AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes)IMOVENCT03333837

Improvisational Movement for People With Memory Loss and Their Caregivers

A study testing Dance Group, Non-Group Dance and Social Group in people with Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) and Dementia, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dementia is a progressive decline in cognition that impairs a person's ability to perform activities of daily living. Changes in mood, gait, and balance are prominent secondary symptoms of Alzheimer's dementia that can dramatically decrease quality of life for the person with dementia and increase caregiver burden. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Dance Group, Non-Group Dance and Social Group
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
104 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Feb 2018to 26 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 60-85 years
  • Adjudicated as having mild cognitive impairment or early-stage dementia of Alzheimer's, vascular, or mixed Alzheimer's/vascular type
  • MRI compatible
  • English speaking
  • Have study partner who is around the person with dementia approximately 10 hours/week and is willing to be an active study partner.
  • Able to attend bi-weekly intervention classes or come to study visits for no-contact control.
  • Not enrolled in another interventional study for at least 3 months prior to beginning this study.

Who cannot join

  • Untreated depression
  • Other causes of dementia (for example, frontotemporal, early onset, Lewy body or Parkinsonian dementia)
  • Current cancer treatment or other major medical problems that might independently affect cognition or movement
  • Other neurological disorders (e.g., Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis)
  • Taking medication that could negatively influence safety during intervention
  • Planned extensive travel during the study period
  • Any reason for which the study doctor or personal physician feels the intervention is contraindicated for the participant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wake Forest Baptist Health

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27104

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: IMOVE: Improvisational Movement for People With Memory Loss and Their Caregivers

Dementia is a progressive decline in cognition that impairs a person's ability to perform activities of daily living. Changes in mood, gait, and balance are prominent secondary symptoms of Alzheimer's dementia that can dramatically decrease quality of life for the person with dementia and increase caregiver burden. The overall aim of this study is to determine the independent and combined effects of dance movement and social engagement on quality of life in people with early-stage dementia, and test the neural mechanisms of these effects.

Read the detailed description

Dementia is a progressive decline in cognition that impairs a person's ability to perform activities of daily living. Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of dementia, the most common neurodegenerative disease in older adults, and the 6th leading cause of death in the US. Neuropsychiatric symptoms (apathy, depression, anxiety) and altered gait and balance are prominent secondary symptoms of Alzheimer's disease that increase medical costs and decrease quality of life for both the person with dementia and their caregiver.

In a report from the Secretariat (Executive Board, 134th Session, December 20th, 2013), the World Health Organization identified a need to integrate evidence-based palliative care services into the continuum of care for serious chronic diseases, including Alzheimer's disease. However, two recent NIH workshops identified major gaps in the evidence supporting the wider use of non-pharmacologic activities to ameliorate secondary symptoms of chronic disease. Arts-based activities were identified as particularly understudied for symptom management, given growing evidence that various arts-based activities can improve quality of life, relieve symptoms, and reduce reliance on medications. It is important that these benefits can be achieved without adding medications. Dance is an arts-based activity that can improve quality of life, decrease symptoms of depression, and improve balance in healthy older adults, those with Parkinson disease, and Alzheimer's disease. Thus, dance is a non-pharmacological intervention that simultaneously addresses two sets of prominent secondary symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: 1) gait and balance and 2) neuropsychiatric symptoms. However, the mechanisms through which dance exerts these effects are unknown.

Pilot data from the investigators' laboratory suggest that participating in a group improvisational movement class twice weekly improved balance and connectivity in motor-related brain regions, as well as improving mood and connectivity in brain regions associated with social engagement. Improvisation is the ability to create new gestures and movements spontaneously. Improvisation can be a part of many different art forms. However, improvisational movement can also be practiced as a specific dance form. The objective in improvisational movement is that choreographed movement is replaced by a cue or prompt that allows the possibility for multiple responses. This unique form of dance is especially well-suited for people with dementia because it: 1) does not rely heavily on memory of repeated movements; 2) can be seamlessly adapted to include sitting, standing, or moving around the room; 3) is cognitively challenging; and 4) fosters a social, playful atmosphere. Participants seemed to benefit from both the social nature of the class and the movement. Therefore, the overall aim of this proposal is to experimentally determine the independent and combined effects of dance movement and social engagement on quality of life in people with early stage dementia, and test the neural mechanisms of these effects.

