Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionNCT03336060
Neurophysiologic Correlates of Movement Planning During Complex Jump Landing Tasks and the Role of Cognitive Function
An observational study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, run by Goethe University at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
To examine the long-term effects of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and reconstructions (after successful rehabilitation) on cortical processes of motor planning during complex jump landing tasks and the relevance of cognitive performance measures for landing stability, respectively knee injury risk. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 40 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- What is being tested?
- Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing Task
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2017to 30 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 40 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Cases: Healthy male participants (18 - 40 lifeyears) with unilateral ACL reconstruction and succesfull rehabilitation Controls: Healthy male participants (18 - 40 lifeyears)
Who may be able to join
- male (18 - 40 years, right-handed)
- sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer)
- Only cases:
- unilateral, primary anterior cruciate ligament tear and reconstruction (1-10yrs ago)
- no serious concomitant injuries (e.g. "unhappy triad")
- no kinesiophobia
- symmetric single leg jump performance (>85 %)
Who cannot join
- acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases
- any medication
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Goethe University Department of Sports Medicine
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60487
Winfried Banzer, Prof, 06979824482, banzer@sport.uni-frankfurt.de
Florian Giesche, M.Sc., 06979824482, Giesche@sport.uni-frankfurt.de
About this study
Official title: Long-term Effects of ACL Reconstruction Surgery on Neurophysiologic Correlates of Movement Planning During Complex Jump Landing Tasks and the Role of Neuropsychological Performance Measures: An Explorative Cross-sectional Study
To examine the long-term effects of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and reconstructions (after successful rehabilitation) on cortical processes of motor planning during complex jump landing tasks and the relevance of cognitive performance measures for landing stability, respectively knee injury risk.
Read the detailed description
Particularly, in the context of ball sports ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are among the most frequent injuries. However, the ACL tear does not only result in a loss of mechanical stability in the knee joint: the tear of the ligament and the subsequent reconstructive surgery lead to a massive damage of so-called mechanoreceptors (proprioceptors). These small sensors provide the brain with precise information on the tension of the cruciate ligament and the position of the knee joint. Due to this feedback, it is possible for humans to adjust the activity of the stabilizing muscles to various situations in sports and daily life and to protect the knee from injuries. Thus, coordination deficits are common consequences after ACL-rupture and reconstruction due to the poorer sensory feedback.
New findings provide evidence that the injury-induced damage of the mechanoreceptors also causes persistent, neuronal reorganisations in the brain (injury induced neuroplasticity). These relate in particular to the motor cortex by which voluntary movements are controlled. According to the results of imaging (eg. functional magnetic resonance tomography; MRI) and electrophysiological studies (eg. Electroencephalography; EEG), these neurologic adaptation appear to persist far beyond the resumption of daily, sporting or competitive activities. Researchers suggest that these adaptations of the central nervous system might be the underlying cause of the frequently observed, persistent motor control and functional deficits (eg. muscle strength and muscle activation deficits), the relatively high re-injury, low return to sports rates and small proportions returning to their initial performance level after ACL tears and reconstruction. A pure restoration of the neuromuscular function without the elimination of the neuroplastic changes in the brain does therefore not appear sufficient.
In recent studies the effects of ACL trauma on brain activity have been investigated exclusively during unspecific, sport- and injury-unrelated tests (eg. simple flexion and extension movements and angular reproduction tasks of the knee). Often, injuries to the ACL occur under unpredictable conditions, especially in complex, dynamic movements such as changes of direction, jumps and landings. Here, the brain has to process information from the receptors of the ACL as quickly as possible to initiate an adequate motor response to protect the knee.
Against the background of the above described findings, this cross-sectional case-control study will firstly investigate the effects of completely healed ACL tears and reconstruction (side symmetry of neuromuscular performance measures above 85%) on movement planning related cortical activity (via Electroencephalography) measures during complex jump-landing tasks: The study participants perform counter-movement jumps (n=80; CMJ, flight time approximately 500 ms) followed by single leg landings. While under an anticipated condition (n=40), the individuals receive the visual information (presented on a screen) on which leg/ foot (left, right) they are required to land before self-initiated CMJs, the individuals will receive this information under the non-anticipated condition (n=40) only after take-off (approximately 400 ms before ground contact). The measurement of the landing stability is standardized by means of selected biomechanical parameters (capacitive force platform). Injury-relevant, cognitive characteristics (e.g., reaction, information processing speed and working memory) are detected by computer and paper-based clinical cognition tests.
