.There is a four-point response metric, from "Definitely not" (0) to "Definitely did" (3). Only women having unprotected sex with a partner they perceived to have risk > 0 by this system were included into the study. For a given visit, unprotected vaginal and anal sex with all high risk partners in the previous 3 months were calculated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.
Measured: change in sex risk behavior from baseline to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2017
- Study start26 Nov 2008
- Primary completion16 Mar 2011
- Study completion28 Feb 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV/AIDSStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 295 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Northeastern University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rachel Jones, PhD, Principal investigator, Northeastern University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03330522
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LSCR012008
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jones R, Hoover DR, Lacroix LJ. A randomized controlled trial of soap opera videos streamed to smartphones to reduce risk of sexually transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in young urban African American women. Nurs Outlook. 2013 Jul-Aug;61(4):205-215.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
PubMed 23743482Jones R, Lacroix LJ. Streaming weekly soap opera video episodes to smartphones in a randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV risk in young urban African American/black women. AIDS Behav. 2012 Jul;16(5):1341-58. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0170-9.
PubMed 22430640
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reducing HIV Risk in Urban Women: Soap Opera Videos on Video-Capable Cell Phones
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03330522
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LSCR012008
- Conditions
- HIV/AIDS, Sexual Behavior, Woman's Role, Risk Behavior
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 295 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Northeastern UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 26 Nov 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Mar 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Love, Sex, and Choices (LSC) is a soap opera video series created to reduce HIV sex risk in women.
Methods: LSC was compared to text messages in a randomized trial in 238 high-risk mostly Black young urban women. 117 received 12-weekly LSC videos, 121 received 12-weekly HIV prevention messages on smartphones. Changes in unprotected sex with high risk partners were compared by mixed models.
Detailed description
This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate "Love, Sex, \& Choices" (LSC), a video-based intervention to reduce human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) sex risk behaviors in young adult urban women. Consisting of 12-weekly soap opera videos lasting up to 20 minutes each, messages about reducing HIV sexual risk are communicated through the drama and context of relationships, a strength of the soap opera modality. Based on true stories analyzed from focus groups, viewers can identify with the heroines in the videos who suffer tragedy and heartbreak and transform their behavior through a new awareness of their value as women, their choices, and their potential. Women watch a new video sequel weekly for 12 weeks on smartphones. A control group receives text/audio messages concerning HIV risk reduction. If successful, the public health impact is that women at risk for HIV will be able to access video interventions to reduce HIV risk on personal mobile devices.
Prior to this work, a 43-minute soap opera video, "A Story about Toni, Mike, and Valerie" had been produced and pilot tested by the Principal Investigator (PI) on handheld computers (RO3 NR009349). Findings had indicated the video was highly appealing and there was a statistically significant short-term reduction in stereotypical gender views about the need to engage in unprotected sex in the video intervention arm that was not observed in the control arm.
The current RCT seeks to test the effect of the LSC series on sex risk behavior as compared to a control receiving HIV prevention text messages. Analysis and story development had been guided by Sex Script Theory and the Theory of Power as Knowing Participation in Change; as well as, content analysis of focus groups with urban young adult African American and Latina women. Consistent with the theories and focus group analyses, the new LSC series elaborates on the original story weaving in the stories of four women. In both the RO3 pilot study and the related National Library of Medicine funded study (1 G08 LM008349-01), the use of small handheld computers to watch the video was found to be enjoyable and promoted a sense of privacy. Based on these promising findings concerning the experience of viewing videos on small handheld devices, the popularity of cell phones in this age group, and that the use of cell phones to watch videos is growing as cell phone technology, multimedia, and Internet connections improve, the present study seeks to deliver the weekly series of videos on smartphones.
There are several advantages of viewing videos on smartphones, in particular the freedom to watch the intervention videos often and in privacy. This study is also consistent with several NINR objectives stated in its strategic plan. These are: to apply findings concerning the social and cultural context of health behavior to health promotion, to develop and test interactive web-based and wireless technologies to eliminate health disparities, and to refine methods in the delivery of health promotion. The overall aim of this study is to conduct a RCT to determine whether the 12-week series of theory-based urban soap operas will reduce HIV sexual risk behavior. The specific aims of this study are:
Aim1. Complete final editing phase of LSC, a series of 12, 20-minute soap opera videos, and 12 HIV health promotion text/audio messages that will be released weekly and viewed on smartphones.
Aim 2. Deploy the web-based applications, specifically: a) integrate voice and text files into the audio computer assisted self-interview (ACASI) for access on desk top computers b) stream the videos to the video intervention group and send text/audio messages to the control group for viewing on smartphones c) maintain password protected availability so the video intervention group can watch the videos (or control group view text messages) anytime during the 12-weeks d) track how often and how long each video(or text) is viewed, and e) secure hardware and networks.
