Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin LymphomaPhase 2ROSEWOODNCT03332017
A Study Comparing Obinutuzumab and BGB-3111 Versus Obinutuzumab Alone in Treating R/R Follicular Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing Zanubrutinib and Obinutuzumab in people with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by BeiGene at 88 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
This clinical study examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of zanubrutinib and obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab alone in adults with follicular lymphoma whose disease returned after or did not respond to prior therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Zanubrutinib and Obinutuzumab
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 217 participants
- Where
- 88 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Nov 2017to 27 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of B-cell follicular lymphoma.
- Participants had received two or more prior systemic treatments for follicular lymphoma.
- Participants had previously received both an anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (anti-CD20) antibody and an appropriate alkylator-based combination therapy.
- Participants had disease that had progressed after completion of the most recent therapy or was considered refractory to treatment.
- Participants had measurable disease present.
- Archival tissue confirming the diagnosis was available.
- Participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2.
- Participants had adequate renal and hepatic function.
Who cannot join
- Participants had prior exposure to a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor.
- Participants had known central nervous system involvement by leukemia or lymphoma.
- Participants had evidence of transformation from follicular lymphoma to another aggressive histologic subtype.
- Participants had undergone an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation within 12 months of enrollment.
- Participants had a prior malignancy within the past 2 years, except for those who had curatively treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 6.
- Participants had clinically significant cardiovascular disease.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Participants had undergone major surgery within 4 weeks prior to the start of study treatment.
- Participants had an active fungal, bacterial, or viral infection requiring systemic treatment.
- Participants had a history of severe bleeding disorder.
- Note: Other protocol-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may have applied.
Trial locations and contacts
88 sites in 17 countries.
88 sites in 17 countries
Australia12 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, SA 5000
Icon Cancer Centre Wesley
Auchenflower, Queensland, QLD 4066
Monash Health
Clayton, Victoria, VIC 3168
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Concord, New South Wales, NSW 2139
Saint Vincents Hospital Sydney
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, NSW 2010
St Vincents Hospital Melbourne
Fitzroy, Victoria, VIC 3065
Peninsula Private Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, VIC 3199
Canberra Hospital
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, ACT 2605
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, WA 6000
Icon Cancer Foundation
South Brisbane, Queensland, QLD 4101
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Waratah, New South Wales, NSW 2298
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, NSW 2145
China12 sites
Peking University Third Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000
Peking University Peoples Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044
Beijing Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Guangdong Provincial Peoples Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022
Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150000
Jiangsu Province Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200000
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300060
Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030
Henan Cancer Hospital
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000
France9 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Damiens Hopital Sud
Amiens, 80054
Centre de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Institut Bergonie
Bordeaux, 33000
Centre Hospitalier de Dunkerque
Dunkirk, 59240
Clinique Louis Pasteur
Esseylesnancy, 54270
Necker University Hospital
Paris, 75015
Chu Bordeaux Hopital Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33600
Chu Hopital Lyon Sud
PierreBenite, 69495
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitier Hopital de La Miletrie Hopital Jean Bernard
Poitiers, 86000
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
Spain8 sites
Institut Catala Doncologia
Barcelona, 08908
Hospital Universitario Puerta Del Mar
Cadiz, 11009
Md Anderson Cancer Center Madrid Spain
Madrid, 28033
Hospital Universitario de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario Ramon Y Cajal
Madrid, 28048
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
Majadahonda, 28222
Hospital Universitario Quironsalud Madrid
Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007
Italy7 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Di Bari
Bari, 70124
Policlinico Sorsola Malpighi, Aou Di Bologna
Bologna, 40138
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132
Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia
Milan, 20141
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Parma
Parma, 43126
Unita Di Ematologia, Dipartimento Di Ematologia Ed Oncologia
Ravenna, 48121
Ospedale Di Circolo E Fondazione Macchi
Varese, 21100
United States4 sites
Emory University Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322-1013
University of Illinois At Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-4795
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169-3321
Bulgaria4 sites
University Multiprofile Hospital For Active Treatment Dr Georgi Stranski
Pleven, 5803
Acibadem City Clinic Mhat Tokuda Ead
Sofia, 1407
University Multiprofile Hospital For Active Treatment Saint Ivan Rilski
Sofia, 1407
University Multiprofile Hospital For Active Treatment Alexandrovska
Sofia, 1431
Czechia4 sites
Fakultni Nemocnice Brno
Brno, 625 00
Fakultni Nemocnice Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, 500 03
Slezska Nemocnice V Opave
Opava, 746 01
Vseobecna Fakultni Nemocnice V Praze
Prague, 10000
Poland4 sites
Pratia McM Krakow
Krakow, 30-727
Wielospecjalistyczne Centrum Onkologii I Traumatologii Im M Kopernika W Lodzi
Lodz, 93-513
Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej
Lublin, 20-090
Szpital Wojewodzki W Opolu
Opole, 45-372
South Korea4 sites
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
BundangGu SeongnamSi, Gyeonggi-do, 13620
Samsung Medical Center
GangnamGu, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 06351
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Junggu, Daegu Gwang'yeogsi, 41944
The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St Marys Hospital
