Tooth FracturesNCT03331887
E-max CAD Crowns Retained With Fiber Reinforced Composite Post Versus E-max CAD Endocrowns
A study testing E-max CAD endocrown and E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post in people with Tooth Fractures and Debonding, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
Different types of post and core have been used for several years for restoring anterior endodontically treated teeth, but their preparations involve various risks such as: root perforation, root weakness and tooth fracture. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tooth Fractures, Debonding
- What is being tested?
- E-max CAD endocrown and E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2017to Apr 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age range of the patients from 20-60 years old who can read and sign informed consent document. Illiterate patients will be excluded.
- Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.
- Medically free patients or with controlled systemic disease.
- No active periodontal disease.
- Patients with anterior endodontically treated tooth/teeth indicated for Endocrown restoration (e.g. teeth without missing any wall, 2-3mm of sound tooth structure above cement-enamel junction).
Who cannot join
- Patients under 20 years old.
- Patients with bad oral hygiene and motivation.
- Patients with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation (patient have phobia from dental treatments or needle bricks).
- Patients with missing teeth opposing to the area intended for restoration.
- Patients with parafunctional habits (clencing /bruxism).
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: One Year Clinical Evaluation of E-max CAD Crowns Retained With Fiber Reinforced Composite Post Versus E-max CAD Endocrowns in Anterior Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Different types of post and core have been used for several years for restoring anterior endodontically treated teeth, but their preparations involve various risks such as: root perforation, root weakness and tooth fracture. The introduction of adhesive systems and conservative restorations, make it possible to reconstruct damaged anterior endodontically treated teeth with conservative restoration as endocrowns. The hypothesis of this trial is that E-max CAD endocrowns will show comparably equal clinical performance if compared to E-max CAD crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post and core system when treating anterior endodontically treated teeth..
Read the detailed description
This trial will be conducted on patients from the out patient clinic in the fixed prosthodontics clinic, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
- Adherence session will take place in the presence of the patients in the initial visit. This include that the patients will be informed by Abou El-Enein Y about the study steps and maintenance of oral hygiene instructions. Participant will be asked by Abou El-Enein Y if they have any problem like pain.
- Motivation and enforcing the maintenance of oral hygiene measures by Abou El-Enein Y.
The visits will be designed as follow:
- st visit: (Y.A) will call participants before tooth preparation procedure for preoperative records, face to face adherence reminder session, clinical examination, radiograohic examination, pre-operative photographing, Impression taking for study cast analysis and waxing up. Each participant will be asked to sign consent form written in patient native language. 2nd visit: Tooth preparation for either e-max crown retained with fiber reinforced composie post or e-max endocrown, secondary impression and temporarization. 3rd visit: Try in of the restoration. 4th visit: Participants will be called again for final cementation. 5th visit: Follow up.
Sample size: 12 in each group to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the rates for case and controls are equal with probability (power) 0.8. This number is to be increased to 16 in each group to compensate for possible losses during follow up.
Recruitment: The patients fulfill inclusion criteria will be selected from dental clinics of the Fixed Prosthodontics Department - Cairo University (internal recruitment).
Screening of patients will carried out until target number is reached (consecutive sampling).
Methods: Assignment of interventions:
Sequence generation: Radi I (R.I) will allocate participants in two different groups with 1:1 allocation ratio by using computerized sequence generation (www.randomizer.org).
Implementation: IR will be responsible for provide allocation generation and save it in the envelopes in secured place until the date of performing procedure.
Plans to promote participant retention \& complete follow up: Telephone numbers of each patients and address will be taken and included in study, then phone calls and messages will be sent to remind patients before each appointment.
Data management: Guindy J (G.J) will enter all data electronically. Patient files are to stored in numerical order in a secured place in locked cabinets. G.J and Z.A will have access to data . Categorical data will be described as numbers and percentages. Data will be explored for normality using Kolmogrov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparisons between two groups for normally distributed numeric variables will be done using the Student's t-test while for non normally distributed numeric variables will be done by Mann-Whitney test. Comparisons between categorical variables will be performed using the chi square test. A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All tests will be two tailed. Statistical Methods will be done using IBM SPSS advanced statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Data Monitoring: Z.A will be responsible of data monitoring if any lost or delete occurs, in that case: back up data will be taken from (G.J) to provide hard copy for the requested data for Z.A.
