Hypovolemia Due to Acute Blood LossPhase 4TETHYSNCT03338218
Safety and Efficacy of a 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Trauma Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Volulyte 6% and Ionolyte in people with Hypovolemia Due to Acute Blood Loss, run by Fresenius Kabi at 22 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to investigate the safety of a 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) in trauma patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypovolemia Due to Acute Blood Loss
- What is being tested?
- Volulyte 6% and Ionolyte
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 238 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Feb 2019to 25 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female adult patients ≥18 years of age. Women of child bearing potential must test negative on standard pregnancy test (urine or serum) (as soon as possible during emergency care)
- Patients with blunt or penetrating trauma suffering from estimated blood loss of ≥ 500 ml
- Initial surgery deemed necessary within 24 hrs after trauma
- Deferred signed written informed consent form or as locally required
- No signs of intracranial or cerebral hemorrhage
- Administration of less than 15 ml/kg body weight colloid between trauma injury and hospital admission.
Who cannot join
- Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the other excipients of the Investigational Products
- Body weight ≥ 140 kg
- Patients expected to die within 24h after traumatic injury
- Sepsis
- Burns
- Renal impairment (AKIN stage ≥ 1 or chronic) or acute and/or chronic Renal Replacement Therapy
Show all 19Show fewer
- Critically ill patients (typically admitted to the intensive care unit)
- Hyperhydration
- Pulmonary edema
- Dehydration
- Hyperkalemia
- Severe hypernatremia
- Severe hyperchloremia
- Severely impaired hepatic function
- Congestive heart failure
- Severe coagulopathy
- Organ transplant patients
- Metabolic alkalosis
- Simultaneous participation in another interventional clinical trial (drugs or medical devices studies)
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 7 countries.
22 sites in 7 countries
South Africa8 sites
Groote Schuur Hospital
Cape Town
Gama Research Centre Emergency Department, Leratong Hospital
Germiston
Gama Research Centre
Germiston
Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital
Johannesburg
Trident Clinical, Homestead Medical Centre
Kimberley
Steve Biko Academic Hospital
Pretoria
FCRN Clinical Trials Centre
Vereeniging
Clinical Projects Research SA
Worcester
Germany4 sites
Universitätsklinikum Aachen
Aachen
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
Dresden
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
Kiel
Spain3 sites
Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid
Hospital Clinico Universitario
Valencia
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic la Fe
Valencia
Czechia2 sites
Fakultni nemocnice Brno
Brno
Military University Hospital
Prague
France2 sites
CHRU Nancy - Hôpital Central
Nancy
Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg
Netherlands2 sites
Academic Medical Center (AMC) Anesthesiology
Amsterdam
University Medical Center (UMC) Maastricht
Maastricht
About this study
Official title: Pragmatic, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Multinational Study on the Safety and Efficacy of a 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Trauma Patients
The aim of the study is to investigate the safety of a 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) in trauma patients.
- Conditions
- Hypovolemia Due to Acute Blood Loss
- Being tested
- Volulyte 6%, Ionolyte
- Keywords
- Hydroxyethyl starch, HES, HES 130
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Volulyte 6%Drug
Also called Hydroxyethyl starch 130
Solution for infusion
IonolyteDrug
Also called Ionolyte Electrolyte Solution
Solution for infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Volulyte 6% | Experimental | Volulyte 6% solution for infusion Receives: Drug: Volulyte 6% |
| Ionolyte | Active comparator | Ionolyte solution for infusion Receives: Drug: Ionolyte |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Composite endpoint of 90 day mortality and 90 day renal failure defined as biomarker increase as defined by AKIN stage 2 or RIFLE injury stage or need for RRT at any time during the first 3 months.
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (40)
Serum creatinine
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Cystatin-C
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Cystatin-C-based mean estimated glomerular filtration rate
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
AKIN stages
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Highest AKIN stage reached on each day during the first week
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
RIFLE stages
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Urine output (if available)
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Days on Renal Replacement Therapy
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Platelet count
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
International normalized ratio
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Activated partial thromboplastin time
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Adverse Events
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Mortality
Measured: 90 days after randomization
Length of Stay in ICU/hospital
Measured: 90 days after randomization
C-reactive protein
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Hours on mechanical ventilation
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Total volume of administered investigational products
Measured: until 24 hours after investigational product treatment start
Fluid balance
Sum of volume of all intravenous medication (including investigational product and blood products) minus sum of volume of urine output (if available), drainage and estimated due to surgeries and trauma
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Heart rate
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Temperature
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Mean arterial pressure
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Systolic arterial blood pressure
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Diastolic arterial blood pressure
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Central venous pressure (if available)
Measured: 7 days post-trauma
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Partial pressure of oxygen
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Bicarbonate
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Arterial oxygen saturation
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Hemoglobin
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Hematocrit
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
pH
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Base excess
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Lactate
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Central venous oxygen saturation (if available)
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Serum sodium
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Serum potassium
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Serum calcium
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Serum chloride
Measured: 3 days post-trauma
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2017
- Study start23 Feb 2019
- Primary completion25 Jun 2022
- Study completion25 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hypovolemia Due to Acute Blood LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 238 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fresenius Kabi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- B. Braun Melsungen AG, European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wolfgang F. Buhre, Prof. Dr. med., Study chair, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03338218
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HC-G-H-1505
- Other IDs
- HE06-021-CP4
- Acronym
- TETHYS
- Status last verified
- Aug 2022
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Palma CD, Mamba M, Geldenhuys J, Fadahun O, Rossaint R, Zacharowski K, Brand M, Diaz-Cambronero O, Belda J, Westphal M, Brauer U, Dormann D, Dehnhardt T, Hernandez-Gonzalez M, Schmier S, de Korte D, Plani F, Buhre W. PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study. Trials. 2022 Jun 2;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06390-x.