SeochoGu, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 06591
Taiwan4 sites
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung Ho Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 807
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
North Dist, 704
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Zhonghe Dist, 235041
National Taiwan University Hospital West Campus
Zhongzheng Dist, 10048
United Kingdom4 sites
The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals Nhs Foundation
Bournemouth, BH7 7DW
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals Nhs Trust
Leeds, LS9 7TF
Barts Health Nhs Trust
London, EC1A 7BE
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust
Norwich, NR4 7UY
Belarus3 sites
Minsk City Clinical Oncological Dispensary
Minsk, 220013
Nn Alexandrov National Cancer Centre of Belarus
Minsk, 223040
Vitebsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
Vitebsk, 210603
New Zealand3 sites
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, 1023
Aotearoa Clinical Trials
Auckland, 2025
Christchurch Hospital
Christchurch, 8011
Russia3 sites
N N Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center Konstantin Laktionov
Moscow, Moscow, 115478
State Healthcare Institution Oncologic Dispensary No Health Department of Krasnodar Region
Sochi, Krasnodarskiy Kray, 354000
Central City Hospital
Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620137
Canada2 sites
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, QC H3t 1E2
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
About this study
Official title: An International, Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized Study of BGB-3111 Combined With Obinutuzumab Compared With Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Relapsed/ Refractory Follicular Lymphoma
This clinical study examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of zanubrutinib and obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab alone in adults with follicular lymphoma whose disease returned after or did not respond to prior therapy.
Read the detailed description
This study randomly assigned participants in a 2:1 ratio to receive either zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab or obinutuzumab alone. The assignment considered how many prior treatments participants had received, whether their cancer had stopped responding to rituximab, and whether they were enrolled in Mainland China or other regions. Each treatment cycle lasted 28 days, with zanubrutinib taken by mouth twice daily and obinutuzumab given intravenously on a set schedule, followed by optional maintenance for up to 24 months. Participants who had obinutuzumab alone could have switched to the combination treatment if their disease worsened or did not respond after 12 months, if confirmed by an independent review.
- Being tested
- Zanubrutinib, Obinutuzumab
- Keywords
- Relapsed/Refractory Follicular non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Follicular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ZanubrutinibDrug
Also called BGB-3111, Brukinsa
Oral administration as a capsule
ObinutuzumabDrug
Also called Gazyva
Intravenous administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Participants received obinutuzumab 1000 milligrams (mg) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 6; and then every 8 weeks for an additional 24 months or until disease progression. Each treatment cycle was 28 days.
Participants who experienced progressive disease or did not respond to therapy within 12 months may have received crossover treatment with zanubrutinib + obinutuzumab at the investigator's discretion. Receives: Drug: Obinutuzumab |
| Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Participants received zanubrutinib 160 mg twice a day orally with or without food and obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 6, and then every 8 weeks for an additional 24 months or until disease progression. Each treatment cycle was 28 days. Receives: Drug: Zanubrutinib; Drug: Obinutuzumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Secondary outcomes (14)
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by Investigator Assessment
DOR was defined as the time from the date that a confirmed response (CR or PR) was first observed to the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. For participants in the monotherapy arm who crossed over to combination therapy, disease assessments after crossover were not included in the DOR calculation. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
DOR as Determined by ICR
DOR was defined as the time from the date that a confirmed response (CR or PR) was first observed to the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. For participants in the monotherapy arm who crossed over to combination therapy, disease assessments after crossover were not included in the DOR calculation. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, as determined by the ICR or investigator assessment. For participants in the monotherapy arm who crossed over to combination therapy, disease assessments after crossover were not included in the PFS calculation. Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Complete Response Rate
CRR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a complete response or complete metabolic response as their best overall response, as determined by ICR and investigator assessment. Responses were assessed from randomization until the data cutoff date, the start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date for participants in the monotherapy arm who switched to combination therapy.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Time to Response (TTR)
TRR was defined as the time from randomization to the first date that response criteria (CR or PR) were met, as determined by ICR and investigator assessment. Only participants who achieved an overall response were included in the analysis. For participants in the monotherapy arm who crossed over to combination therapy, disease assessments after crossover were not included in the TRR calculation.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL), Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, and Symptom Scores
The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 30 questions covering 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social), 1 global health scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). Participants report their health over the past week. Most items use a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all to 4 = Very much), while 2 global QOL items use a 7-point scale (1 = Very poor to 7 = Excellent). Raw scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale; higher GHS and functional scores and lower symptom scores indicate better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' A higher score indicates better health outcomes.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event refers to any unintended or unfavorable sign, symptom, or condition (including abnormal lab results) that occurs during the study, regardless of whether it is linked to the study drug.
