Clinical OutcomesNCT03354195
MAKO-Uni-Knee Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes and Function
A study testing Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. in people with Clinical Outcomes, run by Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study represents a single-surgeon/institution, non-randomized, consecutive series, prospective and comparative cohort design. The Principal Investigator is anticipating 100 study patients in the INTACT group and 35 patients in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient group.The schedule of events lists the imaging… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 100 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Clinical Outcomes
- What is being tested?
- Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2018to 30 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 100 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must meet these criteria to participate in this study:
- Patients with isolated, symptomatic femorotibial knee arthritis and candidates for UKA;
- Patients ≥ 21 years old;
- Patients with intact and non-functional ACLs as determined through pre-operative imaging, knee laxity tests, rotational stability tests, and intraoperative ACL classification;
- Patients willing and able to sign an informed consent;
- Patients willing and able to comply with 2-year follow-up commitments.
Who cannot join
- Any subject who meets any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Patients with RA;
- Patients with BMI >40;
- Patients with ROM arc > 75°;
- Patients with greater than 10º of hyperextension;
- Patients with greater than 15º of varus or valgus deformity;
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients with active infection;
- Patients without sufficient bone stock to allow appropriate insertion and fixation of the prosthesis;
- Patients without sufficient soft tissue integrity to provide adequate stability;
- Patients with either mental or neuromuscular disorders that do not allow control of the knee joint;
- Patients whose weight, age or activity level might cause extreme loads and early failure of the system.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparative Clinical Outcomes and Function Study Between MAKO Robotic-Arm Assisted UKA in ACL Intact and Deficient Knees
This study represents a single-surgeon/institution, non-randomized, consecutive series, prospective and comparative cohort design. The Principal Investigator is anticipating 100 study patients in the INTACT group and 35 patients in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient group.The schedule of events lists the imaging procedures and questionnaires to be completed at each visit.
Subjects will be consented and enrolled within 28 days prior to surgery and participate in follow-up visits for two years following their Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. A 3-year enrollment duration is anticipated to enroll a minimum and consecutive series of 25 patients in the experimental Anterior Cruciate Ligament-deficient group. Over the same enrollment duration, 100+ patients with intact Anterior Cruciate Ligaments are expected to be in the control group and undergo Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The enrollment duration (3 years) and total study duration (5 years) are based on patient volume estimates provided by the Principal Investigator.
Read the detailed description
To compare functional and clinical outcomes in patients with and without intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament undergoing uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty with MAKOplasty Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery. The primary outcome measurement tools utilized will be the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS,JR). Both the Knee Society Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS,JR) are validated scoring systems. Patient-reported outcome data will be collected at the following study time points:
- Preoperatively - Knee Society Score: Pre-Op, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score
- 3 weeks (±1 week) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score , Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 6 weeks (± 1 week) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 3 months (± 2 weeks) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 1 year (± 1 month) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 2 years (± 2 months) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
Subject Identification
Each subject will be assigned a unique subject number. Subject numbers will not be re-assigned or re-used for any reason. Only assigned subject numbers and associated subject age, Anterior Cruciate Ligament integrity classification, pre/intra-operative imagery information, and temporal outcome data will be shared with Sponsor. Only subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and sign the Inform Consent Form will be assigned a unique study identification number.
Pre-Operative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Integrity
The structural integrity of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament will be determined clinically and pre-operatively with the following:
- Lachman's anterior drawer test: Performed while the patient is in the supine position with the knee in 20° of flexion. The distal femur is fixed with one hand, while the other hand holds the proximal tibia with the thumb on the anteromedial joint line. The tibia is pulled ventrally, and the examiner estimates the ventral displacement of the tibia with respect to the femur. There are three possible outcomes: graded as 1+ (0-5 mm of displacement), 2+ (6-10 mm of displacement) or 3+ (greater than 10 mm of displacement) A 2+ or 3+ Lachman's test grade will be indicative of ACL instability.