Aim 3. Conduct a RCT with 250 urban women aged 18 to 29 in two adjacent cities with a high incidence of HIV/AIDS. Inclusion criteria are women with high sex risk behavior. Eligibility screening will be accomplished by utilizing a previously developed ACASI that functions as a decision support system (DSS) to assign a level of risk based on responses to the screening interview. If supported by results, promote public access to the videos on the study dedicated web site.
The following hypotheses were tested in the RCT:
Primary hypotheses 1) The video group will have greater reductions in unprotected sex with all high risk sex partners (as measured by the USR score) from baseline to 3 and 6 months than will the control group. 2) The video group will have greater reduction in sexual pressure scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months than will the control group.
Secondary hypotheses: Compared to the control group, the video group will have 1) greater reductions in USR with high risk main partner/s from baseline to 3 and 6 months, 2) greater reductions in USR with non-main and secondary partners at 3 and 6 months, and, 3) The video group will have fewer high risk sex partners at 3 and 6 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Love, Sex, & Choices video seriesThe active intervention is "Love, Sex, \& Choices," a 12-episode, online HIV prevention intervention video series accessed on study provided smartphones. Each episode is up to 20 minutes in length. Study participants receive one episode per week for 12 weeks on study provided smartphones. |
| Control Comparison Group | Active comparator | Other: Messages in textThe control comparison intervention is twelve messages in text that promote HIV prevention behaviors and open communication with male sex partners. Study participants receive one message per week for 12 weeks on study provided smartphones. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 29 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Women 18-29 years old
- Unprotected vaginal or anal sex with at least one man that they perceive as engaging in risky behavior OR
- Unprotected vaginal or anal sex with more than 1 man regardless of perceived partner risk
- Can understand written and spoken English
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Women younger than 18 years old
- Women older than 29 years old
- Cannot understand written or spoken English
- Previously participated in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Love, Sex, & Choices video seriesLove, Sex, and Choices was written and scripted by the study team and underwent pilot testing in the target population. The series was divided into 15-to-20 minute episodes that were streamed weekly. The principles of reducing HIV risk were communicated through the characters and high risk situations. The lead characters model how women become more powerful, meaning more aware of themselves as worthy of respect, making choices intentionally, feeling free to pursue their intentions, and involving themselves in creating change. This process leads to higher power sex scripts in the characters, meaning pursuing intentional choices and health promoting behaviors. The lead characters model open communication about HIV testing with a resistant partner, and initiating condom use. | Other | Intervention |
| Messages in textThe comparison group received 12 weekly HIV health promotion written messages over the smartphone. The messages were based on prevailing CDC recommendations and the theoretical framework. An example is: "Sexual health means respecting your own rights and feelings. Feeling pressured to have sex means limiting your choices and your freedom to love safely. …. If he doesn't like you being you, it may be time to walk." Other messages provided instructions on the correct condom use and the importance of HIV testing. The 12 messages were reviewed by ten African American and Latina undergraduate nursing students for ease of comprehension. | Other | Control Comparison Group |
Primary outcome
Change in unprotected sex risk with high risk partners from baseline to 6 months post-intervention
Time frame: change in sex risk behavior from baseline to 6 months
Sex risk is measured by the Vaginal Episode Equivalent (VEE) score (Susser, Desvarieux, \& Wittkowski, 1998) with high risk partners. The VEE is the sum of all unprotected vaginal anal sex acts weighted by the relative HIV transmission risk (vaginal 1 and anal 2). A high risk partner is defined as the likelihood the male partner had sex with another woman, sex with men, or injected drugs in the past 3 months. Partner risk could range from 0 to 9; main or non-main partners with scores > 0 were considered to engage in risk behavior. Multiple partners were considered high-risk. An HIV positive partner is high risk.There is a four-point response metric, from "Definitely not" (0) to "Definitely did" (3). Only women having unprotected sex with a partner they perceived to have risk > 0 by this system were included into the study. For a given visit, unprotected vaginal and anal sex with all high risk partners in the previous 3 months were calculated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 23743482Jones R, Hoover DR, Lacroix LJ. A randomized controlled trial of soap opera videos streamed to smartphones to reduce risk of sexually transmitted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in young urban African American women. Nurs Outlook. 2013 Jul-Aug;61(4):205-215.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 22430640Jones R, Lacroix LJ. Streaming weekly soap opera video episodes to smartphones in a randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV risk in young urban African American/black women. AIDS Behav. 2012 Jul;16(5):1341-58. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0170-9.
- Link to main study publicationLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for HIV/AIDS
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rachel Jones, PhD principal investigator
Northeastern University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Love, Sex, & Choices video series and Messages in text in people with HIV/AIDS and Sexual Behavior, run by Northeastern University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in unprotected sex risk with high risk partners from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (time frame: change in sex risk behavior from baseline to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03330522, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2017.