AzTrials
AzTrials

Mechanically Ventilated PatientsPhase 4NCT03333395

Nebulized Heparin and Salbutamol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With AECOPD

A Phase 4 study testing Nebulized heparin and salbutamol and Nebulized salbutamol in people with Mechanically Ventilated Patients, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomised study was designed to assess the efficacy of nebulised heparin and salbutamol in improving lung function in mechanically ventilated patients with AECOPD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Mechanically Ventilated Patients
What is being tested?
Nebulized heparin and salbutamol and Nebulized salbutamol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Feb 2017to 30 Sep 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • > or = 18 years of age,
  • body weight 70-110Kg,
  • height 160-180 cm
  • with clinically evident AECOPD and in need for mechanical ventilation confirmed by arterial blood gases (ABGs).

Who cannot join

  • Excluded Patients from the study were those who were not enrolled within the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation and those who were likely to be extubated within 24 hours. - History of ischemic heart disease,
  • History of pulmonary bleeding within the previous 3 months,
  • History of bleeding diathesis,
  • Known to be allergic to heparin or
  • History of thrombocytopenia after previous treatment with heparin.
  • Female patients were excluded if they were pregnant or breast feeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Internal Medicine ICU of Ain-Shams University Hospitals

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of Nebulized Heparin and Salbutamol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Exacerbation Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Randomized Clinical Trial

This randomised study was designed to assess the efficacy of nebulised heparin and salbutamol in improving lung function in mechanically ventilated patients with AECOPD.

Read the detailed description

Methods:

Patients:

This study was performed between February 2017 and September 2017. Admitted Patients to the Internal Medicine ICU of Ain-Shams University Hospitals were screened for meeting enrollment criteria. Written informed consent was taken from all patients, their parents or their guardians before any study procedure was done. Patients were included in the study if they were > or = 18 years of age, body weight 70-110Kg, height 160-180 cm with clinically evident AECOPD and in need for mechanical ventilation confirmed by arterial blood gases (ABGs).

Excluded Patients from the study were those who were not enrolled within the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation and those who were likely to be extubated within 24 hours. Patients were also excluded if they have any history of ischemic heart disease, pulmonary bleeding within the previous 3 months, history of bleeding diathesis, known to be allergic to heparin or history of thrombocytopenia after previous treatment with heparin. Female patients were excluded if they are pregnant or breast feeding.

Study design:

This study was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Block randomization was performed in random blocks of two to eight. After enrollment, patients were randomly allocated into either of the two groups, HS and S. Allocations were concealed in opaque, sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes.

Study medications:

Patients in either group were treated by nebulization of 7.5 ml of study medication every 6 hours (4imes a day). The study medications were prepared by the local pharmacist who gave them to the nurse in charge and they were not involved in any other part of the study.

The study medications were either a HS Group medications (study group) (30 patients) which was prepared by adding Heparin 25000 IU in 5ml (5 ampoules of Heparin Sodium 5000 I.U/ML, Nile company for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries-A.R.E.) to Salbutamol 5mg/2.5ml Nebulizer Solution (one Ventolin nebule containing a preservative-free solution of Salbutamol Sulphate BP 2.5mg, GlaxoSmithKline Inc.) or S Group medications (control group) (30 patients) which was prepared by adding Salbutamol 5mg/2.5ml Nebulizer Solution + Na cl 0.9% 5ml.

Standard medications were used in both groups which included analgesics, sedatives, fluid management, antibiotic prophylaxis, steroids and thrombo-prophylaxis according to local guidelines.

Nebulization and Ventilation:

Nebulization was conducted by adding the nebulization medication to a nebulization chamber (Ameco Technology, particle size 0.5 To 10um, Nebulization rate> 0.3ml/min) connected to the inspiratory limb of the breathing circuit by a T-piece (22M-22M/15F, with port- TNTAIR medical) close to the patient but after the moist exchanger if applied. An expiratory filter was applied in the expiratory limb of the breathing circuit. The nebulization session was continued for at least 20 minutes.

Patients in the heparin group were eliminated (drop-out) if they developed a heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, an increase in APTT more than double normal,an evident bleeding that necessitated blood transfusion or if an excessive blood tinged sputum or bleeding appeared during suctioning or bronchial lavage.