- Anterior drawer test: Performed with the patient in the supine position with the hips flexed to 45°, the knees flexed to 90° and the feet flat on the table. The thumbs are placed along the joint line on either side of the patellar tendon and the tibia is drawn forward anteriorly. An increased amount of anterior tibial translation compared with the opposite limb or lack of a firm end point may be indicative of either a sprain of the anteromedial bundle or complete tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. If the tibia pulls forward or backward more than normal, the test is considered positive.
- Pivot-Shift Test: Test is performed with the patient lying in supine position with the hip passively flexed to 30°.The examiner stands lateral to the patient on the side of the knee that is being examined. The lower leg and ankle is grasped maintaining 20 degrees of internal tibial rotation. The knee is allowed to sag into complete extension. The opposite hand grasps the lateral portion of the leg at the level of the superior tibiofibular joint, increasing the force of internal rotation. While maintaining internal rotation, a valgus force is applied to the knee while it is slowly flexed. If the tibia's position on the femur reduces as the knee is flexed in the range of 30 to 40 degrees or if there is an anterior subluxation felt during extension the test is positive for instability.
- Biodex knee laxity test: This quantitative evaluation of knee laxity will be performed in accordance with the standardized procedures utilized by the Department of Physical Therapy at Florida Orthopaedic Institute.
Plain X-Ray
Knee osteoarthritis will be diagnosed and subjectively graded by taking plain radiographs in accordance with the Principal Investigator's Standard of Care, which include a (1) weight-bearing (WB) postero-anterior (PA) view, (2) sunrise view, and (3) lateral view. Degenerative disease of the knees will be graded per the Ahlback - Grades 1-5, increasing in severity or Kellgren and Lawrence Grade 0-4, increasing in severity classification systems. The Principal Investigator also uses a subjective classification system of mild, moderate, or severe osteoarthritis, which is captured in the clinic note.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
A standardized imaging protocol will be utilized for all Magnetic Resonance Imaging images. Specifically, a 3D-proton density non-fat suppressed fast spin echo sequence shall be used. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the knee will be obtained prior to surgery using the parameters as requested by the Sponsor using Florida Orthopaedic Institute Siemens Aera 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanner: TR/TE=1000/46, Flip angle=120°, repetition time=1000msec, echo time=46msec, bandwidth=97.3 Hz/pixel, matrix size= 320x300 pixels. The Sponsor has requested the use of a 3T magnet, but Florida Orthopaedic Institute currently has 1.5T magnets in their Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanners, so this request cannot be accommodated. We will perform a scan with the 1.5T magnet and share with Sponsor to confirm that the available imagery information is acceptable for their purposes.
Computed Tomography (CT) Scans
A Computed Tomography scan of the knee will be obtained prior to surgery using the standardized partial knee arthroplasty Computed Tomography scanning protocol with bone mineral density (BMD) phantom protocol as provided by the Sponsor. Sponsor will provide the phantom for use during scanning. A pre-operative Computed Tomography scan is required as the Standard of Care for robotic-arm assisted knee procedures. Each patient's Computed Tomography scan is used to create a 3D model of the patient's anatomy for accurate implant planning, bone resection and implant placement.
KOOS-JR
The abbreviated version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) survey is a validated and self-reported questionnaire (7 questions) designed to measure "knee health" as it reflects aspects of pain, symptom severity, and activities of daily living (ADL) including movement or activities that are directly relevant and difficult for patients with knee Osteoarthritis.The Knee Injury- Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score-JR knee survey consists of 7 questions pertaining to knee stiffness, knee pain, and physical function. The survey will be administered to all patients at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years.
KSS
The knee society score has been in use for over 20 years and is a simple, objective means to measure a patient's functional ability before and after surgery (11-13). It includes ROM assessment. The Principal Investigator will utilize the updated Knee Society Score (2011), which has been modified to include both an objective physician-derived component with a subjective patient-derived component that evaluates pain relief, functional abilities, satisfaction, and fulfillment of expectations. This updated scoring system prioritizes the patient perspective, to better track patient expectations, satisfaction, and activity levels than was possible with its predecessor. Patients will complete this survey with the Principal Investigator at all study time points.
