AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee OsteoarthritisNCT03359603

Electro-acupuncture in Knee Osteoarthritis

A study testing Electro-acupuncture in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Ping Zhou at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases in clinic. It usually occurs in middle-aged people, especially women. An estimated lifetime risk for KOA is approximately 40% in men and 47% in women. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Knee Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Electro-acupuncture
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
25 Dec 2017to 30 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 45-75 years old, male or female;
  • Single / bilateral knee pain, duration of more than 6 months;
  • KL (Kellgren-Lawrence) grade Ⅱ or Ⅲ in recent 6 months;
  • NRS ≥ 40mm;
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Surgery history of knee or waiting for surgery (knee replacement or knee arthroscopy);
  • Knee pain caused by other diseases (such as joint bodies, severe effusion of joint cavity, infection, malignant tumors, autoimmune diseases, trauma, etc.);
  • History of arthroscopy within 1 year or intra-articular injection within 4 months;
  • History of receiving acupuncture treatment within 3 months;
  • Severe acute/chronic organic or mental diseases;
  • Pregnant women, pregnant and lactating women;
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Coagulation disorders (such as hemophilia, etc.);
  • Participation in another clinical study in the past 3 months;
  • With a cardiac pacemaker, metal allergy or needle phobia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Cun-Zhi Liu, MD contact

010-52176043

lcz623780@126.com

Lu-Lu Lin, Postgraduate Student contact

15628933890

linlulu365@126.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Beijing Hostipal of Traditional Chinese Medicine affiliated to Capital medical University

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000

    Cun-Zhi Liu, MD, 010-52176043, lcz623780@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Electro-acupuncture of Different Treatment Frequency in Knee Osteoarthritis: a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases in clinic. It usually occurs in middle-aged people, especially women. An estimated lifetime risk for KOA is approximately 40% in men and 47% in women. KOA is a chronic disease which can lead to obvious pain, joint stiffness, limitation of activity and even disability, with significant associated costs and effects on society, health systems, and individuals. The use of acupuncture as an approach for the management of chronic pain, is receiving increasing recognition from both the public and professionals. However, there are no universally accepted treatment frequency criteria in previous studies. The number of acupuncture treatments is no more than twice per week in most previous studies, while it is usually 3-5 sessions per week in clinical practice in China. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of different EA sessions (3 sessions per week versus once per week) in a pilot randomized controlled trial of KOA.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the 24-session treatments group (group A), patients will receive EA 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks. The EA stimulation lasted for 30 minutes with a dilatational wave of 2/100 Hz and a current intensity depending on the participant's comfort level (preferably with skin around the acupoints shivering mildly without pain). It involves having needles inserted into acupoints which are stimulated manually for 10 seconds to create "De Qi" sensation and paired alligator clips will be attached to the needle holders at LR8-GB33 and two other customized acupoints. Disposable needles (Huatuo) and the HANS-200A acupoint nerve stimulator (Nanjing Jisheng Medical Co., Ltd. production) will be used.

Patients in the 8-session treatments group (group B) will receive EA once per week for 8 weeks. Other interventions are the same as group A. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and 4, 6, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after randomization.

It is expected that the interventions will alleviate the sufferings of the patient. The risks of participation are minimal. Occasionally, acupuncture can make people feel nauseous or experience a temporary increase in pain either during or after treatment. Rare side effects during acupuncture treatment include fainting, infection and subcutaneous hematoma (pooling of blood under the skin). Participants will be warned of these potential side-effects before consenting to have acupuncture.

Patients will be allowed, or required, to back out of the trial based on the following:

  1. A major protocol violation;
  2. Development of a serious disease;
  3. Adverse events related to electro-acupuncture;
  4. Request to be back out of the trial. The purpose of the study is to accumulate clinical data, obtain the outcome data of the intervention method and prove the feasibility of the study protocol.

Sixty patients will be selected as the sample size according to clinical experience.

Being tested
Electro-acupuncture
Keywords
Electro-acupuncture, Knee osteoarthritis, Treatment frequency
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electro-acupunctureDevice

    Patients will be treated by use of 5 obligatory and 3 customized acupoints. Obligatory points (ST35, EX-LE5, LR8, GB33 and Ashi) will be used in all patients. Other 3 customized acupoints should be chosen by the physicians on the basis of traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis for acupuncture channels related to the individual pain area, with the intent of optimizing efficacy. ST34, ST36, ST32, ST40 and EX-LE2 will be used for pain at stomach meridian. GB31, GB36, GB34, GB39 and GB41 will be used for pain at gallbladder meridian. BL39, BL40, BL57 and BL60 will be used for pain at bladder meridian. LR7, SP9, SP10, KI10, SP4, SP6, LR3 and KI3 will be used for pain at three yin meridians of foot. Needles will be stimulated manually for 10 seconds to achieve"De Qi". Paired alligator clips will be attached transversely to the needle holders at LR8-GB33 and two other customized acupoints. Other needles will be manipulated for 10 seconds during the treatments.

Study groups in NCT03359603
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group AExperimentalAfter recruiting, patients are assigned to the group by randomization,and then receive electro-acupuncture treatment. Patients in the group will receive EA 3 sessions per week for 8 weeks. The EA stimulation lasted for 30 minutes with a dilatational wave of 2/100 Hz and a current intensity depending on the patient's comfort level (preferably with skin around the acupoints shivering mildly without pain).
Receives: Device: Electro-acupuncture
Group BExperimentalAfter recruiting, patients are assigned to the group by randomization,and then receive electro-acupuncture treatment. Patients in the group will receive EA once per week for 8 weeks. The EA stimulation lasted for 30 minutes with a dilatational wave of 2/100 Hz and a current intensity depending on the patient's comfort level (preferably with skin around the acupoints shivering mildly without pain).
Receives: Device: Electro-acupuncture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Response rate

    the percentage of patients with improvement in average pain (numerical rating scale, NRS) at least 2 units and in Western Ontario and Mcmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function subscale score at least 6 units at 8 weeks. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

    Measured: baseline and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Pain

    using numerical rating scale (NRS) and WOMAC pain subscale. Pain NRS was a self-administered instrument, a number selected from 0-10 by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 =no pain to 10 =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain. The WOMAC pain subscale referred to the patient's pain. It was comprised of 5 items, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst pain condition. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

    Measured: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks

  2. Knee-joint function

    using WOMAC function subscale. The WOMAC function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

    Measured: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks

  3. Stiffness

    using WOMAC stiffness subscale. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.

    Measured: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks

  4. Overall effect

    using the Overall Treatment Effect (OTE)

    Measured: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks

  5. Quality of life

    using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)

    Measured: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks

  6. Adverse events

    using Adverse Event Form

    Measured: up to 16 weeks

  7. Credibility score

    using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire

    Measured: 1 week(after the first treatment)

  8. Expectancy score

    using Credibility/expectancy questionnaire

    Measured: 1 week(after the first treatment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Dec 2017
  2. Study start25 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03359603
Sponsor's protocol ID
2017BL-076-01
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
16 Nov 2017
Last updated
28 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Lin LL, Tu JF, Shao JK, Zou X, Wang TQ, Wang LQ, Yang JW, Sun N, Liu CZ. Acupuncture of different treatment frequency in knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a pilot randomized clinical trial. Trials. 2019 Jul 11;20(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3528-8.

    PubMed 31296249

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Electro-acupuncture in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Ping Zhou at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Cun-Zhi Liu, MD (010-52176043, lcz623780@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Response rate (time frame: baseline and 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03359603, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Dec 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in