Breast CancerPhase 2/3NCT03354611
Contrast-Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT for Diagnostic Breast Imaging
A Phase 2/3 study testing Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT Scan and Contrast Dye, Iodinated in people with Breast Cancer, run by Koning Corporation at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Up to one hundred (100) female patients will be enrolled and consented to participate in the study. These women will be enrolled from screening assigned BIRADS 0, patient complaint, or referral for second opinion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT Scan and Contrast Dye, Iodinated
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Sep 2018to 1 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female sex
- Age 35 years or older
- Any ethnicity
- Have an abnormality detected by Breast Self Exam (BSE), or Clinical Breast Exam (CBE), or have an abnormality detected by an imaging modality.
- Will undergo study imaging within four weeks from the date of diagnostic mammography, prior to breast biopsy (if needed).
- Able to provide informed consent
- Post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or effective birth control. For women of childbearing potential, negative pregnancy test or has signed pregnancy test waiver
- If required by standard of care, eGFR >45 within 48 hours to 6 weeks of CE-CBBCT exam
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Lactation
- Unknown pregnancy status AND
- has refused pregnancy testing and
- has refused to sign a pregnancy test waiver
- Women who are unable or unwilling to understand or to provide informed consent
Show all 34Show fewer
- Women with physical limitations that may prohibit resting prone on the exam table, such as, but not limited to: frozen shoulder, recent heart surgery, pace maker.
- Women who are unable to tolerate study constraints.
- Women who have received radiation treatments to the thorax or breast area for malignant and nonmalignant conditions, such as (but not limited to):
- Treatment for enlarged thymus gland as an infant
- Irradiation for benign breast conditions, including breast inflammation after giving birth
- Treatment for Hodgkin's disease
- Women who have participated in a prior breast clinical trial that gave additional radiation dose, such as an additional mammogram.
- Women who have received large numbers of diagnostic x-ray examinations for monitoring of disease such as (but not limited to):
- Tuberculosis
- Severe scoliosis
- Additional Exclusion Criteria Due To Contrast Injection:
- Allergic to iodinated contrast material
- Previous non-ionic contrast reaction
- Any conditions below regardless of eGFR
- Renal Disease
- Chronic renal dysfunction
- Renal Transplant (or waiting for a transplant)
- One kidney or other birth defect
- Polycystic Kidneys
- Renal Tumor/Renal Cancer
- History of liver failure/cirrhosis/liver transplant/pending liver transplant
- Congestive heart failure
- Multiple myeloma
- Hyperthyroidism
- Pheochromocytoma
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Asthma requiring daily use of inhaler Additional exclusion criteria due to machine limitations
- Patient's body weight is over the limit of the scanner table (440 lbs or 200kg)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Knoxville Comprehensive Breast Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
UR Medicine Breast Imaging
Rochester, New York, 14623
About this study
Up to one hundred (100) female patients will be enrolled and consented to participate in the study. These women will be enrolled from screening assigned BIRADS 0, patient complaint, or referral for second opinion. The enrolled patient will accept CE-CBBCT scans within 4 weeks of her diagnostic mammography and before breast biopsy if biopsy is needed. The final diagnostic workup outcome of these enrolled patients needs to include at least 30 confirmed cancers cases.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT Scan, Contrast Dye, Iodinated
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT ScanRadiation
- Pre-contrast scan
- Begin contrast injection (and saline chaser)
- Post-contrast Scan. Start time of post-contrast CE-CBBCT scan is 90-200 seconds after start of injection, depending on method of contrast delivery (bolus vs hand injection)
Contrast Dye, IodinatedDrug
1.5-2ml/kg body weight (100 ml maximum) of a low osmolar, nonionic, 300-350 mgI/ml iodinated contrast agent, will be injected at a rate of ~2.0 ml/s, for a total injection time of 30-60 seconds (for a 50 kg subject). This will be immediately followed by a saline "chaser" from 20 to 40 ml at ~2 ml/s (20 seconds) to maximize dynamic enhancement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Workup | Experimental | The subjects will first have a pre-contrast CBBCT scan. Iodinated contrast will be injected intravenously, and then another CBBCT scans will be performed to capture the tumor vasculature enhancement. Receives: Radiation: Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT Scan; Drug: Contrast Dye, Iodinated |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Breast lesions
The existence of lesions in the breast
Measured: Within 4 weeks after the imaging acquisition if finished if there is a suspicious finding in the images.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Nov 2017
- Study start10 Sep 2018
- Primary completion1 Sep 2021
- Study completion1 Sep 2021
Why it stopped: The study progress doesn't meet the sponsor's requirement
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Subjects in this group will be enrolled from screening assigned BIRADS 0, patient complaint, or referral for second opinion. The enrolled patient will accept CE-CBBCT scans within 4 weeks of her diagnostic mammography and before breast biopsy if biopsy is needed.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Koning Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354611
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-01
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
O'Connell A, Conover DL, Zhang Y, Seifert P, Logan-Young W, Lin CF, Sahler L, Ning R. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1017.
