AzTrials
AzTrials

Social SkillsISR-PEERSNCT03354923

Parent-Child Reciprocity and the Effectiveness of PEERS

A study testing PEERS intervention in people with Social Skills and Parent-Child Relational Problem, run by Bar-Ilan University, Israel at 1 site in Israel.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Early adolescence marks a significant development in teens' social abilities, shifting from play to conversation-based activities, and having stronger and more intimate friendships. Parents contribute to this shift by practicing reciprocal social interaction with their teens. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 17 years
What is being tested?
PEERS intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
Jan 2016to Aug 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Capable and willing to provide informed assent
  • Diagnosed with ASD (high functioning)
  • IQ > 80

Who cannot join

  • Intellectual Disability
  • History of significant head injury or neurological illness
  • Current diagnosis of substance dependence

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Bar Ilan University

    Ramat Gan, 5290002

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Parent-Child Reciprocity and the Effectiveness of a Parent-Assisted Social Skills Training Program for Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Early adolescence marks a significant development in teens' social abilities, shifting from play to conversation-based activities, and having stronger and more intimate friendships. Parents contribute to this shift by practicing reciprocal social interaction with their teens.

For teens with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) this shift in their peers' social abilities extends their characteristic social deficits even further. Social skills deficits in individuals with ASD are associated with poor adaptive functioning and increased psychopathology. Parents play a pivotal role in caring for and tutoring their children with ASD into adulthood. However, the effect parent-teen reciprocity has on the social skills of adolescents with ASD has not been tested. Furthermore, whereas parent-child reciprocity predicted intervention outcome in young children with ASD, no study has examined this effect in teens with ASD.

The proposed study aims to test these questions using the Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS), an evidence-based parent-assisted social skills training program for teens with ASD.

Read the detailed description

Entering adolescence is a significant milestone in the development of socialization. Same-sex friendships and "best friends", developed during childhood, become more intensive, reciprocal, and intimate. In addition, social networks evolve and become more central for adolescents. Social interaction moves in adolescence from focusing on game playing to conversation focused interaction. Teens begin to exhibit dialogical skills, including the capacity to acknowledge others' opinions and emotions; view oneself in someone else's position; discuss disagreements with empathy while maintaining positive affect; and engage in a give-and-take, fluent, and non-constricted exchange while maintaining an autonomous stance. The consolidation of close friendships requires for teens to learn to dialogue joint positive plans as well as interpersonal conflicts within the relationship. Parents, through their relationships with their teens, can provide them with opportunities to learn, experience, and practice the dialogical skills needed for social functioning. Parental contribution to teens' dialogical skills is possible despite the differences between parent-teen and teen-peers interactions, since interaction in both kinds of relationships requires reciprocity .

Reciprocity is defined as the capacity to engage in social exchange that integrates inputs from multiple partners into a unified social event. It involves an ongoing process of awareness to- and interpretation of- the emotional and interpersonal cues of others, followed by an appropriate response that enables a smooth continuation of the social interaction. Parent-child reciprocity is a key element of early social relationships, which sets the foundation for social collaboration, empathy, and pro-social behavior. Developmental studies have demonstrated how early parent-child reciprocity predicts social adaptive functioning in adolescence, whereas intrusive, controlling parenting is associated with poorer social outcomes, such as affiliations with deviant friends. Adolescents gain from productive reciprocity with the parent, as it gives them an opportunity to express their individuation vis-a-vis the parental stance, and to practice important perspective taking, exchanging information, negotiation, and conflict resolution skills in a secure, enabling environment. The proposed study aims to examine the effect parent-teen reciprocity has on adolescents with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neuro-developmental condition, characterized by social communication deficits and restricted and repetitive behavior patterns. ASD symptoms vary in severity (e.g. from total lack of social initiative and extreme difficulty tolerating change, to an awkward social approach and difficulties adapting behavior do the social context), which may be related to different levels of functioning. In addition, ASD can involve intellectual impairment and comorbid psychopathology, that may further hamper independent functioning . Despite positive effects of early intervention social deficits in ASD persist throughout the lifespan even for higher functioning individuals .