The investigators hypothesize that the injury-related neurological adjustments in the motor cortex lead to a more intensive motor action planning before movement initiation (compensation of sensory deficits). The increased use of neuronal capacities for movement planning could subsequently lead to a slower or to unprecise motor responses to unforeseen/ non-anticipated events and subsequently cause greater landing instability, or increase the knee injury risk, respectively. It is also assumed that a lower cognitive information processing is associated with a more instable landing, or a higher risk of injury or higher injury incidence rate, respectively.
- Being tested
- Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing Task
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing TaskDiagnostic test
The study participants perform counter-movement jumps (CMJ, flight time approximately 500 ms) followed by single leg landings. While under an anticipated condition, the individuals receive the visual information (presented on a screen) on which leg/ foot (left, right) they are required to land before self-initiated CMJs, the individuals will receive this information under the non-anticipated condition only after take-off (approximately 400 ms before ground contact).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Control | Age matched healthy subjects. Inclusion criteria for healthy controls are: male (18 - 40 years, right-handed); sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer); no acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases; no medication Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing Task | |
| Subjects with ACL reconstruction | Unilateral, primary anterior cruciate ligament tear and reconstruction (1 to 10 years ago); no serious concomitant injuries, e.g. "unhappy triad"); no kinesiophobia; symmetric single leg jump performance (>85 %); male (18 - 40 years, right-handed); sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer); no acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases; no medication Receives: Diagnostic Test: Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing Task |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Bereitschaftspotential - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures
Determined via Electroencephalography as amplitude in microvolt [μV] and latency in milliseconds [ms] before initiation of jump movement
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day
Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)/ low beta-band power - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures
Determined via Electroencephalography in microvolt^2 [μV²]
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day
Frontal theta-band power - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures
Determined via Electroencephalography in microvolt^2 [μV²]
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, SMR/ low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day
Secondary outcomes (19)
Peak ground reaction force - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings
Determined via capacitive force platform: Biomechanical outcome measure of single leg jump-landing (Newton [N])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)
Time to stabilisation - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings
Determined via capacitive force platform: Biomechanical outcome measure of single leg jump-landing (seconds [s])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)
Center of pressure sway - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings
Determined via capacitive force platform: Biomechanical outcome measure of single leg jump-landing (in millimeter [mm])^2 [μV²])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)
Visual perceptual ability - Lower cognitive function
Determined via pen and paper tests: Trail Making Test A (Time for task completion in seconds [s])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Reaction time/ processing speed - Lower cognitive function
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test (mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses in milliseconds [ms])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 10 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Working memory - Higher cognitive function
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test (One card learning test: Speed of performance (mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses) and Accuracy of performance (arcsine transformation of the square root of the proportion of correct responses); Digit Span Task: Number of correct reproduced digits)
Measured: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 10 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Cognitive flexibility - Higher cognitive function
Determined via pen and paper test: Trail-Making-Test B vs. A (time for task completion in seconds [s])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Inhibitory control - Higher cognitive function
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test: Stop-Signal-Task (Stop signal reaction time in milliseconds [ms])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 15 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Interference control - Higher cognitive function
Determined via pen and paper test: Stroop-Test (Time for task completion in seconds [s])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Kinesiophobia (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via questionnaire (Tampa scale)
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Self-reported knee function (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via questionnaire (Lysholm knee score)
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Physical activities (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via questionnaire (IPAQ)
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Sport activities (current and past; subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via questionnaire
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Risk behaviour (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via questionnaire (DOSPERT scale)
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Musculoskeletal injuries (current and past; subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via questionnaire
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Single and both legs jump performance (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via motor testing (in centimeter [cm])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Single leg jump symmetry (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via motor testing (in percent [%])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Static postural control (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via motor testing (in millimeter [mm])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Visuomotor reaction time (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Determined via computer-based neuropsychological test (in milliseconds [ms])
Measured: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2017
- Study start1 Oct 2017
- Primary completion31 May 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Goethe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Dr. Dr. Winfried Banzer, Goethe University
- Investigators
- Winfried Banzer, Prof, Principal investigator, Head of Department; Goethe University Department of Sports Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03336060
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SpM2016-006
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Giesche F, Engeroff T, Wilke J, Niederer D, Vogt L, Banzer W. Neurophysiological correlates of motor planning and movement initiation in ACL-reconstructed individuals: a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e023048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023048.
