ObesityPhase 4BARIOPTIMISENCT03341429
Evaluation of Liraglutide 3.0mg in Patients With Poor Weight-loss and a Suboptimal Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Response
A Phase 4 study testing Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda] in people with Obesity, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
A double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of liraglutide 3.0 mg in patients with poor weight-loss and a suboptimal glucagon-like peptide-1 response following bariatric surgery Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda]
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 22 Aug 2018to 11 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients, 1 year or more after primary RYGB or primary SG, with poor weight-loss (<20% WL) that is not caused by either a surgical or psychological problem.
- Adults, 18-64 years inclusive.
- Suboptimal nutrient-stimulated GLP-1 response assessed by a meal test. Suboptimal active GLP-1 response is defined as a ≤2-fold increase in active GLP-1 circulating levels between time 0 and time 30 minutes.
- Females of childbearing potential and males must be willing to use an effective method of contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control, abstinence) from the time consent is signed until 6 weeks after treatment discontinuation.
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to being registered for trial treatment. NOTE: Subjects are considered not of child bearing potential if they are surgically sterile (i.e. they have undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or they are postmenopausal.
- ≤5 % variation in body weight over preceding 3 months.
- Fluent in English and able to understand and complete questionnaires.
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with the trial protocol.
Who cannot join
- Had a surgical procedure other than gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.
- Pregnant or lactating mothers.
- Participation in other clinical intervention trial.
- Lifetime history of suicidal behaviour or severe depression assessed by direct questioning.
- Clinically significant medical abnormalities (e.g., unstable hypertension, clinically significant ECG abnormalities, liver cirrhosis, AST or ALT > 3x the upper normal limit).
- Heart rate ≥ 100 beats/minute at screening on two separate measurements.
Show all 20Show fewer
- Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg).
- Renal impairment (estimated glomerular infiltration rate (eGFR <30 ml/min 1.73 m2)
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to liraglutide 3.0 mg and placebo or any of the excipients involved in their formulation.
- Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2.
- Personal history of pancreatitis.
- Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism.
- History of stroke, unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class III-IV within the preceding 12 months.
- History of arrhythmias.
- Inflammatory bowel disease.
- Diabetic gastroparesis.
- Concomitant GLP-1 receptor agonist usage.
- Concomitant usage of medications that cause weight gain or weight loss.
- Concomitant usage of DPPIV-inhibitors.
- Insulin usage.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: BARI-OPTIMISE: a Double-blinded, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Trial of Liraglutide 3.0 mg in Patients With Poor Weight-loss and a Suboptimal Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Response Following Bariatric Surgery
A double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of liraglutide 3.0 mg in patients with poor weight-loss and a suboptimal glucagon-like peptide-1 response following bariatric surgery
Read the detailed description
Subjects with poor weight loss response (<20% of their total weight) following 1 year or more primary gastric bypass or primary sleeve gastrectomy, will be identified from the trial site (University College London Hospital) and participant identification centre (Whittington Hospital) and invited to attend a screening visit. The screening assessment will be undertaken only upon patients providing informed consent to undergo such procedure. Information regarding medical history and concomitant medications will be gathered. In addition, full physical examination, blood test and a meal test will be performed. All female participants of childbearing potential will be tested for pregnancy. Once all data related to the screening visit has been acquired, the investigator will review the participants' eligibility for BARI-OPTIMISE trial. Patients with suboptimal GLP-1 response and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be invited to take part in the trial and asked to sign a second consent form. Assurance of adequate use of contraceptive throughout the trial period will be obtained before a written informed consent is sought. Consented participants will then be asked to attend a baseline visit.
During the baseline visit, data such as body weight, body composition, physical function, physical activity level and health-related quality of life will be collected. Adverse events will be reviewed and a meal test will be repeated. Upon completion of all the baseline procedures, participants will be randomised to receive either subcutaneous injection of liraglutide 3.0 mg or identical placebo for 24 weeks. Participants will be counselled for a calorie-reduced diet and to increase their level of physical activity. Participants will also be taught how to self-administer the treatment (by subcutaneous injection). For safety purpose, subject visits will be carried out at weeks 2, 4, 8, 17 and 24 of the treatment initiation. At all these visits, targeted physical examination will be performed and adverse events will be assessed. End-of-study visit will be over the phone 4 weeks after the end of treatment (i.e. week 28).