Global Satisfaction Survey
This custom, 2-page survey has been designed by the study team to track patient satisfaction after their Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty over time. It's a simple, seven-item survey that also includes a Visual Analogue Scale for knee pain. The survey will be administered to all patients at all post-operative visits.
Intra-Operative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Integrity
During surgery, the Anterior Cruciate Ligament will be inspected, manually stressed and probed following standard techniques to assess its structure and function.The state of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament will be recorded and classified into one of four categories per these intra-operative examinations and available pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging data:
Group 1 - intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Group 2 - intact but fibrillated (frayed) ligament) Group 3 - nearly completely torn ligament (>50% and disrupted)
Assessment will be performed by the Principal Investigator. Knees with Anterior Cruciate Ligaments classified as Group 1 and Group 2 will be accepted as functionally intact. Those classified as Group 3 will be deemed as having functionally absent Anterior Cruciate Ligaments.
- Conditions
- Clinical Outcomes
- Being tested
- Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system.Procedure or surgery
Also called UKA with Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system
All patients will receive the RESTORIS MCK (Multicompartmental Knee) Implant System, which is approved for use in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. The femoral component is constructed from cobalt chrome (CoCr) and the tibial component is constructed from an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) insert and titanium (Ti) baseplate. UKA will be facilitated with MAKO Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery, which has been shown in prior studies to lower pain and result in more accurate implant placement than manual UKA in a randomized controlled trial.(15)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Group 1 - intact ACL ligament will be accepted as functionally intact
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. Receives: Procedure: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Group 2 - intact but fibrillated (frayed) ligament) will be accepted as functionally intact
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. Receives: Procedure: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. |
| Group 3 | Active comparator | Group 3 - nearly completely torn ligament (>50% and disrupted) will be deemed as having functionally absent ACLs
unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. Receives: Procedure: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional and Clinical Outcomes comparing patients with and without intact Anterior Cruciate Ligaments undergoing arthroplasty with MAKO Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery.
Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Measured: Baseline (screening), compared to a 24 month follow-up visit. There are also several additional time points from 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months where the functional and clinical outcomes are assessed.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Height and Weight
to calculate subjects BMI
Measured: Baseline (screening)
Computed Tomography
A pre-operative CT scan is required as the Standard of Care for robotic-arm assisted knee procedures.
Measured: Baseline (screening)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI of the knee will be obtained prior to surgery using the parameters as requested by the Sponsor
Measured: Baseline (screening)
Radiographs (3 views)
Knee osteoarthritis will be diagnosed and subjectively graded by taking plain radiographs in accordance with the PI's Standard of Care, which include a (1) weight-bearing (WB) postero-anterior (PA) view, (2) sunrise view, and (3) lateral view. Degenerative disease of the knees will be graded per the Ahlback Grades 1-5, increasing in severity or Kellgren and Lawrence ,Grade 0-4, increasing in severity classification systems. The Principal Investigator also uses a subjective classification system of mild, moderate, or severe osteoarthritis, which is captured in the clinic note.
Measured: Baseline (screening)
Global Satisfaction Survey
2-page survey has been designed by the study team to track patient satisfaction after their UKA over time
Measured: Baseline (screening), 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months
Intra-Operative ACL Integrity
Knees with ACLs classified as Group 1 and Group 2 will be accepted as functionally intact. Those classified as Group 3 will be deemed as having functionally absent ACLs.
