AzTrials
AzTrials

InfertilityNCT03343405

Online Mind/Body Program for Fertility

A study testing Online Mind/Body Program for Fertility in people with Infertility, run by University of Vermont at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot-study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of an Online Mind/Body Fertility Program, designed to help individuals and/or couples cope with the physical and emotional impact of infertility by learning special relaxation strategies and improving lifestyle habits. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Infertility
What is being tested?
Online Mind/Body Program for Fertility
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
71 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
14 Mar 2015to 14 Apr 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women and Men
  • Infertility diagnosis
  • Trying to get pregnant
  • 18 years or older
  • Read and write English

Who cannot join

  • No current diagnosis for an active psychotic disorder, eating disorder, substance abuse or dependence
  • Not reporting current suicidal ideation/intent
  • No psychotropic medication changes in the last four weeks
  • Has not completed a formal mind/body program focused on infertility that included relaxation, yoga, mindfulness, cognitive restructuring, stress reduction strategies, listening and communication skills, goal setting and assertiveness training.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Vermont

    Burlington, Vermont, 05405

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Fertility & Well-Being: Mind/Body Protocol

This pilot-study assesses the feasibility and acceptability of an Online Mind/Body Fertility Program, designed to help individuals and/or couples cope with the physical and emotional impact of infertility by learning special relaxation strategies and improving lifestyle habits. Participants included women experiencing infertility who had not given birth to a child. Half of participants received access to the 10-week Online Mind-Body Program and the other half were placed on a waiting-list.

Read the detailed description

Infertility is defined as the inability to conceive a child. A couple may be acknowledged as infertile if conception has not occurred after 12 months of having regular, unprotected intercourse. Over six million couples in the United States are affected by infertility. Research suggests that there is a relationship between psychological distress and infertility, but the relationship is complex. The information from this study will be used to better understand the relationship between psychological distress and infertility among couples. Furthermore, the investigators are interested in testing Dr. Alice Domar's Mind/Body Fertility Program that was designed to help individuals regain control of their life and learn new lifestyle habits that can increase their chances of conceiving. There is evidence that individuals that participated in the group format of this treatment protocol showed statistically significant decreases in physical and psychological symptoms of stress and increases in conception rates. Our primary goals are to evaluate patients willingness to be recruited and randomized as well as their adherence and attrition to the program. Our secondary goals are to evaluate reductions in emotional distress (i.e., anxiety, depression, and stress) and enhance emotion regulation skills as well as pregnancy rates.

Conditions
Infertility
Being tested
Online Mind/Body Program for Fertility
Keywords
Mind/Body
Medical subject headings
Infertility

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Online Mind/Body Program for FertilityBehavioural

    The Mind/Body intervention involves (1) reducing physical symptoms of stress, (2) enhancing lifestyle behaviors related to fertility, (4) self-nurturing and coping skills, and (5) relaxation methods.

Study groups in NCT03343405
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention: Online Mind/BodyExperimentalParticipants randomized to the intervention group (i.e., Online Mind/Body Program for Fertility) were provided the 10 online modules provided weekly (one module per week), intended to be completed over 10 weeks. Additionally, participants received weekly therapeutic feedback.
Receives: Behavioral: Online Mind/Body Program for Fertility
Wait-ListNo interventionAfter 10-weeks being in the wait-list group, participants had the potential to participate in the intervention protocol if they desire.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility 1: Feasibility of recruitment and randomization

    Number of participants recruited and randomized. From time study began to when recruitment closed.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  2. Feasibility 2: Time

    Time between recruitment and completion of the study. Time between recruitment and randomization; time between each of the modules; time between each of the assessments (pre-assessment; mid-assessment; post-assessment, and follow-up).

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  3. Feasibility 3: Participant retention and acceptability

    Percentage of enrolled participants that completed each stage of the study (mid-assessment, post-assessment, follow-up, and each of the ten modules for the intervention group only).

