AzTrials
AzTrials

Hydrogen Peroxide AllergyPhase 3NSAIDsNCT03343392

The Effect of Different Drugs in the Prevention of Tooth Sensitivity Caused by Tooth Bleaching Treatment.

A Phase 3 study testing acetam/ketoro tromet group in people with Hydrogen Peroxide Allergy, run by Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: The administration of the intra-oral drugs was not capable of reducing this side effect, maybe the use of two analgesics may to present better analgesic effect to avoid the bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (TS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Hydrogen Peroxide Allergy
What is being tested?
acetam/ketoro tromet group
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
5 Nov 2017to 1 Dec 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients were at least 18 years old.
  • Patients had good general and oral health, and did not report any type of tooth sensitivity (TS).
  • The participants were required to have six caries-free maxillary anterior teeth and without restorations, absence of periodontal disease and must reviewed and signed the informed consent form.
  • The central incisors should be shade A2 or darker as judged by comparison with a value-oriented shade guide (Vita Classical, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany).

Who cannot join

  • Participants with anterior restorations or dental prosthesis, with orthodontics apparatus, with severe internal tooth discoloration (tetracycline stains, fluorosis, pulpless teeth) were not included in the study.
  • Pregnant/lactating women, participants with any other pathology that could cause sensitivity (such as recession, dentine exposure, presence of visible cracks in teeth), taking anti-inflammatory and/or analgesic drugs, smokers, bruxists or participants that had undergone tooth-whitening procedures were also excluded.
  • Patients that reported some earlier or present health problems in stomach, heart, kidney and liver, participants reporting continuous use of anti-inflammatory and/or analgesic drugs were excluded.
  • Diabetics, hypertensive or patients with known allergy to acetaminophen and lactose.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Eloisa Andrade de Paula

    Santos, São Paulo, 11045551

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Combination of Two Analgesics Does Not Avoid Bleaching-induced Tooth Sensitivity: a Randomized, Triple-blind Clinical Trial

Background: The administration of the intra-oral drugs was not capable of reducing this side effect, maybe the use of two analgesics may to present better analgesic effect to avoid the bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity (TS). Methods: A triple-blind, parallel-randomized clinical trial was conducted with 114 health patients who received either a placebo or an association of ketorolac tromethamine/acetaminophen. The first doses of two analgesic (Acetaminophen 750 mg/ Ketorolac Tromethamine 10 mg) or placebo was administered 1 h before the in-office bleaching (35% hydrogen peroxide), and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h. The TS was recorded using 0-10 visual analog scale and a 0-4 numeric rating scale in different periods: during bleaching and from 1 h up to 6h, from 12 h up to 18h, from 18h up to 24 h, from 24h up to 48 h post-bleaching. The color was measured before and one month after dental bleaching with a visual shade guide Vita Classical, Vita Bleachedguide 3D-Master and spectrophotometer Vita Easyshade (Vita Zahnfabrik). The absolute risk of TS was evaluated by Fisher's exact test. Data of TS intensity with NRS scale of the two groups were compared with Mann-Whitney and Friedman tests, while data from the VAS scale were evaluated by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test for pairwise comparison. The color changes between groups were compared using a Student t-test (α = 0.05).

Read the detailed description

Trial design, settings and locations of data collection This was a randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, triple-mask clinical trial, in which the patient, operator and evaluator were masked to the group assignment. A third researcher, not involved in the evaluation process, was responsible for the randomization process, and delivery and guidance on the administration of the drugs. This study was performed from 05/11/2017 up to 01/12/2018 in the city of Cascavel (Paraná, Brazil). All bleaching procedures were carried out within the Clinics of the Dental School of the State University of Oeste do Paraná (Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil).

Sample size calculation The primary outcome of this study was the absolute risk of TS. The absolute risk of TS was reported to be approximately 87% (Tay et al. 2009, De Paula et al. 2013) for the bleaching product Whiteness HP Maxx (FGM, Prod. Odont. Ltda, Joinville, SC, Brazil). Thus, a minimum sample size of 114 patients was required to have a 90% chance of detecting, as significant at the two-sided 5% level, a decrease in the primary outcome measure from 87% in the control group to 60% in the experimental group (which represent a difference of 31% in the absolute risk of TS).

Random sequence generation and allocation concealment. The investigator used blocked randomization (block sizes of 2 and 4) with an equal allocation ratio. The randomization process was performed by software freely available on the internet (www.sealedenvelope.com). Opaque and sealed envelopes containing the identification of the groups were prepared by third party, not involved in the study intervention. This third researcher, not involved in the evaluation process, was responsible for the randomization process, delivery and guidance on the administration of the drugs. A single random sequence was performed for both centers.

