Neuropathic PainPhase 4PELICANNCT03348735
Localized Neuropathic Pain: Topical Treatment Versus Systemic Treatment
A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine patch 5%, Capsaicin 8% Patch and Pregabalin in people with Neuropathic Pain, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 13 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
Evaluation of topical treatment with lidocaine 5% patch (daily administration) or capsaicin 8% patch (periodic administration - upon reoccurrence of pain symptoms) in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) across a wide variety of etiologies, with a duration between 1 and 24 months (subacute to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- Lidocaine patch 5%, Capsaicin 8% Patch and Pregabalin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 3 Dec 2018to 19 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Age < 18;
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women;
- Infection in the painful skin region;
- Poorly healed or non-healed wound or scar in the painful skin region as well as presence of cutaneous abnormalities (non-intact skin barrier) within the painful skin region related to dermatological conditions;
- Known and/or strong suspicion of allergy to the study medication, known skin disorder (resulting in disruption of the normal skin barrier);
- Previous treatment with any of the three medications included in the study protocol for the same painful area within the last 12 months at the time of screening;
- Risk of heart failure and/or renal failure.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
Belgium13 sites
AZ Monica (campus Antwerpen)
Antwerp, 2018
AZ Klina
Brasschaat, 2930
AZ Sint Jan Brugge
Bruges, 8000
UVC Brugmann
Brussels, 1020
Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
Charleroi, 6000
University hospital Antwerp
Edegem, Antwerp, 2650
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL
Genk, 3600
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent (UZG)
Ghent, 9000
UZ Brussel
Jette, 1090
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (UZL)
Leuven, 3000
Hopital Universitaire Sart Tilman de Liège (ULg) (CHU)
Liège, 4000
AZ Delta
Roeselare, 8800
AZ Turnhout
Turnhout, 2300
About this study
Official title: Safety, Efficacy and Patient Acceptability of Topical Treatment Versus Systemic Treatment: a Randomized, Multicentre, Comparative Pragmatic Trial in Adult Patients Suffering From Diverse Localized Neuropathic Pain (LNP) Syndromes
Evaluation of topical treatment with lidocaine 5% patch (daily administration) or capsaicin 8% patch (periodic administration - upon reoccurrence of pain symptoms) in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) across a wide variety of etiologies, with a duration between 1 and 24 months (subacute to chronic neuropathic pain (NP)).
Read the detailed description
A multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative trial evaluating topical treatment options versus oral systemic treatment in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) syndromes. A wide variety of peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes will be included such as post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), post-surgical NP/post-traumatic NP/scar pain, post-amputation NP, post-radiation therapy NP, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1. In contrast to most (or even all) commercial clinical studies we will not limit the inclusion to one or two distinct neuropathic pain syndromes such as post-herpetic neuralgia (inclusion based on etiology of the neuropathic syndrome). In this pragmatic trial we will however include all patients suffering from a clinical neuropathic syndrome with distinct clinical features such as hyperalgesia/allodynia, presence of spontaneous positive sensory phenomena and lasting for more than 3 months without making any exclusion based on etiology. Initial pain intensity indicates the presence of either moderate or severe pain in these adult patients (NRS 4/10).
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Being tested
- Lidocaine patch 5%, Capsaicin 8% Patch, Pregabalin
- Medical subject headings
- Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lidocaine patch 5%Drug
Application of Lidocaine 5% patch for 12 hours.
Capsaicin 8% PatchDrug
Application of Capsaicin 8% patch for
PregabalinDrug
Oral treatment with pregabalin (75mg capsules) will be used at optimized doses to best match clinical practice in Europe.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine patch 5% | Experimental | Lidocaine 5% medicated plasters will be applied daily, during 12 consecutive hours. Receives: Drug: Lidocaine patch 5% |
| Capsaicin 8% patch | Experimental | Capsaicin 8% patches need to applied in a hospital setting during 1 hour. Re-application of these capsaicin patches will be performed upon re-occurrence of painful symptoms (mostly after 12 weeks - so not after a fixed time interval). Application of capsaicin patches will be carried out in a hospital setting (+/- 3 hours procedure). Receives: Drug: Capsaicin 8% Patch |
| Pregabaline | Active comparator | Oral treatment with pregabalin (75mg capsules) will be used at optimized doses to best match clinical practice in Europe. In European clinical practice, up-titration of the dose is often carried out over a longer time-period. This study thus includes up-titration schedule for pregabalin over a period of 4 weeks. If patients develop side-effects during the intake/uptitration of pregabalin this treatment can be stopped and switched to gabapentin (300mg capsules). Gabapentin will always be the back-up treatment for failed systematic treatment with pregabalin. Dose of gabapentin will be uptitrated to maximum 1200mg per day. Receives: Drug: Pregabalin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Health-related quality of life questionnaire
To determine if topical treatment significantly improves health-related quality of life compared to systemic treatment in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain across a wide variety of etiologies (LNP), with a duration between 1 and 24 months.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Pain relief
Reduction in pain intensity (PI-NRS), time to worsening of the pain (PI-NRS and NPSI) and use of rescue medication (MSQ III-R)
Measured: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Health-related quality of life
AUC for EQ-5D-5L measurements, global perceived effect (GPE), effect on mood (HADS), quality of sleep (NRS and ISI).
Measured: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Drug tolerance
Percentage of patients without systemic drug related side effects, percentage of patients who discontinue the study drug.
Measured: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Functional status of the patient
Impact of pain on functioning (Interference - BPI), participation in activities (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI).
