AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 1/2NCT03331302

Hyper Polarized Xenon-129 MRI vs Xenon-133 Scintigraphy

A Phase 1/2 study testing Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI (Experimental) and Radioactive Xenon-133 scintigraphy (Active Comparator) in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hyper polarized Xenon-129 MRI will be directly compared to a radioactive Xe-133 scintigraphy to detect defects in lung ventilation from airflow limitation. This study is conducted as a pilot study with intention to conduct a larger clinical trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
What is being tested?
Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI (Experimental) and Radioactive Xenon-133 scintigraphy (Active Comparator)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2018to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of COPD
  • at their clinical baseline on the day of imaging
  • must be clinically stable in order to participate in the study.
  • COPD subjects will be categorized according to the GOLD
  • Current/Former SmokerSubjects
  • must have a smoking history ≥ 10 pack years

Who cannot join

  • Dx of asthma
  • Continuous oxygen use at home
  • Blood oxygen saturation of 92% less than as measured by pulse oximetry on the day of imaging
  • FEV1 percent predicted less than 25%
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Claustrophobia, inner ear implants, aneurysm or other surgical clips, metal foreign bodies in eye, pacemaker or other contraindication to MR scanning
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Subjects with any implanted device that cannot be verified as MRI compliant will be excluded
  • Chest circumference greater than that of the xenon MR and/or helium coil. The circumference of the coil is approximately 42 inches
  • History of congenital cardiac disease, chronic renal failure, or cirrhosis
  • Inability to understand simple instructions or to hold still for approximately 10 seconds
  • History of respiratory infection within 2 weeks prior to the MR scan
  • History of MI, stroke and/or poorly controlled hypertension.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Roselove Nunoo-Asare, RT contact

4342437363

RNN3B@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Virginia Health System

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

    Sarah Struchen, RN, 434-243-6074, SS8YM@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu

    Roselove Nunoo-Asare, RT, 434-243-6074, RNN3B@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Hyper polarized Xenon-129 MRI will be directly compared to a radioactive Xe-133 scintigraphy to detect defects in lung ventilation from airflow limitation. This study is conducted as a pilot study with intention to conduct a larger clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI has been developed by a number of techniques for imaging the lung that provide information about various aspects of lung function and structure. The main objective of this pilot study is to test and optimize the imaging parameters for a future industry sponsored clinical trial. The goal of the future trial is to determine the concordance between hyperpolarized xenon-129 ventilation MR imaging and nuclear medicine ventilation imaging (Gold Standard). In this study we will test the imaging parameters and techniques. We will directly compare human ventilation lung images in subjects with COPD, using nuclear medicine ventilation imaging with Xenon-133 gas scintigraphy versus hyperpolarized xenon-129 gas MRI. Our hypothesis is that current Xe-133 scintigraphy, which uses a radioactive gas (Xe-133) and produces a projection image of the lungs with relatively poor resolution, will not be able to detect small lung ventilation obstructions, which can be detected using hyperpolarized Xe-129 gas MRI.

Being tested
Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI (Experimental), Radioactive Xenon-133 scintigraphy (Active Comparator)
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI (Experimental)Drug

    Also called Polarean Pilot study

    MRI ventilation scan of the lung with inhaled contrast agent (hyperpolarized Xenon-129)

  • Radioactive Xenon-133 scintigraphy (Active Comparator)Drug

    Also called Pilot study

    Radioactive ventilation scintigraphy of the lung with inhaled radioactive contrast agent (Xenon-133)

Study groups in NCT03331302
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
COPD patients - Xe-133Active comparatorCOPD patients who will be assessed with Xenon-133 scintigraphy (Standard diagnostic study)
Receives: Drug: Radioactive Xenon-133 scintigraphy (Active Comparator)
COPD patients - Hyperpolarized Xe-129ExperimentalCOPD patients crossed over from the Active Comparator Arm who will be assessed with hyper polarized Xenon-129 MRI (Experimental diagnostic study)
Receives: Drug: Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI (Experimental)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ventilation imaging resolution comparison between MRI and scintigraphy

    Compare the quality of the imaging between hyper polarized xenon-129 and radioactive xenon-133

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2017
  2. Study start1 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
COPD patients with standard vs study diagnostic methods (imaging procedures)
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03331302
Sponsor's protocol ID
20053
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
31 Oct 2017
Last updated
4 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Undecided for now.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Hyperpolarized Xenon-129 MRI (Experimental) and Radioactive Xenon-133 scintigraphy (Active Comparator) in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by University of Virginia at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sarah Struchen, RN (4342436074, SS8YM@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ventilation imaging resolution comparison between MRI and scintigraphy (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in