Postoperative PainPhase 4NCT03354572
Pilot Study: Postoperative Pain Reduction by Pre Emptive N-Acetylcysteine
A Phase 4 study testing Acetyl cysteine in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Despite current available analgesic drugs, post-surgical pain management remains challenging. A potential new target for analgesic drugs are group-II metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors), since growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors produce s… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain
- What is being tested?
- Acetyl cysteine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 20 Oct 2017to 29 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects scheduled for laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair
- ASA 1 or2.
- Age >18 years.
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Allergy to NAC
- History of chronic pain
- Use of opioids or neuropathic analgesics
- Use of NAC prior to trial (< 1 month of planned surgery)
- Alcoholism
Show all 11Show fewer
- Diabetes Mellitus (insulin therapy)
- Asthma or Chronic Obstructive pulmonary Disease
- Known renal function disorders (MDRD <ô0)
- Known liver failure (bilirubin >1.Sx upper limit of normal)
- No written lC by patient
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Despite current available analgesic drugs, post-surgical pain management remains challenging. A potential new target for analgesic drugs are group-II metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors), since growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors produce s analgesic effects in inflammatory and in neuropathic pain states. . N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is a safe agent and with little to no side effects. NAC can induce analgesia by activating the glutamate:cystein antiporter, causing endogenous activation of the mGlu 2/3 receptors. However, this has only been investigated once in the peri-operative setting, were it showed preliminary promising result of reduction in opiate necessity. In healthy subjects there was a significant reduction in pain ratings to laser stimuli and amplitudes of laser evoked potentials after NAC. Based on these promising results, we hypothesize that pre emptive intravenous NAC can reduce postoperative pain and thereby cause less necessity for escape analgesics like opiates.
Read the detailed description
Currently approximately 240 million surgical procedures are done worldwide on a yearly basis. lnguinal hernia repair is one of the most performed surgeries in ambulatory setting. Despite currently available analgesic drugs, post surgical pain management remains challenging in this group of patients, as the pain score appears inadequate (mean VAS of 5.8 +/- 1 .22 cm) one day after surgery with the use of common analgesics. Beside accounting for patient discomfort, pain is also a major contributor to prolonged length of hospital stay and is a health care quality indicator. With multimodal pain management the intention is to reduce pain with less side effects of analgesics. Multimodal pain management is the combination of different pharmacologic mechanisms of action, which work by acting at different sites within the central and peripheral nervous system, thereby having an additive or synergistic effect and reducing the necessity of opiates. With this in mind, a potential new target for analgesic drugs are group- ll metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors) localized in the spinal cord and other regions of the nociceptive system. Growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors occur via the glutamate:cystein antiporter and can induce analgesia in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. They depress pain transmission at synapses between primary afferent fibers and second order sensory neurons on the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.
N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is on the market since 1968 and is an over the counter available agent, mostly known for its role as mucolytic agent in cystic fibrosis and for the treatment of acetaminophen intoxication. lt is a safe agent with little to no side effects. Recent studies have shown NAC can inhibit nociceptive transmission in rats and in healthy humans.NAC can induce analgesia by activating the glutamate:cystein antiporter, causing endogenous activation of the mGlu2/3 receptors. Therefore, NAC can potentially become a cheap and safe additive in the multimodal pain management. However, evidence for usage of NAC in the context of multimodal pain management is still lacking. Only one available study in humans evaluated the effect of NAC in the perioperative setting. Despite being a randomised controlled trial, there are several limitations in this study; the study arms are too small and only morphine consumption is presented. Also, blinding might have not as good as suggested since oral NAC has a typical flavour and the placebo was lemonade.
Due to these limitations, still no answer on the question whether NAC can be an additive in current multimodal pain management is provided.
Objective of the study:
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous NAC in comparison with placebo in terms of pain relief after unilateral inguinal hernia repair measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100) at day 1 after surgery.
Secondary Objective(s):
- Difference in pain scores between NAC and placebo direct after surgery, before discharge and in following 3 days postoperative.
- Difference in time before first pain medication is administered postoperative between NAC and placebo.
- Difference in total consumption of opiates in the hospital (mg) between NAC and placebo.
- Difference in time from surgery to discharge between NAC and placebo.