For many individuals with ASD, adolescence is a particularly troubling period, characterized by enhanced motivation for social relationships, but at the same time, by increased realization of the difficulties they encounter when interacting with peers and their lack of knowledge and experience in friend-making . As they attempt to integrate socially, adolescents with ASD experience more negative social outcomes (e.g., fewer friends, little support from classmates, limited involvement in social activities, and increased peer rejection) compared to adolescents with other developmental disabilities or typically developing teens. Due to their social-communication deficits as well as their social naivety, adolescents with ASD are also more exposed to bullying, reflected in high rates of victimization and perpetration.

Parents play a pivotal role in caring for their child with ASD. Due to the developmental delays and social isolation of individuals with ASD, parents continue to care for their children into adolescence and adulthood, often as the only carers . Because of their central supportive role in their children's lives, research has attempted to highlight parental factors that may predict the quality of parent-child relationships as well as child outcomes. Most studies observing such parental factors have focused on parents of toddlers and preschoolers, associating parental resolution of the child's diagnosis, parental insightfulness into the experience of the child, and parental sensitivity, with child's secure attachment. Studies of parents' relationship with their older offspring linked maternal pessimism to poorer relationships with sons/daughters with ASD , and maternal warmth and praise with lower levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms in adolescents and adults with ASD. However, these studies are based on self and parental report rather than on behavioral observation, and did not examine parent-teen reciprocity.

Examinations of the effects of parent-child reciprocity on children with ASD have mostly focused on young children. Our own work showed parent-child reciprocity is associated with improved emotion regulation and lower negative emotionality as well as with increased levels of oxytocin in children with ASD. On the other hand, controlling, intrusive parenting was associated with externalizing behavior problems in children and adolescents with ASD. Parent-child reciprocity has also been shown to predict higher social skills of children with ASD and to mediate the relation between child's level of functioning and social skills. The contribution of parent-child reciprocity to the child's intervention related progress has been addressed in some intervention studies for toddlers and pre-schoolers with ASD , revealing parent-child reciprocity mediates the effect of social communication interventions in this young age group. However, an examination of parentadolescent reciprocity in ASD, as a predictor of teen outcome is still needed.

The complexity of the parental role in adolescence is greater and more stressful when parenting teens with ASD . The need for greater parental input into the nature of social interaction, the new themes of intimacy and sexuality brought upon by puberty, and the parental wish to protect their teens from exclusion and bullying may bring parents to be more controlling, and even intrusive in their interaction with their teens . However, as described above, parent-teen reciprocity is important in developing teens' appropriate social reciprocity with peers. Hence, the ability of parents to be more reciprocal and less intrusive in their interaction with their teens is expected to predict teens' social skills and reciprocity with peers. Furthermore, parent-teen reciprocity is expected to play a part in the ability of teens and parents to gain from interventions targeting social skills, such as parent-assisted social skills groups.

