Colorectal CancerNCT03346005
Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Using an Electronic Nose Device (AeoNoseTM)
A study testing Aeonose in people with Colorectal Cancer and Polyps of Colon, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The present study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the Aeonose (the eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) to distinguish the breath of patients suspected for CRC (based on a positive fecal immunochemical test), who are truly diagnosed with CRC, from patients suspected for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Polyps of Colon
- What is being tested?
- Aeonose
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,345 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2017to 31 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years referred for a colonoscopy procedures after a positive FIT test.
Who cannot join
- Patients with a history of any type of malignancy (not including basal-cell skin cancer (BCC) and squamous-cell skin cancer (SCC))
- Prior surgical resection of any portion of the colon
- Patients who are unable to perform breathing maneuver needed for Aeonose-analysis of exhaled air
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The present study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the Aeonose (the eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) to distinguish the breath of patients suspected for CRC (based on a positive fecal immunochemical test), who are truly diagnosed with CRC, from patients suspected for CRC in whom this diagnosis is rejected after colonoscopy.
Read the detailed description
Study rationale:
Colonoscopy plays a key role in all colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities. An important limitation of colonoscopy remains that the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy both depend on several physician and patient-related factors. Significant amounts of polyps are missed during colonoscopy and severe untoward effects still occur in 0.1%-0.3% of all colonoscopy procedures, even among expert examiners. Moreover, the burdensome nature of the procedure and the necessity of full bowel preparation negatively influences participation rates and the use of colonoscopy as a CRC screening test is limited by healthcare costs and the expertise needed to perform the screening. These disadvantages of colonoscopy warrant the development of a new, non-invasive, accurate CRC screening test.
An electronic nose device is an artificial olfactory system that analyses volate organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. The use of electronic noses has already been assessed as a potential non-invasive diagnostic biomarker test for lung cancer, breast cancer and malignant melanomas. The present study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the AeonoseTM (The eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) to distinguish the breath of patients suspected for CRC (based on a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT)), who are truly diagnosed with CRC, from patients suspected for CRC in whom this diagnosis is rejected after colonoscopy.
Objectives:
- To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the AeonoseTM to distinguish the breath of patients suspected for CRC based on a positive FIT test, who are truly diagnosed with CRC, from patients suspected for CRC in whom this diagnosis is rejected after colonoscopy.
- To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the AeonoseTM for other (pre-)malignant colon lesions (e.g. advanced adenomas, non-advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated lesions).
- To assess the acceptance rate of using the AeonoseTM device.
Study design: The present multicenter study will include 1950 FIT-positive patients. The study will be conducted in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. First a database of breath prints will be developed to detect CRC. In this study phase the AeonoseTM will be trained and the database of breath prints will be verified using "leave 10% out" cross validation. After the calibration phase the diagnostic accuracy of AeonoseTM will be assessed in new study patients (external validation).
Study population: Patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years old with a positive FIT-test referred for a colonoscopy procedure.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
- The ability of AeonoseTM to distinguish between patients with and without CRC in a FIT-positive population in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
- The diagnostic accuracy of AeonoseTM for other (pre-)malignant colon lesions.
- Acceptance rate of AeonoseTM
Statistical analysis:
Data on demographic and baseline characteristics will be summarized for continuous variables, in case of normal distribution by mean and standard deviation, and in case of non-normal distribution by median and interquartile range. For discrete variables (eg, race and sex) data will be summarized by proportions (percentages). Differences in baseline characteristics will be determined using independent sample t test, Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test, when appropriate. A 2-sided p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
The data will be analyzed by an artificial neural network (ANN) to identify data classifiers to extract differences between the patterns in patients by the presence or absence of CRC in biopsies. By analyzing a group of breath prints from patients with and without CRC, individual differences of diet, medications, co-morbidities, and other factors can be filtered out to identify features that distinguish the compounds of patients with CRC. This process continues until a selected level of discrimination is met. Data compression and ANN have been integrated in a proprietary software package (Aethena) of the eNose Company (Zutphen, the Netherlands).
