Diabetes in PregnancyNCT03338829
Incentives and Glucose Adherence in Diabetes
A study testing Positive incentive and Loss aversion in people with Diabetes in Pregnancy, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Diabetes in pregnancy carries significant pregnancy specific risks and requires frequent glucose monitoring to reduce these risks. This project compares the effect of two incentive schemes on adherence rates of glucose testing in pregnancy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes in Pregnancy
- What is being tested?
- Positive incentive and Loss aversion
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 May 2016to 30 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- pregnant women with insulin dependent diabetes prior to 29 weeks gestation.
Who cannot join
- incarcerated, not English speaking
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52246
About this study
Official title: Incentive Models on Testing Adherence for Women With Diabetes During Pregnancy
Diabetes in pregnancy carries significant pregnancy specific risks and requires frequent glucose monitoring to reduce these risks. This project compares the effect of two incentive schemes on adherence rates of glucose testing in pregnancy.
Read the detailed description
Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with increased risks of maternal and fetal complications and can be challenging to manage due to increasing insulin requirements with advancing gestational age. Based on standard of care guidelines, patients with diabetes check their blood glucose at least 4 times per day. Optimal management requires frequent glucose self-monitoring and active management of abnormal blood sugars and medications by clinicians. Poorly controlled diabetes has both significant maternal and neonatal consequences: Improving test adherence could benefit both the pregnant woman and her fetus. In this study, we propose to test the effect of two incentive schemes on rates of glucose monitoring on pregnant women with diabetes requiring medication.
Pregnant women with diabetes requiring medication are invited to participate if they meet specific inclusion criteria (<29 weeks) and followed in our outpatient clinic. Participants are randomized into one of three groups:
- control group - receive compensation at time of enrollment,
- positive incentive group - receive compensation per test completed
- loss aversion group - receive between a range of compensation depending on their overall level of adherence.
Primary outcome of the study is frequency of prescribed glucose testing in pregnancy
- Conditions
- Diabetes in Pregnancy
- Being tested
- Positive incentive, Loss aversion
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes, Gestational
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Positive incentiveBehavioural
Compensation is paid for each glucose test completed
Loss aversionBehavioural
Fixed compensation is offered to patients and they can earn a range of compensation at the completion of pregnancy depending on overall glucose testing adherence
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | The control arm will receive compensation at time of enrollment for agreeing to participate. |
| Positive Incentive | Experimental | The positive incentive arm will receive compensation per prescribed test, payable every month based on testing adherence. Receives: Behavioral: Positive incentive |
| Loss Aversion | Experimental | The loss aversion arm will have compensation deposited into a University of Iowa Women's Health account. The participant will then "lose" compensation depending on actual adherence to recommended testing Receives: Behavioral: Loss aversion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of Glucose Monitoring
Patients with type 1 diabetes were advised to monitor glucose seven times daily (fasting, 1hour post breakfast, pre- lunch, 1 hour post lunch, pre-dinner and 1 hour post dinner and nightly). Patients with type 2 and gestational diabetes were advised to have four glucose tests daily (fasting and 1hour post breakfast, lunch and dinner). Adherence to glucose testing was determined by the number of tests daily divided by the # of recommended tests daily and averaged over the course of the study as previously described
Measured: Pregnancy
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2017
- Study start5 May 2016
- Primary completion18 Dec 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes in PregnancyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Iowa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janet Andrews, MD, Principal investigator, University of Iowa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03338829
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201603724
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Wernimont SA, Sheng JS, Tymkowicz A, Fleener DK, Summers KM, Syrop CH, Andrews JI. Adherence to self-glucose monitoring recommendations and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Aug;1(3):100031. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100031. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
PubMed 33345801Homko CJ, Reece EA. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002 Dec;12(6):389-95. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.6.389.395.
PubMed 12683649de Veciana M, Major CA, Morgan MA, Asrat T, Toohey JS, Lien JM, Evans AT. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 9;333(19):1237-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511093331901.
