Atrial FibrillationMICRO-AFNCT03350581
Does the Merged 3D Imaging Improve Contact Force and Long Term Procedure Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation?
A study testing FAM 3D map group and FAM-CT 3D map group in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Korea University Guro Hospital at 2 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether or not there are the differences in acute procedure and long-term clinical outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) using the 3D map constructed by the integration of CT(or MRI) with the fast anatomical mapping (FAM) versus using… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation
- What is being tested?
- FAM 3D map group and FAM-CT 3D map group
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 21 Nov 2017to 30 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for AF.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
Who cannot join
- Patients who have previously undergone AF ablation
- Patients with more than mild mitral valve stenosis or mechanical mitral valve replacement
- Patients with chronic renal impairment with creatinine clearance rate of < 50
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
South Korea2 sites
Bucheon Sejong Hospital
Bucheon-si, 14754
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, Guro-gu, 08308
About this study
Official title: Does the Merged 3D Imaging Improve Contact Force and Long Term Procedure Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation? (MICRO-AF Study)
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether or not there are the differences in acute procedure and long-term clinical outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) using the 3D map constructed by the integration of CT(or MRI) with the fast anatomical mapping (FAM) versus using the 3D map constructed by FAM only.
Read the detailed description
In a recent study, ablation therapy of AF was superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrences in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Various techniques have been proposed and are currently under investigation in various electrophysiology laboratories, with increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of human AF and critical assessment of clinical outcome after the procedure. The factors related with the technical success involves appropriate contact force between catheter tip and target tissue for the complete electrical blockade and transmural ablation scar formation through continuous and sufficient energy transfer.
For improving contact and energy transfer, it is required to accurately visualize the 3D anatomy of the left atrium in order to reduce fluoroscopic exposure during the procedure. For the purpose, electro-anatomic mapping systems (EAM) are commonly being used to reconstruct a virtual 3D chamber anatomy through the acquisition of a limited number of anatomical surface location points derived from the position of the catheter tip and an extrapolation of the chamber surface in between these acquired anatomical points.
Previously, a more detailed appreciation of the complex left atrium (LA) anatomy can be obtained with 3D-anatomical chamber reconstructions derived from the computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging(MRI). Integration of EAM with CT (or MRI) was generally regarded as a more accurate method. However, the method needs to be improved since it sometimes generates significant error during the integration process. Recently, volume-rendered 3D imaging can be created more accurately and easily through fast anatomical mapping (FAM) using multi-polar catheter. Furthermore, 3D anatomy obtained by FAM might provide more sophisticated information than that obtained from CT or MRI images since it reflects the real-time physiology and shape of the heart during the ablation procedure.
However, there have been no prospective studies investigating that 3D anatomy obtained through which method can help to improve acute or long-term procedural outcome of the ablation procedure as well as reduce procedure-related adverse effects or complications.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the differences between the 3D map constructed by the integration of the FAM with CT or MRI (FAM-CT 3D map) and that by FAM (FAM 3D map) alone with respect to following aspects:
- the contact force between the electrode and the atrial tissue during the ablation procedure;
- the safety and the procedure-related complications during or after the ablation procedure;
- the long term procedural outcome after the ablation procedure.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Being tested
- FAM 3D map group, FAM-CT 3D map group
- Keywords
- Catheter ablation, Fast anatomical mapping (FAM), Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance image (MRI), Contact force, Atrial fibrillation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FAM 3D map groupProcedure or surgery
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using the 3D map which is constructed by FAM alone.
FAM-CT 3D map groupProcedure or surgery
Radiofrequency catheter ablation using the 3D map which is constructed by the integration of the FAM with CT or MRI.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FAM-CT 3D map group | Active comparator | Operator will perform radiofrequency catheter ablation using 3D map which is constructed by integration of FAM with CT or MRI. Receives: Procedure: FAM-CT 3D map group |
| FAM 3D map group | Experimental | Operator will perform radiofrequency catheter ablation using 3D map which is constructed by integration of FAM alone. Receives: Procedure: FAM 3D map group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Freedom rate of any atrial tachy-arrhythmia at 1 year after ablation procedure
Any recurrence of ECG or Holter documented sustained AF >30 s duration.
