Obesity, MorbidBaSENCT03339791
Sleeve Versus Bypass in Older Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
A study testing Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass in people with Obesity, Morbid and Surgery, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to compare two different bariatric procedures performed in patients with 65 years or more: gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Primary outcomes will be weight loss, control of comorbidities and morbidity of the operation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity, Morbid, Surgery, Elderly
- What is being tested?
- Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2017to 16 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- BMI over 40 Kg/m2 for at least 5 years with failure of obesity medical treatments
- BMI over 35 Kg/m2 with at least 2 comorbidities and failure of medical treatments
Who cannot join
- prior bariatric surgery
- clinical or psychological conditions that contraindicate bariatric surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP
São Paulo, 05403-000
About this study
Official title: Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity in Patients With 65 Years or Older: a Randomized Controlled Trial - The "BaSE" Trial - Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly.
The aim of the study is to compare two different bariatric procedures performed in patients with 65 years or more: gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Primary outcomes will be weight loss, control of comorbidities and morbidity of the operation. Secondary outcomes are related to functionality, that will be evaluated with specific tests.
Read the detailed description
Introduction: Surgical treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age is controversial. For patients in this age group, there is a prevailing concept that the risk / benefit ratio of the procedure should be evaluated for each individual patient, without determining objective criteria or outcomes that characterize this benefit. Increased surgical risk in patients older than 65 years is undoubtedly a limiting factor for the broader indication of bariatric surgery in this population. The two most applied surgical techniques are Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Most of the studies that evaluated the two techniques in elderly patients are retrospective, prospective non-randomized, or contemplated only one technique. Recent, studies concluded that in the elderly the weight loss with Gastric Bypass was higher, but the surgical morbidity with the Sleeve was lower and there was no difference in the resolution of comorbidities between the two techniques. In evaluating the benefits of surgery, most studies address outcomes such as weight loss and control of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities. Outcomes that are specific to the treatment of obesity in the elderly, such as improvement of functionality, decreased fragility and improvement of the quality of life have not been studied yet. In this field, there is concern that excessive weight loss, accompanied by loss of muscle mass may compromise the mentioned parameters, especially in individuals who already have loss of bone and muscle mass before surgery. For this reason, the assessment of bone mass and body composition in the preoperative period of these individuals is fundamental. In order to identify the benefits of weight loss promoted by surgery and life expectancy, the elderly patients in preparation for operation at the Bariatric Surgery Unit of the Hospital das Clinicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine are submitted to a geriatric evaluation, which includes the analysis of their functional dependency profile, Important prognostic factor in this population. Objectives: The primary objective of the study will be to evaluate surgical morbidity and short-term (weight loss, comorbid control) outcomes of surgical treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age, comparing two techniques: Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and Gastric Bypass (GB). The secondary objective will be to evaluate the body composition of the individuals, before and after the surgery, comparing the two techniques. Patients and methods: This is a prospective study, in which 40 consecutive patients, aged 65 years and over, will be admitted to the Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit of the Discipline of Digestive System Surgery of Hospital das Clinicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine with indication criteria for bariatric surgery. Patients will be randomized into two groups according to the surgical technique to be used: SG or GB. Data related to surgical morbidity, weight loss, control of comorbidities, nutritional deficiencies, changes in body composition and functionality will be evaluated and compared after a follow-up of at least 12 months.
- Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid, Surgery, Elderly
- Being tested
- Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastric Bypass
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Morbid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sleeve GastrectomyProcedure or surgery
Also called Vertical gastrectomy
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Technique: complete mobilization of the greater curvature and gastric fundus up to the angle of Hiss; stapling beginning at 3 to 4 cm away from the pylorus; bougie size 32 French; oversuture of the staple line; hiatoplasty in selected cases; routine drainage of the abdominal cavity
Gastric BypassProcedure or surgery
Also called Roux-en_y Gastric Bypass
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass. Technique: Pouch size 30 to 40 ml, biliopancreatic limb 70 to 100 cm, alimentary limb 100 to 120 cm, antecolic, routine closure of the mesenterial defects, routine drainage of the abdominal cavity
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sleeve | Active comparator | Morbid obese patients, 65 years old or more, submitted to Sleeve Gastrectomy Receives: Procedure: Sleeve Gastrectomy |
| Bypass | Active comparator | Morbid obese patients, 65 years old or more, submitted to Gastric Bypass Receives: Procedure: Gastric Bypass |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total Weight loss
Weight loss measured in percentage of weight loss (%WL)
Measured: 1 year
Surgical Complications
Bleeding, Leakage, Fistula, Bowel obstruction
Measured: 30 days
Mortality
mortality
Measured: 90 days
Improvement of Type II diabetes
Measure of glycated hemoglobin
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Improvement of hypertension
measure of blood pressure (mmHg)
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Improvement of LDL
measure of LDL
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Clinical complications
cardiac, pulmonary, other
Measured: 30 days
Excess weight loss
excess weight loss (%EWL); considering the normal weight the equivalent to the BMI 25 Kg/m2
Measured: 1 year
Improvement of hypertension by use of medication
evaluation of the number of drugs used to treat hypertension
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Improvement of HDL
measure of HDL
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Improvement of triglycerides
measure of triglycerides
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
Functionality
Functionality specific test (Activities of Day living)
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Body composition
Dexa (Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) body composition study
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Functionality
Functionality specific test (Instrumental activities of day living)
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Functionality
Time up and go test
Measured: baseline and 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Nov 2017
- Study start23 Sep 2017
- Primary completion7 Nov 2017
- Study completion16 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obesity, MorbidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Denis Pajecki, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Investigators
- Denis Pajecki, Principal investigator, Hospital das Clinicas - Faculdade de Medicina da USP
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03339791
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 68401117.4.0000.0068
- Acronym
- BaSE
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The plan is to publish the complete data after the end of the study
Publications
Maghrabi AH, Wolski K, Abood B, Licata A, Pothier C, Bhatt DL, Nissen S, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Schauer PR, Kashyap SR. Two-year outcomes on bone density and fracture incidence in patients with T2DM randomized to bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Dec;23(12):2344-8. doi: 10.1002/oby.21150. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
PubMed 26193177Abbas M, Cumella L, Zhang Y, Choi J, Vemulapalli P, Melvin WS, Camacho D. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients Older than 60. Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2251-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1712-9.
PubMed 26001882Pajecki D, Santo MA, Kanagi AL, Riccioppo D, de Cleva R, Cecconello I. Functional assessment of older obese patients candidates for bariatric surgery. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan-Mar;51(1):25-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000100006.
PubMed 24760060Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, Dakin G, Inabnet WB, Saif T. Comparison of fat-free mass in super obesity (BMI >/= 50 kg/m2) and morbid obesity (BMI <50 kg/m2) in response to different weight loss surgeries. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
PubMed 22118843
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Treatment of Severe Obesity in Patients With 65 Years or Older: a Randomized Controlled Trial - The "BaSE" Trial - Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03339791
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BaSE / 68401117.4.0000.0068
- Conditions
- Obesity, Morbid, Surgery, Elderly
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to compare two different bariatric procedures performed in patients with 65 years or more: gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Primary outcomes will be weight loss, control of comorbidities and morbidity of the operation. Secondary outcomes are related to functionality, that will be evaluated with specific tests.
Detailed description
Introduction: Surgical treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age is controversial. For patients in this age group, there is a prevailing concept that the risk / benefit ratio of the procedure should be evaluated for each individual patient, without determining objective criteria or outcomes that characterize this benefit. Increased surgical risk in patients older than 65 years is undoubtedly a limiting factor for the broader indication of bariatric surgery in this population. The two most applied surgical techniques are Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Most of the studies that evaluated the two techniques in elderly patients are retrospective, prospective non-randomized, or contemplated only one technique. Recent, studies concluded that in the elderly the weight loss with Gastric Bypass was higher, but the surgical morbidity with the Sleeve was lower and there was no difference in the resolution of comorbidities between the two techniques. In evaluating the benefits of surgery, most studies address outcomes such as weight loss and control of metabolic and cardiovascular comorbidities. Outcomes that are specific to the treatment of obesity in the elderly, such as improvement of functionality, decreased fragility and improvement of the quality of life have not been studied yet. In this field, there is concern that excessive weight loss, accompanied by loss of muscle mass may compromise the mentioned parameters, especially in individuals who already have loss of bone and muscle mass before surgery. For this reason, the