Communication ResearchNCT03333785
Randomized Trial of eOncoNote
A study testing eOncoNote in people with Communication Research and Breast Cancer, run by University of Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Improving Cancer Care Together through eOncoNote is a pragmatic randomized trial involving a secure online eConsultation system (referred to as eOncoNote) that will allow primary care providers and cancer specialist providers to communicate about their patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Communication Research, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- eOncoNote
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 181 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 5 Feb 2018to 17 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Patient inclusion criteria:
- at least 18 years of age,
- being in one of the following three cancer continuum specific phases:
- Diagnosis phase: patients referred to the Cancer Assessment Clinic with suspected colorectal, prostate, or lung cancer;
- Treatment phase: patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer, or radical or adjuvant radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer;
- Survivorship phase: patients referred to the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program post completion of their adjuvant therapy for either breast or colorectal cancer with the intent of being discharged for survivorship care to their own family physician;
- no prior history of cancer in the past 5 years (those with non-melanoma skin cancer can participate).
Patient exclusion criteria:
- Currently participating in another study requiring ongoing completion of patient reported outcome measures (such as quality of life measures) in order to minimize respondent burden,
- Does not have a primary care provider,
- Patients will be excluded if their primary care provider has another patient enrolled in the trial in order to control for contamination between randomization groups,
- Inability to read and write in English,
- Inability to provide informed consent, and
- In the survivorship phase, patients who are discharged to the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program nurse practitioner (rather than their primary care providers) will be excluded.
Primary care providers eligibility criteria:
- Licensed family physician or nurse practitioner,
- Their patient has consented to be enrolled in the study, and they do not have any other patients enrolled in the study (to avoid contamination between intervention and control groups),
- They are already registered on the Champlain BASE(TM) eConsult system prior to their patient being enrolled in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Improving Cancer Care Together Through eOncoNote
Improving Cancer Care Together through eOncoNote is a pragmatic randomized trial involving a secure online eConsultation system (referred to as eOncoNote) that will allow primary care providers and cancer specialist providers to communicate about their patients.
Read the detailed description
The overall objectives of this randomized trial are to test an intervention designed to improve coordination/continuity of care between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialist providers (CSPs), and to improve patient experience with regards to patients' perceived continuity of care. Participants will be patients at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre in any one of three phases of the cancer continuum: diagnosis (colorectal, prostate, or lung cancer), active treatment (breast or prostate cancer) or survivorship (breast or colorectal cancer). The intervention involves a secure online eConsultation system that will allow PCPs and CSPs to communicate about their patient. Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: 1) intervention group whereby their PCP and CSP will use a cancer-specific modification of the eConsultation system (eOncoNote) in addition to usual methods of communication or 2) control group receiving usual care (i.e. usual methods of communication such as telephone, fax, mailed consultation letters and progress notes). Randomization and outcomes will be at the level of the individual patient. The primary outcome is patients' perception of team/cross-boundary continuity. Secondary outcomes include measures of patients' anxiety and depression, and patients' experience of the care process. Qualitative methods including interviews with patients, PCPs, CSPs, and cancer system managers will also be conducted.
- Conditions
- Communication Research, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Lung Cancer, Program, Communication
- Being tested
- eOncoNote
- Keywords
- Primary Care, Oncology, Continuity of care, Integration of care, Communication
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Communication, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eOncoNoteBehavioural
- Diagnosis phase: The patient's nurse navigator will initiate an eOncoNote to the patient's PCP, inviting them to send any questions related to the patient's diagnostic process. The nurse navigator will initiate case closure after the diagnostic process has been completed (case will be open up to 4 months).
- Treatment phase: The patient's medical or radiation oncologist will initiate an eOncoNote to the patient's PCP inviting them to ask questions related to the patient's cancer treatment and/or request information related to the patient's co-morbidities. The oncologist will initiate case closure after the treatment has been completed.
- Survivorship phase: The patient's registered nurse within the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program will send an eOncoNote invitation to the patient's PCP inviting them to ask any questions as the patient transitions back to their care. The nurse will initiate case closure after one year.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Primary care providers whose patients have been randomized to the intervention group will receive an invitation from their patient's cancer specialist provider to communicate using eOncoNote. Primary care providers and cancer specialist providers will use eOncoNote in addition to usual methods of communication. Receives: Behavioral: eOncoNote |
| Control group | No intervention | Primary care providers whose patients have been randomized to the control group will receive usual care (i.e. their primary care providers will not access eOncoNote to communicate with the cancer specialist providers and vice versa) and will be able to contact each other via telephone, fax, and mail consultation letters and progress notes, as per usual care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Team/Cross Boundary Continuity subscale of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire
4-item subscale (scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree); calculate the mean of the items in the subscale
Measured: Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Anxiety
Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7); 7 items; 4 response options ("not at all" = 0; "several days" = 1; "more than half the days" = 2; "nearly every day" = 3)
Measured: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Depression
Patient Health Questionnaire on major depression (PHQ-9); 10 items in total; items 1-9: 4 response options ("not at all" = 0; "several days" = 1; "more than half the days" = 2; "nearly every day" = 3); item 10: four-point scale (ranging from "not difficult at all" to "extremely difficult")
Measured: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Patient experience of the care process
Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire (PPE-15); 15 items; each item scored as dichotomous score indicating presence or absence of a problem (defined as an aspect of health care that could be improved upon from the patient's perspective)
Measured: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2017
- Study start5 Feb 2018
- Primary completion31 Aug 2020
- Study completion17 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Communication ResearchStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Improving Cancer Care Together through eOncoNote is a concurrent mixed-methods hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation study design. Effectiveness of eOncoNote will be assessed by a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with individual patient randomization and outcomes measured at the patient level. Implementation will be assessed using a mixed methods process evaluation involving key stakeholders to assess barriers and facilitators to implementation of the intervention.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG), Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Eva Grunfeld, University of Toronto
- Investigators
- Eva Grunfeld, MD, DPhil, Principal investigator, University of TorontoSharon McGee, MD, Principal investigator, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03333785
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OHSN-REB#20170381-01H
- Other IDs
- 128272
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Petrovic B, Julian JA, Liddy C, Afkham A, McGee SF, Morgan SC, Segal R, Sussman J, Pond GR, O'Brien MA, Bender JL, Grunfeld E. Web-Based Asynchronous Tool to Facilitate Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Cancer Specialists: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 18;25:e40725. doi: 10.2196/40725.