All patients were mechanically ventilated using SIMV mode, with a targeted TV: 6-8 ml/kg, rate: 10-12 bpm, PEEP: 5-10 cm H2O, and FIO2:40%-60%.

Data collection:

The PaO2/FiO2 ratio and, PaCo2 were measured each day at 7 a.m. No changes in the ventilator settings or the patient's position were permitted for the 10 minutes before this measurement.

Demographic data including history of smoking (never, former, current) were collected on study entry, and ventilation parameters, clinical and radiological data, sputum character, medication usage, and adverse events, including blood-stained sputum or frank blood in sputum and red cell transfusions, were recorded daily while the patient remained mechanically ventilated.

Ventilator- free days were defined as the number of days patients were breathing without mechanical ventilation during the first 14 days.

Development of acute lung injury (ALI) was defined using the consensus criteria (15). Vasopressor usage was defined by the administration of any of the following: dopamine, dobutamine, norepinephrine, or epinephrine. Renal failure was defined as a serum creatinine of greater than 300 μmol/L or urine output of less than 500 mL per day or renal replacement therapy for acute renal impairment. Respiratory failure was defined as the acute requirement for mechanical ventilation primarily due to acute exacerbation of COPD evident clinically by severe shortness of breath, with or without Co2 narcosis, and by ABG as PH <7.3, PaO2<60 mmHg and PaCO2 >50 mmHg.

Outcomes:

The following data were collected and compared for each group with respect to:

The primary outcome was:

  • The number of ventilator hours; number of hours during which the patient was mechanically ventilated.
  • The average daily ratio of partial pressure of oxygen to FiO2 (PaO2/FiO2) while the patient remained ventilated for a maximum of 14 days from randomization and

The secondary outcome was:

  • The length of ICU stays.
  • CRP quantitative titer was measured daily as part of the routine clinical care. The maximum serum CRP level during the ICU stay was designated as max- CRP as a prognostic factor. Normal concentration of CRP in healthy human serum is between 5 and 10 mg/L, increasing with aging(14).
  • Platelets count and
  • The number of suctions with blood tinged sputum.

Analysis of Data:

Depending on Dixon et al.,2010(16) who found that the ventilation free days (22.6 ±4.0 and 18.0 ± 7.1 in heparin and control groups respectively, and assuming the power= 0.80 and α=0.05, and by using PASS 11th release the minimal sample size for an equal size controlled clinical trial is 26 in each group. We will recruit 30 in each group for possible attrition (17,18).

The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 22.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, USA, 2013.

Being tested
Nebulized heparin and salbutamol, Nebulized salbutamol
Keywords
Mechanical ventilation, Acute Exacerbation of chronic obstructive airway disease (AECOPD), Nebulized heparin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nebulized heparin and salbutamolDrug

    HS Group medications (study group) (30 patients) which was prepared by adding Heparin 25000 IU in 5ml (5 ampoules of Heparin Sodium 5000 I.U/ML, Nile company for Pharmaceuticals and Chemical Industries-A.R.E.) to Salbutamol 5mg/2.5ml Nebulizer Solution (one Ventolin nebule containing a preservative-free solution of Salbutamol Sulphate BP 2.5mg, GlaxoSmithKline Inc.)

  • Nebulized salbutamolDrug

    S Group medications (control group) (30 patients) which was prepared by adding Salbutamol 5mg/2.5ml Nebulizer Solution + Na cl 0.9% 5ml.

Study groups in NCT03333395
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HS Group (study group)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Nebulized heparin and salbutamol
S Group (control group)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Nebulized salbutamol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The number of ventilator hours

    Number of hours during which the patient was mechanically ventilated.

    Measured: Maximum of 14 days from randomization.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2017
  2. Study start1 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03333395
Sponsor's protocol ID
R 26 / 2017
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
2 Nov 2017
Last updated
21 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Nebulized heparin and salbutamol and Nebulized salbutamol in people with Mechanically Ventilated Patients, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The number of ventilator hours (time frame: Maximum of 14 days from randomization.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in