To accomplish this goal, the investigators will use a 2x2 factorial design and randomize 120 community-dwelling older adults adjudicated as having early-stage dementia of the presumed Alzheimer's type to one of four 3-month interventions: 1) Dance Group, 2) Non-group Dance, 3) Social Group, or 4) No Contact Control.

It is not hypothesized that dance affects the underlying disease course, and therefore no improvement is expected in cognition.

Being tested
Dance Group, Non-Group Dance, Social Group, No Contact
Keywords
Improvisation, Memory loss, Caregivers, Quality of Life, Dance, Social Group, MRI, mild cognitive impairment, MCI, Social engagement
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease, Dementia, Cognitive Dysfunction, Memory Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dance GroupBehavioural

    Active imagination refers to working with imagery and is crucial in improvisatory practice. Verbal auditory cues are used to create movement scenarios that cue or activate the motor imagination. Variability means the improvisational method does not aim to learn a specific movement pattern and habituate to it. Cues are delivered quickly, one after another. Within an average of two minutes, tasks requiring quicker decision-making are introduced. Pacing is the rate at which new movement prompts are presented. Quick changes in pace avoid defaulting to habitual responses, thereby facilitating new movement options. Participants cannot rely on copying another, memory, or anticipation to address the motor problem.

  • Non-Group DanceBehavioural

    The caregiver will be asked to stay in the area while the subject is dancing. A video camera will be affixed in an upper corner of the room to record individual dance sessions. This recording will yield data that a trained student or staff member can view and code to document movement fidelity (e.g., that the person has responded to the dance prompts and for the purpose of comparing the amount of quality of movements that occur in individual vs. group dance settings). For the first two sessions, study staff would observe the full dance session from outside the room to be sure that instruction was clear and adherence was attained, and that no safety issues arise.

  • Social GroupBehavioural

    The social group will consist of improvisational party games to foster curiosity and playfulness, use imagery, and encourage non-judgment. Games that may be used include 'Balderdash', 'Wise and Otherwise', 'Charades', 'Pictionary', and 'Tell Me A Story' cards. These games will also use the same core strategies as the dance group. Games will be varied within an hour-long session to incorporate pacing and variability into the social group, akin to the dance group. The social group will occur 2x/week for 1 hour each time and be led by the same instructors who lead the Dance Group, to control for effects of personality of the group leader.

  • No ContactBehavioural

    The condition of not receiving an intervention can have ethical implications and reduce retention rates. Therefore, these participants will be invited to join in a weekly community improvisational dance class after they complete the study, for as many sessions as they would like.