- Difference in postoperative pain medication at home necessary to reach adequate pain relief between NAC and placebo (acetaminophen / NSAID's/ opiates).
- lf there is a difference in 5, is there also a difference in adverse effects of pain medication (like nausea, obstipation) between NAC and placebo.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
- Being tested
- Acetyl cysteine, Placebos
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acetyl cysteineDrug
Also called NAC
acetyl cysteine 150 mg/kg prior to surgery
PlacebosDrug
Also called Saline 0.9%
saline 0.9% prior to surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NAC | Active comparator | receive 150 mg/kg acetylcysteïne in 200 ml saline (NaCl0,9%) prior to surgery Receives: Drug: Acetyl cysteine |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | receive only NaCl 0.9% prior to surgery (volume identical to active comparator) Receives: Drug: Placebos |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pain score day 1 after surgery
To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous NAC in comparison with placebo in terms of pain relief after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100 millimeters) at day 1 after surgery. The higher the score, the more pain the patient has.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (7)
direct postoperative pain
Difference in pain scores between NAC and placebo direct after surgery (1 hour. Measurement in visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100 millimeters) at 1 hour after surgery. The higher the score, the more pain the patient has.
Measured: <1 hours
time to first pain medication
Difference in time before first pain medication is administered postoperative between NAC and placebo
Measured: <4hours
total consumption of opiates
Difference in total consumption of opiates in the hospital (mg) between NAC and placebo
Measured: <4 hours
time to discharge
Difference in time from surgery to discharge between NAC and placebo.
Measured: 24 hours
postoperative dosage of analgesics
Difference in postoperative pain medication at home necessary to reach adequate pain relief between NAC and placebo ( Acetaminophen /NSAID's/opiates).
Measured: 72 hours
adverse effects of analgesics
is there also a difference in adverse effects of pain medication (like nausea, obstipation) between NAC and placebo
Measured: 72 hours
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (e.g. safety of acetylcystein)
adverse effects of acetylcysteine; do we see exanthema or breathing problems during administration of acetylcystein.
Measured: <4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2017
- Study start20 Oct 2017
- Primary completion29 Oct 2018
- Study completion29 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study will be a single centre double blinded randomized placebo controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Maxima Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kris Vissers, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Chair
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354572
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NAC.TEP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 25 Oct 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: not yet decided, if there is a question for data we will comply as much as possible
Publications
Mulkens CE, Staatsen M, van Genugten L, Snoeker BAM, Vissers KCP, Bruhn J, Bucx MJL. Postoperative pain reduction by pre-emptive N-acetylcysteine: an exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Nov;46(11):960-964. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102884. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
PubMed 34446544
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study: Postoperative Pain Reduction by Pre Emptive N-Acetylcysteine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354572
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NAC.TEP
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Maxima Medical Center
- Study start
- 20 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Despite current available analgesic drugs, post-surgical pain management remains challenging. A potential new target for analgesic drugs are group-II metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors), since growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors produce s analgesic effects in inflammatory and in neuropathic pain states. . N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is a safe agent and with little to no side effects. NAC can induce analgesia by activating the glutamate:cystein antiporter, causing endogenous activation of the mGlu 2/3 receptors. However, this has only been investigated once in the peri-operative setting, were it showed preliminary promising result of reduction in opiate necessity. In healthy subjects there was a significant reduction in pain ratings to laser stimuli and amplitudes of laser evoked potentials after NAC. Based on these promising results, we hypothesize that pre emptive intravenous NAC can reduce postoperative pain and thereby cause less necessity for escape analgesics like opiates.
Detailed description
Currently approximately 240 million surgical procedures are done worldwide on a yearly basis. lnguinal hernia repair is one of the most performed surgeries in ambulatory setting. Despite currently available analgesic drugs, post surgical pain management remains challenging in this group of patients, as the pain score appears inadequate (mean VAS of 5.8 +/- 1 .22 cm) one day after surgery with the use of common analgesics. Beside accounting for patient discomfort, pain is also a major contributor to prolonged length of hospital stay and is a health care quality indicator. With multimodal pain management the intention is to reduce pain with less side effects of analgesics. Multimodal pain management is the combination of different pharmacologic mechanisms of action, which work by acting at different sites within the central and peripheral nervous system, thereby having an additive or synergistic effect and reducing the necessity of opiates. With this in mind, a potential new target for analgesic drugs are group- ll metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors) localized in the spinal cord and other regions of the nociceptive system. Growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors occur via the glutamate:cystein antiporter and can induce analgesia in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. They depress pain transmission at synapses between primary afferent fibers and second order sensory neurons on the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.