Harms: If 50% of the patients showed any unfavorable signs as sever pain, irreparable fracture or shade changes which might affect the results. Then the treatment will be considered as stopped guidelines which necessitate stopping the treatment and interim analysis will be performed.
Consent: Researcher will discuss the trial with all patients. Then patient can have an informed discussion with the researcher. Researcher will obtain written consent from patients willing to participate in the trial. All consent forms will write in Arabic language (Appendix 1.1).
Access to data: The supervisors (Z.A and G.J) will give access to the data sets. All data sets will be protected by password. To ensure confidentiality, Participant study information will become confidentially.
Ancillary and post-trial care: All patients will be followed up 2 years even after the trial ends to report success of the treatments.
Dissemination policy: Study results will be published as partial fulfillment the Requirements for PHD degree in fixed prosthodontics.Topics suggested for presentation or publication will be circulated to the authors.
Data collection: The following assessment surveys (clinical evaluations) will done for both groups: All patients will be recalled after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. For each recall examination, evaluator will performed the direct clinical evaluation using modified USPHS criteria for margin integrity and gross fracture. In addition, questionnaires will be used to evaluate patients' satisfaction and potential postoperative discomfort
- Conditions
- Tooth Fractures, Debonding
- Being tested
- E-max CAD endocrown, E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post
- Keywords
- endodontically treate teeth, Emax crowns, Fiber reinforced composite post, Endocrowns
- Medical subject headings
- Tooth Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
E-max CAD endocrownProcedure or surgery
endocrown used to restore endodontically treated teeth with E-max CAD endocrowns
E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite postProcedure or surgery
fiber reinforced composite post need to restore endodontically treated tooth with E-max crown
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| E-max CAD crowns retained with Fiber Reinforced Composite Post | Active comparator | The modulus of elasticity of FRC post is (18-22 GPa) resembling that of dentin. Ideally the remaining tooth, the fiber post and the composite cement create a "monoblock" in which the loads are uniformly dissipated, ensuring a behavior similar to healthy teeth with a lower risk of root fracture. Using lithium disilicate e.max restorations is documented in literature as a successful restoration. Receives: Procedure: E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post |
| E-max CAD Endocrowns | Experimental | Endocrowns have several advantages over conventional crowns like adequate function and esthetic with less chair time reduced number of interfaces in the restorative system. Stress concentration is less because of the reduction in the nonhomogenous material present. The preparation design is conservative compared to the traditional crown. Supragingival margin prevents interferences with periodontal tissues so involvement of the biological width is minimal. The application and polymerization of resins is also better controlled. Emax ceramic material have a high mechanical strength and are capable of being acid etched, with the adhesive capacity of adhesive systems and resinous cements, made it possible to restore endodontically treated teeth, without cores and intraradicular posts. Receives: Procedure: E-max CAD endocrown |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Gross Fracture
it indicates if the restoration is intact and fully retained or not using USPHS criteria for recording Categorical Alpha (A):Restoration is intact and fully retained.Bravo (B):Restoration is partially retained with some portion of the restoration still intact.Charlie (C):Restoration is completely missing
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Patient Satisfaction
measured using Visual Analogue scale For Endocrowns:Are you satisfied with your endocrown appearance? Are you satisfied with your endocrown shade Do you feel your endocrown are poorly aligned? Do you feel your endocrown are protruding?Are you hiding your teeth while smiling? For E-max crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post: Are you satisfied with your crown appearance? Are you satisfied with your crown shade?Do you feel your crown are poorly aligned? Do you feel your crown are protruding?Are you hiding your teeth while smiling
Measured: 12 months
Marginal Integrity
Alpha (A):The explorer does not catch and no visible crevice along the periphery of the restoration.Bravo (B):The explorer catches and there is visible evidence of a crevice, which the explorer penetrates, indicating that the edge of the restoration does not adapt closely to the tooth structure. The dentin and/or the base is not exposed, and the restoration is not mobile.Charlie ©: The explorer penetrates and extended to the dento-enamel junction.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2017
- Study startDec 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completionFeb 2019 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2019 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Tooth FracturesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yasmin Hesham Abou El-Enein, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03331887
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEBD-CU-2017-10-28
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- One Year Clinical Evaluation of E-max CAD Crowns Retained With Fiber Reinforced Composite Post Versus E-max CAD Endocrowns in Anterior Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03331887
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEBD-CU-2017-10-28
- Conditions
- Tooth Fractures, Debonding
- Keywords
- endodontically treate teeth, Emax crowns, Fiber reinforced composite post, Endocrowns
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2019 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2019 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Different types of post and core have been used for several years for restoring anterior endodontically treated teeth, but their preparations involve various risks such as: root perforation, root weakness and tooth fracture. The introduction of adhesive systems and conservative restorations, make it possible to reconstruct damaged anterior endodontically treated teeth with conservative restoration as endocrowns. The hypothesis of this trial is that E-max CAD endocrowns will show comparably equal clinical performance if compared to E-max CAD crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post and core system when treating anterior endodontically treated teeth..