Measured: From first dose to 30 days after zanubrutinib, 90 days after obinutuzumab, or before new therapy, whichever came first, up to study cut-off (31 Dec 2024); maximum exposure was 28.7 months for obinutuzumab and 67.4 months for combination therapy.
Area Under the Curve (AUCss) of Zanubrutinib at Steady State
Pharmacokinetic exposure parameters were estimated for each participant using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Predose (within 30 minutes before zanubrutinib dosing) and 2 hours (± 30 minutes) post-dose.
Zanubrutinib Plasma Concentrations
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Predose (within 30 minutes before zanubrutinib dosing) and 2 hours (± 30 minutes) post-dose.
Minimum Observed Concentration (Cmin) of Zanubrutinib at Steady State
Pharmacokinetic exposure parameters were estimated for each participant using a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model.
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Predose (within 30 minutes before zanubrutinib dosing) and 2 hours (± 30 minutes) post-dose.
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Zanubrutinib at Steady State
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 (2 hours postdose) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (predose and 2 hours postdose)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2017
- Study start14 Nov 2017
- Primary completion8 Oct 2021
- Study completion27 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BeiGeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 217 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- BeiGene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, BeiGene
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03332017
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BGB-3111-212
- Other IDs
- 2017-001552-54, CTR20220712, 2023-509975-17-00, 2023, 2017
- Acronym
- ROSEWOOD
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 31 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: BeiGene shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved. BeiGene shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations. Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeiGene review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.
Publications
Trotman J, Folwer N, Auer R, Flowers C, Reed W, Stern JC, Huang J, Zinzani PL. Phase 2 Obinutuzumab Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL). American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018.
Fowler N, Trotman J, Auer R, Flowers C, Reed W, Marimpietri C, Huang J, Zinzani PL.Randomized phase 2 zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) + obinutuzumab (obi) vs obi monotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL). American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2019
Fowler NH, Trotman J, Auer R, Flowers CR, Reed WF, Ivanova E, Huang J, Zinzani PL.Randomized Phase 2 Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) + Obinutuzumab vs Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL). American Society of Hematology. 2019
Trotman J, Zinzani PL, Song Y, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL) Treated With Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab Monotherapy: The ROSEWOOD Trial. Poster presented at: 65th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December, 2023; San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-181195
Judith Trotman, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Krimo Bouabdallah, Shanmei Liao, Adam Greenbaum, Laura Dima, Laurent Dumartin; Comparative Efficacy of Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Last Prior Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Growth Modulation Index Analysis from ROSEWOOD Study. Blood 2024; 144 (Supplement 1): 3029. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-198500
Zinzani PL, Mayer J, Flowers CR, Bijou F, De Oliveira AC, Song Y, Zhang Q, Merli M, Bouabdallah K, Ganly P, Zhang H, Johnson R, Martin Garcia-Sancho A, Provencio Pulla M, Trneny M, Yuen S, Tilly H, Kingsley E, Tumyan G, Assouline SE, Auer R, Ivanova E, Kim P, Huang S, Delarue R, Trotman J. ROSEWOOD: A Phase II Randomized Study of Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5107-5117. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00775. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
PubMed 37506346Zinzani PL, Mayer J, Trotman J, et al. Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Analysis of the ROSEWOOD Study. Oral presentation at: 17th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma; June, 2023; Lugano, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.3163_81
Trotman J, Zinzani PL Mayer J, et al. Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Analysis of the ROSEWOOD Study. Poster presented at: European Hematology Association; June, 2023; Frankfurt, Germany.
