Uncomplicated Urinary Tract InfectionsPhase 3NCT03354598
Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid Versus Ciprofloxacin for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Adult Women
A Phase 3 study testing Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid and Ciprofloxacin in people with Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections, run by Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited at 60 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections
- What is being tested?
- Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid and Ciprofloxacin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,671 participants
- Where
- 60 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2018to 20 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female patients ≥18 years of age with 24-96 hours of urinary symptoms attributable to a urinary tract infection (UTI)
- Two of the following signs and symptoms of uUTI: urinary frequency, urinary urgency, pain or burning micturition, suprapubic pain
- A mid-stream urine specimen with:
- a dipstick analysis positive for nitrite AND
- evidence of pyuria as defined by either:
- a dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase ii. at least 10 white blood cells per cubic millimeter on microscopic analysis of unspun urine iii. White blood cell count ≥10 cells/high-powered field in the sediment of a spun urine
- Has given written informed consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- Presence of signs and symptoms suggestive of acute pyelonephritis: fever (temperature > 38°Celsius), chills, costovertebral angle tenderness, flank pain, nausea, and/or vomiting
- Receipt of antibacterial drug therapy potentially effective as treatment of uUTI within the prior 7 days
- Concurrent use of non-study treatments that would have a potential effect on outcome evaluations in patients with uUTI
- Patients with ileal loops or urinary stoma
- Patients with an indwelling urinary catheter in the previous 30 days
- Patients with paraplegia
Show all 25Show fewer
- Patients who are likely to receive ongoing antibacterial drug prophylaxis after treatment of uUTI (e.g., patients with vesico-ureteral reflux)
- Any history of trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract
- Patient's urine culture, if available at study entry, identify more than 2 microorganisms regardless of colony count or patient has a confirmed fungal UTI
- Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or had a renal transplant
- Known history of creatinine clearance <50 mL/min
- Patients known to have liver disease
- Patients who are pregnant, or females of child-bearing age unable to take adequate contraceptive precautions
- Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
- Patients with history of blood dyscrasias
- Patients with history of uric acid kidney stones
- Patients with acute gouty attack
- Patients on chronic methotrexate therapy
- Patient known to be immunocompromised
- Patients with a known history of myasthenia gravis
- Patients who require concomitant administration of tizanidine or valproic acid
- Patients with a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to carbapenems, beta-lactams, quinolones or probenecid
- Patient is considered unlikely to survive the 4-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness including septic shock which is associated with a high risk of mortality
- History of seizures
- Use of any other investigational drug in the 30 days prior to the study
Trial locations and contacts
60 sites in 1 country.
60 sites in 1 country
United States60 sites
Medical Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
Medical Facility
Austin, Texas, 78705
Medical Facility
Austin, Texas, 78735
Medical Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, 35242
Medical Facility
Bountiful, Utah, 84010
Medical Facility
Bradenton, Florida, 34209
Medical Facility
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
Medical Facility
Carrollton, Texas, 75010
Medical Facility
Cerritos, California, 90703
Medical Facility
Chula Vista, California, 91911
Medical Facility
Clearwater, Florida, 33761
Medical Facility
Corpus Christi, Texas, 78414
Medical Facility
Dallas, Texas, 75204
Medical Facility
Doral, Florida, 33166
Medical Facility
Easley, South Carolina, 29640
Medical Facility
Edgewater, Florida, 32132
Medical Facility
Fullerton, California, 92835
Medical Facility
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Medical Facility
Houston, Texas, 77029
Medical Facility
Houston, Texas, 77036
Medical Facility
Hugo, Oklahoma, 74743
Medical Facility
La Mesa, California, 91942
Medical Facility
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601
Medical Facility
Lancaster, South Carolina, 29720
Medical Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109
Medical Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89121
Medical Facility
Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, 33319
Medical Facility
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Medical Facility
Metairie, Louisiana, 70115
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33126
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33135
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33144
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33145
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33155
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33165
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33172
Medical Facility
Miami, Florida, 33173
Medical Facility
Miami Springs, Florida, 33166
Medical Facility
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572
Medical Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Medical Facility
New Port Richey, Florida, 34653
Medical Facility
Norcross, Georgia, 30092
Medical Facility
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Medical Facility
Palmetto Bay, Florida, 33157
Medical Facility
Pearland, Texas, 77584
Medical Facility
Perry, Georgia, 31069
Medical Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032
Medical Facility
Plano, Texas, 75024
Medical Facility
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Medical Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84109
Medical Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121
Medical Facility
San Diego, California, 92108
Medical Facility
South Jordan, Utah, 84095
Medical Facility
St. George, Utah, 84790
Medical Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33711
Medical Facility
Sugar Land, Texas, 77478
Medical Facility
Sylmar, California, 91342
Medical Facility
Tolleson, Arizona, 85353
Medical Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20011
Medical Facility
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Multi-center Double-blind Study of Efficacy Tolerability & Safety of Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (uUTI) in Adult Women
This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women
- Conditions
- Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections
- Being tested
- Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid, Ciprofloxacin
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/ProbenecidDrug
Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection
CiprofloxacinDrug
Also called Cipro
Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid | Experimental | Sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid 500 mg PO twice daily for 5 days Receives: Drug: Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid |
| Ciprofloxacin | Active comparator | Ciprofloxacin 250 mg PO administered twice daily for 3 days Receives: Drug: Ciprofloxacin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall Success
Overall Success: Clinical Success (resolution of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) symptoms present at study entry and no new symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
Measured: Day 12+/-1 day
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall Success
Overall Success is Clinical Success (resolution of uUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new uUTI symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
Measured: Day 12 +/- 1 day
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic Success
Microbiologic success is defined as eradication of the baseline pathogen (<1000 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/mL) at the Test of Cure visit
Measured: Day 12+/-1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2017
- Study start1 Aug 2018
- Primary completion16 Jan 2020
- Study completion20 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,671 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354598
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IT001-301
- Status last verified
- Dec 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dunne MW, Aronin SI, Das AF, Akinapelli K, Zelasky MT, Puttagunta S, Boucher HW. Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):66-77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac738.
PubMed 36069202
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Phase 3 Randomized Multi-center Double-blind Study of Efficacy Tolerability & Safety of Oral Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ciprofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections (uUTI) in Adult Women
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354598
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IT001-301
- Conditions
- Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,671 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Iterum Therapeutics, International LimitedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Dec 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus oral ciprofloxacin for treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) in adult women
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid | Experimental | Drug: Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/ProbenecidSulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid 500 mg PO twice daily for 5 days |
| Ciprofloxacin | Active comparator | Drug: CiprofloxacinCiprofloxacin 250 mg PO administered twice daily for 3 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Female patients ≥18 years of age with 24-96 hours of urinary symptoms attributable to a urinary tract infection (UTI)
- Two of the following signs and symptoms of uUTI: urinary frequency, urinary urgency, pain or burning micturition, suprapubic pain
- A mid-stream urine specimen with:
- Has given written informed consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (25 listed)
- Presence of signs and symptoms suggestive of acute pyelonephritis: fever (temperature > 38°Celsius), chills, costovertebral angle tenderness, flank pain, nausea, and/or vomiting
- Receipt of antibacterial drug therapy potentially effective as treatment of uUTI within the prior 7 days
- Concurrent use of non-study treatments that would have a potential effect on outcome evaluations in patients with uUTI
- Patients with ileal loops or urinary stoma
- Patients with an indwelling urinary catheter in the previous 30 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/ProbenecidTreatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection | Drug | Sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid |
| CiprofloxacinAlso: CiproTreatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection | Drug | Ciprofloxacin |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall Success
Time frame: Day 12+/-1 day
Overall Success: Clinical Success (resolution of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (uUTI) symptoms present at study entry and no new symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Susceptible (Micro-MITTS) Participants With Overall Success
Time frame: Day 12 +/- 1 day
Overall Success is Clinical Success (resolution of uUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new uUTI symptoms) AND Microbiologic success (eradication of the baseline pathogen)
1 secondary outcome
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Patients With Microbiologic Success
Time frame: Day 12+/-1 day
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36069202Dunne MW, Aronin SI, Das AF, Akinapelli K, Zelasky MT, Puttagunta S, Boucher HW. Sulopenem or Ciprofloxacin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;76(1):66-77. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac738.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Investigate Pivmecillinam Versus Nitrofurantoin in Female Adolescents 12 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection
Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections
RecruitingPhase 3
Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of U101 Oral Capsules in the Prevention of Uncomplicated rUTIs in Women
Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Women
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of LBP-EC01 in the Treatment of Acute Uncomplicated UTI Caused by Drug Resistant E. Coli (ELIMINATE Trial)
Urinary Tract Infections
RecruitingObservational study
Single Dose Amikacin for Uncomplicated Cystitis in the ED: A Feasibility Study
Urinary Tract Infections
Not yet recruiting
Urine Alkalinization for UTI in Women: RCT
UTI - Urinary Tract Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
60 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid and Ciprofloxacin in people with Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections, run by Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited at 60 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 25 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 60 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Microbiologic Modified Intent to Treat Resistant (Micro-MITTR) Participants With Overall Success (time frame: Day 12+/-1 day). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03354598, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2021.