PubMed 30232114
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Long-term Effects of ACL Reconstruction Surgery on Neurophysiologic Correlates of Movement Planning During Complex Jump Landing Tasks and the Role of Neuropsychological Performance Measures: An Explorative Cross-sectional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03336060
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SpM2016-006
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Goethe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To examine the long-term effects of anterior cruciate ligament injuries and reconstructions (after successful rehabilitation) on cortical processes of motor planning during complex jump landing tasks and the relevance of cognitive performance measures for landing stability, respectively knee injury risk.
Detailed description
Particularly, in the context of ball sports ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are among the most frequent injuries. However, the ACL tear does not only result in a loss of mechanical stability in the knee joint: the tear of the ligament and the subsequent reconstructive surgery lead to a massive damage of so-called mechanoreceptors (proprioceptors). These small sensors provide the brain with precise information on the tension of the cruciate ligament and the position of the knee joint. Due to this feedback, it is possible for humans to adjust the activity of the stabilizing muscles to various situations in sports and daily life and to protect the knee from injuries. Thus, coordination deficits are common consequences after ACL-rupture and reconstruction due to the poorer sensory feedback.
New findings provide evidence that the injury-induced damage of the mechanoreceptors also causes persistent, neuronal reorganisations in the brain (injury induced neuroplasticity). These relate in particular to the motor cortex by which voluntary movements are controlled. According to the results of imaging (eg. functional magnetic resonance tomography; MRI) and electrophysiological studies (eg. Electroencephalography; EEG), these neurologic adaptation appear to persist far beyond the resumption of daily, sporting or competitive activities. Researchers suggest that these adaptations of the central nervous system might be the underlying cause of the frequently observed, persistent motor control and functional deficits (eg. muscle strength and muscle activation deficits), the relatively high re-injury, low return to sports rates and small proportions returning to their initial performance level after ACL tears and reconstruction. A pure restoration of the neuromuscular function without the elimination of the neuroplastic changes in the brain does therefore not appear sufficient.
In recent studies the effects of ACL trauma on brain activity have been investigated exclusively during unspecific, sport- and injury-unrelated tests (eg. simple flexion and extension movements and angular reproduction tasks of the knee). Often, injuries to the ACL occur under unpredictable conditions, especially in complex, dynamic movements such as changes of direction, jumps and landings. Here, the brain has to process information from the receptors of the ACL as quickly as possible to initiate an adequate motor response to protect the knee.
Against the background of the above described findings, this cross-sectional case-control study will firstly investigate the effects of completely healed ACL tears and reconstruction (side symmetry of neuromuscular performance measures above 85%) on movement planning related cortical activity (via Electroencephalography) measures during complex jump-landing tasks: The study participants perform counter-movement jumps (n=80; CMJ, flight time approximately 500 ms) followed by single leg landings. While under an anticipated condition (n=40), the individuals receive the visual information (presented on a screen) on which leg/ foot (left, right) they are required to land before self-initiated CMJs, the individuals will receive this information under the non-anticipated condition (n=40) only after take-off (approximately 400 ms before ground contact). The measurement of the landing stability is standardized by means of selected biomechanical parameters (capacitive force platform). Injury-relevant, cognitive characteristics (e.g., reaction, information processing speed and working memory) are detected by computer and paper-based clinical cognition tests.