Measured: Within 1 year after the ablation procedure
Secondary outcomes (6)
Contact Force distribution during procedure (g/cm2)
Measurements from the SmartTouch™ catheter(Biosense Webster Inc.) integrated with the Carto3®(Biosense Webster Inc.)
Measured: during procedure
Rate of bidirectional conduction block
in linear ablation line
Measured: during procedur
Percentage of pulmonary vein isolation
with one encircling line
Measured: during procedure
Total procedural time
Time duration from the transseptal puncture to the end of the procedure
Measured: during procedure
Total cumulative amount of radiation exposure
related with the procedure
Measured: during procedure
Procedure-related complication rate
any adverse events
Measured: Within 1 year after the ablation procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2017
- Study start21 Nov 2017
- Primary completion20 Aug 2019
- Study completion30 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Korea University Guro Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hong Euy Lim, MD, Korea University Guro Hospital
- Investigators
- Hong Euy Lim, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03350581
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KUGH17237 (MICRO-AF)
- Acronym
- MICRO-AF
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Miyazaki S, Kuwahara T, Takahashi A, Kobori A, Takahashi Y, Nozato T, Hikita H, Sato A, Aonuma K, Hirao K, Isobe M. Effect of left atrial ablation on the quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2008 Apr;72(4):582-7. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.582.
PubMed 18362429Stabile G, Bertaglia E, Senatore G, De Simone A, Zoppo F, Donnici G, Turco P, Pascotto P, Fazzari M, Vitale DF. Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (Catheter Ablation For The Cure Of Atrial Fibrillation Study). Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(2):216-21. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi583. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
PubMed 16214831Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, Schmidt B, Saoudi N, Herrera C, Jais P, Hindricks G, Peichl P, Yulzari A, Lambert H, Neuzil P, Natale A, Kuck KH. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Nov;9(11):1789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.016. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
PubMed 22820056Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N, Kautzner J, Herrera C, Hindricks G, Jais P, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Jan;9(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.021. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
PubMed 21872560Piorkowski C, Kircher S, Arya A, Gaspar T, Esato M, Riahi S, Bollmann A, Husser D, Staab C, Sommer P, Hindricks G. Computed tomography model-based treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial macro-re-entrant tachycardia. Europace. 2008 Aug;10(8):939-48. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun147. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
PubMed 18577508Kistler PM, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, Ellis S, Sporton SC, Schilling RJ. Validation of three-dimensional cardiac image integration: use of integrated CT image into electroanatomic mapping system to perform catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Apr;17(4):341-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00371.x.
PubMed 16643352Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Jahngir M, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, Gupta D, Liew R, Ellis S, Sporton SC, Schilling RJ. The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1093-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00594.x.
PubMed 16989651Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Harris S, Earley MJ, Richmond L, Sporton SC, Schilling RJ. The impact of image integration on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using electroanatomic mapping: a prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):3029-36. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn453. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
PubMed 18931059Marai I, Suleiman M, Blich M, Lessick J, Abadi S, Boulos M. Impact of computed tomography image and contact force technology on catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. World J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 26;8(4):317-22. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i4.317.
PubMed 27152144Im SI, Shin SY, Na JO, Kim YH, Choi CU, Kim SH, Kim JW, Kim EJ, Han SW, Rha SW, Park CG, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Hwang C, Lim HE. Usefulness of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in predicting early recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):4398-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available.
PubMed 23725815Ha AC, Wijeysundera HC, Birnie DH, Verma A. Real-world outcomes, complications, and cost of catheter-based ablation for atrial fibrillation: an update. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000348.