PubMed 7565999Halpern SD, French B, Small DS, Saulsgiver K, Harhay MO, Audrain-McGovern J, Loewenstein G, Brennan TA, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Randomized trial of four financial-incentive programs for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2108-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414293. Epub 2015 May 13.
PubMed 25970009Sen AP, Sewell TB, Riley EB, Stearman B, Bellamy SL, Hu MF, Tao Y, Zhu J, Park JD, Loewenstein G, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Financial incentives for home-based health monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 May;29(5):770-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2778-0. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
PubMed 24522623Yee LM, McGuire JM, Taylor SM, Niznik CM, Simon MA. "I Was Tired of All the Sticking and Poking": Identifying Barriers to Diabetes Self-Care Among Low-Income Pregnant Women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):926-40. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0073.
PubMed 26320923Higgins ST, Washio Y, Heil SH, Solomon LJ, Gaalema DE, Higgins TM, Bernstein IM. Financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant and newly postpartum women. Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55 Suppl(Suppl):S33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.016. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
PubMed 22227223Cosson E, Baz B, Gary F, Pharisien I, Nguyen MT, Sandre-Banon D, Jaber Y, Cussac-Pillegand C, Banu I, Carbillon L, Valensi P. Poor Reliability and Poor Adherence to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Are Common in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and May Be Associated With Poor Pregnancy Outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep;40(9):1181-1186. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0369. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
PubMed 28724718Tappin D, Bauld L, Purves D, Boyd K, Sinclair L, MacAskill S, McKell J, Friel B, McConnachie A, de Caestecker L, Tannahill C, Radley A, Coleman T; Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial Team. Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015 Jan 27;350:h134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h134.
PubMed 25627664Wernimont SA, Fleener D, Summers KM, Deonovic B, Syrop CH, Andrews JI. The Effect of Financial Incentives on Adherence to Glucose Self-Monitoring during Pregnancy among Patients with Insulin-Requiring Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e259-e266. doi: 10.1055/a-1889-7765. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
PubMed 35777732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Incentive Models on Testing Adherence for Women With Diabetes During Pregnancy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03338829
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201603724
- Conditions
- Diabetes in Pregnancy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of IowaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 May 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Jul 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diabetes in pregnancy carries significant pregnancy specific risks and requires frequent glucose monitoring to reduce these risks. This project compares the effect of two incentive schemes on adherence rates of glucose testing in pregnancy.
Detailed description
Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with increased risks of maternal and fetal complications and can be challenging to manage due to increasing insulin requirements with advancing gestational age. Based on standard of care guidelines, patients with diabetes check their blood glucose at least 4 times per day. Optimal management requires frequent glucose self-monitoring and active management of abnormal blood sugars and medications by clinicians. Poorly controlled diabetes has both significant maternal and neonatal consequences: Improving test adherence could benefit both the pregnant woman and her fetus. In this study, we propose to test the effect of two incentive schemes on rates of glucose monitoring on pregnant women with diabetes requiring medication.
Pregnant women with diabetes requiring medication are invited to participate if they meet specific inclusion criteria (<29 weeks) and followed in our outpatient clinic. Participants are randomized into one of three groups:
- control group - receive compensation at time of enrollment,
- positive incentive group - receive compensation per test completed
- loss aversion group - receive between a range of compensation depending on their overall level of adherence.