The investigators hypothesize that the injury-related neurological adjustments in the motor cortex lead to a more intensive motor action planning before movement initiation (compensation of sensory deficits). The increased use of neuronal capacities for movement planning could subsequently lead to a slower or to unprecise motor responses to unforeseen/ non-anticipated events and subsequently cause greater landing instability, or increase the knee injury risk, respectively. It is also assumed that a lower cognitive information processing is associated with a more instable landing, or a higher risk of injury or higher injury incidence rate, respectively.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy Control | – | Diagnostic Test: Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing TaskAge matched healthy subjects. Inclusion criteria for healthy controls are: male (18 - 40 years, right-handed); sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer); no acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases; no medication |
| Subjects with ACL reconstruction | – | Diagnostic Test: Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing TaskUnilateral, primary anterior cruciate ligament tear and reconstruction (1 to 10 years ago); no serious concomitant injuries, e.g. "unhappy triad"); no kinesiophobia; symmetric single leg jump performance (>85 %); male (18 - 40 years, right-handed); sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer); no acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases; no medication |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 40 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Cases: Healthy male participants (18 - 40 lifeyears) with unilateral ACL reconstruction and succesfull rehabilitation Controls: Healthy male participants (18 - 40 lifeyears)
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- male (18 - 40 years, right-handed)
- sportive (preferably ball game sports, e.g. soccer)
- unilateral, primary anterior cruciate ligament tear and reconstruction (1-10yrs ago)
- no serious concomitant injuries (e.g. "unhappy triad")
- no kinesiophobia
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- acute injury or life-quality impairing diseases
- any medication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cortical Correlates of Jump Landing TaskThe study participants perform counter-movement jumps (CMJ, flight time approximately 500 ms) followed by single leg landings. While under an anticipated condition, the individuals receive the visual information (presented on a screen) on which leg/ foot (left, right) they are required to land before self-initiated CMJs, the individuals will receive this information under the non-anticipated condition only after take-off (approximately 400 ms before ground contact). | Diagnostic test | Healthy Control, Subjects with ACL reconstruction |
Primary outcome
Bereitschaftspotential - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day
Determined via Electroencephalography as amplitude in microvolt [μV] and latency in milliseconds [ms] before initiation of jump movement
Sensorimotor rhythm (SMR)/ low beta-band power - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day
Determined via Electroencephalography in microvolt^2 [μV²]
Frontal theta-band power - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, SMR/ low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day
Determined via Electroencephalography in microvolt^2 [μV²]
19 secondary outcomes
Peak ground reaction force - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)
Time to stabilisation - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)
Center of pressure sway - Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Biomechanical outcome measures of single leg jump-landings are assessed simultaneously with primary outcome assessment (during same 4 hours on one day)
Visual perceptual ability - Lower cognitive function
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Reaction time/ processing speed - Lower cognitive function
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 10 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Working memory - Higher cognitive function
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 10 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Cognitive flexibility - Higher cognitive function
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Inhibitory control - Higher cognitive function
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 15 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Interference control - Higher cognitive function
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Timeframe for Assessment is 5 minutes (during congnitive function assessment, separate day as primary outcome assessment)
Kinesiophobia (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Self-reported knee function (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Physical activities (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Sport activities (current and past; subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Risk behaviour (subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Musculoskeletal injuries (current and past; subjective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Single and both legs jump performance (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Single leg jump symmetry (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Static postural control (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Visuomotor reaction time (objective measure) - Potential confounder
Time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessments is 5 minutes (same day as cognitive function assessment)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Mar 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30232114Giesche F, Engeroff T, Wilke J, Niederer D, Vogt L, Banzer W. Neurophysiological correlates of motor planning and movement initiation in ACL-reconstructed individuals: a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 19;8(9):e023048. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023048.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Not yet recruiting
Stair Biomechanics and Vibration Study After ACLR
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR), Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Not yet recruiting
Nerve Block of the Vastus Medialis and Anterior Obturator Branch in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With DIDT Graft
Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Supporting Athletes' Return to Sports After ACL Reconstruction: A Study of a Psychological Readiness Program
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Recruiting
Interventions to Enhance Quadriceps Output After ACLR
ACL
Recruiting
Graded Exposure and Mindfulness Meditation for Patients Post-ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Winfried Banzer, Prof principal investigator
Head of Department; Goethe University Department of Sports Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, run by Goethe University at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Winfried Banzer, Prof (06979824482, Banzer@sport.uni-frankfurt.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Bereitschaftspotential - Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (time frame: Cross sectional design. Time Frame for Assessment of Movement planning associated cortical activity measures (Bereitschaftspotential, low beta-band power, frontal theta-band power) is 4 hours on one day). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03336060, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2018.