The binary results will be presented in a scatterplot and a receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-curve). Matthews correlation coefficients will be calculated to measure the quality of binary classifications. Cross-validation of the data will be performed using a leave-10%-out method. A portion of the data is left out to predict the most optimal model.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Polyps of Colon
- Being tested
- Aeonose
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AeonoseDevice
An electronic nose device is an artificial olfactory system that analyses volate organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. The AeonoseTM is a handheld device of 650 gram. A nose clip will be used to prevent the entry of non-filtered air and patients will be instructed to enclose the mouthpiece with their mouth at all times. A measurement cycle lasts for about 15 minutes, of which 5 minutes of in-and exhalation by the patient takes place.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients with positive FIT test | Experimental | Adult patients with a positive FIT-test will breath into an e-nose device for 5 minutes. Receives: Device: Aeonose |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The ability of AeonoseTM to distinguish between patients with and without colorectal cancer in a FIT-positive population in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity and specificity of the Aeonose
Measured: 1.5 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
The diagnostic accuracy of AeonoseTM for other (pre-)malignant colon lesions (e.g. advanced adenomas, non-advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated lesions).
Sensitivity and specificity of the Aeonose
Measured: 1.5 year
Acceptance rate of AeonoseTM.
Willingness to repeat the procedure and discomfort during test
Measured: 1.5 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Nov 2017
- Study start9 Nov 2017
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completion31 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,345 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Peter D Siersema, MD, Principal investigator, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03346005
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2017-3704
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 14 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
van Riswijk MLM, van Keulen KE, Tan ACITL, Schrauwen RWM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Siersema PD; eNose CRC study group. Research Communication: Breath Testing for Colorectal Cancer Detection in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Multicentre Prospective Cross-Sectional Study With External Validation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jul;62(2):208-213. doi: 10.1111/apt.70207. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
PubMed 40459533van Riswijk MLM, van Tintelen BFM, Lucas RH, van der Palen J, Siersema PD. Overcoming methodological barriers in electronic nose clinical studies, a simulation data-based approach. J Breath Res. 2025 May 9;19(3). doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/add291.
PubMed 40306296
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Using an Electronic Nose Device (AeoNoseTM)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03346005
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2017-3704
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Polyps of Colon
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,345 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The present study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the Aeonose (the eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) to distinguish the breath of patients suspected for CRC (based on a positive fecal immunochemical test), who are truly diagnosed with CRC, from patients suspected for CRC in whom this diagnosis is rejected after colonoscopy.
Detailed description
Study rationale:
Colonoscopy plays a key role in all colorectal cancer (CRC) screening modalities. An important limitation of colonoscopy remains that the diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic safety of colonoscopy both depend on several physician and patient-related factors. Significant amounts of polyps are missed during colonoscopy and severe untoward effects still occur in 0.1%-0.3% of all colonoscopy procedures, even among expert examiners. Moreover, the burdensome nature of the procedure and the necessity of full bowel preparation negatively influences participation rates and the use of colonoscopy as a CRC screening test is limited by healthcare costs and the expertise needed to perform the screening. These disadvantages of colonoscopy warrant the development of a new, non-invasive, accurate CRC screening test.
An electronic nose device is an artificial olfactory system that analyses volate organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. The use of electronic noses has already been assessed as a potential non-invasive diagnostic biomarker test for lung cancer, breast cancer and malignant melanomas. The present study aims to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the AeonoseTM (The eNose Company, Zutphen, the Netherlands) to distinguish the breath of patients suspected for CRC (based on a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT)), who are truly diagnosed with CRC, from patients suspected for CRC in whom this diagnosis is rejected after colonoscopy.
Objectives:
- To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the AeonoseTM to distinguish the breath of patients suspected for CRC based on a positive FIT test, who are truly diagnosed with CRC, from patients suspected for CRC in whom this diagnosis is rejected after colonoscopy.
- To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of exhaled breath analysis with the AeonoseTM for other (pre-)malignant colon lesions (e.g. advanced adenomas, non-advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated lesions).
- To assess the acceptance rate of using the AeonoseTM device.