Study groups in NCT03333837
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dance GroupActive comparatorThe Dance Group will participate in 1-hour group improvisational dance lessons 2x/week for 12 weeks. Improvisational dance classes are grounded in 4 principles that shape the tone of the class and result in a sense of social belonging: non-judgment, non-competitiveness, curiosity, and playfulness. The following training strategies are used to maintain: active imagination, variability, and pacing.
Receives: Behavioral: Dance Group
Non-group DanceActive comparatorThe Non-group dance intervention is designed to capture the same dance movement and auditory stimuli as the group class without social interaction. Recordings of the dance instructor teaching a dance class will be played. This will ensure participants hear comparable music and receive comparable verbal auditory cues to prompt dance movements that students in the group class will hear, without interacting with other people. Improvisational dance is particularly suited for this means of delivery because the primary method of instruction is verbal auditory cueing. Participants will be asked to follow the same schedule as participants in the Dance Group arm and complete 2 one-hour dance sessions each week.
Receives: Behavioral: Non-Group Dance
Social GroupActive comparatorThe social group will consist of improvisational party games to foster curiosity and playfulness, use imagery, and encourage non-judgment. Games that may be used include 'Balderdash', 'Wise and Otherwise', 'Charades', 'Pictionary', and 'Tell Me A Story' cards. These games will also use the same core strategies as the dance group. Games will be varied within an hour-long session to incorporate pacing and variability into the social group, akin to the dance group. The social group will occur 2x/week for 1 hour each time and be led by the same instructors who lead the Dance Group, to control for effects of personality of the group leader.
Receives: Behavioral: Social Group
No ContactSham comparatorA No Contact condition captures the condition of no added social contact and no added dance movement. Participants randomized to the No Contact condition will be asked to continue their current disease management and lifestyle for 12 weeks
Receives: Behavioral: No Contact

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD)--Participants With Dementia (PWD)

    Self-reported quality of life in the person with dementia is the primary outcome and will be measured using the QOL-AD . The QOL-AD is validated for use in people with Mini Mental State Exam scores as low as 10.The QOL_AD contains 13 items.Points are assigned to each item as follows: poor = 1, fair = 2, good = 3, excellent = 4.The total score is the sum of all 13 item (range 13- 52) higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. QOL-AD--PWD

    Self-reported quality of life in the person with dementia is the primary outcome and will be measured using the QOL-AD . The QOL-AD is validated for use in people with Mini Mental State Exam scores as low as 10.The QOL_AD contains 13 items.Points are assigned to each item as follows: poor = 1, fair = 2, good = 3, excellent = 4.The total score is the sum of all 13 item (range 13- 52) higher scores represent better outcomes.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Community Structure--PWD

    This is a brain imaging variable derived from fMRI images. Modularity (Q) ranges from 0 (no community structure) to 1 (perfectly modular network). One Q-value is generated for each person and group averages are shown.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Community Structure--PWD

    This is a brain imaging variable derived from fMRI images. Modularity (Q) ranges from 0 (no community structure) to 1 (perfectly modular network). One Q-value is generated for each person and group averages are shown.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Global Efficiency (eGlob)--PWD

    This is a brain imaging variable derived from fMRI images.Scale ranges from 0 (no long-range information processing) to 1 (maximal distributed processing). Decreased Eglob has been associated with aging, cognitive impairment, and depression.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Global Efficiency (eGlob)--PWD

    This is a brain imaging variable derived from fMRI images.Scale ranges from 0 (no long-range information processing) to 1 (maximal distributed processing). Decreased Eglob has been associated with aging, cognitive impairment, and depression.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. Local Efficiency (eLoc)--PWD

    Scale ranges from 0 (no local connectivity) to 1 (maximal local connectivity - all connections are local) and has been observed to change with cognitive impairment and depression.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Local Efficiency (eLoc)--PWD

    Scale ranges from 0 (no local connectivity) to 1 (maximal local connectivity - all connections are local) and has been observed to change with cognitive impairment and depression.

    Measured: Week 12

  7. Path Length--PWD

    Refers to the number of edges that must be crossed to get from one node to another. Longer path length in people with AD has been associated with slower cognitive performance, beta amyloid deposition, and depression.

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Path Length--PWD

    Refers to the number of edges that must be crossed to get from one node to another. Longer path length in people with AD has been associated with slower cognitive performance, beta amyloid deposition, and depression.