PubMed 20651210Pediconi F, Venditti F, Padula S, Roselli A, Moriconi E, Giacomelli L, Catalano C, Passariello R. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer. Radiol Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;110(1-2):61-8. English, Italian.
PubMed 16163140Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):110-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.110.
PubMed 10458224Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):13-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113.
PubMed 11425968Gulsun M, Demirkazik FB, Ariyurek M. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Sep;47(3):227-31. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00181-x.
PubMed 12927667McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, Williamson EE, Eckel LJ. Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):772-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15150025. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PubMed 25742194Prionas ND, Lindfors KK, Ray S, Huang SY, Beckett LA, Monsky WL, Boone JM. Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):714-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092311.
PubMed 20720067Seifert P, Conover D, Zhang Y, Morgan R, Arieno A, Destounis S, Somerville P, Murphy PF. Evaluation of malignant breast lesions in the diagnostic setting with cone beam breast computed tomography (Breast CT): feasibility study. Breast J. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):364-74. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12285. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
PubMed 24934253O'Connell AM, Kawakyu-O'Connor D. Dedicated Cone-beam Breast Computed Tomography and Diagnostic Mammography: Comparison of Radiation Dose, Patient Comfort, And Qualitative Review of Imaging Findings in BI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2:7. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.93274. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
PubMed 22439131O'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S. The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples. Breast J. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):592-605. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12327. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
PubMed 25199995Fukumura D, Duda DG, Munn LL, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: novel insights through intravital imaging in pre-clinical models. Microcirculation. 2010 Apr;17(3):206-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00029.x.
PubMed 20374484Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JH, Ruys SH. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995 Dec;197(3):743-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480749.
PubMed 7480749
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Contrast-Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT for Diagnostic Breast Imaging
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03354611
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16-01
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study progress doesn't meet the sponsor's requirement
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Koning CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Up to one hundred (100) female patients will be enrolled and consented to participate in the study. These women will be enrolled from screening assigned BIRADS 0, patient complaint, or referral for second opinion. The enrolled patient will accept CE-CBBCT scans within 4 weeks of her diagnostic mammography and before breast biopsy if biopsy is needed. The final diagnostic workup outcome of these enrolled patients needs to include at least 30 confirmed cancers cases.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Subjects in this group will be enrolled from screening assigned BIRADS 0, patient complaint, or referral for second opinion. The enrolled patient will accept CE-CBBCT scans within 4 weeks of her diagnostic mammography and before breast biopsy if biopsy is needed.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Workup | Experimental | Radiation: Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT Scan, Drug: Contrast Dye, IodinatedThe subjects will first have a pre-contrast CBBCT scan. Iodinated contrast will be injected intravenously, and then another CBBCT scans will be performed to capture the tumor vasculature enhancement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Female sex
- Age 35 years or older
- Any ethnicity
- Have an abnormality detected by Breast Self Exam (BSE), or Clinical Breast Exam (CBE), or have an abnormality detected by an imaging modality.