Measured: Enrollment (procedure day)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2017
- Study start1 Jul 2018
- Primary completion30 Jan 2020
- Study completion30 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Clinical OutcomesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- During surgery, the ACL will be inspected, manually stressed and probed following standard techniques to assess its structure and function.(20, 21) The state of the ACL will be recorded and classified into one of four categories per these intra-operative examinations (22) and available pre-operative MRI data: Group 1 - intact ACL ligament Group 2 - intact but fibrillated (frayed) ligament) Group 3 - nearly completely torn ligament (\>50% and disrupted) Assessment will be performed by the PI. Knees with ACLs classified as Group 1 and Group 2 will be accepted as functionally intact. Those classified as Group 3 will be deemed as having functionally absent ACLs
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354195
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MM-MAKO-001
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 5 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is not a plan to make the IPD available.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Clinical Outcomes and Function Study Between MAKO Robotic-Arm Assisted UKA in ACL Intact and Deficient Knees
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354195
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MM-MAKO-001
- Conditions
- Clinical Outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and EducationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study represents a single-surgeon/institution, non-randomized, consecutive series, prospective and comparative cohort design. The Principal Investigator is anticipating 100 study patients in the INTACT group and 35 patients in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient group.The schedule of events lists the imaging procedures and questionnaires to be completed at each visit.
Subjects will be consented and enrolled within 28 days prior to surgery and participate in follow-up visits for two years following their Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. A 3-year enrollment duration is anticipated to enroll a minimum and consecutive series of 25 patients in the experimental Anterior Cruciate Ligament-deficient group. Over the same enrollment duration, 100+ patients with intact Anterior Cruciate Ligaments are expected to be in the control group and undergo Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The enrollment duration (3 years) and total study duration (5 years) are based on patient volume estimates provided by the Principal Investigator.
Detailed description
To compare functional and clinical outcomes in patients with and without intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament undergoing uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty with MAKOplasty Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery. The primary outcome measurement tools utilized will be the Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS,JR). Both the Knee Society Score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS,JR) are validated scoring systems. Patient-reported outcome data will be collected at the following study time points:
- Preoperatively - Knee Society Score: Pre-Op, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score
- 3 weeks (±1 week) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score , Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 6 weeks (± 1 week) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 3 months (± 2 weeks) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 1 year (± 1 month) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
- 2 years (± 2 months) - Knee Society Score: Post-Operative, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score, Subject Global Satisfaction Survey
Subject Identification
Each subject will be assigned a unique subject number. Subject numbers will not be re-assigned or re-used for any reason. Only assigned subject numbers and associated subject age, Anterior Cruciate Ligament integrity classification, pre/intra-operative imagery information, and temporal outcome data will be shared with Sponsor. Only subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and sign the Inform Consent Form will be assigned a unique study identification number.
Pre-Operative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Integrity
The structural integrity of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament will be determined clinically and pre-operatively with the following:
- Lachman's anterior drawer test: Performed while the patient is in the supine position with the knee in 20° of flexion. The distal femur is fixed with one hand, while the other hand holds the proximal tibia with the thumb on the anteromedial joint line. The tibia is pulled ventrally, and the examiner estimates the ventral displacement of the tibia with respect to the femur. There are three possible outcomes: graded as 1+ (0-5 mm of displacement), 2+ (6-10 mm of displacement) or 3+ (greater than 10 mm of displacement) A 2+ or 3+ Lachman's test grade will be indicative of ACL instability.
- Anterior drawer test: Performed with the patient in the supine position with the hips flexed to 45°, the knees flexed to 90° and the feet flat on the table. The thumbs are placed along the joint line on either side of the patellar tendon and the tibia is drawn forward anteriorly. An increased amount of anterior tibial translation compared with the opposite limb or lack of a firm end point may be indicative of either a sprain of the anteromedial bundle or complete tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. If the tibia pulls forward or backward more than normal, the test is considered positive.
- Pivot-Shift Test: Test is performed with the patient lying in supine position with the hip passively flexed to 30°.The examiner stands lateral to the patient on the side of the knee that is being examined. The lower leg and ankle is grasped maintaining 20 degrees of internal tibial rotation. The knee is allowed to sag into complete extension. The opposite hand grasps the lateral portion of the leg at the level of the superior tibiofibular joint, increasing the force of internal rotation. While maintaining internal rotation, a valgus force is applied to the knee while it is slowly flexed. If the tibia's position on the femur reduces as the knee is flexed in the range of 30 to 40 degrees or if there is an anterior subluxation felt during extension the test is positive for instability.
