AzTrials
AzTrials

Psoriatic ArthritisPhase 2BE ACTIVE 2NCT03347110

A Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Psoriatic Arthritis

A Phase 2 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 37 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a study to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of bimekizumab in subjects with psoriatic arthritis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriatic Arthritis
What is being tested?
Bimekizumab
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
184 participants
Where
37 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
22 Nov 2017to 29 Oct 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • In the opinion of the Investigator, the subject is expected to benefit from participation in an Open Label Extension (OLE) study
  • Subject completed PA0008 without meeting any withdrawal criteria
  • Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or, if of childbearing potential, must be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception
  • Male subjects with a partner of childbearing potential must be willing to use a condom when sexually active

Who cannot join

  • Female subjects who plan to become pregnant during the study or within 20 weeks following the last dose of IMP. Male subjects who are planning a partner pregnancy during the study or within 20 weeks following the last dose
  • Subjects with any current sign or symptom that may indicate a medically significant active infection (except for the common cold) or has had an infection requiring systemic antibiotics within 2 weeks of study entry
  • Subjects who meet any withdrawal criteria in PA0008. For any subject with an ongoing Serious Adverse Event, or a history of serious infections (including hospitalizations) in the lead-in study, the Medical Monitor must be consulted prior to the subject's entry into PA0009

Trial locations and contacts

37 sites in 6 countries.

37 sites in 6 countries

United States11 sites
  • Pa0009 004

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Pa0009 006

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Pa0009 001

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Pa0009 003

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21502

  • Pa0009 010

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Pa0009 012

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • Pa0009 011

    Lansing, Michigan, 48910

  • Pa0009 025

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40504

  • Pa0009 013

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Pa0009 014

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • Pa0009 028

    Rochester, New York, 14642

Other trials in United States

Poland9 sites
  • Pa0009 452

    Bialystok

  • Pa0009 453

    Elblag

  • Pa0009 456

    Elblag

  • Pa0009 455

    Krakow

  • Pa0009 451

    Poznan

  • Pa0009 450

    Torun

  • Pa0009 454

    Warsaw

  • Pa0009 459

    Warsaw

  • Pa0009 465

    Wroclaw

Other trials in Poland

Czechia6 sites
  • Pa0009 205

    Brno

  • Pa0009 207

    Olomouc

  • Pa0009 201

    Prague

  • Pa0009 202

    Prague

  • Pa0009 210

    Prague

  • Pa0009 203

    Zlín

Other trials in Czechia

Russia5 sites
  • Pa0009 604

    Moscow

  • Pa0009 605

    Moscow

  • Pa0009 607

    Moscow

  • Pa0009 606

    Saint Petersburg

  • Pa0009 608

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Germany4 sites
  • Pa0009 302

    Cologne

  • Pa0009 309

    Erlangen

  • Pa0009 304

    Hamburg

  • Pa0009 301

    Ratingen

Other trials in Germany

Hungary2 sites
  • Pa0009 403

    Budapest

  • Pa0009 401

    Veszprém

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Follow-Up Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Psoriatic Arthritis

This is a study to assess the long-term safety and tolerability of bimekizumab in subjects with psoriatic arthritis

Being tested
Bimekizumab
Keywords
Bimekizumab, Psoriatic Arthritis, PsA
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Psoriatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BimekizumabDrug

    Also called UCB4940

    Bimekizumab at a prespecified dose.

Study groups in NCT03347110
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BimekizumabExperimentalSubjects will receive bimekizumab up to 2 years.
Receives: Drug: Bimekizumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. TEAEs were defined as events with onset date on or after the start date of study medication in PA0009.

    Measured: From Entry Visit of PA0009 until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 120)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study

    A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, life-threatening, significant or persistent disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, important medical event, initial inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization.

    Measured: From Entry Visit of PA0009 until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 120)

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Percentage of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) During the Study

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.

    Measured: From Entry Visit of PA0009 until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 120)

  2. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Week 48 Calculated Relative to Baseline of PA0008

    The ACR20 response rate was based on 20% or greater improvement relative to Baseline of PA0008 in the following measures: Tender Joint Count (TJC) based on 78 joints, Swollen Joint Count (SJC) based on 76 joints; 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Disease activity as assessed by Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGADA), Disease activity as assessed by Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PhGADA), Pain as assessed by Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), Physical function as assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Acute phase response as assessed by high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs CRP). Participants for whom ACR could not be derived due to missing data were counted as non-responders as per NRI analysis.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0008, Week 48

  3. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% Improvement (ACR50) Response at Week 48 Calculated Relative to Baseline of PA0008

    The ACR50 response rate was based on 50% or greater improvement relative to Baseline of PA0008 in the following measures: TJC based on 78 joints, SJC based on 76 joints; 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Disease activity as assessed by PGADA, Disease activity as assessed by PhGADA, Pain as assessed by PtAAP, Physical function as assessed by HAQ-DI, Acute phase response as assessed by hs CRP. Participants for whom ACR could not be derived due to missing data were counted as non-responders as per NRI analysis.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0008, Week 48