    Measured: Week 12

  9. Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (Overall Balance) PWD

    Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB) measures balance using 10 different performance-based tests (scored 0 worst - 4 best), including; standing with feet together and eyes closed, standing on a foam pad with eyes closed, walking while turning the head from side to side rhythmically, functional standing reach, turning around to the left and right, stepping up and over a 6-inch box, standing on one leg, and a test for postural reaction. The scale goes from 0-40 with 40 being the best outcome and a cutoff of <=25 for risk of falls.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (Overall Balance) PWD

    Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB) measures balance using 10 different performance-based tests (scored 0 worst - 4 best), including; standing with feet together and eyes closed, standing on a foam pad with eyes closed, walking while turning the head from side to side rhythmically, functional standing reach, turning around to the left and right, stepping up and over a 6-inch box, standing on one leg, and a test for postural reaction. The scale goes from 0-40 with 40 being the best outcome and a cutoff of <=25 for risk of falls.

    Measured: Week 12

  11. Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES) PWD

    A 16-item scale to assess fear of falling where higher scores reflect a higher fear and risk of falling. Out of a total score of 100, a score of 70 or above indicates the individual has a fear of falling.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES) PWD

    A 16-item scale to assess fear of falling where higher scores reflect a higher fear and risk of falling. Out of a total score of 100, a score of 70 or above indicates the individual has a fear of falling.

    Measured: Week 12

  13. Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q)

    The NPI is a reliable and valid structured interview designed to assess neuropsychiatric symptoms in person with dementia through a structured interview with the caregiver. The NPI includes questions about 12 domains of symptoms: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, elation/ euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor activity, sleep, and eating. For each, symptom severity is scored on a scale of 0-4, with 4 being the worst outcome and caregiver distress is scored on a scale from 0-5, with 5 being the worst outcome. The sum of all 12 domains is calculated. Severity scores are reported here with a range from 0-36 with a higher score reflecting greater symptom severity.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. NPI-Q

    The NPI is a reliable and valid structured interview designed to assess neuropsychiatric symptoms in person with dementia through a structured interview with the caregiver. The NPI includes questions about 12 domains of symptoms: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression, anxiety, elation/ euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor activity, sleep, and eating. For each, symptom severity is scored on a scale of 0-4, with 4 being the worst outcome and caregiver distress is scored on a scale from 0-5, with 5 being the worst outcome. The sum of all 12 domains is calculated. Severity scores are reported here with a range from 0-36 with a higher score reflecting greater symptom severity.

    Measured: Week 12

  15. Geriatric Depression Scale

    The person with dementia will be asked to complete a screening tool for assessing depression. This test has 15 yes/no questions with a yes receiving 1 point for a depressive answer. A total score is calculated and will be on a scale from 0-15 with 0-4 indicating no depression, 5-10 suggestive of a mild depression, and 11+ suggestive of severe depression.

    Measured: Baseline

  16. Geriatric Depression Scale

    The person with dementia will be asked to complete a screening tool for assessing depression. This test has 15 yes/no questions with a yes receiving 1 point for a depressive answer. A total score is calculated and will be on a scale from 0-15 with 0-4 indicating no depression, 5-10 suggestive of a mild depression, and 11+ suggestive of severe depression.

    Measured: Week 12

  17. Geriatric Anxiety Scale

    The Geriatric Anxiety Scale measures symptoms of anxiety in older adults. A single total score ranges from 0 (low anxiety) to 63 (high anxiety). Four cutoff scores have been provided by authors in the manuals: 0-7 (normal anxiety), 8-15 (mild-moderate anxiety), 16-25 (moderate-severe anxiety), and 26-63 (severe anxiety).

    Measured: Baseline

  18. Geriatric Anxiety Scale

    The Geriatric Anxiety Scale measures symptoms of anxiety in older adults. A single total score ranges from 0 (low anxiety) to 63 (high anxiety). Four cutoff scores have been provided by authors in the manuals: 0-7 (normal anxiety), 8-15 (mild-moderate anxiety), 16-25 (moderate-severe anxiety), and 26-63 (severe anxiety).