- Biodex knee laxity test: This quantitative evaluation of knee laxity will be performed in accordance with the standardized procedures utilized by the Department of Physical Therapy at Florida Orthopaedic Institute.
Plain X-Ray
Knee osteoarthritis will be diagnosed and subjectively graded by taking plain radiographs in accordance with the Principal Investigator's Standard of Care, which include a (1) weight-bearing (WB) postero-anterior (PA) view, (2) sunrise view, and (3) lateral view. Degenerative disease of the knees will be graded per the Ahlback - Grades 1-5, increasing in severity or Kellgren and Lawrence Grade 0-4, increasing in severity classification systems. The Principal Investigator also uses a subjective classification system of mild, moderate, or severe osteoarthritis, which is captured in the clinic note.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
A standardized imaging protocol will be utilized for all Magnetic Resonance Imaging images. Specifically, a 3D-proton density non-fat suppressed fast spin echo sequence shall be used. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the knee will be obtained prior to surgery using the parameters as requested by the Sponsor using Florida Orthopaedic Institute Siemens Aera 1.5T Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanner: TR/TE=1000/46, Flip angle=120°, repetition time=1000msec, echo time=46msec, bandwidth=97.3 Hz/pixel, matrix size= 320x300 pixels. The Sponsor has requested the use of a 3T magnet, but Florida Orthopaedic Institute currently has 1.5T magnets in their Magnetic Resonance Imaging scanners, so this request cannot be accommodated. We will perform a scan with the 1.5T magnet and share with Sponsor to confirm that the available imagery information is acceptable for their purposes.
Computed Tomography (CT) Scans
A Computed Tomography scan of the knee will be obtained prior to surgery using the standardized partial knee arthroplasty Computed Tomography scanning protocol with bone mineral density (BMD) phantom protocol as provided by the Sponsor. Sponsor will provide the phantom for use during scanning. A pre-operative Computed Tomography scan is required as the Standard of Care for robotic-arm assisted knee procedures. Each patient's Computed Tomography scan is used to create a 3D model of the patient's anatomy for accurate implant planning, bone resection and implant placement.
KOOS-JR
The abbreviated version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) survey is a validated and self-reported questionnaire (7 questions) designed to measure "knee health" as it reflects aspects of pain, symptom severity, and activities of daily living (ADL) including movement or activities that are directly relevant and difficult for patients with knee Osteoarthritis.The Knee Injury- Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score-JR knee survey consists of 7 questions pertaining to knee stiffness, knee pain, and physical function. The survey will be administered to all patients at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years.
KSS
The knee society score has been in use for over 20 years and is a simple, objective means to measure a patient's functional ability before and after surgery (11-13). It includes ROM assessment. The Principal Investigator will utilize the updated Knee Society Score (2011), which has been modified to include both an objective physician-derived component with a subjective patient-derived component that evaluates pain relief, functional abilities, satisfaction, and fulfillment of expectations. This updated scoring system prioritizes the patient perspective, to better track patient expectations, satisfaction, and activity levels than was possible with its predecessor. Patients will complete this survey with the Principal Investigator at all study time points.
Global Satisfaction Survey
This custom, 2-page survey has been designed by the study team to track patient satisfaction after their Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty over time. It's a simple, seven-item survey that also includes a Visual Analogue Scale for knee pain. The survey will be administered to all patients at all post-operative visits.