PEERS Intervention: Social skills groups are common interventions for people with ASD, especially those with average to above-average cognitive skills . However, the majority of social skills training programs have focused on children aged 7-12, and few studies have examined the benefit of such groups for adolescents with ASD . Furthermore, few Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) have examined the effectiveness of social skills training for those with ASD. The proposed study aims to conduct the first RCT of a social skills training program for adolescents with ASD in Israel, using the well-established Program for the Education and Enrichment of Relational Skills (PEERS). PEERS , is a parent-assisted, manualized social skills training program for high-functioning adolescents with ASD, addressing crucial areas of social functioning for adolescents (see methods for a description). Ecologically valid skills for making and maintaining friends are taught using psychoeducational and cognitive-behavioral treatment techniques. Parents learn how to be social coaches to their teens in a separate group, running in parallel to the teens' group. Teens practice the taught skills in between sessions. Parents, as social coaches, are expected to supervise their teens' treatment fidelity, and in addition to practice the taught skills with their teens (e.g., running a two-way conversation, noticing the others' non-verbal cues, etc.). In North America, PEERS has been evaluated using RCTs, with its efficacy established for improving a variety of social skills in adolescents, including social skills knowledge, social responsiveness, social communication, social cognition, social awareness, social motivation, assertion, cooperation, and responsibility . PEERS related gains were maintained even 5 years post intervention. PEERS treatment effects have also been reflected in changes in the social brain as revealed through biomarkers of treatment outcome using EEG . A first cross-cultural validation study of PEERS in South Korea, yielded a significant improvement in teens' social skills knowledge, interpersonal skills, play/leisure skills, and a decrease in teens' autism symptoms and depression, as well as parents' anxiety. Recently, two preintervention child factors; parental report on teens' social skills, and teens' self-awareness of their popularity, were found to predict PEERS intervention outcome. PEERS positive effects on parents' self-efficacy have also been reported. However, although PEERS relies on parents as social coaches, the effect of parent-teen reciprocity on PEERS outcome has not been examined. As in everyday life, parents have a complex role in PEERS: On one hand, supervising their teens' work may call for more controlling, intrusive parenting. On the other hand, in order to effectively practice the taught social skills with their teens (and to meet the program's goals), parents and teens need to reciprocally collaborate. The use of reciprocity and intrusiveness in parent-teen interaction could therefore mediate the effect of PEERS on teens' social skills. In addition, since PEERS also teaches parents how to be less intrusive and more reciprocal with their teens, an improvement in parent-teen reciprocity is expected

Being tested
PEERS intervention
Medical subject headings
Social Skills

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PEERS interventionBehavioural

    PEERS is a 14-week manualized social skills treatment program that targets the friendship skills of adolescents with ASD. In the Israeli adaptation of PEERS, two meeting were extended. An adolescents group will be held concurrently with the parents group in different rooms. Both groups will begin the session with homework review, followed by a didactic social skills lesson, utilizing the teaching methods of modeling and role-playing. In order to practice the newly learned social skills,a behavioral rehearsal interaction will be assigned in the adolescents group. Finally,Socialization homework assignments designed to address further mastery and generalization of newly learned skills within the natural social environment will be assigned too.

Study groups in NCT03354923
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
immediate intervention groupExperimentalImmediate PEERS intervention
Receives: Behavioral: PEERS intervention
delayed interventionOtherdelayed PEERS intervention to begin after experimental group
Receives: Behavioral: PEERS intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline Parent-Adolescent reciprocity paradigm at 4 and 8 months

    This paradigm is designed to test dyadic reciprocity between a parent and an adolescent. Adolescents will be observed in three 10-minute discussions (one positive, one support giving and one negative) with the parent who serves as their PEERS coach: In the positive discussion, parent and teen will be asked to plan a fun outing together. In the support giving the parent and child take turns and each tells the other something sad/disappointing that happened to him/her outside the relationship (with friends, boss, etc.) and the other gives support. After five minutes partners change roles. In the negative discussion they will be asked about a common conflict between them and negotiate it. The three discussions will be videotaped and coded using the Coding Interactive Behavior manual (Feldman, 1998). The CIB is a global rating system for social interactions that includes 52 codes rated on a scale of 1 to 5 which are aggregated into several composites

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  2. Change from baseline Contextual Assessment of Social Skills at 4 and 8 months

    The CASS is a live role-play assessment of conversational skills developed for adolescents with high-functioning ASD. Conversational skills are assessed via behavioral coding of two semi-structured role-plays (with an interested companion and with a bored companion) and scores on a conversation rating scale. Behaviors coded during the role plays include asking questions, topic changes, vocal expressiveness, gestures, positive affect, posture, kinesics arousal, social anxiety, involvement in the conversation, quality of rapport, and an overall score. Psychometric properties of the CASS are good, with mean internal consistency of .83 and mean inter-rater reliability of .68. The CASS was reported as a sensitive measure of change in an evaluation of a social skills program for young adults with ASD (White, Scarpa, Conner, Maddox, \& Bonete, 2014).