assessment of bone mass and body composition in the preoperative period of these individuals is fundamental. In order to identify the benefits of weight loss promoted by surgery and life expectancy, the elderly patients in preparation for operation at the Bariatric Surgery Unit of the Hospital das Clinicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine are submitted to a geriatric evaluation, which includes the analysis of their functional dependency profile, Important prognostic factor in this population. Objectives: The primary objective of the study will be to evaluate surgical morbidity and short-term (weight loss, comorbid control) outcomes of surgical treatment of obesity in patients over 65 years of age, comparing two techniques: Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and Gastric Bypass (GB). The secondary objective will be to evaluate the body composition of the individuals, before and after the surgery, comparing the two techniques. Patients and methods: This is a prospective study, in which 40 consecutive patients, aged 65 years and over, will be admitted to the Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery Unit of the Discipline of Digestive System Surgery of Hospital das Clinicas University of São Paulo School of Medicine with indication criteria for bariatric surgery. Patients will be randomized into two groups according to the surgical technique to be used: SG or GB. Data related to surgical morbidity, weight loss, control of comorbidities, nutritional deficiencies, changes in body composition and functionality will be evaluated and compared after a follow-up of at least 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sleeve | Active comparator | Procedure: Sleeve GastrectomyMorbid obese patients, 65 years old or more, submitted to Sleeve Gastrectomy |
| Bypass | Active comparator | Procedure: Gastric BypassMorbid obese patients, 65 years old or more, submitted to Gastric Bypass |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- BMI over 40 Kg/m2 for at least 5 years with failure of obesity medical treatments
- BMI over 35 Kg/m2 with at least 2 comorbidities and failure of medical treatments
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- prior bariatric surgery
- clinical or psychological conditions that contraindicate bariatric surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sleeve GastrectomyAlso: Vertical gastrectomyLaparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. Technique: complete mobilization of the greater curvature and gastric fundus up to the angle of Hiss; stapling beginning at 3 to 4 cm away from the pylorus; bougie size 32 French; oversuture of the staple line; hiatoplasty in selected cases; routine drainage of the abdominal cavity | Procedure or surgery | Sleeve |
| Gastric BypassAlso: Roux-en_y Gastric BypassLaparoscopic Gastric Bypass. Technique: Pouch size 30 to 40 ml, biliopancreatic limb 70 to 100 cm, alimentary limb 100 to 120 cm, antecolic, routine closure of the mesenterial defects, routine drainage of the abdominal cavity | Procedure or surgery | Bypass |
Primary outcome
Total Weight loss
Time frame: 1 year
Weight loss measured in percentage of weight loss (%WL)
Surgical Complications
Time frame: 30 days
Bleeding, Leakage, Fistula, Bowel obstruction
Mortality
Time frame: 90 days
mortality
Improvement of Type II diabetes
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
Measure of glycated hemoglobin
Improvement of hypertension
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
measure of blood pressure (mmHg)
Improvement of LDL
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
measure of LDL
Clinical complications
Time frame: 30 days
cardiac, pulmonary, other
Excess weight loss
Time frame: 1 year
excess weight loss (%EWL); considering the normal weight the equivalent to the BMI 25 Kg/m2
Improvement of hypertension by use of medication
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
evaluation of the number of drugs used to treat hypertension
Improvement of HDL
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
measure of HDL
Improvement of triglycerides
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
measure of triglycerides
4 secondary outcomes
Functionality
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
Body composition
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
Functionality
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
Functionality
Time frame: baseline and 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2020.
- Background: PubMed 26193177Maghrabi AH, Wolski K, Abood B, Licata A, Pothier C, Bhatt DL, Nissen S, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Schauer PR, Kashyap SR. Two-year outcomes on bone density and fracture incidence in patients with T2DM randomized to bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Dec;23(12):2344-8. doi: 10.1002/oby.21150. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 26001882Abbas M, Cumella L, Zhang Y, Choi J, Vemulapalli P, Melvin WS, Camacho D. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Patients Older than 60. Obes Surg. 2015 Dec;25(12):2251-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1712-9.
- Background: PubMed 24760060Pajecki D, Santo MA, Kanagi AL, Riccioppo D, de Cleva R, Cecconello I. Functional assessment of older obese patients candidates for bariatric surgery. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014 Jan-Mar;51(1):25-8. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000100006.
- Background: PubMed 22118843Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, Dakin G, Inabnet WB, Saif T. Comparison of fat-free mass in super obesity (BMI >/= 50 kg/m2) and morbid obesity (BMI <50 kg/m2) in response to different weight loss surgeries. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012 May-Jun;8(3):255-9. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The plan is to publish the complete data after the end of the study
Related trials for Obesity, Morbid
Active, not recruiting
Comparing 150cm OAGB With 150cm Biliopancreatic Limb RYGB. A Non-inferiority Trial
Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Obesity
Active, not recruiting
Mindfulness Based Eating Awareness Training for Bariatric Surgery Patients
Obesity, Morbid, Eating Disorder Symptom
RecruitingPhase 3
Fiber and Metformin Combination Therapy in Adolescents With Severe Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Obesity, Childhood, Insulin Resistance
RecruitingPhase 4
Optimizing Portal Hypertension With TIPS and Interval Metabolic Surgery for Advanced Liver Disease
Liver Cirrhoses, Portal Hypertension Related to Cirrhosis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Mibavademab Treatment of Obesity Due to Leptin (LEP) Gene Mutations in Children, Adolescents and Adults
Monogenic Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Denis Pajecki principal investigator
Hospital das Clinicas - Faculdade de Medicina da USP
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass in people with Obesity, Morbid and Surgery, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total Weight loss (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03339791, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2020.