    Measured: Week 12

  19. Apathy Evaluation Scale--PWD

    The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) addresses characteristics of goal directed behavior that reflect apathy including behavioral, cognitive, and emotional indicators. A short form will be used that has been modified for use with people with dementia. This shortened version has 10 questions scored 1-4 with 4 being the positive outcome answer. The total score is calculated and on a scale of 10-40 with lower scores reflecting less apathy and thus a better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline

  20. Apathy Evaluation Scale--PWD

    The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) addresses characteristics of goal directed behavior that reflect apathy including behavioral, cognitive, and emotional indicators. A short form will be used that has been modified for use with people with dementia. This shortened version has 10 questions scored 1-4 with 4 being the positive outcome answer. The total score is calculated and on a scale of 10-40 with lower scores reflecting less apathy and thus a better outcome.

    Measured: Week 12

  21. Expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB)

    The eSPPB is a brief test of global mobility function with excellent test-retest and inter-examiner reliability; is sensitive to change; is safe, and is a robust predictor of future physical disability and death. To avoid ceiling effects, investigators will use an expanded version (eSPPB) that increases the difficulty of the standing balance task by asking participants to hold postures for 30 instead of 10 seconds, adds a one-leg stand, and adds a narrow walk. The resulting score is normally distributed, continuous, and shows greater sensitivity to change. Dementia patients have lower scores on the SPPB so a favorable outcome for this outcome measure would be a significantly higher score post treatment. The eSPPB is scored as a continuous measure with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 3.0 where 3 is the best possible outcome.

    Measured: Baseline

  22. Expanded Short Physical Performance Battery (eSPPB)

    The eSPPB is a brief test of global mobility function with excellent test-retest and inter-examiner reliability; is sensitive to change; is safe, and is a robust predictor of future physical disability and death. To avoid ceiling effects, investigators will use an expanded version (eSPPB) that increases the difficulty of the standing balance task by asking participants to hold postures for 30 instead of 10 seconds, adds a one-leg stand, and adds a narrow walk. The resulting score is normally distributed, continuous, and shows greater sensitivity to change. Dementia patients have lower scores on the SPPB so a favorable outcome for this outcome measure would be a significantly higher score post treatment. The eSPPB is scored as a continuous measure with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 3.0 where 3 is the best possible outcome.

    Measured: Week 12

  23. Postural Sway--PWD

    Center of pressure displacement (area of the 95% confidence ellipse) using an AccuSway forceplate. Center of pressure displacement is one way to characterize postural sway. Increased postural sway is correlated with decreased balance in older adults and increased fall risk. Center of pressure displacement was measured using the area of the 95% confidence ellipse using an AccuSway forceplate. Higher numbers indicate greater levels of postural sway.

    Measured: Baseline

  24. Postural Sway--PWD

    Center of pressure displacement (area of the 95% confidence ellipse) using an AccuSway forceplate. Center of pressure displacement is one way to characterize postural sway. Increased postural sway is correlated with decreased balance in older adults and increased fall risk. Center of pressure displacement was measured using the area of the 95% confidence ellipse using an AccuSway forceplate. Higher numbers indicate greater levels of postural sway.

    Measured: Week 12

  25. Gait Speed--PWD

    The time one takes to walk a specified distance on level surfaces over a short distance. 4m usual gait speed was measured as part of the eSPPB.

    Measured: Baseline

  26. Gait Speed--PWD

    The time one takes to walk a specified distance on level surfaces over a short distance. 4m usual gait speed was measured as part of the eSPPB.

    Measured: Week 12

  27. Gait Variability--PWD

    Stride time variability, which is calculated out of the mean and standard deviation of stride time, reflects the change in time elapsed between the first two contacts of two consecutive footfalls of the same foot over a number of gait cycles. Increased gait variability is associated with increased fall risk in older adults.

    Measured: Baseline

  28. Gait Variability--PWD

    Stride time variability, which is calculated out of the mean and standard deviation of stride time, reflects the change in time elapsed between the first two contacts of two consecutive footfalls of the same foot over a number of gait cycles. Increased gait variability is associated with increased fall risk in older adults.