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Being tested
- Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda], Placebo
- Keywords
- obesity, GLP-1, liraglutide, diabetes, bariatric surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda]Drug
Also called Saxenda
Daily injection of GLP-1 agonist (liraglutide 3.0 mg) for obese patients presenting poor weight loss (<20%) after bariatric surgery and suboptimal GLP-1 levels.
PlaceboDrug
Daily subcutaneous injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Daily subcutaneous injection of liraglutide 3.0 mg
Study dosing of liraglutide:
Week 1: 0.6 mg once daily Week 2: 1.2 mg once daily Week 3: 1.8 mg once daily Week 4: 2.4 mg once daily Week 5-24: 3.0 mg once daily
In addition to the daily injection of liraglutide/placebo, participants in both groups will be advised to cut down approximately 500 calories from their usual food intake and to achieve a minimum of 150 minutes per week of physical activity. Receives: Drug: Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda] |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Daily subcutaneous injection of placebo; the same dosage regimen as treatment to be followed.
In addition to the daily injection of liraglutide/placebo, participants in both groups will be advised to cut down approximately 500 calories from their usual food intake and to achieve a minimum of 150 minutes per week of physical activity. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
%WL
The primary objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration, as an adjunct to diet and exercise, on %WL in participants with poor weight-loss and a sub-optimal active GLP-1 response following primary RYGB or SG at the end of the 24-week treatment period.
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (17)
%fat
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on % body fat assessed using DXA scanning
Measured: 24 weeks
Skeletal muscle mass
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on skeletal muscle mass assessed using DXA scanning
Measured: 24 weeks
Bone mineral density
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on bone mineral density assessed using DXA scanning
Measured: 24 weeks
Glucose level
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on fasted and meal-stimulated levels of glucose assessed using blood test
Measured: 24 weeks
Insulin
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on fasted and meal-stimulated levels of insulin assessed using blood test
Measured: 24 weeks
HbA1c
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on fasted and meal-stimulated levels of HbA1c assessed using blood test
Measured: 24 weeks
Leptin
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on fasted and meal-stimulated levels of leptin assessed using blood test
Measured: 24 weeks
Gut Hormones
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on fasted and meal-stimulated levels of gut hormones assessed using blood test
Measured: 24 weeks
Adipokines
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on fasted and meal-stimulated levels of adipokines assessed using blood test
Measured: 24 weeks
physical functional assessment
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on physical functioning assessed using the 6-minute walk test (6-MWT)
Measured: 24 weeks
physical function assessment
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on physical functioning assessed using the sit-to-stand test (STS Test)
Measured: 24 weeks
physical function assessment
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on physical functioning assessed using hand-grip strength
Measured: 24 weeks
physical function assessment
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on physical functioning assessed using the Paffenbarger Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ)
Measured: 24 weeks
HRQoL
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on health related quality of life assessed using an adapted Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)
Measured: 24 weeks
HRQoL
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on health related quality of life assessed using EuroQol-5D (ED5DEQ-5D)
Measured: 24 weeks
HRQoL
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on health related quality of life assessed using Impact of weight on quality of life-lite (IWQOL-Lite)
Measured: 24 weeks
HRQoL
To compare the effect of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration as an adjunct to diet and exercise at the end of the 24-week treatment period on health related quality of life assessed using Beck depression inventory (BDI)
Measured: 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2017
- Study start22 Aug 2018
- Primary completion28 Nov 2019
- Study completion11 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel group, single-site trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rachel L Batterham, PhD FRCP, Principal investigator, UCL
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03341429
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17/0238
- Acronym
- BARIOPTIMISE
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Participants who agree to, through the consent form, will have some of the study data, any remaining study samples and contact details shared with the ORBiS biobank run by the same Centre for Obesity Research and under the oversight of the same Chief Investigator.
Publications
Lenz M, Richter T, Muhlhauser I. The morbidity and mortality associated with overweight and obesity in adulthood: a systematic review. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Oct;106(40):641-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0641. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
PubMed 19890430Fruhbeck G, Toplak H, Woodward E, Yumuk V, Maislos M, Oppert JM; Executive Committee of the European Association for the Study of Obesity. Obesity: the gateway to ill health - an EASO position statement on a rising public health, clinical and scientific challenge in Europe. Obes Facts. 2013;6(2):117-20. doi: 10.1159/000350627. Epub 2013 Apr 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 23548858Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, Kashyap SR, Schauer PR, Mingrone G, Bucher HC, Nordmann AJ. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013 Oct 22;347:f5934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5934.