Measured: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Nov 2017
- Study start3 Dec 2018
- Primary completion19 Apr 2021
- Study completion19 Apr 2021
Why it stopped: Low inclusion rate
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neuropathic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, AntwerpThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative trial evaluating topical treatment options (lidocaine 5% or capsaicine 8% patch) versus oral systemic treatment (pregabaline as standard of care) in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) syndromes.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Antwerp
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Davina Wildemeersch, University Hospital, Antwerp
- Investigators
- Guy Hans, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Antwerp
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03348735
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R017007
- Acronym
- PELICAN
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hans GH, Almeshal D, Vanlommel L, Roelant E, Verhaegen I, Smits E, Van Boxem K, Fontaine R, Investigators Team TP. Considerations on the Obstacles That Lead to Slow Recruitment in a Pain Management Clinical Trial: Experiences from the Belgian PELICAN (PrEgabalin Lidocaine Capsaicin Neuropathic Pain) Pragmatic Study. Pain Res Manag. 2023 Apr 14;2023:7708982. doi: 10.1155/2023/7708982. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37089721
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety, Efficacy and Patient Acceptability of Topical Treatment Versus Systemic Treatment: a Randomized, Multicentre, Comparative Pragmatic Trial in Adult Patients Suffering From Diverse Localized Neuropathic Pain (LNP) Syndromes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03348735
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PELICAN / R017007
- Conditions
- Neuropathic Pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Low inclusion rate
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, AntwerpUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evaluation of topical treatment with lidocaine 5% patch (daily administration) or capsaicin 8% patch (periodic administration - upon reoccurrence of pain symptoms) in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) across a wide variety of etiologies, with a duration between 1 and 24 months (subacute to chronic neuropathic pain (NP)).
Detailed description
A multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative trial evaluating topical treatment options versus oral systemic treatment in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) syndromes. A wide variety of peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes will be included such as post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), post-surgical NP/post-traumatic NP/scar pain, post-amputation NP, post-radiation therapy NP, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1. In contrast to most (or even all) commercial clinical studies we will not limit the inclusion to one or two distinct neuropathic pain syndromes such as post-herpetic neuralgia (inclusion based on etiology of the neuropathic syndrome). In this pragmatic trial we will however include all patients suffering from a clinical neuropathic syndrome with distinct clinical features such as hyperalgesia/allodynia, presence of spontaneous positive sensory phenomena and lasting for more than 3 months without making any exclusion based on etiology. Initial pain intensity indicates the presence of either moderate or severe pain in these adult patients (NRS 4/10).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- A multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative trial evaluating topical treatment options (lidocaine 5% or capsaicine 8% patch) versus oral systemic treatment (pregabaline as standard of care) in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) syndromes.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine patch 5% | Experimental | Drug: Lidocaine patch 5%Lidocaine 5% medicated plasters will be applied daily, during 12 consecutive hours. |
| Capsaicin 8% patch | Experimental | Drug: Capsaicin 8% PatchCapsaicin 8% patches need to applied in a hospital setting during 1 hour. Re-application of these capsaicin patches will be performed upon re-occurrence of painful symptoms (mostly after 12 weeks - so not after a fixed time interval). Application of capsaicin patches will be carried out in a hospital setting (+/- 3 hours procedure). |
| Pregabaline | Active comparator | Drug: PregabalinOral treatment with pregabalin (75mg capsules) will be used at optimized doses to best match clinical practice in Europe. In European clinical practice, up-titration of the dose is often carried out over a longer time-period. This study thus includes up-titration schedule for pregabalin over a period of 4 weeks. If patients develop side-effects during the intake/uptitration of pregabalin this treatment can be stopped and switched to gabapentin (300mg capsules). Gabapentin will always be the back-up treatment for failed systematic treatment with pregabalin. Dose of gabapentin will be uptitrated to maximum 1200mg per day. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age < 18;
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women;
- Infection in the painful skin region;
- Poorly healed or non-healed wound or scar in the painful skin region as well as presence of cutaneous abnormalities (non-intact skin barrier) within the painful skin region related to dermatological conditions;
- Known and/or strong suspicion of allergy to the study medication, known skin disorder (resulting in disruption of the normal skin barrier);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lidocaine patch 5%Application of Lidocaine 5% patch for 12 hours. | Drug | Lidocaine patch 5% |
| Capsaicin 8% PatchApplication of Capsaicin 8% patch for | Drug | Capsaicin 8% patch |
| PregabalinOral treatment with pregabalin (75mg capsules) will be used at optimized doses to best match clinical practice in Europe. | Drug | Pregabaline |
Primary outcome
Health-related quality of life questionnaire
Time frame: 24 months
To determine if topical treatment significantly improves health-related quality of life compared to systemic treatment in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain across a wide variety of etiologies (LNP), with a duration between 1 and 24 months.
4 secondary outcomes
Pain relief
Time frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Drug tolerance
Time frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Functional status of the patient
Time frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Low inclusion rate). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37089721Hans GH, Almeshal D, Vanlommel L, Roelant E, Verhaegen I, Smits E, Van Boxem K, Fontaine R, Investigators Team TP. Considerations on the Obstacles That Lead to Slow Recruitment in a Pain Management Clinical Trial: Experiences from the Belgian PELICAN (PrEgabalin Lidocaine Capsaicin Neuropathic Pain) Pragmatic Study. Pain Res Manag. 2023 Apr 14;2023:7708982. doi: 10.1155/2023/7708982. eCollection 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Naltrexone Therapy for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Chronic Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
A Master Protocol Study (LY900028) of Multiple Intervention-Specific-Appendices (ISAs) in Participants With Chronic Pain
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Diabetic Neuropathic Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Trigeminal Neuralgia Electrophysiology
Trigeminal Neuralgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guy Hans, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Antwerp
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Lidocaine patch 5%, Capsaicin 8% Patch and Pregabalin in people with Neuropathic Pain, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 13 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Low inclusion rate). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Health-related quality of life questionnaire (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03348735, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2021.