- Will undergo study imaging within four weeks from the date of diagnostic mammography, prior to breast biopsy (if needed).
Key exclusion criteria (34 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Lactation
- Unknown pregnancy status AND
- has refused pregnancy testing and
- has refused to sign a pregnancy test waiver
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT Scan* Pre-contrast scan * Begin contrast injection (and saline chaser) * Post-contrast Scan. Start time of post-contrast CE-CBBCT scan is 90-200 seconds after start of injection, depending on method of contrast delivery (bolus vs hand injection) | Radiation | Diagnostic Workup |
| Contrast Dye, Iodinated1.5-2ml/kg body weight (100 ml maximum) of a low osmolar, nonionic, 300-350 mgI/ml iodinated contrast agent, will be injected at a rate of ~2.0 ml/s, for a total injection time of 30-60 seconds (for a 50 kg subject). This will be immediately followed by a saline "chaser" from 20 to 40 ml at ~2 ml/s (20 seconds) to maximize dynamic enhancement. | Drug | Diagnostic Workup |
Primary outcome
Breast lesions
Time frame: Within 4 weeks after the imaging acquisition if finished if there is a suspicious finding in the images.
The existence of lesions in the breast
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study progress doesn't meet the sponsor's requirement). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 20651210O'Connell A, Conover DL, Zhang Y, Seifert P, Logan-Young W, Lin CF, Sahler L, Ning R. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):496-509. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1017.
- Background: PubMed 16163140Pediconi F, Venditti F, Padula S, Roselli A, Moriconi E, Giacomelli L, Catalano C, Passariello R. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer. Radiol Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;110(1-2):61-8. English, Italian.
- Background: PubMed 10458224Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jan;17(1):110-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.110.
- Background: PubMed 11425968Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001 Jul;220(1):13-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl3113.
- Background: PubMed 12927667Gulsun M, Demirkazik FB, Ariyurek M. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. Eur J Radiol. 2003 Sep;47(3):227-31. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00181-x.
- Background: PubMed 25742194McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, Williamson EE, Eckel LJ. Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging. Radiology. 2015 Jun;275(3):772-82. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15150025. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 20720067Prionas ND, Lindfors KK, Ray S, Huang SY, Beckett LA, Monsky WL, Boone JM. Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):714-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10092311.
- Background: PubMed 24934253Seifert P, Conover D, Zhang Y, Morgan R, Arieno A, Destounis S, Somerville P, Murphy PF. Evaluation of malignant breast lesions in the diagnostic setting with cone beam breast computed tomography (Breast CT): feasibility study. Breast J. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):364-74. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12285. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 22439131O'Connell AM, Kawakyu-O'Connor D. Dedicated Cone-beam Breast Computed Tomography and Diagnostic Mammography: Comparison of Radiation Dose, Patient Comfort, And Qualitative Review of Imaging Findings in BI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2:7. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.93274. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
- Background: PubMed 25199995O'Connell AM, Karellas A, Vedantham S. The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples. Breast J. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):592-605. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12327. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 20374484Fukumura D, Duda DG, Munn LL, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: novel insights through intravital imaging in pre-clinical models. Microcirculation. 2010 Apr;17(3):206-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00029.x.
- Background: PubMed 7480749Boetes C, Mus RD, Holland R, Barentsz JO, Strijk SP, Wobbes T, Hendriks JH, Ruys SH. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology. 1995 Dec;197(3):743-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480749.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam Breast CT Scan and Contrast Dye, Iodinated in people with Breast Cancer, run by Koning Corporation at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study progress doesn't meet the sponsor's requirement). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Breast lesions (time frame: Within 4 weeks after the imaging acquisition if finished if there is a suspicious finding in the images.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03354611, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2023.