AzTrials
AzTrials

PneumoniaVAPNCT03343717

Physiotherapy on Pneumonia in Childrens

A study testing Rehabilitation and Chest physical therapy in people with Pneumonia, run by Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The children's susceptibility to respiratory problems is due to their anatomical and physiological characteristics; therefore, children with more severe clinical conditions may undergo invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 8 years
Conditions the study is for
Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Rehabilitation and Chest physical therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Jan 2017to 1 Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 8 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • patients on invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation for less than 96 hours
  • with pneumonia due to invasive mechanical ventilation,
  • aged between 1 year and 8 years

Who cannot join

  • Severe Respiratory Failure
  • active bleeding
  • acute cerebral disorder
  • presence of orthopedic contraindications (bone fractures, dislocations, subluxations, postoperative, unstable spine)
  • neurological impairment with minimal functionality
  • neuromuscular disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Fundação Santa Casa de Misericórdia do Pará

    Belém, Pará, 66.050-380

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Effects of Early Mobilization in Children With Pneumonia

The children's susceptibility to respiratory problems is due to their anatomical and physiological characteristics; therefore, children with more severe clinical conditions may undergo invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). However, its prolonged use favors tracheal injury, barotrauma and / or volutrauma, decreased cardiac output and oxygen toxicity, and especially the accumulation of respiratory secretions due to ineffective cough due to non-closure of the glottis and damage in the transport of mucus by the presence of the tracheal tube. Thus, triggering the development of mechanical ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP), which is defined as a pulmonary infection that arises 48 to 72 hours after endotracheal intubation and the institution of invasive mechanical ventilation. As a consequence, respiratory work is performed by IMV, reducing the work exerted by spontaneous ventilation, causing neuromuscular disorders after 5 to 7 days of IMV, changes in muscle mechanics, reducing the capacity of the diaphragm to generate force, thus contributing to changes in modulation autonomic heart rate, changes in muscular trophism, generating physical deconditioning due to weakness and, finally, an increase in the length of hospitalization and immobilism. From this perspective, early mobilization emerges as a rehabilitation mechanism to improve muscle strength and joint mobility, as well as to improve lung function and respiratory system performance, as well as improved autonomic heart rate modulation. It can facilitate the weaning of IMV, reducing hospitalization time and promoting quality of life after discharge.

Read the detailed description

We will select 40 volunteers of both sexes and between the ages of 1 and 8 years, with clinical diagnosis of VAP hospitalized in an intensive care unit, which will be submitted, together with the hospital protocol, the protocol of early mobilization. For these patients will be performed physical therapy evaluation in the pre-protocol period, on the second and fourth day of application of the protocol and 1 week at the end of the proposed protocol. For statistical analysis will be compared the pre and post-treatment data found in the evaluations and tabulated in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. BioStat 5.2 software will be used to analyze the results, and the choice of tests for this will depend on the types of distributions found and the homogeneity of the variables.

Conditions
Pneumonia
Being tested
Rehabilitation, Chest physical therapy
Keywords
Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, Mechanical ventilation, Physical therapy
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RehabilitationOther

    Also called physical therapy

    physical therapy exercise

  • Chest physical therapyOther

    chest physical therapy exercise

Study groups in NCT03343717
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
rehabilitationExperimentalPhase 1 passive mobilization with 10 repetitions on each joint motion and muscle stretching to the upper. Phase 2 - ability to respond to 3 of 5 simple verbal commands. Beginning with passive, active-assisted or active exercises with 5 repetitions in each joint movement in the MMSS and MMII, following the sequence of phase 1. Phase 3 - exercises of MMSS with cycle ergometer - 1 series of 1 minute or passive, active-assisted, active or active-resistidos with 5 repetitions in each joint movement, following the sequence of phase 1.
Receives: Other: Rehabilitation
chest physical therapyActive comparatorrespiratory exercises that include techniques of bronchial hygiene maneuvers with the objective of airway clearance, pulmonary reexpansion techniques for reversal of atelectasis, passive mobilization techniques with the aim of reducing deformities and preserving joint mobility
Receives: Other: Chest physical therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Heart rate variability

    Influence of exercise on cardiac autonomic modulation

    Measured: 5 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Muscle force

    Analysis by Medical Research Council Scale of muscle force. The scale is classified in five grades Grade 5: Muscle contracts normally against full resistance. Grade 4: Muscle strength is reduced but muscle contraction can still move joint against resistance.

    Grade 3: Muscle strength is further reduced such that the joint can be moved only against gravity with the examiner's resistance completely removed. As an example, the elbow can be moved from full extension to full flexion starting with the arm hanging down at the side.

    Grade 2: Muscle can move only if the resistance of gravity is removed. As an example, the elbow can be fully flexed only if the arm is maintained in a horizontal plane.

    Grade 1: Only a trace or flicker of movement is seen or felt in the muscle or fasciculations are observed in the muscle.

    Grade 0: No movement is observed.

    Measured: 5 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2017
  2. Study start1 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
randomized clinical trial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03343717
Sponsor's protocol ID
2.084.580
Acronym
VAP
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
12 Nov 2017
Last updated
13 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Choong K, Koo KK, Clark H, Chu R, Thabane L, Burns KE, Cook DJ, Herridge MS, Meade MO. Early mobilization in critically ill children: a survey of Canadian practice. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jul;41(7):1745-53. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318287f592.

    PubMed 23507722
  • Choong K, Foster G, Fraser DD, Hutchison JS, Joffe AR, Jouvet PA, Menon K, Pullenayegum E, Ward RE; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Acute rehabilitation practices in critically ill children: a multicenter study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;15(6):e270-9. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000160.

    PubMed 24777303
  • Choong K. Early Mobilization in Critically Ill Children: Ready for Implementation? Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec;17(12):1194-1195. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000992. No abstract available.

    PubMed 27918395
  • Souza GSB, Novais MFM, Lemes GE, de Mello MLFMF, de Sales SCD, Cunha KDC, Rocha LSO, Avila PES, Rocha RSB. Effectiveness of Different Physiotherapy Protocols in Children in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2022 Jan 1;34(1):10-15. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000848.

    PubMed 34873117

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rehabilitation and Chest physical therapy in people with Pneumonia, run by Universidade Metodista de Piracicaba at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Heart rate variability (time frame: 5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03343717, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in