AzTrials
AzTrials

Obstructive Sleep ApneaNCT03345524

Predictive Analytics and Peer-Driven Intervention for Guideline-based Care for Sleep Apnea

A study testing Peer-Buddy System in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition that affects 7 to 12% of the US population and is characterized by repetitive collapse of the upper airway during sleep. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of OSA, however, adherence is poor with up to… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
What is being tested?
Peer-Buddy System
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
145 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Nov 2017to 11 Oct 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Referral for sleep study testing for possible OSA
  • Medicaid and dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries
  • Household income in the bottom national quartile of household median income
  • Adherent to CPAP therapy (greater than or equal to 4 hours per night of CPAP use)
  • Willing to meet with peer-buddy on 2-4 occasions in-person
  • Has a cell phone or other reliable telephone line
  • Willing to undergo one-two training and orientation session(s) and pass a subsequent mock patient interaction

Who cannot join

  • Central sleep apnea (CSA)
  • Participation in another intervention-based research study
  • Patient's primary care provider refuses patient participation for medical instability
  • Central sleep apnea (CSA)
  • Participation in another intervention-based research study
  • Patient's primary care provider refuses patient participation for medical instability
  • Major depression or other major psychiatric illness
  • Shift-worker or frequent out of town traveler

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sairam Parthasarathy, MD contact

520-626-6109

sparthasarathy@deptofmed.arizona.edu

United States1 site
  • University of Arizona

    Tucson, Arizona, 85721

    Sairam Parthasarathy, MD, 520-626-6109, sparthasarathy@deptofmed.arizona.edu

    Chris Morton, 520-626-8457, cjmorton@email.arizona.edu

Other trials in United States

About this study

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent condition that affects 7 to 12% of the US population and is characterized by repetitive collapse of the upper airway during sleep. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of OSA, however, adherence is poor with up to 54% of patients being non-adherent to CPAP therapy by Medicare criteria, which has been attributed to inadequate patient education and support for CPAP therapy.

Poor treatment adherence in patients with OSA can lead to adverse health consequences, poor quality of life, and patient dissatisfaction. Poor treatment adherence may be due to lack of sufficient patient education, time delays in delivery of care, lack of adequate healthcare coordination, or difficulty accessing various healthcare providers across a front desk which serves as a "healthcare bottle-neck". Better efficiency in healthcare delivery, with greater connectivity through knowledgeable and trained peer volunteers and cheap cell-phones integrated by a smart telephone exchange may alleviate some of the care and communication burden faced by the healthcare system. Specifically, such community health education volunteers ("peer-buddies") who are experienced in managing their OSA may be able to impart knowledge and confidence to a recently diagnosed patient in a much more personalized manner than that of a group therapy session.

Read the detailed description

OSA affects 7 to 12% of the US population and is an independent risk factor for several clinical consequences such as systemic hypertension, cardiovascular disease, stroke, reduced HR-QOL, increased all-cause mortality, and motor vehicle accidents due to sleepiness. However, OSA and other sleep disorders are woefully underdiagnosed because of time constraints at the PCP's office. Such poor CPAP adherence is associated with increased risk for fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events. CPAP therapy has been associated with up to 3-fold reduction in fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in both on-treatment analysis of RCTs and observational studies. CPAP therapy is associated with 7-fold reduction in sleepiness-related accidents. The overarching aim of this proposal is to institute a multi-level strategy aimed at improving guideline based care for OSA in populations with health disparities.