Intra-Operative Anterior Cruciate Ligament Integrity
During surgery, the Anterior Cruciate Ligament will be inspected, manually stressed and probed following standard techniques to assess its structure and function.The state of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament will be recorded and classified into one of four categories per these intra-operative examinations and available pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging data:
Group 1 - intact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Group 2 - intact but fibrillated (frayed) ligament) Group 3 - nearly completely torn ligament (>50% and disrupted)
Assessment will be performed by the Principal Investigator. Knees with Anterior Cruciate Ligaments classified as Group 1 and Group 2 will be accepted as functionally intact. Those classified as Group 3 will be deemed as having functionally absent Anterior Cruciate Ligaments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- During surgery, the ACL will be inspected, manually stressed and probed following standard techniques to assess its structure and function.(20, 21) The state of the ACL will be recorded and classified into one of four categories per these intra-operative examinations (22) and available pre-operative MRI data: Group 1 - intact ACL ligament Group 2 - intact but fibrillated (frayed) ligament) Group 3 - nearly completely torn ligament (>50% and disrupted) Assessment will be performed by the PI. Knees with ACLs classified as Group 1 and Group 2 will be accepted as functionally intact. Those classified as Group 3 will be deemed as having functionally absent ACLs
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Active comparator | Procedure: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system.Group 1 - intact ACL ligament will be accepted as functionally intact unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Procedure: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system.Group 2 - intact but fibrillated (frayed) ligament) will be accepted as functionally intact unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. |
| Group 3 | Active comparator | Procedure: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system.Group 3 - nearly completely torn ligament (>50% and disrupted) will be deemed as having functionally absent ACLs unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with isolated, symptomatic femorotibial knee arthritis and candidates for UKA;
- Patients ≥ 21 years old;
- Patients with intact and non-functional ACLs as determined through pre-operative imaging, knee laxity tests, rotational stability tests, and intraoperative ACL classification;
- Patients willing and able to sign an informed consent;
- Patients willing and able to comply with 2-year follow-up commitments.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Any subject who meets any of the exclusion criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Patients with RA;
- Patients with BMI >40;
- Patients with ROM arc > 75°;
- Patients with greater than 10º of hyperextension;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system.Also: UKA with Mako Robotic Arm-assisted systemAll patients will receive the RESTORIS MCK (Multicompartmental Knee) Implant System, which is approved for use in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. The femoral component is constructed from cobalt chrome (CoCr) and the tibial component is constructed from an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) insert and titanium (Ti) baseplate. UKA will be facilitated with MAKO Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery, which has been shown in prior studies to lower pain and result in more accurate implant placement than manual UKA in a randomized controlled trial.(15) | Procedure or surgery | Group 1, Group 2, Group 3 |
Primary outcome
Functional and Clinical Outcomes comparing patients with and without intact Anterior Cruciate Ligaments undergoing arthroplasty with MAKO Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery.
Time frame: Baseline (screening), compared to a 24 month follow-up visit. There are also several additional time points from 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months where the functional and clinical outcomes are assessed.
Knee Society Score (KSS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
6 secondary outcomes
Height and Weight
Time frame: Baseline (screening)
Computed Tomography
Time frame: Baseline (screening)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time frame: Baseline (screening)
Radiographs (3 views)
Time frame: Baseline (screening)
Global Satisfaction Survey
Time frame: Baseline (screening), 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months, 24 months
Intra-Operative ACL Integrity
Time frame: Enrollment (procedure day)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Feb 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is not a plan to make the IPD available.
Related trials for Clinical Outcomes
RecruitingObservational study
PULSE Registry: for Patients Receiving Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan
Metastatic Prostate Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Effects Of Periodontal Therapy In Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Periodontal Diseases, IBD
Recruiting
A Clinical Trial to Study the Effects on the Olfaction Capacity of an Individual Undergoing Skull Base Surgeries Using Cautery vs Scalpel .
Olfaction
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Outcomes of Edwards Lifesciences MITRIS RESLILA Mitral Valve in the Asian Population
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Biological Outcomes of BioBrace-Augmented ACL Reconstruction
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Mako Robotic Arm-assisted system. in people with Clinical Outcomes, run by Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional and Clinical Outcomes comparing patients with and without intact Anterior Cruciate Ligaments undergoing arthroplasty with MAKO Robotic-Arm Assisted Surgery. (time frame: Baseline (screening), compared to a 24 month follow-up visit. There are also several additional time points from 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months where the functional and clinical outcomes are assessed.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2020.