Detailed description
This trial will be conducted on patients from the out patient clinic in the fixed prosthodontics clinic, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
- Adherence session will take place in the presence of the patients in the initial visit. This include that the patients will be informed by Abou El-Enein Y about the study steps and maintenance of oral hygiene instructions. Participant will be asked by Abou El-Enein Y if they have any problem like pain.
- Motivation and enforcing the maintenance of oral hygiene measures by Abou El-Enein Y.
The visits will be designed as follow:
- st visit: (Y.A) will call participants before tooth preparation procedure for preoperative records, face to face adherence reminder session, clinical examination, radiograohic examination, pre-operative photographing, Impression taking for study cast analysis and waxing up. Each participant will be asked to sign consent form written in patient native language. 2nd visit: Tooth preparation for either e-max crown retained with fiber reinforced composie post or e-max endocrown, secondary impression and temporarization. 3rd visit: Try in of the restoration. 4th visit: Participants will be called again for final cementation. 5th visit: Follow up.
Sample size: 12 in each group to be able to reject the null hypothesis that the rates for case and controls are equal with probability (power) 0.8. This number is to be increased to 16 in each group to compensate for possible losses during follow up.
Recruitment: The patients fulfill inclusion criteria will be selected from dental clinics of the Fixed Prosthodontics Department - Cairo University (internal recruitment).
Screening of patients will carried out until target number is reached (consecutive sampling).
Methods: Assignment of interventions:
Sequence generation: Radi I (R.I) will allocate participants in two different groups with 1:1 allocation ratio by using computerized sequence generation (www.randomizer.org).
Implementation: IR will be responsible for provide allocation generation and save it in the envelopes in secured place until the date of performing procedure.
Plans to promote participant retention \& complete follow up: Telephone numbers of each patients and address will be taken and included in study, then phone calls and messages will be sent to remind patients before each appointment.
Data management: Guindy J (G.J) will enter all data electronically. Patient files are to stored in numerical order in a secured place in locked cabinets. G.J and Z.A will have access to data . Categorical data will be described as numbers and percentages. Data will be explored for normality using Kolmogrov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparisons between two groups for normally distributed numeric variables will be done using the Student's t-test while for non normally distributed numeric variables will be done by Mann-Whitney test. Comparisons between categorical variables will be performed using the chi square test. A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All tests will be two tailed. Statistical Methods will be done using IBM SPSS advanced statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Data Monitoring: Z.A will be responsible of data monitoring if any lost or delete occurs, in that case: back up data will be taken from (G.J) to provide hard copy for the requested data for Z.A.
Harms: If 50% of the patients showed any unfavorable signs as sever pain, irreparable fracture or shade changes which might affect the results. Then the treatment will be considered as stopped guidelines which necessitate stopping the treatment and interim analysis will be performed.
Consent: Researcher will discuss the trial with all patients. Then patient can have an informed discussion with the researcher. Researcher will obtain written consent from patients willing to participate in the trial. All consent forms will write in Arabic language (Appendix 1.1).
Access to data: The supervisors (Z.A and G.J) will give access to the data sets. All data sets will be protected by password. To ensure confidentiality, Participant study information will become confidentially.