The overarching aim of the program of research is to eventually institute a multi-level strategy with interventions aimed at both providers and patients in order to improve guideline based care for OSA in populations with health disparities. Specifically, in order to address the under-diagnosis of OSA, an electronic health record (EHR) based predictive analytics system will be implemented. A similar EHR-based alert system with reflex order sets for initiating testing for OSA that the investigators have developed will enable PCPs to effectively diagnose and treat OSA. It was found that in a nationally representative dataset of ~220,000 patients, lower neighborhood income was associated with lower CPAP adherence. Considering the time and access-related barriers in the PCP office, it is believed that such socioeconomic status (SES) related differences in CPAP adherence needs to be addressed by culturally-competent peer educators (such as promotors) with OSA serving as "peer-buddies". In a recent multi-site RCT, it was found that CPAP adherence and patient satisfaction was improved by peer-driven intervention through an interactive voice response system (PDI-IVR; PCORI-IHS-1306-02505), whereby the peers shared their experiences with CPAP naïve patients and educated them about OSA and risks of CPAP nonadherence. Whether PDI-IVR can improve adherence in underserved population in low resource clinics is unclear. In this proposal, 110 CPAP naïve patients and 35 experienced peer-buddies will be recruited in from a large healthcare system that provides care for an underserved population with an excess burden of sleep disorders (Medicaid and dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries). This study will address health disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of OSA using a patient-level educational intervention (PDI-IVR system) targeting patients and thereby promote health equity. This proposal will also inform future studies by gathering additional data on the effect of PDI-IVR on adherence to sleep study testing and CPAP adherence in an underserved population in low resource clinics.

Specific Aim #1: To test a peer-driven intervention with interactive voice response (PDI-IVR) system to improve adherence to sleep study testing in a lower socioeconomic population.

Hypothesis #1: A PDI-IVR support system will lead to greater adherence to sleep study testing in patients with OSA when compared to patients receiving conventional education.

Specific Aim #2: To test a peer-driven intervention with interactive voice response (PDI-IVR) system to improve CPAP treatment adherence in a lower socioeconomic population.

Hypothesis #2: A PDI-IVR support system will lead to greater adherence to CPAP therapy in patients with OSA when compared to patients receiving conventional education.

Being tested
Peer-Buddy System, Usual Care
Keywords
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, OSA, Peer-Buddies, CPAP, CPAP Adherence
Medical subject headings
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peer-Buddy SystemOther

    2-4 30-minute in person sessions with Peer Buddy (2 before and 2 after receiving CPAP)

    Standard of care CPAP educational training

    8-10 phone conversations with Peer Buddy over 3 month period

    Subsequent 3 months use of phone system to contact Peer Buddy as needed

  • Usual CareOther

    Standard of care CPAP educational training

    Educational Brochures and DVD videos mailed to participants (12 times)

Study groups in NCT03345524
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Peer-buddy systemExperimentalWill meet with peer-buddy who will help with them with CPAP usage. Also will receive standard of care CPAP educational training
Receives: Other: Peer-Buddy System
Usual CareActive comparatorWill receive educational material at the same frequency that those in the experimental arm. Will also receive standard of care CPAP educational training.
Receives: Other: Usual Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients undergoing sleep study testing

    Difference between the proportion of patients in the peer-buddy arm from the proportion of patients in the conventional educational arm that follow-through and undergo sleep study testing.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. CPAP Adherence downloads

    All CPAP devices have internal adherence monitoring which can be downloaded using a computer cable, smart card, SD chip or wireless transmission. The objective, adherence information as 'mask-on' time for 6 months, number of nights used, cumulative hours used, average hours of CPAP use per night, and average number of hours per day of CPAP use will be derived. The proportion of days in which CPAP use was at least 4 hr (Medicare criterion) will also be utilized. Change in CPAP adherence over time will be assessed.

    Measured: Day 30, Day 90, and Day 180

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2017
  2. Study start17 Nov 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion11 Oct 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion11 Oct 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized Controlled Trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
145 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03345524
Sponsor's protocol ID
1709834717
Other IDs
1R56HL138377-01
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
13 Nov 2017
Last updated
17 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Punjabi NM. The epidemiology of adult obstructive sleep apnea. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008 Feb 15;5(2):136-43. doi: 10.1513/pats.200709-155MG.