PubMed 24149519Manning S, Pucci A, Carter NC, Elkalaawy M, Querci G, Magno S, Tamberi A, Finer N, Fiennes AG, Hashemi M, Jenkinson AD, Anselmino M, Santini F, Adamo M, Batterham RL. Early postoperative weight loss predicts maximal weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1484-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3829-7. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
PubMed 25239175Batterham RL, Cummings DE. Mechanisms of Diabetes Improvement Following Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):893-901. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0145.
PubMed 27222547Jimenez A, Casamitjana R, Flores L, Viaplana J, Corcelles R, Lacy A, Vidal J. Long-term effects of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus in morbidly obese subjects. Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):1023-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262ee6b.
PubMed 22968072Arterburn DE, Bogart A, Sherwood NE, Sidney S, Coleman KJ, Haneuse S, O'Connor PJ, Theis MK, Campos GM, McCulloch D, Selby J. A multisite study of long-term remission and relapse of type 2 diabetes mellitus following gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2013 Jan;23(1):93-102. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0802-1.
PubMed 23161525Lee MH, Lee WJ, Chong K, Chen JC, Ser KH, Lee YC, Chen SC. Predictors of long-term diabetes remission after metabolic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jun;19(6):1015-21. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2808-1. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
PubMed 25840670Laurino Neto RM, Herbella FA, Tauil RM, Silva FS, de Lima SE Jr. Comorbidities remission after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for morbid obesity is sustained in a long-term follow-up and correlates with weight regain. Obes Surg. 2012 Oct;22(10):1580-5. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0731-z.
PubMed 22907795Sundbom M, Hedberg J, Marsk R, Boman L, Bylund A, Hedenbro J, Laurenius A, Lundegardh G, Moller P, Olbers T, Ottosson J, Naslund I, Naslund E; Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry Study Group. Substantial Decrease in Comorbidity 5 Years After Gastric Bypass: A Population-based Study From the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1166-1171. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001920.
PubMed 27429019Lassailly G, Caiazzo R, Buob D, Pigeyre M, Verkindt H, Labreuche J, Raverdy V, Leteurtre E, Dharancy S, Louvet A, Romon M, Duhamel A, Pattou F, Mathurin P. Bariatric Surgery Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Morbidly Obese Patients. Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):379-88; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
PubMed 25917783Caiazzo R, Lassailly G, Leteurtre E, Baud G, Verkindt H, Raverdy V, Buob D, Pigeyre M, Mathurin P, Pattou F. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus adjustable gastric banding to reduce nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 5-year controlled longitudinal study. Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):893-8; discussion 898-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000945.
PubMed 25379859Mohos E, Jano Z, Richter D, Schmaldienst E, Sandor G, Mohos P, Horzov M, Tornai G, Prager M. Quality of life, weight loss and improvement of co-morbidities after primary and revisional laparoscopic roux Y gastric bypass procedure-comparative match pair study. Obes Surg. 2014 Dec;24(12):2048-54. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1314-y.
PubMed 24913243Raoof M, Naslund I, Rask E, Karlsson J, Sundbom M, Edholm D, Karlsson FA, Svensson F, Szabo E. Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQoL) on an Average of 12 Years After Gastric Bypass Surgery. Obes Surg. 2015 Jul;25(7):1119-27. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1513-6.
PubMed 25566743Dirksen C, Jorgensen NB, Bojsen-Moller KN, Kielgast U, Jacobsen SH, Clausen TR, Worm D, Hartmann B, Rehfeld JF, Damgaard M, Madsen JL, Madsbad S, Holst JJ, Hansen DL. Gut hormones, early dumping and resting energy expenditure in patients with good and poor weight loss response after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Nov;37(11):1452-9. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.15. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
PubMed 23419600
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- BARI-OPTIMISE: a Double-blinded, Randomised, Placebo-controlled Trial of Liraglutide 3.0 mg in Patients With Poor Weight-loss and a Suboptimal Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Response Following Bariatric Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03341429
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BARIOPTIMISE / 17/0238
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Keywords
- obesity, GLP-1, liraglutide, diabetes, bariatric surgery
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of liraglutide 3.0 mg in patients with poor weight-loss and a suboptimal glucagon-like peptide-1 response following bariatric surgery
Detailed description
Subjects with poor weight loss response (<20% of their total weight) following 1 year or more primary gastric bypass or primary sleeve gastrectomy, will be identified from the trial site (University College London Hospital) and participant identification centre (Whittington Hospital) and invited to attend a screening visit. The screening assessment will be undertaken only upon patients providing informed consent to undergo such procedure. Information regarding medical history and concomitant medications will be gathered. In addition, full physical examination, blood test and a meal test will be performed. All female participants of childbearing potential will be tested for pregnancy. Once all data related to the screening visit has been acquired, the investigator will review the participants' eligibility for BARI-OPTIMISE trial. Patients with suboptimal GLP-1 response and fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be invited to take part in the trial and asked to sign a second consent form. Assurance of adequate use of contraceptive throughout the trial period will be obtained before a written informed consent is sought. Consented participants will then be asked to attend a baseline visit.
