AnesthesiaNCT03344445
Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit
A study testing video-assisted pre anesthesia explain in people with Anesthesia, run by IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch.
Trial summary
To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- video-assisted pre anesthesia explain
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2017to 31 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All adult patients were included who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery
Who cannot join
- Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was expected or unexpected.,Repeated general anesthesia had been performed in the previous 6 months,ASA classification was more than or equal to III,There were pronounced cognitive and or speech barriers
About this study
To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction
Read the detailed description
We made up a video which showed the type, the method, the risk, and the benefit of all anesthesia with words, pictures, and image. A study nurse will ask the will of patients. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly divided into traditional group(control group) and study group(study group). The study group will watch the video at first, then our anesthesiologist visit the patient. The control group will receive traditional anesthesiologist visit. After doctors' visit, the patients have to complete a test and a questionnaire. The patients who don't participate in the study will have traditional visit and no test.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Being tested
- video-assisted pre anesthesia explain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
video-assisted pre anesthesia explainOther
Anesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| traditional vist | No intervention | Patients receive traditional anesthesiologist visit |
| video-assisted | Experimental | Patients watch the video, then an anesthesiologist visit Receives: Other: video-assisted pre anesthesia explain |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
inform gain analysis
The score of test would represent the inform gain of patient
Measured: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data
satification anaylsis
The score of questionnaire represent the ratification of patient
Measured: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Nov 2017
- Study start1 Jan 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- simple compare of information gain between traditional visit and video-assisted visit
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
- Investigators
- Li Kuei Chen, M.D., Study chair, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03344445
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 102-019-E
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 13 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Yang YL, Wang KJ, Chen WH, Chuang KC, Tseng CC, Liu CC. Improved satisfaction of preoperative patients after group video-teaching during interview at preanesthetic evaluation clinic: the experience of a medical center in Taiwan. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):149-54.
PubMed 17972617Snyder-Ramos SA, Seintsch H, Bottiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E, Bauer M. Patient satisfaction and information gain after the preanesthetic visit: a comparison of face-to-face interview, brochure, and video. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1753-1758. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153010.49776.E5.
PubMed 15920209
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03344445
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 102-019-E
- Conditions
- Anesthesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu BranchUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction
Detailed description
We made up a video which showed the type, the method, the risk, and the benefit of all anesthesia with words, pictures, and image. A study nurse will ask the will of patients. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly divided into traditional group(control group) and study group(study group). The study group will watch the video at first, then our anesthesiologist visit the patient. The control group will receive traditional anesthesiologist visit. After doctors' visit, the patients have to complete a test and a questionnaire. The patients who don't participate in the study will have traditional visit and no test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- simple compare of information gain between traditional visit and video-assisted visit
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| traditional vist | No intervention | –Patients receive traditional anesthesiologist visit |
| video-assisted | Experimental | Other: video-assisted pre anesthesia explainPatients watch the video, then an anesthesiologist visit |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All adult patients were included who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was expected or unexpected.,Repeated general anesthesia had been performed in the previous 6 months,ASA classification was more than or equal to III,There were pronounced cognitive and or speech barriers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| video-assisted pre anesthesia explainAnesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video. | Other | video-assisted |
Primary outcome
inform gain analysis
Time frame: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data
The score of test would represent the inform gain of patient
satification anaylsis
Time frame: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data
The score of questionnaire represent the ratification of patient
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Mar 2018.
- Results publication: PubMed 17972617Yang YL, Wang KJ, Chen WH, Chuang KC, Tseng CC, Liu CC. Improved satisfaction of preoperative patients after group video-teaching during interview at preanesthetic evaluation clinic: the experience of a medical center in Taiwan. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2007 Sep;45(3):149-54.
- Results publication: PubMed 15920209Snyder-Ramos SA, Seintsch H, Bottiger BW, Motsch J, Martin E, Bauer M. Patient satisfaction and information gain after the preanesthetic visit: a comparison of face-to-face interview, brochure, and video. Anesth Analg. 2005 Jun;100(6):1753-1758. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153010.49776.E5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthesia
Recruiting
NOL Guided Analgesia During Elective Laparoscopic Surgery Under General Anesthesia
Intraoperative Analgesia
RecruitingObservational study
Prevalence of Pain During Cesarean Section
Cesarean Birth
RecruitingObservational study
Pulse Wave Transit Time After Infraclavicular Block
Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
RecruitingPhase 4
Propofol-Ketamine Versus Sevoflurane for Laryngeal Mask Anesthesia in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization
Propofol, Ketamine
Recruiting
Lateral QL Block vs Intrathecal Morphine for Cesarean Section
Anesthesia, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Li Kuei Chen, M.D. study chair
National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing video-assisted pre anesthesia explain in people with Anesthesia, run by IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
inform gain analysis (time frame: after every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the data). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03344445, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Mar 2018.