    PubMed 18250205
  • Marin JM, Agusti A, Villar I, Forner M, Nieto D, Carrizo SJ, Barbe F, Vicente E, Wei Y, Nieto FJ, Jelic S. Association between treated and untreated obstructive sleep apnea and risk of hypertension. JAMA. 2012 May 23;307(20):2169-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3418.

    PubMed 22618924
  • Peppard PE, Young T, Palta M, Skatrud J. Prospective study of the association between sleep-disordered breathing and hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1378-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421901.

    PubMed 10805822
  • Nieto FJ, Young TB, Lind BK, Shahar E, Samet JM, Redline S, D'Agostino RB, Newman AB, Lebowitz MD, Pickering TG. Association of sleep-disordered breathing, sleep apnea, and hypertension in a large community-based study. Sleep Heart Health Study. JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1829-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.14.1829.

    PubMed 10770144
  • Peker Y, Carlson J, Hedner J. Increased incidence of coronary artery disease in sleep apnoea: a long-term follow-up. Eur Respir J. 2006 Sep;28(3):596-602. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00107805. Epub 2006 Apr 26.

    PubMed 16641120
  • Leung RS, Bradley TD. Sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Dec 15;164(12):2147-65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.12.2107045. No abstract available.

    PubMed 11751180
  • Yumino D, Wang H, Floras JS, Newton GE, Mak S, Ruttanaumpawan P, Parker JD, Bradley TD. Relationship between sleep apnoea and mortality in patients with ischaemic heart failure. Heart. 2009 May;95(10):819-24. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.160952. Epub 2009 Jan 8.

    PubMed 19131443
  • Yaggi HK, Concato J, Kernan WN, Lichtman JH, Brass LM, Mohsenin V. Obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for stroke and death. N Engl J Med. 2005 Nov 10;353(19):2034-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043104.

    PubMed 16282178
  • Weaver TE. Outcome measurement in sleep medicine practice and research. Part 1: assessment of symptoms, subjective and objective daytime sleepiness, health-related quality of life and functional status. Sleep Med Rev. 2001 Apr;5(2):103-128. doi: 10.1053/smrv.2001.0152.

    PubMed 12531049
  • Punjabi NM, Caffo BS, Goodwin JL, Gottlieb DJ, Newman AB, O'Connor GT, Rapoport DM, Redline S, Resnick HE, Robbins JA, Shahar E, Unruh ML, Samet JM. Sleep-disordered breathing and mortality: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2009 Aug;6(8):e1000132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000132. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

    PubMed 19688045
  • Gami AS, Howard DE, Olson EJ, Somers VK. Day-night pattern of sudden death in obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1206-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041832.

    PubMed 15788497
  • Teran-Santos J, Jimenez-Gomez A, Cordero-Guevara J. The association between sleep apnea and the risk of traffic accidents. Cooperative Group Burgos-Santander. N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 18;340(11):847-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903183401104.

    PubMed 10080847
  • Mulgrew AT, Nasvadi G, Butt A, Cheema R, Fox N, Fleetham JA, Ryan CF, Cooper P, Ayas NT. Risk and severity of motor vehicle crashes in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea. Thorax. 2008 Jun;63(6):536-41. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.085464. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

    PubMed 18234904
  • Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ, Shahar E, O'Connor GT, Resnick HE, Diener-West M, Sanders MH, Wolf PA, Geraghty EM, Ali T, Lebowitz M, Punjabi NM. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and incident stroke: the sleep heart health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Jul 15;182(2):269-77. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200911-1746OC. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

    PubMed 20339144
  • Rahaghi F, Basner RC. Delayed Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Don't Ask, Don't Tell. Sleep Breath. 1999;3(4):119-124. doi: 10.1007/s11325-999-0119-z.

    PubMed 11898119

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Peer-Buddy System in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by University of Arizona at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sairam Parthasarathy, MD (520-626-6109, sparthasarathy@deptofmed.arizona.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients undergoing sleep study testing (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03345524, which also lists 23 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in