During the baseline visit, data such as body weight, body composition, physical function, physical activity level and health-related quality of life will be collected. Adverse events will be reviewed and a meal test will be repeated. Upon completion of all the baseline procedures, participants will be randomised to receive either subcutaneous injection of liraglutide 3.0 mg or identical placebo for 24 weeks. Participants will be counselled for a calorie-reduced diet and to increase their level of physical activity. Participants will also be taught how to self-administer the treatment (by subcutaneous injection). For safety purpose, subject visits will be carried out at weeks 2, 4, 8, 17 and 24 of the treatment initiation. At all these visits, targeted physical examination will be performed and adverse events will be assessed. End-of-study visit will be over the phone 4 weeks after the end of treatment (i.e. week 28).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, two-arm, parallel group, single-site trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Drug: Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda]Daily subcutaneous injection of liraglutide 3.0 mg Study dosing of liraglutide: Week 1: 0.6 mg once daily Week 2: 1.2 mg once daily Week 3: 1.8 mg once daily Week 4: 2.4 mg once daily Week 5-24: 3.0 mg once daily In addition to the daily injection of liraglutide/placebo, participants in both groups will be advised to cut down approximately 500 calories from their usual food intake and to achieve a minimum of 150 minutes per week of physical activity. |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboDaily subcutaneous injection of placebo; the same dosage regimen as treatment to be followed. In addition to the daily injection of liraglutide/placebo, participants in both groups will be advised to cut down approximately 500 calories from their usual food intake and to achieve a minimum of 150 minutes per week of physical activity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients, 1 year or more after primary RYGB or primary SG, with poor weight-loss (<20% WL) that is not caused by either a surgical or psychological problem.
- Adults, 18-64 years inclusive.
- Suboptimal nutrient-stimulated GLP-1 response assessed by a meal test. Suboptimal active GLP-1 response is defined as a ≤2-fold increase in active GLP-1 circulating levels between time 0 and time 30 minutes.
- Females of childbearing potential and males must be willing to use an effective method of contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control, abstinence) from the time consent is signed until 6 weeks after treatment discontinuation.
- Females of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to being registered for trial treatment. NOTE: Subjects are considered not of child bearing potential if they are surgically sterile (i.e. they have undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or they are postmenopausal.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Had a surgical procedure other than gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.
- Pregnant or lactating mothers.
- Participation in other clinical intervention trial.
- Lifetime history of suicidal behaviour or severe depression assessed by direct questioning.
- Clinically significant medical abnormalities (e.g., unstable hypertension, clinically significant ECG abnormalities, liver cirrhosis, AST or ALT > 3x the upper normal limit).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda]Also: SaxendaDaily injection of GLP-1 agonist (liraglutide 3.0 mg) for obese patients presenting poor weight loss (<20%) after bariatric surgery and suboptimal GLP-1 levels. | Drug | Treatment |
| PlaceboDaily subcutaneous injection | Drug | Control |
Primary outcome
%WL
Time frame: 24 weeks
The primary objective of this trial is to compare the efficacy of 24-weeks of subcutaneous liraglutide 3.0 mg versus placebo administration, as an adjunct to diet and exercise, on %WL in participants with poor weight-loss and a sub-optimal active GLP-1 response following primary RYGB or SG at the end of the 24-week treatment period.