N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is on the market since 1968 and is an over the counter available agent, mostly known for its role as mucolytic agent in cystic fibrosis and for the treatment of acetaminophen intoxication. lt is a safe agent with little to no side effects. Recent studies have shown NAC can inhibit nociceptive transmission in rats and in healthy humans.NAC can induce analgesia by activating the glutamate:cystein antiporter, causing endogenous activation of the mGlu2/3 receptors. Therefore, NAC can potentially become a cheap and safe additive in the multimodal pain management. However, evidence for usage of NAC in the context of multimodal pain management is still lacking. Only one available study in humans evaluated the effect of NAC in the perioperative setting. Despite being a randomised controlled trial, there are several limitations in this study; the study arms are too small and only morphine consumption is presented. Also, blinding might have not as good as suggested since oral NAC has a typical flavour and the placebo was lemonade.
Due to these limitations, still no answer on the question whether NAC can be an additive in current multimodal pain management is provided.
Objective of the study:
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous NAC in comparison with placebo in terms of pain relief after unilateral inguinal hernia repair measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100) at day 1 after surgery.
Secondary Objective(s):
- Difference in pain scores between NAC and placebo direct after surgery, before discharge and in following 3 days postoperative.
- Difference in time before first pain medication is administered postoperative between NAC and placebo.
- Difference in total consumption of opiates in the hospital (mg) between NAC and placebo.
- Difference in time from surgery to discharge between NAC and placebo.
- Difference in postoperative pain medication at home necessary to reach adequate pain relief between NAC and placebo (acetaminophen / NSAID's/ opiates).
- lf there is a difference in 5, is there also a difference in adverse effects of pain medication (like nausea, obstipation) between NAC and placebo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study will be a single centre double blinded randomized placebo controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NAC | Active comparator | Drug: Acetyl cysteinereceive 150 mg/kg acetylcysteïne in 200 ml saline (NaCl0,9%) prior to surgery |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebosreceive only NaCl 0.9% prior to surgery (volume identical to active comparator) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects scheduled for laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair
- ASA 1 or2.
- Age >18 years.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Allergy to NAC
- History of chronic pain
- Use of opioids or neuropathic analgesics
- Use of NAC prior to trial (< 1 month of planned surgery)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acetyl cysteineAlso: NACacetyl cysteine 150 mg/kg prior to surgery | Drug | NAC |
| PlacebosAlso: Saline 0.9%saline 0.9% prior to surgery | Drug | placebo |
Primary outcome
pain score day 1 after surgery
Time frame: 24 hours
To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous NAC in comparison with placebo in terms of pain relief after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100 millimeters) at day 1 after surgery. The higher the score, the more pain the patient has.
7 secondary outcomes
direct postoperative pain
Time frame: <1 hours
time to first pain medication
Time frame: <4hours
total consumption of opiates
Time frame: <4 hours
time to discharge
Time frame: 24 hours
postoperative dosage of analgesics
Time frame: 72 hours
adverse effects of analgesics
Time frame: 72 hours
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (e.g. safety of acetylcystein)
Time frame: <4 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34446544Mulkens CE, Staatsen M, van Genugten L, Snoeker BAM, Vissers KCP, Bruhn J, Bucx MJL. Postoperative pain reduction by pre-emptive N-acetylcysteine: an exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Nov;46(11):960-964. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102884. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. not yet decided, if there is a question for data we will comply as much as possible
Related trials for Postoperative Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Impact of Parasternal and Rectointercostal Blocks on Extubation Time
Postoperative Pain, Extubation Time
RecruitingObservational study
Quality of Life and Pain After Appendectomy in Children
Chronic Pain, Postoperative, Quality of Life
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus PENG Block for Hip Fracture Surgery
Femur Neck Fracture, Hip Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Esketamine Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Postoperative Recovery Quality After Elective Cesarean Section
Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585), Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kris Vissers, MD, PhD principal investigator
Chair
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Acetyl cysteine in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pain score day 1 after surgery (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03354572, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2019.