Study intervention Patients were divided into acetaminophen/ketorolac tromethamine and placebo groups. All patients received the same bleaching treatment, which was performed by four operators in the Dental School. One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either the acetaminophen 750 mg (Paracetamol 750 mg, Bioativa compounding pharmacy, Cascavel, PR, Brasil) and ketorolac tromethamine oral 10 mg (Toragesic® 10 mg, EMS Sigma Farma, Hortolândia, SP, Brasil) or placebo, for both medicines in identical tablets or capsules. The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h to keep a safe maximum daily dosage of 4000 mg of acetaminophen and 40 mg of ketorolac tromethamine.

The tablets of Toragesic® and Paracetamol were removed them from their original packaging and inserted them whole into new vials made especially for this research. the investigator stored the capsules in individual vials containing 6 capsules of Paracetamol and 6 capsules of Toragesic® required for each bleaching session. The placebo tablets for Paracetamol contained starch lactose free (Bioativa compounding pharmacy, Cascavel, PR, Brasil) and the placebo capsules for Toragesic® contained base past, lactose free (Oro-tab®, Bioativa compounding pharmacy, Cascavel, PR, Brasil) and One hour before starting the bleaching application, the masked researcher responsible for drug administration gave the first dose to the patient. Then, the investigators isolated the gingival tissue of the teeth to be bleached using a light-cured resin dam (Top Dam, FGM Dental Products), and each tooth was light-cured for 10 s (Radii-cal, SDI, Victoria, Australia). After placement of a lip retractor (Arcflex, FGM), the researcher used the 35% hydrogen peroxide gel (Whiteness HP Automixx, FGM) in a single 50-minute application for both groups in accordance with the manufacturer's directions. Two bleaching sessions were performed 1 week apart. All participants were instructed to brush their teeth regularly using fluoridated toothpaste.

Being tested
acetam/ketoro tromet group, Placebo group
Keywords
Hydrogen Peroxide, Analgesics, Tooth Bleaching

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • acetam/ketoro tromet groupDrug

    One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either the acetaminophen 750 mg (Paracetamol 750 mg, Bioativa compounding pharmacy) and ketorolac tromethamine oral 10 mg (Toragesic® 10 mg, EMS Sigma Farma). The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h to keep a safe maximum daily dosage of 4000 mg of acetaminophen and 40 mg of ketorolac tromethamine.

  • Placebo groupDrug

    One hour before in-office bleaching patients received either placebo,The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h.

Study groups in NCT03343392
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
acetam/ketoro tromet groupExperimentalOne hour before in-office bleaching patients received either the acetaminophen 750 mg (Paracetamol 750 mg, Bioativa compounding pharmacy) and ketorolac tromethamine oral 10 mg (Toragesic® 10 mg, EMS Sigma Farma). The operator administered the first dose of drug 1 h before the protocol, and extra doses were administered every 8 h for 48 h to keep a safe maximum daily dosage of 4000 mg of acetaminophen and 40 mg of ketorolac tromethamine.
Receives: Drug: acetam/ketoro tromet group
Placebo groupPlacebo comparatorOne hour before in-office bleaching patients received either placebo.
Receives: Drug: Placebo group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absolute risk of tooth sensitivity (TS)

    The TS was evaluated during bleaching to 48 h post-bleaching. The patient was asked to binary outcome if the sensitivity is present ou not present.

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Intensity of TS

    The intensity of TS was evaluated during bleaching up to 1 h, from 12 h up to 18h, from 18h up to 24 h, from 24h up to 48 h post-bleaching in both sessions. The patient was asked to indicate the numerical value of the degree of sensitivity for each one of the periods above, using a five-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) where 0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = considerable and 4 = severe.

    Measured: 48 hours

  2. Color

    Color obtained with the Vita Classical and Vita Bleached guides between baseline vs. 1 month post bleaching.

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2017
  2. Study start5 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This was a randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled, triple-mask clinical trial, in which the patient, operator and evaluator were masked to the group assignment. A third researcher, not involved in the evaluation process, was responsible for the randomization process, and delivery and guidance on the administration of the drugs. This study was performed from 01/2016 to 12/2017 in the city of Cascavel (Paraná, Brazil). All bleaching procedures were carried out within the Clinics of the Dental School of the State University of Oeste do Paraná (Cascavel, Paraná, Brazil).
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03343392
Sponsor's protocol ID
45733615.6.0000.0109
Acronym
NSAIDs
Status last verified
Nov 2019
First submitted
13 Oct 2017
Last updated
13 Nov 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing acetam/ketoro tromet group in people with Hydrogen Peroxide Allergy, run by Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absolute risk of tooth sensitivity (TS) (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Nov 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in