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change from baseline Social Responsiveness Scale at 4 and 8 months

    The SRS is a 65-item rating scale measuring the severity of autism spectrum symptoms as they occur in natural social settings. Completed by parents and teachers, it is appropriate for use with children from 4 to 18 years of age. Scales include social awareness, social information processing, capacity for reciprocal social communication, social anxiety/avoidance, and autistic preoccupations and traits. The SRS has been shown to be sensitive to changes in social functioning among children with ASD (Wood et al., 2009). Internal consistency for SRS scales varies between 0.91-0.97, test-retest reliability 0.84-0.97 and interrater reliability 0.74-0.95 (Bolte, Poustka, \& Constantino, 2008).

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  2. Change from baseline The Social Skills Improvement System at 4 and 8 months

    The SSIS is a standardized rating scale that assesses global social competence for children 3 to 18 years. Designed to assess social skills change after treatment, it utilizes a multi-informant approach, allowing parents, teachers, and students to evaluate target social behaviors including communication, cooperation, assertion, responsibility, empathy, engagement, and self-control. Targeted problem behaviors include externalizing behaviors and bullying. Internal consistency for the SSIS ranges from .92 to .97, test-retest reliability from .77 to .87, inter-rater reliability from .50 to .68.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  3. Change from baseline Friendship Qualities Scale

    The FQS is an adolescent self-report measure of the quality of best friendships. It is composed of 23-items on a scale of 0-4. The items fall into five categories: Closeness, Companionship, Conflict, Helpfulness, and Security. The FQS has good internal consistency, with alpha coefficients ranging between .71 and .86 across all five categories.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  4. Change from baseline Quality of Play Questionnaire at 4 and 8 months

    The QPQ is a measure completed by adolescents (QPQ-A) and parents (QPQ-P) in which the quality of the adolescent's last get-together and the frequency of weekly get-togethers with peers are assessed. The scales on the QPQ have been shown to discriminate individuals referred to social skills training from a general community sample using a cut point of > 3.5 on the Conflict Scale and a cut point of < 2.5 on the frequencies of get-togethers.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  5. Change from baseline Test of Adolescent Social Skills Knowledge at 4 and 8 months

    The TAASK is a criterion referenced measure designed to assess adolescent knowledge of the specific social skills taught during the PEERS treatment. Two items are derived from each of the PEERS didactic lessons making a total of 26 forced-choice items.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  6. Change from baseline Vineland Adaptive Behaviors Scales II at 4 and 8 months

    The VABS II is a parent interview regarding a child communication, social, motor and daily living skills based on the report of primary caregivers from which a standardized composite score of adaptive function is calculated.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  7. Change from baseline Loneliness and Social Dissatisfaction Questionnaire at 4 and 8 months

    The LSDQ is a 24-item, standardized self-report measure that assesses global feelings of loneliness and social adequacy and inadequacy. It has been validated with typically developing youth, as well as youth with intellectual disabilities and learning disabilities.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  8. Change from baseline Beck Depression Inventory II at 4 and 8 months

    The BDI-II is a 21 items self-administered questionnaire consisting of 21 items that assess the severity of symptoms and attitudes related to depression. The questionnaire identifies the presence and severity of symptoms consistent with the criteria of the DSM-V. The sum of the scores obtained in each item results in a total score when 14-19 is considered as mild, 20-28 moderate and 29-63 is considered as severe symptoms of depression.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  9. Change from baseline Autism Spectrum Quotient at 4 and 8 months

    The AQ is 50 item, self-reported questionnaire measuring the degree to which an adult with normal intelligence has the traits associated with the autistic spectrum. The cut of score which indicates the person has clinically significant levels of autistic traits is 32 or more. The AQ is a well-known screening instrument for autism spectrum disorder

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  10. Change from baseline Empathy Quotient at 4 and 8 months

    The EQ is a 60 item, valid self-assessment questionnaire measuring empathy levels in adults with normal intelligence. The scales of EQ are 0-80 with the cut off score of 30. The EQ is used as a screening instrument for autism spectrum disorder.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

  11. Change from baseline Parenting Stress Index Short Form at 4 and 8 months

    . The PSI/SF is a 36 item, self-reported questionnaire for parents measuring the levels of stress in the parent-child relationship and identifies the presence of dysfunctional parenting. This instrument has 4 subscales: Defensive responsive, Parental Distress, Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction and Difficult Child. Child and Parent domains combine to form the Total Stress Scale.