PubMed 27755137
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does the Merged 3D Imaging Improve Contact Force and Long Term Procedure Outcome in Atrial Fibrillation? (MICRO-AF Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03350581
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MICRO-AF / KUGH17237 (MICRO-AF)
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Keywords
- Catheter ablation, Fast anatomical mapping (FAM), Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic resonance image (MRI), Contact force, Atrial fibrillation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Korea University Guro HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Study start
- 21 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether or not there are the differences in acute procedure and long-term clinical outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) using the 3D map constructed by the integration of CT(or MRI) with the fast anatomical mapping (FAM) versus using the 3D map constructed by FAM only.
Detailed description
In a recent study, ablation therapy of AF was superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone in preventing atrial arrhythmia recurrences in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. Various techniques have been proposed and are currently under investigation in various electrophysiology laboratories, with increasing knowledge of the pathophysiology of human AF and critical assessment of clinical outcome after the procedure. The factors related with the technical success involves appropriate contact force between catheter tip and target tissue for the complete electrical blockade and transmural ablation scar formation through continuous and sufficient energy transfer.
For improving contact and energy transfer, it is required to accurately visualize the 3D anatomy of the left atrium in order to reduce fluoroscopic exposure during the procedure. For the purpose, electro-anatomic mapping systems (EAM) are commonly being used to reconstruct a virtual 3D chamber anatomy through the acquisition of a limited number of anatomical surface location points derived from the position of the catheter tip and an extrapolation of the chamber surface in between these acquired anatomical points.
Previously, a more detailed appreciation of the complex left atrium (LA) anatomy can be obtained with 3D-anatomical chamber reconstructions derived from the computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging(MRI). Integration of EAM with CT (or MRI) was generally regarded as a more accurate method. However, the method needs to be improved since it sometimes generates significant error during the integration process. Recently, volume-rendered 3D imaging can be created more accurately and easily through fast anatomical mapping (FAM) using multi-polar catheter. Furthermore, 3D anatomy obtained by FAM might provide more sophisticated information than that obtained from CT or MRI images since it reflects the real-time physiology and shape of the heart during the ablation procedure.
However, there have been no prospective studies investigating that 3D anatomy obtained through which method can help to improve acute or long-term procedural outcome of the ablation procedure as well as reduce procedure-related adverse effects or complications.
The purpose of the study is to investigate the differences between the 3D map constructed by the integration of the FAM with CT or MRI (FAM-CT 3D map) and that by FAM (FAM 3D map) alone with respect to following aspects:
- the contact force between the electrode and the atrial tissue during the ablation procedure;
- the safety and the procedure-related complications during or after the ablation procedure;
- the long term procedural outcome after the ablation procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FAM-CT 3D map group | Active comparator | Procedure: FAM-CT 3D map groupOperator will perform radiofrequency catheter ablation using 3D map which is constructed by integration of FAM with CT or MRI. |
| FAM 3D map group | Experimental | Procedure: FAM 3D map groupOperator will perform radiofrequency catheter ablation using 3D map which is constructed by integration of FAM alone. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for AF.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who have previously undergone AF ablation
- Patients with more than mild mitral valve stenosis or mechanical mitral valve replacement
- Patients with chronic renal impairment with creatinine clearance rate of < 50
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FAM 3D map groupRadiofrequency catheter ablation using the 3D map which is constructed by FAM alone. | Procedure or surgery | FAM 3D map group |
| FAM-CT 3D map groupRadiofrequency catheter ablation using the 3D map which is constructed by the integration of the FAM with CT or MRI. | Procedure or surgery | FAM-CT 3D map group |
Primary outcome
Freedom rate of any atrial tachy-arrhythmia at 1 year after ablation procedure
Time frame: Within 1 year after the ablation procedure
Any recurrence of ECG or Holter documented sustained AF >30 s duration.