PubMed 36652284
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Cancer Care Together Through eOncoNote
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03333785
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OHSN-REB#20170381-01H
- Conditions
- Communication Research, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, Lung Cancer, Program, Communication
- Keywords
- Primary Care, Oncology, Continuity of care, Integration of care, Communication
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (OCOG), Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre
- Study start
- 5 Feb 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Improving Cancer Care Together through eOncoNote is a pragmatic randomized trial involving a secure online eConsultation system (referred to as eOncoNote) that will allow primary care providers and cancer specialist providers to communicate about their patients.
Detailed description
The overall objectives of this randomized trial are to test an intervention designed to improve coordination/continuity of care between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialist providers (CSPs), and to improve patient experience with regards to patients' perceived continuity of care. Participants will be patients at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre in any one of three phases of the cancer continuum: diagnosis (colorectal, prostate, or lung cancer), active treatment (breast or prostate cancer) or survivorship (breast or colorectal cancer). The intervention involves a secure online eConsultation system that will allow PCPs and CSPs to communicate about their patient. Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: 1) intervention group whereby their PCP and CSP will use a cancer-specific modification of the eConsultation system (eOncoNote) in addition to usual methods of communication or 2) control group receiving usual care (i.e. usual methods of communication such as telephone, fax, mailed consultation letters and progress notes). Randomization and outcomes will be at the level of the individual patient. The primary outcome is patients' perception of team/cross-boundary continuity. Secondary outcomes include measures of patients' anxiety and depression, and patients' experience of the care process. Qualitative methods including interviews with patients, PCPs, CSPs, and cancer system managers will also be conducted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Improving Cancer Care Together through eOncoNote is a concurrent mixed-methods hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation study design. Effectiveness of eOncoNote will be assessed by a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with individual patient randomization and outcomes measured at the patient level. Implementation will be assessed using a mixed methods process evaluation involving key stakeholders to assess barriers and facilitators to implementation of the intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: eOncoNotePrimary care providers whose patients have been randomized to the intervention group will receive an invitation from their patient's cancer specialist provider to communicate using eOncoNote. Primary care providers and cancer specialist providers will use eOncoNote in addition to usual methods of communication. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Primary care providers whose patients have been randomized to the control group will receive usual care (i.e. their primary care providers will not access eOncoNote to communicate with the cancer specialist providers and vice versa) and will be able to contact each other via telephone, fax, and mail consultation letters and progress notes, as per usual care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eOncoNote* Diagnosis phase: The patient's nurse navigator will initiate an eOncoNote to the patient's PCP, inviting them to send any questions related to the patient's diagnostic process. The nurse navigator will initiate case closure after the diagnostic process has been completed (case will be open up to 4 months). * Treatment phase: The patient's medical or radiation oncologist will initiate an eOncoNote to the patient's PCP inviting them to ask questions related to the patient's cancer treatment and/or request information related to the patient's co-morbidities. The oncologist will initiate case closure after the treatment has been completed. * Survivorship phase: The patient's registered nurse within the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program will send an eOncoNote invitation to the patient's PCP inviting them to ask any questions as the patient transitions back to their care. The nurse will initiate case closure after one year. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Team/Cross Boundary Continuity subscale of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire
Time frame: Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months
4-item subscale (scored on a five-point scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree); calculate the mean of the items in the subscale
3 secondary outcomes
Anxiety
Time frame: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Depression
Time frame: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Patient experience of the care process
Time frame: (Follow-up 1 = Treatment: 1 month; Survivorship: 6 months); (Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36652284Petrovic B, Julian JA, Liddy C, Afkham A, McGee SF, Morgan SC, Segal R, Sussman J, Pond GR, O'Brien MA, Bender JL, Grunfeld E. Web-Based Asynchronous Tool to Facilitate Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Cancer Specialists: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 18;25:e40725. doi: 10.2196/40725.
- Champlain BASE eConsult WebsiteLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Communication Research
Recruiting
Evaluating AI for the Translation of KM Resources
Communication Research
Recruiting
Empower EI: Comparing Early Intervention Approaches to Improve Communication in Toddlers With Developmental Delays
Developmental Delays
RecruitingObservational study
FOXP1 Syndrome: The Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment is Characterizing FOXP1-related Neurodevelopmental Disorders Using Genetic, Medical, and Neuropsychological Measures.
FOXP1, Mental Retardation With Language Impairment and With or Without Autistic Features
Active, not recruiting
Let's Know!2: Language-focused Intervention for Children at Risk of Comprehension Difficulties
Language Disorders in Children
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The Fundamentals of Communication in Surgery
Communication Research, Communication Programs
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eva Grunfeld, MD, DPhil principal investigator
University of Toronto
Sharon McGee, MD principal investigator
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing eOncoNote in people with Communication Research and Breast Cancer, run by University of Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Team/Cross Boundary Continuity subscale of the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (time frame: Follow-up 2 = Diagnosis: 2 weeks; Treatment: 4 months for prostate cancer patients, 6 months for breast cancer patients; Survivorship: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03333785, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.