Study design: The present multicenter study will include 1950 FIT-positive patients. The study will be conducted in seven hospitals in the Netherlands. First a database of breath prints will be developed to detect CRC. In this study phase the AeonoseTM will be trained and the database of breath prints will be verified using "leave 10% out" cross validation. After the calibration phase the diagnostic accuracy of AeonoseTM will be assessed in new study patients (external validation).
Study population: Patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years old with a positive FIT-test referred for a colonoscopy procedure.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
- The ability of AeonoseTM to distinguish between patients with and without CRC in a FIT-positive population in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
- The diagnostic accuracy of AeonoseTM for other (pre-)malignant colon lesions.
- Acceptance rate of AeonoseTM
Statistical analysis:
Data on demographic and baseline characteristics will be summarized for continuous variables, in case of normal distribution by mean and standard deviation, and in case of non-normal distribution by median and interquartile range. For discrete variables (eg, race and sex) data will be summarized by proportions (percentages). Differences in baseline characteristics will be determined using independent sample t test, Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test, when appropriate. A 2-sided p-value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
The data will be analyzed by an artificial neural network (ANN) to identify data classifiers to extract differences between the patterns in patients by the presence or absence of CRC in biopsies. By analyzing a group of breath prints from patients with and without CRC, individual differences of diet, medications, co-morbidities, and other factors can be filtered out to identify features that distinguish the compounds of patients with CRC. This process continues until a selected level of discrimination is met. Data compression and ANN have been integrated in a proprietary software package (Aethena) of the eNose Company (Zutphen, the Netherlands).
The binary results will be presented in a scatterplot and a receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC-curve). Matthews correlation coefficients will be calculated to measure the quality of binary classifications. Cross-validation of the data will be performed using a leave-10%-out method. A portion of the data is left out to predict the most optimal model.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients with positive FIT test | Experimental | Device: AeonoseAdult patients with a positive FIT-test will breath into an e-nose device for 5 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients between the ages of 55 and 75 years referred for a colonoscopy procedures after a positive FIT test.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with a history of any type of malignancy (not including basal-cell skin cancer (BCC) and squamous-cell skin cancer (SCC))
- Prior surgical resection of any portion of the colon
- Patients who are unable to perform breathing maneuver needed for Aeonose-analysis of exhaled air
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AeonoseAn electronic nose device is an artificial olfactory system that analyses volate organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. The AeonoseTM is a handheld device of 650 gram. A nose clip will be used to prevent the entry of non-filtered air and patients will be instructed to enclose the mouthpiece with their mouth at all times. A measurement cycle lasts for about 15 minutes, of which 5 minutes of in-and exhalation by the patient takes place. | Device | Adult patients with positive FIT test |
Primary outcome
The ability of AeonoseTM to distinguish between patients with and without colorectal cancer in a FIT-positive population in terms of sensitivity and specificity.
Time frame: 1.5 year
Sensitivity and specificity of the Aeonose
2 secondary outcomes
The diagnostic accuracy of AeonoseTM for other (pre-)malignant colon lesions (e.g. advanced adenomas, non-advanced adenomas, and sessile serrated lesions).
Time frame: 1.5 year
Acceptance rate of AeonoseTM.
Time frame: 1.5 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40459533van Riswijk MLM, van Keulen KE, Tan ACITL, Schrauwen RWM, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Siersema PD; eNose CRC study group. Research Communication: Breath Testing for Colorectal Cancer Detection in Patients With a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test: A Multicentre Prospective Cross-Sectional Study With External Validation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Jul;62(2):208-213. doi: 10.1111/apt.70207. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40306296van Riswijk MLM, van Tintelen BFM, Lucas RH, van der Palen J, Siersema PD. Overcoming methodological barriers in electronic nose clinical studies, a simulation data-based approach. J Breath Res. 2025 May 9;19(3). doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/add291.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter D Siersema, MD principal investigator
Radboud University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Aeonose in people with Colorectal Cancer and Polyps of Colon, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The ability of AeonoseTM to distinguish between patients with and without colorectal cancer in a FIT-positive population in terms of sensitivity and specificity. (time frame: 1.5 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03346005, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2020.