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Acceptability 1: Ease of modules

    Participants will be asked at the end of each module: "how easy was this module." Answer choices are on a 3-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("easy") to 3 ("not easy"). Data collected from beginning to end of intervention.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  2. Acceptability 2: Helpfulness

    Participants will be asked at the end of each module: "how helpful was the module." Answer choices are on a four-item Likert scale ranging from 0 ("unhelpful") to 3 ("very helpful"). Data is collected throughout the Mind/Body program, intervention group only.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  3. Satisfaction of Intervention

    Participant satisfaction as measured by the Client Satisfaction Inventory Short-Form (McMurtry \& Hudson, 2000). This measurement is a 9-item self-report scale that assesses the satisfaction of the participant with the effects of the treatments. Participants are asked to rate the way they feel about the services they received on a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 ("none of the time") to 7 ("all of the time"). The total scores range between 0 and 100 (for scoring algorithm, see McMurty \& Hudson, 2000), with higher scores indicating more satisfaction. Data is collected for the intervention group at post-assessment only.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  4. Pregnancy: Between group comparison

    Self-reported confirmation of pregnancy. Data collected at baseline, pre-assessment, mid-assessment, post-assessment, and follow-up.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  5. Anxiety 1: Individual changes

    Individual changes in anxiety as measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory. The Beck Anxiety Inventory is a 21-item self-report measure used to assess somatic or panic-related anxiety symptoms. Individuals are asked to rate their symptoms of anxiety over the past week on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("severely; I could barely stand it"). A total score is calculated by summing all items. Scores range from 0 (no anxiety severity) to 63 (severe anxiety severity). Data collected throughout study (baseline, pre-assessment, mid-assessment, post-assessment, and follow-up) as well as at the beginning of each intervention module.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  6. Anxiety 2: Between group changes

    Between group changes in anxiety as measured by Beck Anxiety Inventory (Beck, Steer, Beck, \& Newman, 1993). The Beck Anxiety Inventory is a 21-item self-report measure used to assess somatic or panic-related anxiety symptoms. Individuals are asked to rate their symptoms of anxiety over the past week on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("severely; I could barely stand it"). A total score is calculated by summing all items. Scores range from 0 (no anxiety severity) to 63 (severe anxiety severity). Data collected throughout study (baseline, pre-assessment, mid-assessment, post-assessment, and follow-up) as well as at the beginning of each intervention module.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  7. Depression 1: Individual changes

    Individual changes in depression as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory - 2nd Edition. The Beck Depression Inventory - 2nd Edition is a 21-item self-report measure used to assess cognitive, affective, and physical depressive symptoms. Questions include content such as sadness, guilt, disappointment, and loss of energy. Participants are asked to rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (not endorsed) to 3 (endorsed at maximum severity). A total score is calculated by summing all items. Scores range from 0 (no depressive symptoms) to 63 (severe depressive symptoms). Data collected at baseline, pre-assessment, mid-assessment, post-assessment and follow-up).

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  8. Depression 2: Between group changes

    Between group changes in depression as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory - 2nd Edition (Beck, Steer, Ball, \& Ranieri, 1996). The Beck Depression Inventory - 2nd Edition is a 21-item self-report measure used to assess cognitive, affective, and physical depressive symptoms. Questions include content such as sadness, guilt, disappointment, and loss of energy. Participants are asked to rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (not endorsed) to 3 (endorsed at maximum severity). A total score is calculated by summing all items. Scores range from 0 (no depressive symptoms) to 63 (severe depressive symptoms). Data collected at baseline, pre-assessment, mid-assessment, post-assessment and follow-up).

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  9. Stress: Between group changes

    Between group changes in stress as measured by Perceived Stress Scale. The Perceived Stress Scale is a 10-item questionnaire measuring the present level of self-rated stress in the last month. Items were designed to assess how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded respondents find their lives. Higher scores indicate more distress. Participants are asked to rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 ("never") to 4 ("very often"). Scores range from 0 to 40 where higher scores indicate greater perceived stress (for scoring algorithm see Cohen, 1988; Cohen, Kamarck, \& Mermelstein, 1983).