PubMed 35655234Chappell D, Jacob M. Should hydroxyethyl starch be banned? Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):118. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31174-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 30017128
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pragmatic, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Multi-centre, Multinational Study on the Safety and Efficacy of a 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch (HES) Solution Versus an Electrolyte Solution in Trauma Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03338218
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TETHYS / HC-G-H-1505
- Conditions
- Hypovolemia Due to Acute Blood Loss
- Keywords
- Hydroxyethyl starch, HES, HES 130
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 238 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fresenius KabiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- B. Braun Melsungen AG, European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
- Study start
- 23 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to investigate the safety of a 6% hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) in trauma patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Volulyte 6% | Experimental | Drug: Volulyte 6%Volulyte 6% solution for infusion |
| Ionolyte | Active comparator | Drug: IonolyteIonolyte solution for infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or female adult patients ≥18 years of age. Women of child bearing potential must test negative on standard pregnancy test (urine or serum) (as soon as possible during emergency care)
- Patients with blunt or penetrating trauma suffering from estimated blood loss of ≥ 500 ml
- Initial surgery deemed necessary within 24 hrs after trauma
- Deferred signed written informed consent form or as locally required
- No signs of intracranial or cerebral hemorrhage
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the other excipients of the Investigational Products
- Body weight ≥ 140 kg
- Patients expected to die within 24h after traumatic injury
- Sepsis
- Burns
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Volulyte 6%Also: Hydroxyethyl starch 130Solution for infusion | Drug | Volulyte 6% |
| IonolyteAlso: Ionolyte Electrolyte SolutionSolution for infusion | Drug | Ionolyte |
Primary outcome
Composite endpoint of 90 day mortality and 90 day renal failure defined as biomarker increase as defined by AKIN stage 2 or RIFLE injury stage or need for RRT at any time during the first 3 months.
Time frame: 90 days
40 secondary outcomes
Serum creatinine
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Cystatin-C
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Cystatin-C-based mean estimated glomerular filtration rate
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
AKIN stages
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Highest AKIN stage reached on each day during the first week
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
RIFLE stages
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Urine output (if available)
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Days on Renal Replacement Therapy
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Platelet count
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
International normalized ratio
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Activated partial thromboplastin time
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Adverse Events
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Mortality
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
Length of Stay in ICU/hospital
Time frame: 90 days after randomization
C-reactive protein
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Hours on mechanical ventilation
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Total volume of administered investigational products
Time frame: until 24 hours after investigational product treatment start
Fluid balance
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Heart rate
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Temperature
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Mean arterial pressure
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Systolic arterial blood pressure
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Diastolic arterial blood pressure
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Central venous pressure (if available)
Time frame: 7 days post-trauma
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Partial pressure of oxygen
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Bicarbonate
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Arterial oxygen saturation
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Hemoglobin
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Hematocrit
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
pH
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Base excess
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Lactate
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Central venous oxygen saturation (if available)
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Serum sodium
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Serum potassium
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Serum calcium
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Serum chloride
Time frame: 3 days post-trauma
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35655234Palma CD, Mamba M, Geldenhuys J, Fadahun O, Rossaint R, Zacharowski K, Brand M, Diaz-Cambronero O, Belda J, Westphal M, Brauer U, Dormann D, Dehnhardt T, Hernandez-Gonzalez M, Schmier S, de Korte D, Plani F, Buhre W. PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study. Trials. 2022 Jun 2;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06390-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30017128Chappell D, Jacob M. Should hydroxyethyl starch be banned? Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):118. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31174-7. No abstract available.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wolfgang F. Buhre, Prof. Dr. med. study chair
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
22 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Volulyte 6% and Ionolyte in people with Hypovolemia Due to Acute Blood Loss, run by Fresenius Kabi at 22 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in South Africa, Germany, Spain, Czechia, France and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Composite endpoint of 90 day mortality and 90 day renal failure defined as biomarker increase as defined by AKIN stage 2 or RIFLE injury stage or need for RRT at any time during the first 3 months. (time frame: 90 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03338218, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2022.