    Measured: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2017
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionAug 2018
  4. Study completionAug 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03354923
Sponsor's protocol ID
BIU121216
Acronym
ISR-PEERS
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
29 Jan 2017
Last updated
26 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Hartup WW. Adolescents and their friends. New Dir Child Dev. 1993 Summer;(60):3-22. doi: 10.1002/cd.23219936003. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8414122
  • Lempers JD, Clark-Lempers DS. Young, middle, and late adolescents' comparisons of the functional importance of five significant relationships. J Youth Adolesc. 1992 Feb;21(1):53-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01536983.

    PubMed 24263682
  • Paul R. Promoting social communication in high functioning individuals with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003 Jan;12(1):87-106, vi-vii. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00047-0.

    PubMed 12512400
  • Constantino JN, Davis SA, Todd RD, Schindler MK, Gross MM, Brophy SL, Metzger LM, Shoushtari CS, Splinter R, Reich W. Validation of a brief quantitative measure of autistic traits: comparison of the social responsiveness scale with the autism diagnostic interview-revised. J Autism Dev Disord. 2003 Aug;33(4):427-33. doi: 10.1023/a:1025014929212.

    PubMed 12959421
  • Feldman R. Mother-infant synchrony and the development of moral orientation in childhood and adolescence: direct and indirect mechanisms of developmental continuity. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007 Oct;77(4):582-97. doi: 10.1037/0002-9432.77.4.582.

    PubMed 18194038
  • Feldman R, Bamberger E, Kanat-Maymon Y. Parent-specific reciprocity from infancy to adolescence shapes children's social competence and dialogical skills. Attach Hum Dev. 2013;15(4):407-23. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2013.782650. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

    PubMed 23544455
  • Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Smits, I., Lowet, K., & Goossens, L. (2007). The role of intrusive parenting in the relationship between peer management strategies and peer affiliation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(3), 239-249.

  • McElhaney, K. B., Allen, J. P., Stephenson, J. C., & Hare, A. L. (2009). Attachment and Autonomy during Adolescence. In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • Russell, A., Pettit, G. S., & Mize, J. (1998). Horizontal Qualities in Parent-Child Relationships: Parallels with and Possible Consequences for Children's Peer Relationships. Developmental Review, 18(3), 313-352

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. American Psychiatric Association.

  • Dawson G, Zanolli K. Early intervention and brain plasticity in autism. Novartis Found Symp. 2003;251:266-74; discussion 274-80, 281-97.

    PubMed 14521198
  • Howlin, P. (2004). Autism and Asperger syndrome: Preparing for adulthood. London: Routledge.

  • Tantam D. The challenge of adolescents and adults with Asperger syndrome. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003 Jan;12(1):143-63, vii-viii. doi: 10.1016/s1056-4993(02)00053-6.

    PubMed 12512403
  • Haddad J. Social skills for teenagers with developmental and autism spectrum disorders: The PEERS treatment manual. J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2013;25(1):93-4. doi: 10.2989/17280583.2013.802447. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25860311
  • Renno P, Wood JJ. Discriminant and convergent validity of the anxiety construct in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Sep;43(9):2135-46. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1767-1.

    PubMed 23354538

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PEERS intervention in people with Social Skills and Parent-Child Relational Problem, run by Bar-Ilan University, Israel at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline Parent-Adolescent reciprocity paradigm at 4 and 8 months (time frame: Day 0, 4 months and 8 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03354923, which also lists 51 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in