Flowers CR, Zinzani PL, Mayer J, et al. Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Analysis of the ROSEWOOD Study. Poster presented at: 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting; June, 2023; Chicago, IL. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.7545
Gaballa S, Xue M, Swami S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States. Poster presented at: International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Europe 2024; November, 2024; Barcelona, Spain. https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/presentations-database/presentation/intl2024-3896/136274 http://reg2022.csco.org.cn/24?lang=en
Trotman J, Zinzani PL, Song Y, Delarue R, Kim P, Ivanova E, Korde R, Mayer J, De Oliveira AC, Assouline SE, Flowers CR, Barnes G. Patient-reported outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab monotherapy: results from the ROSEWOOD trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Nov;40(11):1863-1871. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2409837. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
PubMed 39376156
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An International, Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized Study of BGB-3111 Combined With Obinutuzumab Compared With Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Relapsed/ Refractory Follicular Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03332017
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROSEWOOD / BGB-3111-212
- Keywords
- Relapsed/Refractory Follicular non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 217 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BeiGeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 14 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical study examined the safety and efficacy of the combination of zanubrutinib and obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab alone in adults with follicular lymphoma whose disease returned after or did not respond to prior therapy.
Detailed description
This study randomly assigned participants in a 2:1 ratio to receive either zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab or obinutuzumab alone. The assignment considered how many prior treatments participants had received, whether their cancer had stopped responding to rituximab, and whether they were enrolled in Mainland China or other regions. Each treatment cycle lasted 28 days, with zanubrutinib taken by mouth twice daily and obinutuzumab given intravenously on a set schedule, followed by optional maintenance for up to 24 months. Participants who had obinutuzumab alone could have switched to the combination treatment if their disease worsened or did not respond after 12 months, if confirmed by an independent review.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Drug: ObinutuzumabParticipants received obinutuzumab 1000 milligrams (mg) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 6; and then every 8 weeks for an additional 24 months or until disease progression. Each treatment cycle was 28 days. Participants who experienced progressive disease or did not respond to therapy within 12 months may have received crossover treatment with zanubrutinib + obinutuzumab at the investigator's discretion. |
| Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab | Experimental | Drug: Zanubrutinib, Drug: ObinutuzumabParticipants received zanubrutinib 160 mg twice a day orally with or without food and obinutuzumab 1000 mg intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 6, and then every 8 weeks for an additional 24 months or until disease progression. Each treatment cycle was 28 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Participants had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of B-cell follicular lymphoma.
- Participants had received two or more prior systemic treatments for follicular lymphoma.
- Participants had previously received both an anti-cluster of differentiation 20 (anti-CD20) antibody and an appropriate alkylator-based combination therapy.
- Participants had disease that had progressed after completion of the most recent therapy or was considered refractory to treatment.
- Participants had measurable disease present.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Participants had prior exposure to a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor.
- Participants had known central nervous system involvement by leukemia or lymphoma.
- Participants had evidence of transformation from follicular lymphoma to another aggressive histologic subtype.
- Participants had undergone an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation within 12 months of enrollment.
- Participants had a prior malignancy within the past 2 years, except for those who had curatively treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 6.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ZanubrutinibAlso: BGB-3111, BrukinsaOral administration as a capsule | Drug | Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab |
| ObinutuzumabAlso: GazyvaIntravenous administration | Drug | Obinutuzumab, Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab |
Primary outcome
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per the Lugano Classification for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma.
14 secondary outcomes
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
DOR as Determined by ICR
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Complete Response Rate
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Time to Response (TTR)
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QOL), Physical Functioning, Role Functioning, and Symptom Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, and Week 24
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From first dose to 30 days after zanubrutinib, 90 days after obinutuzumab, or before new therapy, whichever came first, up to study cut-off (31 Dec 2024); maximum exposure was 28.7 months for obinutuzumab and 67.4 months for combination therapy.
Area Under the Curve (AUCss) of Zanubrutinib at Steady State
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Predose (within 30 minutes before zanubrutinib dosing) and 2 hours (± 30 minutes) post-dose.
Zanubrutinib Plasma Concentrations
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Predose (within 30 minutes before zanubrutinib dosing) and 2 hours (± 30 minutes) post-dose.
Minimum Observed Concentration (Cmin) of Zanubrutinib at Steady State
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1: Predose (within 30 minutes before zanubrutinib dosing) and 2 hours (± 30 minutes) post-dose.
