AzTrials
AzTrials

Unresectable Hepatocellular CarcinomaNCT03345225

A Clinical Study of Precision TACE (P-TACE) With Surefire

A study testing SureFire Infusion System and Standard Endhole Microcatheter in people with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by University of Miami at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this research study is to learn about 2 types of FDA-approved catheters used in angiographic (X-ray of blood vessels, with radiopaque substance) procedures like DEB-TACE treatment. The Principal Investigator will check the beads given during the DEB-TACE. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
What is being tested?
SureFire Infusion System and Standard Endhole Microcatheter
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
May 2018to Nov 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients > 18 years with confirmed diagnosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who are candidates for TACE therapy
  • Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Classification (BCLC) A or B
  • Child-Pugh Class A or B
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1
  • 1 to 5 target tumors that are < 6cm with at least one tumor ≥ 3cm in size
  • Vessel size ≥ 1.5 mm
  • Subject must be able to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Extra-hepatic spread of the cancer
  • Macrovascular tumor invasion
  • Diffuse HCC (>50% liver involvement)
  • Previous chemotherapy, radiotherapy, transarterial embolization or ablations in the targeted tumor(s)
  • Advanced liver disease (bilirubin > 3 mg/dl, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or ALT > 5x upper limit of normal or > 250 U/I
  • Extrahepatic supply to the tumor
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Hypovascular tumors
  • Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction or Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40 percent
  • Any serious medical or psychiatric illness/condition that will interfere or limit compliance with study requirements/treatments.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Clinical Study of Precision TACE (P-TACE) With Surefire Infusion Catheter Versus Standard Endhole Catheter (E-TACE) Utilizing Radiopaque Drug Eluting Beads (LUMI) in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

The purpose of this research study is to learn about 2 types of FDA-approved catheters used in angiographic (X-ray of blood vessels, with radiopaque substance) procedures like DEB-TACE treatment. The Principal Investigator will check the beads given during the DEB-TACE. They will compare the way in which they are spread out in the tumor and density (how condensed something is).

Being tested
SureFire Infusion System, Standard Endhole Microcatheter
Keywords
Chemoembolization (TACE), HCC, Liver Cancer
Medical subject headings
Liver Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SureFire Infusion SystemDevice

    Surefire is a modified microcatheter with an expandable cone at its tip to prevent retrograde reflux of flow and change flow dynamics downstream.

  • Standard Endhole MicrocatheterDevice

    A Microcatheter with a single hole at the end for a infusion.

Study groups in NCT03345225
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupActive comparatorParticipants will be randomized to receive DEB-TACE utilizing a standard endhole microcatheter
Receives: Device: Standard Endhole Microcatheter
Surefire GroupExperimentalParticipants will be randomized to receive DEB-TACE utilizing the Surefire Infusion System
Receives: Device: SureFire Infusion System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparing the change in the Lencioni score between the SureFire infusion system and a standard endhole microcatheter

    The Lencioni score (calculated by comparing pre and post embolization CT attenuation of the tumor averaged over tumor volume) is used to compare the distribution of chemoembolic beads in the tumor to see if the Surefire Infusion system improves tumor coverage.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. The Lencioni Score (LS)

    The Lencioni score (calculated by comparing pre and post embolization CT attenuation of the tumor averaged over tumor volume) is used to compare the distribution of chemoembolic beads in the tumor to see if the Surefire Infusion system improves tumor coverage.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. The Lencioni Score (LS)

    The Lencioni score (calculated by comparing pre and post embolization CT attenuation of the tumor averaged over tumor volume) is used to compare the distribution of chemoembolic beads in the tumor to see if the Surefire Infusion system improves tumor coverage.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Objective Response Rate as measured by mRECIST

    Objective Response Rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients who are responders as confirmed with partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) based on enhancement pattern and size of target lesions

    Measured: 1 Month

  4. Objective Response Rate as measured by mRECIST

    Objective Response Rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients who are responders as confirmed with partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) based on enhancement pattern and size of target lesions

    Measured: 3 Month

  5. Objective Response Rate as measured by mRECIST

    Objective Response Rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients who are responders as confirmed with partial response (PR) or confirmed complete response (CR) based on enhancement pattern and size of target lesions

    Measured: 6 Month

  6. Distribution of Radiopaque beads

    Qualitative assessment of the coverage distribution of radiopaque beads, measured on a Likert scale (with response values ranking from 1-5 where 1 is complete coverage and 5 is minimal coverage) in the two treatment arms

    Measured: 1 Month

  7. Distribution of Radiopaque beads

    Qualitative assessment of the coverage distribution of radiopaque beads, measured on a Likert scale (with response values ranking from 1-5 where 1 is complete coverage and 5 is minimal coverage) in the two treatment arms

    Measured: 3 Month

  8. Distribution of Radiopaque beads

    Qualitative assessment of the coverage distribution of radiopaque beads, measured on a Likert scale (with response values ranking from 1-5 where 1 is complete coverage and 5 is minimal coverage) in the two treatment arms

    Measured: 6 Month

  9. Tumor enhancement

    Comparing tumor enhancement relative to a calibrated imaging phantom

    Measured: 1 month

  10. Tumor enhancement

    Comparing tumor enhancement relative to a calibrated imaging phantom

    Measured: 3 month

  11. Tumor enhancement

    Comparing tumor enhancement relative to a calibrated imaging phantom

    Measured: 6 month

  12. Number of Adverse Event

    Adverse Event measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE)

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2017
  2. Study startMay 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2021 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03345225
Sponsor's protocol ID
20170185
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
13 Nov 2017
Last updated
11 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SureFire Infusion System and Standard Endhole Microcatheter in people with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by University of Miami at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparing the change in the Lencioni score between the SureFire infusion system and a standard endhole microcatheter (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in