Primary outcome of the study is frequency of prescribed glucose testing in pregnancy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –The control arm will receive compensation at time of enrollment for agreeing to participate. |
| Positive Incentive | Experimental | Behavioral: Positive incentiveThe positive incentive arm will receive compensation per prescribed test, payable every month based on testing adherence. |
| Loss Aversion | Experimental | Behavioral: Loss aversionThe loss aversion arm will have compensation deposited into a University of Iowa Women's Health account. The participant will then "lose" compensation depending on actual adherence to recommended testing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- pregnant women with insulin dependent diabetes prior to 29 weeks gestation.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- incarcerated, not English speaking
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Positive incentiveCompensation is paid for each glucose test completed | Behavioural | Positive Incentive |
| Loss aversionFixed compensation is offered to patients and they can earn a range of compensation at the completion of pregnancy depending on overall glucose testing adherence | Behavioural | Loss Aversion |
Primary outcome
Frequency of Glucose Monitoring
Time frame: Pregnancy
Patients with type 1 diabetes were advised to monitor glucose seven times daily (fasting, 1hour post breakfast, pre- lunch, 1 hour post lunch, pre-dinner and 1 hour post dinner and nightly). Patients with type 2 and gestational diabetes were advised to have four glucose tests daily (fasting and 1hour post breakfast, lunch and dinner). Adherence to glucose testing was determined by the number of tests daily divided by the # of recommended tests daily and averaged over the course of the study as previously described
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 33345801Wernimont SA, Sheng JS, Tymkowicz A, Fleener DK, Summers KM, Syrop CH, Andrews JI. Adherence to self-glucose monitoring recommendations and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2019 Aug;1(3):100031. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2019.100031. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
- Background: PubMed 12683649Homko CJ, Reece EA. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002 Dec;12(6):389-95. doi: 10.1080/jmf.12.6.389.395.
- Background: PubMed 7565999de Veciana M, Major CA, Morgan MA, Asrat T, Toohey JS, Lien JM, Evans AT. Postprandial versus preprandial blood glucose monitoring in women with gestational diabetes mellitus requiring insulin therapy. N Engl J Med. 1995 Nov 9;333(19):1237-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199511093331901.
- Background: PubMed 25970009Halpern SD, French B, Small DS, Saulsgiver K, Harhay MO, Audrain-McGovern J, Loewenstein G, Brennan TA, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Randomized trial of four financial-incentive programs for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 28;372(22):2108-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414293. Epub 2015 May 13.
- Background: PubMed 24522623Sen AP, Sewell TB, Riley EB, Stearman B, Bellamy SL, Hu MF, Tao Y, Zhu J, Park JD, Loewenstein G, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Financial incentives for home-based health monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 May;29(5):770-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2778-0. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 26320923Yee LM, McGuire JM, Taylor SM, Niznik CM, Simon MA. "I Was Tired of All the Sticking and Poking": Identifying Barriers to Diabetes Self-Care Among Low-Income Pregnant Women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):926-40. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0073.
- Background: PubMed 22227223Higgins ST, Washio Y, Heil SH, Solomon LJ, Gaalema DE, Higgins TM, Bernstein IM. Financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant and newly postpartum women. Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55 Suppl(Suppl):S33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.12.016. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 28724718Cosson E, Baz B, Gary F, Pharisien I, Nguyen MT, Sandre-Banon D, Jaber Y, Cussac-Pillegand C, Banu I, Carbillon L, Valensi P. Poor Reliability and Poor Adherence to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Are Common in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and May Be Associated With Poor Pregnancy Outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep;40(9):1181-1186. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0369. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 25627664Tappin D, Bauld L, Purves D, Boyd K, Sinclair L, MacAskill S, McKell J, Friel B, McConnachie A, de Caestecker L, Tannahill C, Radley A, Coleman T; Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial Team. Financial incentives for smoking cessation in pregnancy: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2015 Jan 27;350:h134. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h134.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35777732Wernimont SA, Fleener D, Summers KM, Deonovic B, Syrop CH, Andrews JI. The Effect of Financial Incentives on Adherence to Glucose Self-Monitoring during Pregnancy among Patients with Insulin-Requiring Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e259-e266. doi: 10.1055/a-1889-7765. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes in Pregnancy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study on the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Guominkang in the Treatment of Diabetic Kidney Disease
Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD), Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Urinary Vitamin C Loss in Diabetic Subjects
Diabetes
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Role of ET-1, Physical Activity, and Sedentary Behavior in Microvascular Dysfunction Following GDM
Gestational Diabetes, Endothelial Dysfunction
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Metformin for the Treatment of Microvascular Dysfunction After Gestational Diabetes
Gestational Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Vasopressin and Pain Perception in the Brain
Acute Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janet Andrews, MD principal investigator
University of Iowa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Positive incentive and Loss aversion in people with Diabetes in Pregnancy, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jul 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of Glucose Monitoring (time frame: Pregnancy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03338829, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2025.