17 secondary outcomes
%fat
Time frame: 24 weeks
Skeletal muscle mass
Time frame: 24 weeks
Bone mineral density
Time frame: 24 weeks
Glucose level
Time frame: 24 weeks
Insulin
Time frame: 24 weeks
HbA1c
Time frame: 24 weeks
Leptin
Time frame: 24 weeks
Gut Hormones
Time frame: 24 weeks
Adipokines
Time frame: 24 weeks
physical functional assessment
Time frame: 24 weeks
physical function assessment
Time frame: 24 weeks
physical function assessment
Time frame: 24 weeks
physical function assessment
Time frame: 24 weeks
HRQoL
Time frame: 24 weeks
HRQoL
Time frame: 24 weeks
HRQoL
Time frame: 24 weeks
HRQoL
Time frame: 24 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19890430Lenz M, Richter T, Muhlhauser I. The morbidity and mortality associated with overweight and obesity in adulthood: a systematic review. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2009 Oct;106(40):641-8. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2009.0641. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
- Background: PubMed 23548858Fruhbeck G, Toplak H, Woodward E, Yumuk V, Maislos M, Oppert JM; Executive Committee of the European Association for the Study of Obesity. Obesity: the gateway to ill health - an EASO position statement on a rising public health, clinical and scientific challenge in Europe. Obes Facts. 2013;6(2):117-20. doi: 10.1159/000350627. Epub 2013 Apr 3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24149519Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, Kashyap SR, Schauer PR, Mingrone G, Bucher HC, Nordmann AJ. Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2013 Oct 22;347:f5934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5934.
- Background: PubMed 25239175Manning S, Pucci A, Carter NC, Elkalaawy M, Querci G, Magno S, Tamberi A, Finer N, Fiennes AG, Hashemi M, Jenkinson AD, Anselmino M, Santini F, Adamo M, Batterham RL. Early postoperative weight loss predicts maximal weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1484-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3829-7. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
- Background: PubMed 27222547Batterham RL, Cummings DE. Mechanisms of Diabetes Improvement Following Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):893-901. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0145.
- Background: PubMed 22968072Jimenez A, Casamitjana R, Flores L, Viaplana J, Corcelles R, Lacy A, Vidal J. Long-term effects of sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery on type 2 diabetes mellitus in morbidly obese subjects. Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):1023-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318262ee6b.
- Background: PubMed 23161525Arterburn DE, Bogart A, Sherwood NE, Sidney S, Coleman KJ, Haneuse S, O'Connor PJ, Theis MK, Campos GM, McCulloch D, Selby J. A multisite study of long-term remission and relapse of type 2 diabetes mellitus following gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2013 Jan;23(1):93-102. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0802-1.
- Background: PubMed 25840670Lee MH, Lee WJ, Chong K, Chen JC, Ser KH, Lee YC, Chen SC. Predictors of long-term diabetes remission after metabolic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jun;19(6):1015-21. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2808-1. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
- Background: PubMed 22907795Laurino Neto RM, Herbella FA, Tauil RM, Silva FS, de Lima SE Jr. Comorbidities remission after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for morbid obesity is sustained in a long-term follow-up and correlates with weight regain. Obes Surg. 2012 Oct;22(10):1580-5. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0731-z.
- Background: PubMed 27429019Sundbom M, Hedberg J, Marsk R, Boman L, Bylund A, Hedenbro J, Laurenius A, Lundegardh G, Moller P, Olbers T, Ottosson J, Naslund I, Naslund E; Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry Study Group. Substantial Decrease in Comorbidity 5 Years After Gastric Bypass: A Population-based Study From the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Ann Surg. 2017 Jun;265(6):1166-1171. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001920.
- Background: PubMed 25917783Lassailly G, Caiazzo R, Buob D, Pigeyre M, Verkindt H, Labreuche J, Raverdy V, Leteurtre E, Dharancy S, Louvet A, Romon M, Duhamel A, Pattou F, Mathurin P. Bariatric Surgery Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Morbidly Obese Patients. Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):379-88; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 25379859Caiazzo R, Lassailly G, Leteurtre E, Baud G, Verkindt H, Raverdy V, Buob D, Pigeyre M, Mathurin P, Pattou F. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus adjustable gastric banding to reduce nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a 5-year controlled longitudinal study. Ann Surg. 2014 Nov;260(5):893-8; discussion 898-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000945.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Participants who agree to, through the consent form, will have some of the study data, any remaining study samples and contact details shared with the ORBiS biobank run by the same Centre for Obesity Research and under the oversight of the same Chief Investigator.
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rachel L Batterham, PhD FRCP principal investigator
UCL
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Liraglutide Pen Injector [Saxenda] in people with Obesity, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
%WL (time frame: 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03341429, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2020.