    Measured: Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2017
  2. Study start6 Feb 2018
  3. Primary completion26 May 2021
  4. Study completion26 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized controlled trial. Investigators will use a 2x2 factorial design to test the separate and combined effects of social engagement and dance movement on QoL in 120 community-dwelling older adults adjudicated as having mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or early-stage dementia of the presumed AD or mixed AD/vascular type. Participants will be randomized to one of four 12-week interventions: 1) Dance Group 2) Non-group Dance, 3) Social Group, or 4) No Contact Control.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
104 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03333837
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00042460
Other IDs
R01AT009444
Acronym
IMOVE
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
1 Nov 2017
Last updated
27 Jul 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Alzheimer's Association. 2013 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Mar;9(2):208-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.003.

    PubMed 23507120
  • Gaugler JE, Yu F, Krichbaum K, Wyman JF. Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia. Med Care. 2009 Feb;47(2):191-8. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31818457ce.

    PubMed 19169120
  • Okura T, Langa KM. Caregiver burden and neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults with cognitive impairment: the Aging, Demographics, and Memory Study (ADAMS). Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2011 Apr-Jun;25(2):116-21. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e318203f208.

    PubMed 21192239
  • Schubert CC, Boustani M, Callahan CM, Perkins AJ, Hui S, Hendrie HC. Acute care utilization by dementia caregivers within urban primary care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov;23(11):1736-40. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0711-0. Epub 2008 Aug 9.

    PubMed 18690489
  • Committee, S.o.t.F., State of the Field Report: Arts in Healthcare 2009, 2009, Society for the Arts in Healthcare: Washington, DC.

  • Verghese J, Lipton RB, Katz MJ, Hall CB, Derby CA, Kuslansky G, Ambrose AF, Sliwinski M, Buschke H. Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2508-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022252.

    PubMed 12815136
  • Verghese J. Cognitive and mobility profile of older social dancers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Aug;54(8):1241-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00808.x.

    PubMed 16913992
  • Coubard OA, Duretz S, Lefebvre V, Lapalus P, Ferrufino L. Practice of contemporary dance improves cognitive flexibility in aging. Front Aging Neurosci. 2011 Sep 20;3:13. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2011.00013. eCollection 2011.

    PubMed 21960971
  • Earhart GM. Dance as therapy for individuals with Parkinson disease. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009 Jun;45(2):231-8.

    PubMed 19532110
  • Hackney, M.E., S. Kantorovich, and G.M. Earhart, A study of the effects of Argentine tango as a form of partnered dance for those with Parkinson disease and the healthy elderly. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 2007. 29(2): p. 109-127.

  • Hui E, Chui BT, Woo J. Effects of dance on physical and psychological well-being in older persons. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2009 Jul-Aug;49(1):e45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2008.08.006. Epub 2008 Oct 5.

    PubMed 18838181
  • Shanahan J, Morris ME, Bhriain ON, Saunders J, Clifford AM. Dance for people with Parkinson disease: what is the evidence telling us? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jan;96(1):141-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.017. Epub 2014 Sep 16.

    PubMed 25223491
  • Sharp K, Hewitt J. Dance as an intervention for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Nov;47:445-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

    PubMed 25268548
  • Tjaden K. Speech and Swallowing in Parkinson's Disease. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2008;24(2):115-126. doi: 10.1097/01.TGR.0000318899.87690.44.

    PubMed 19946386
  • Adam D, Ramli A, Shahar S. Effectiveness of a Combined Dance and Relaxation Intervention on Reducing Anxiety and Depression and Improving Quality of Life among the Cognitively Impaired Elderly. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016 Feb;16(1):e47-53. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2016.16.01.009. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

    PubMed 26909213

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dance Group, Non-Group Dance and Social Group in people with Alzheimer's Disease (Incl Subtypes) and Dementia, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (QOL-AD)--Participants With Dementia (PWD) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03333837, which also lists 103 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in