AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative PainPhase 4NCT03354572

Pilot Study: Postoperative Pain Reduction by Pre Emptive N-Acetylcysteine

A Phase 4 study testing Acetyl cysteine in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite current available analgesic drugs, post-surgical pain management remains challenging. A potential new target for analgesic drugs are group-II metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors), since growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors produce s… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Pain
What is being tested?
Acetyl cysteine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
20 Oct 2017to 29 Oct 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects scheduled for laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair
  • ASA 1 or2.
  • Age >18 years.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy or lactating
  • Allergy to NAC
  • History of chronic pain
  • Use of opioids or neuropathic analgesics
  • Use of NAC prior to trial (< 1 month of planned surgery)
  • Alcoholism
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Diabetes Mellitus (insulin therapy)
  • Asthma or Chronic Obstructive pulmonary Disease
  • Known renal function disorders (MDRD <ô0)
  • Known liver failure (bilirubin >1.Sx upper limit of normal)
  • No written lC by patient

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • Maxima Medical Centre

    Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5631BM

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Despite current available analgesic drugs, post-surgical pain management remains challenging. A potential new target for analgesic drugs are group-II metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors), since growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors produce s analgesic effects in inflammatory and in neuropathic pain states. . N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is a safe agent and with little to no side effects. NAC can induce analgesia by activating the glutamate:cystein antiporter, causing endogenous activation of the mGlu 2/3 receptors. However, this has only been investigated once in the peri-operative setting, were it showed preliminary promising result of reduction in opiate necessity. In healthy subjects there was a significant reduction in pain ratings to laser stimuli and amplitudes of laser evoked potentials after NAC. Based on these promising results, we hypothesize that pre emptive intravenous NAC can reduce postoperative pain and thereby cause less necessity for escape analgesics like opiates.

Read the detailed description

Currently approximately 240 million surgical procedures are done worldwide on a yearly basis. lnguinal hernia repair is one of the most performed surgeries in ambulatory setting. Despite currently available analgesic drugs, post surgical pain management remains challenging in this group of patients, as the pain score appears inadequate (mean VAS of 5.8 +/- 1 .22 cm) one day after surgery with the use of common analgesics. Beside accounting for patient discomfort, pain is also a major contributor to prolonged length of hospital stay and is a health care quality indicator. With multimodal pain management the intention is to reduce pain with less side effects of analgesics. Multimodal pain management is the combination of different pharmacologic mechanisms of action, which work by acting at different sites within the central and peripheral nervous system, thereby having an additive or synergistic effect and reducing the necessity of opiates. With this in mind, a potential new target for analgesic drugs are group- ll metabotropic glutamate receptors subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors) localized in the spinal cord and other regions of the nociceptive system. Growing evidence from animal models show that activation of these receptors occur via the glutamate:cystein antiporter and can induce analgesia in models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. They depress pain transmission at synapses between primary afferent fibers and second order sensory neurons on the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.

N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is on the market since 1968 and is an over the counter available agent, mostly known for its role as mucolytic agent in cystic fibrosis and for the treatment of acetaminophen intoxication. lt is a safe agent with little to no side effects. Recent studies have shown NAC can inhibit nociceptive transmission in rats and in healthy humans.NAC can induce analgesia by activating the glutamate:cystein antiporter, causing endogenous activation of the mGlu2/3 receptors. Therefore, NAC can potentially become a cheap and safe additive in the multimodal pain management. However, evidence for usage of NAC in the context of multimodal pain management is still lacking. Only one available study in humans evaluated the effect of NAC in the perioperative setting. Despite being a randomised controlled trial, there are several limitations in this study; the study arms are too small and only morphine consumption is presented. Also, blinding might have not as good as suggested since oral NAC has a typical flavour and the placebo was lemonade.

Due to these limitations, still no answer on the question whether NAC can be an additive in current multimodal pain management is provided.

Objective of the study:

Primary Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous NAC in comparison with placebo in terms of pain relief after unilateral inguinal hernia repair measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100) at day 1 after surgery.

Secondary Objective(s):

  1. Difference in pain scores between NAC and placebo direct after surgery, before discharge and in following 3 days postoperative.
  2. Difference in time before first pain medication is administered postoperative between NAC and placebo.
  3. Difference in total consumption of opiates in the hospital (mg) between NAC and placebo.
  4. Difference in time from surgery to discharge between NAC and placebo.
  5. Difference in postoperative pain medication at home necessary to reach adequate pain relief between NAC and placebo (acetaminophen / NSAID's/ opiates).
  6. lf there is a difference in 5, is there also a difference in adverse effects of pain medication (like nausea, obstipation) between NAC and placebo.
Being tested
Acetyl cysteine, Placebos
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Acetyl cysteineDrug

    Also called NAC

    acetyl cysteine 150 mg/kg prior to surgery

  • PlacebosDrug

    Also called Saline 0.9%

    saline 0.9% prior to surgery

Study groups in NCT03354572
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NACActive comparatorreceive 150 mg/kg acetylcysteïne in 200 ml saline (NaCl0,9%) prior to surgery
Receives: Drug: Acetyl cysteine
placeboPlacebo comparatorreceive only NaCl 0.9% prior to surgery (volume identical to active comparator)
Receives: Drug: Placebos

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pain score day 1 after surgery

    To evaluate the efficacy of intravenous NAC in comparison with placebo in terms of pain relief after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100 millimeters) at day 1 after surgery. The higher the score, the more pain the patient has.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. direct postoperative pain

    Difference in pain scores between NAC and placebo direct after surgery (1 hour. Measurement in visual analogue scale (VAS 0-100 millimeters) at 1 hour after surgery. The higher the score, the more pain the patient has.

    Measured: <1 hours

  2. time to first pain medication

    Difference in time before first pain medication is administered postoperative between NAC and placebo

    Measured: <4hours

  3. total consumption of opiates

    Difference in total consumption of opiates in the hospital (mg) between NAC and placebo

    Measured: <4 hours

  4. time to discharge

    Difference in time from surgery to discharge between NAC and placebo.

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. postoperative dosage of analgesics

    Difference in postoperative pain medication at home necessary to reach adequate pain relief between NAC and placebo ( Acetaminophen /NSAID's/opiates).

    Measured: 72 hours

  6. adverse effects of analgesics

    is there also a difference in adverse effects of pain medication (like nausea, obstipation) between NAC and placebo

    Measured: 72 hours

  7. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (e.g. safety of acetylcystein)

    adverse effects of acetylcysteine; do we see exanthema or breathing problems during administration of acetylcystein.

    Measured: <4 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2017
  2. Study start20 Oct 2017
  3. Primary completion29 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion29 Oct 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study will be a single centre double blinded randomized placebo controlled trial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03354572
Sponsor's protocol ID
NAC.TEP
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
25 Oct 2017
Last updated
13 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: not yet decided, if there is a question for data we will comply as much as possible

Publications

  • Mulkens CE, Staatsen M, van Genugten L, Snoeker BAM, Vissers KCP, Bruhn J, Bucx MJL. Postoperative pain reduction by pre-emptive N-acetylcysteine: an exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Nov;46(11):960-964. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102884. Epub 2021 Aug 26.

    PubMed 34446544

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Acetyl cysteine in people with Postoperative Pain, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pain score day 1 after surgery (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03354572, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in