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Zanubrutinib at Steady State
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 (2 hours postdose) and Cycle 2 Day 1 (predose and 2 hours postdose)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BackgroundTrotman J, Folwer N, Auer R, Flowers C, Reed W, Stern JC, Huang J, Zinzani PL. Phase 2 Obinutuzumab Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL). American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2018.
- BackgroundFowler N, Trotman J, Auer R, Flowers C, Reed W, Marimpietri C, Huang J, Zinzani PL.Randomized phase 2 zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) + obinutuzumab (obi) vs obi monotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (R/R FL). American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2019
- BackgroundFowler NH, Trotman J, Auer R, Flowers CR, Reed WF, Ivanova E, Huang J, Zinzani PL.Randomized Phase 2 Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) + Obinutuzumab vs Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL). American Society of Hematology. 2019
- BackgroundTrotman J, Zinzani PL, Song Y, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma (R/R FL) Treated With Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab Monotherapy: The ROSEWOOD Trial. Poster presented at: 65th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition; December, 2023; San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2023-181195
- Results publicationJudith Trotman, Pier Luigi Zinzani, Krimo Bouabdallah, Shanmei Liao, Adam Greenbaum, Laura Dima, Laurent Dumartin; Comparative Efficacy of Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Last Prior Treatment in Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Growth Modulation Index Analysis from ROSEWOOD Study. Blood 2024; 144 (Supplement 1): 3029. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2024-198500
- Results publication: PubMed 37506346Zinzani PL, Mayer J, Flowers CR, Bijou F, De Oliveira AC, Song Y, Zhang Q, Merli M, Bouabdallah K, Ganly P, Zhang H, Johnson R, Martin Garcia-Sancho A, Provencio Pulla M, Trneny M, Yuen S, Tilly H, Kingsley E, Tumyan G, Assouline SE, Auer R, Ivanova E, Kim P, Huang S, Delarue R, Trotman J. ROSEWOOD: A Phase II Randomized Study of Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab Monotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 20;41(33):5107-5117. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00775. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
- Results publicationZinzani PL, Mayer J, Trotman J, et al. Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Analysis of the ROSEWOOD Study. Oral presentation at: 17th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma; June, 2023; Lugano, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.3163_81
- Results publicationTrotman J, Zinzani PL Mayer J, et al. Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Analysis of the ROSEWOOD Study. Poster presented at: European Hematology Association; June, 2023; Frankfurt, Germany.
- Results publicationFlowers CR, Zinzani PL, Mayer J, et al. Zanubrutinib Plus Obinutuzumab Versus Obinutuzumab in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Analysis of the ROSEWOOD Study. Poster presented at: 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting; June, 2023; Chicago, IL. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.7545
- Results publicationGaballa S, Xue M, Swami S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Zanubrutinib + Obinutuzumab for Treatment of Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma in the United States. Poster presented at: International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Europe 2024; November, 2024; Barcelona, Spain. https://www.ispor.org/heor-resources/presentations-database/presentation/intl2024-3896/136274 http://reg2022.csco.org.cn/24?lang=en
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39376156Trotman J, Zinzani PL, Song Y, Delarue R, Kim P, Ivanova E, Korde R, Mayer J, De Oliveira AC, Assouline SE, Flowers CR, Barnes G. Patient-reported outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma treated with zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus obinutuzumab monotherapy: results from the ROSEWOOD trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 Nov;40(11):1863-1871. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2409837. Epub 2024 Oct 14.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. BeiGene shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved. BeiGene shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations. Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeiGene review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.
Related trials for Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Pembrolizumab and Pralatrexate in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas
Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, Nodal Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma With TFH Phenotype
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacokinetic Study of Venetoclax Tablets Crushed and Dissolved Into a Solution
Hematologic Malignancy, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
RecruitingObservational study
Tissue, Blood, and Body Fluid Sample Collection From Patients With Hematologic Cancer
Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Study Adding Drugs to Usual Treatment for Large B-Cell Lymphoma That Returned or Did Not Respond to Treatment
Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Director study director
BeiGene
88 sites in 17 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Zanubrutinib and Obinutuzumab in people with Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by BeiGene at 88 sites in 17 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 88 sites in Australia, China, France, Spain, Italy and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment (time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (08OCT2021) start of a new anticancer therapy, or the crossover date, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 12.45 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03332017, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2026.