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  10. Mindfulness: Between group comparison

    Between group changes in mindfulness as measured by the Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ; Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, \& Toney, 2006). The FFMQ is a 39-item self-report measure used to assess a trait-like tendency to be mindful in daily life. It has five subscales (i.e., observe, describe, awareness, non-judgmental, and non-reactive). Each question on the FFMQ is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("never or very rarely true") to 5 ("very often or always true"). Total score (adding subscale scores) ranges from 39 to 195 with higher scores indicating greater mindfulness (for scoring algorithm see Baer, Smith, Hopkins, Krietemeyer, \& Toney, 2006). Data collected at baseline, mid-assessment, and post-assessment.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  11. Fertility Problem Inventory: Between group changes

    Between group changes in fertility related distress as measured by The Fertility Problem Inventory. The Fertility Problem Inventory is a 46-item questionnaire that measures domains (Social Concern, Sexual Concern, Relationship Concern, Need for Parenthood, and Rejection of Child-Free Lifestyle) considered important in understanding perceived infertility related stress as well as an overall global index of infertility-related stress (composite score of the all domains). The overall score ranges from 46 to 276. For each of the scales, higher scores indicate more fertility related distress (for a scoring algorithm see Newton, Sherrard, \& Glavac, 1999). Data collected at baseline, post-assessment, and follow-up.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  12. Emotion Regulation: Between group comparison

    Between group changes in emotion regulation as measured by the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz \& Roemer, 2004). The DERS is a 36-item self-report questionnaire measuring problems with emotional regulation based on responses indicating impairment in six dimensions (Goals, Impulse, Awareness, Nonacceptance, Strategy, and Clarity) and a total score (sum of all subscales). Total score ranges from 36 to 180. For each of the scales, higher scores indicate greater difficulties with emotional regulation in each of the domains (for scoring algorithm see Gratz \& Roemer, 2004). Data collected at baseline and post-assessment.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

  13. Relationship Quality: Between group comparison

    Between group changes in emotion regulation as measured by the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (Spanier, 1976). The Dyadic Adjustment Scale is a 32-item questionnaire assessing relationship difficulty in four domains (Consensus, Satisfaction, Affective Expression, and Cohesion) and a total score. The total score ranges form 0 and 151. Greater scores indicate greater marital satisfaction (for scoring algorithm see, Spanier, 1976). Data collected at baseline and post-assessment.

    Measured: Approximately 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2017
  2. Study start14 Mar 2015
  3. Primary completion14 Apr 2017
  4. Study completion14 Apr 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A between groups repeated measure experimental design. Participants that met inclusion criteria and were interested in continuing with the study were randomized to either the treatment or wait-list group. Participants randomized to the treatment group were provided with 10 online program modules provided weekly over 10 weeks. After 10-weeks the wait-list group had the opportunity to participate in the intervention protocol if they desire. All participants will be asked to complete pre-, mid-, post-, f/u- intervention questionnaires.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03343405
Sponsor's protocol ID
MindBody
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
19 Sep 2017
Last updated
17 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Domar AD, Clapp D, Slawsby EA, Dusek J, Kessel B, Freizinger M. Impact of group psychological interventions on pregnancy rates in infertile women. Fertil Steril. 2000 Apr;73(4):805-11. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00493-8.

    PubMed 10731544
  • Domar AD, Clapp D, Slawsby E, Kessel B, Orav J, Freizinger M. The impact of group psychological interventions on distress in infertile women. Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):568-75. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.568.

    PubMed 11129360
  • Domar AD, Rooney KL, Wiegand B, Orav EJ, Alper MM, Berger BM, Nikolovski J. Impact of a group mind/body intervention on pregnancy rates in IVF patients. Fertil Steril. 2011 Jun;95(7):2269-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.046. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

    PubMed 21496800

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Online Mind/Body Program for Fertility in people with Infertility, run by University of Vermont at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility 1: Feasibility of recruitment and randomization (time frame: Approximately 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03343405, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in