Ancillary and post-trial care: All patients will be followed up 2 years even after the trial ends to report success of the treatments.
Dissemination policy: Study results will be published as partial fulfillment the Requirements for PHD degree in fixed prosthodontics.Topics suggested for presentation or publication will be circulated to the authors.
Data collection: The following assessment surveys (clinical evaluations) will done for both groups: All patients will be recalled after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. For each recall examination, evaluator will performed the direct clinical evaluation using modified USPHS criteria for margin integrity and gross fracture. In addition, questionnaires will be used to evaluate patients' satisfaction and potential postoperative discomfort
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| E-max CAD crowns retained with Fiber Reinforced Composite Post | Active comparator | Procedure: E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite postThe modulus of elasticity of FRC post is (18-22 GPa) resembling that of dentin. Ideally the remaining tooth, the fiber post and the composite cement create a "monoblock" in which the loads are uniformly dissipated, ensuring a behavior similar to healthy teeth with a lower risk of root fracture. Using lithium disilicate e.max restorations is documented in literature as a successful restoration. |
| E-max CAD Endocrowns | Experimental | Procedure: E-max CAD endocrownEndocrowns have several advantages over conventional crowns like adequate function and esthetic with less chair time reduced number of interfaces in the restorative system. Stress concentration is less because of the reduction in the nonhomogenous material present. The preparation design is conservative compared to the traditional crown. Supragingival margin prevents interferences with periodontal tissues so involvement of the biological width is minimal. The application and polymerization of resins is also better controlled. Emax ceramic material have a high mechanical strength and are capable of being acid etched, with the adhesive capacity of adhesive systems and resinous cements, made it possible to restore endodontically treated teeth, without cores and intraradicular posts. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age range of the patients from 20-60 years old who can read and sign informed consent document. Illiterate patients will be excluded.
- Patients willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.
- Medically free patients or with controlled systemic disease.
- No active periodontal disease.
- Patients with anterior endodontically treated tooth/teeth indicated for Endocrown restoration (e.g. teeth without missing any wall, 2-3mm of sound tooth structure above cement-enamel junction).
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients under 20 years old.
- Patients with bad oral hygiene and motivation.
- Patients with psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectation (patient have phobia from dental treatments or needle bricks).
- Patients with missing teeth opposing to the area intended for restoration.
- Patients with parafunctional habits (clencing /bruxism).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| E-max CAD endocrownendocrown used to restore endodontically treated teeth with E-max CAD endocrowns | Procedure or surgery | E-max CAD Endocrowns |
| E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite postfiber reinforced composite post need to restore endodontically treated tooth with E-max crown | Procedure or surgery | E-max CAD crowns retained with Fiber Reinforced Composite Post |
Primary outcome
Gross Fracture
Time frame: 12 months
it indicates if the restoration is intact and fully retained or not using USPHS criteria for recording Categorical Alpha (A):Restoration is intact and fully retained.Bravo (B):Restoration is partially retained with some portion of the restoration still intact.Charlie (C):Restoration is completely missing
2 secondary outcomes
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: 12 months
Marginal Integrity
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tooth Fractures
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Clinical Performance, Shade Matching, and Patient Satisfaction of Different Resin Composite Layering Techniques Using 3D Printed Cast
Tooth Fractures (Class IV), Composite Resins
Enrolling by invitation
The Impact of Adhesion Strategy on the Clinical Performance Of Indirect Dental Restorations
Healthy Adult Participants, Tooth Fracture
Recruiting
PMCF Study on The Performance and Safety of ON DENT® PMMA Discs/Blocks and Resin Products for Temporary Restorations
Tooth Loss, Dentin Caries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Corrective Surgery Versus Dental Implants in Compromised Mandibular Molars
Root Caries, Vertical Root Fracture
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite in Cuspal Coverage Restorations of Vital Posterior Teeth (RCT)
Cusp Capping, Cuspal Coverage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing E-max CAD endocrown and E-max CAd crowns retained with fiber reinforced composite post in people with Tooth Fractures and Debonding, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yasmin Hesham Abou El-Enein, Assistant lecturer ((+02) 01116604441, Yasmin.112@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Gross Fracture (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2017.