  4. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% Improvement (ACR70) Response at Week 48 Calculated Relative to Baseline of PA0008

    The ACR70 response rate was based on 70% or greater improvement relative to Baseline of PA0008 in the following measures: TJC based on 78 joints, SJC based on 76 joints; 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: Disease activity as assessed by PGADA, Disease activity as assessed by PhGADA, Pain as assessed by PtAAP, Physical function as assessed by HAQ-DI, Acute phase response as assessed by hs CRP. Participants for whom ACR could not be derived due to missing data were counted as non-responders as per NRI analysis.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0008, Week 48

  5. Change From Baseline of PA0008 in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Index (MASES) at Week 48 Calculated Relative to Baseline of PA0008

    The MASES is an index that measures the severity (ie, intensity and extent) of enthesitis through the assessment of 13 entheses (bilateral costochondral 1, costochondral 7, anterior superior iliac spine, posterior iliac spine, iliac crest and proximal insertion of the Achilles tendon sites, and the fifth lumbar vertebral body spinous process). Each item was scored as 0 = not tender or 1 = tender and then were summed for a possible score of 0 to 13, with higher scores indicating worse enthesitis. If 7 or more items were available, MASES was calculated by dividing the summed score with the number of assessments and multiplying the result by 13. If less than 7 items were available, MASES was treated as missing.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0008, Week 48

  6. Change From Baseline of PA0008 in the Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) at Week 48 Calculated Relative to Baseline of PA0008

    Presence of dactylitis was assessed using the LDI basic which evaluated for a greater than or equal to (>=) 10% difference in the circumference of the digit compared to the opposite digit and was then multiplied by the tenderness score, using a simple grading system (0=absent, 1=present). The results from each digit with dactylitis were summed to produce a final score. For the final score, the minimum value for LDI is zero and there is no maximum value. A low score indicates less dactylitis symptoms. A score of zero is considered dactylitis free. Observed values have been reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0008, Week 48

  7. Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI75) Response at Week 48 Calculated Relative to Baseline of PA0008

    The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline of PA0008. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining percentage of skin covered with psoriasis (PSO) for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. For the Final score, minimum possible PASI value is 0= no disease, maximum value is 72= maximal disease. Missing PASI responses were imputed using least observation carried forward (LOCF) for any visits where the corresponding BSA has not increased compared to the preceding visit.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0008, Week 48

  8. Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI90) Response at Week 48 Calculated Relative to Baseline of PA0008

    The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline of PA0008. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. For the final score, minimum possible PASI value is 0= no disease, maximum value is 72= maximal disease. Missing PASI responses were imputed using LOCF for any visits where the corresponding BSA has not increased compared to the preceding visit.

    Measured: Baseline of PA0008, Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Nov 2017
  2. Study start22 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2020
  4. Study completion29 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
184 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03347110
Sponsor's protocol ID
PA0009
Other IDs
2017-001003-74, 2017
Acronym
BE ACTIVE 2
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
15 Nov 2017
Last updated
1 Dec 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mease PJ, Asahina A, Gladman DD, Tanaka Y, Tillett W, Ink B, Assudani D, de la Loge C, Coarse J, Eells J, Gossec L. Effect of bimekizumab on symptoms and impact of disease in patients with psoriatic arthritis over 3 years: results from BE ACTIVE. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Feb 1;62(2):617-628. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac353.

    PubMed 35789257
  • Mease PJ, Merola JF, Magrey M, Nash P, Poddubnyy D, Lebwohl M, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Gensler LS. Bimekizumab longer-term safety profile in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: an updated analysis of six phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2026 Mar 10;12(1):e006174. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006174.

    PubMed 41807031
  • Mease PJ, Gensler LS, Orbai AM, Warren RB, Bajracharya R, Ink B, Marten A, Massow U, Shende V, Manente M, Peterson L, White K, Landewe R, Poddubnyy D. Long-term safety of bimekizumab in adult patients with axial spondyloarthritis or psoriatic arthritis: pooled results from integrated phase IIb/III clinical studies. RMD Open. 2025 Apr 6;11(2):e005026. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-005026.

    PubMed 40194794
  • Coates LC, McInnes IB, Merola JF, Warren RB, Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb AB, Gossec L, Assudani D, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Ink B, Ritchlin CT. Safety and Efficacy of Bimekizumab in Patients With Active Psoriatic Arthritis: Three-Year Results From a Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial and Its Open-Label Extension Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Dec;74(12):1959-1970. doi: 10.1002/art.42280. Epub 2022 Nov 18.

    PubMed 35829656

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Bimekizumab in people with Psoriatic Arthritis, run by UCB Biopharma SRL at 37 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 37 sites in United States, Poland, Czechia, Russia, Germany and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Dec 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study (time frame: From Entry Visit of PA0009 until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 120)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03347110, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 28 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in