6 secondary outcomes
Contact Force distribution during procedure (g/cm2)
Time frame: during procedure
Rate of bidirectional conduction block
Time frame: during procedur
Percentage of pulmonary vein isolation
Time frame: during procedure
Total procedural time
Time frame: during procedure
Total cumulative amount of radiation exposure
Time frame: during procedure
Procedure-related complication rate
Time frame: Within 1 year after the ablation procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2019.
- Background: PubMed 18362429Miyazaki S, Kuwahara T, Takahashi A, Kobori A, Takahashi Y, Nozato T, Hikita H, Sato A, Aonuma K, Hirao K, Isobe M. Effect of left atrial ablation on the quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2008 Apr;72(4):582-7. doi: 10.1253/circj.72.582.
- Background: PubMed 16214831Stabile G, Bertaglia E, Senatore G, De Simone A, Zoppo F, Donnici G, Turco P, Pascotto P, Fazzari M, Vitale DF. Catheter ablation treatment in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: a prospective, multi-centre, randomized, controlled study (Catheter Ablation For The Cure Of Atrial Fibrillation Study). Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(2):216-21. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi583. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
- Background: PubMed 22820056Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, Schmidt B, Saoudi N, Herrera C, Jais P, Hindricks G, Peichl P, Yulzari A, Lambert H, Neuzil P, Natale A, Kuck KH. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Nov;9(11):1789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.016. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 21872560Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N, Kautzner J, Herrera C, Hindricks G, Jais P, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Jan;9(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.08.021. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
- Background: PubMed 18577508Piorkowski C, Kircher S, Arya A, Gaspar T, Esato M, Riahi S, Bollmann A, Husser D, Staab C, Sommer P, Hindricks G. Computed tomography model-based treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial macro-re-entrant tachycardia. Europace. 2008 Aug;10(8):939-48. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun147. Epub 2008 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 16643352Kistler PM, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, Ellis S, Sporton SC, Schilling RJ. Validation of three-dimensional cardiac image integration: use of integrated CT image into electroanatomic mapping system to perform catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Apr;17(4):341-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00371.x.
- Background: PubMed 16989651Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Jahngir M, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, Gupta D, Liew R, Ellis S, Sporton SC, Schilling RJ. The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Oct;17(10):1093-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00594.x.
- Background: PubMed 18931059Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Harris S, Earley MJ, Richmond L, Sporton SC, Schilling RJ. The impact of image integration on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using electroanatomic mapping: a prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J. 2008 Dec;29(24):3029-36. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn453. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 27152144Marai I, Suleiman M, Blich M, Lessick J, Abadi S, Boulos M. Impact of computed tomography image and contact force technology on catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. World J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 26;8(4):317-22. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v8.i4.317.
- Background: PubMed 23725815Im SI, Shin SY, Na JO, Kim YH, Choi CU, Kim SH, Kim JW, Kim EJ, Han SW, Rha SW, Park CG, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Hwang C, Lim HE. Usefulness of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in predicting early recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):4398-400. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.05.042. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27755137Ha AC, Wijeysundera HC, Birnie DH, Verma A. Real-world outcomes, complications, and cost of catheter-based ablation for atrial fibrillation: an update. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):47-52. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000348.
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingObservational study
BOdygUardian MOnitoriNg for ReCurrencE of AF
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Active, not recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Pulsed-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Resumption of Anticoagulation After Major Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Recruiting
A Comparison of Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) vs Cryoablation for Atrial Fibrillation Under Deep Sedation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Not yet recruiting
CATCH AF - Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Cryptogenic Stroke
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hong Euy Lim, MD, PhD principal investigator
Professor
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FAM 3D map group and FAM-CT 3D map group in people with Atrial Fibrillation, run by Korea University Guro Hospital at 2 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Freedom rate of any atrial tachy-arrhythmia at 1 year after ablation procedure (time frame: Within 1 year after the ablation procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03350581, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2019.