AzTrials
AzTrials

Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Lung Biopsy Under CT GuidanceSAENCT03360084

Systemic Air Embolism After CT-guided Lung Biopsy

An observational study of Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Lung Biopsy Under CT Guidance and Patients Who Presented Systemic Air Embolism After Percutaneous Lung Biopsy Under CT Guidance Depicted at the Time of the Procedure on a Whole Thoracic CT, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Systemic air embolism is traditionally considered as an extremely rare complication of percutaneous lung biopsy. Current literature includes mainly case reports or small case series of SAE. Majority of cases resulted in cardiac and/or neurological symptoms, often causing death. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Percutaneous lung biopsy under CT guidance
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
559 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
30 Sep 2015to 31 Jul 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All consecutive lung biopsies performed between April 2014 to May 2016 at our department of cardiothoracic interventional radiology were included using the local thoracic biopsy database.

Who may be able to join

  • percutaneous CT guided lung biopsies

Who cannot join

  • absence of intra-parenchymal pathway (pleural, parietal or mediastinal lesions)
  • radiofrequency ablation
  • peripheral nodule marking procedure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Uhmontpellier

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Systemic Air Embolism After CT-guided Lung Biopsy: Incidence and Risk Factors Assessment

Systemic air embolism is traditionally considered as an extremely rare complication of percutaneous lung biopsy. Current literature includes mainly case reports or small case series of SAE. Majority of cases resulted in cardiac and/or neurological symptoms, often causing death. In most reported cases, the diagnosis of systemic air embolism referred to clinical manifestations without radiological diagnosis at the time of the procedure. Hence, its incidence might be underestimated in case of asymptomatic patients. Immediate recognition of air embolism during the procedure has been reported as the main factor to minimize severe complications since specific management of patient can be initiated earlier.

The purpose of this study is to retrospectively assess the incidence of systemic air embolism depicted at the time of the procedure on a whole thoracic CT, systematically performed after transthoracic lung biopsy in a large cohort of consecutive patients. Secondary objectives are to determine possible influencing factors and to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Read the detailed description

In this retrospective cohort study, all consecutive lung biopsies performed between April 2014 to May 2016 at our department of cardiothoracic interventional radiology were included using the local thoracic biopsy database. Biopsies were scheduled after the weekly multidisciplinary lung cancer meeting approval. Pleural, parietal and mediastinal lesions were excluded due to the absence of intra-parenchymal pathway. Radiofrequency ablation and peripheral nodule marking procedure were also excluded.

A complete retrospective imaging review of the procedures was performed on a PACS workstation by an experienced chest radiologist. Clinical data was also collected from the electronic medical record system.

Variables analyzed were age, sex, spirometry data, emphysema on CT, therapeutics previously done, target lesion characteristics (location, depth, and nodule size and feature), patient position, length of intrapulmonary biopsy path, number of pleural needle passes, biopsy length and number of biopsy passes. Procedural air embolism and other associated complications (hemoptysis and pneumothorax) and their management and consequences (length of hospitalization and additional action) were recorded.

Patient's characteristics with and without air embolism were compared using Student or Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables and Chi-square or Fisher test for categorical ones. To determine the relative importance of air embolism occurrence influencing factors, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on variables according to significance level or clinical coherence. A backward selection was used; the α-to-enter and the α-to-exit were set, respectively, at 0.20 and 0.10. Statistical bilateral significance threshold was set at 5%. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).

Being tested
Percutaneous lung biopsy under CT guidance
Keywords
CT, Interventional radiology, Lung biopsy, Transthoracic biopsy, Systemic air embolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Percutaneous lung biopsy under CT guidanceProcedure or surgery

    Percutaneous lung biopsy under CT guidance

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of systemic air embolism

    Systemic air embolism was depicted on the CT scan performed on the whole chest in the same position as for the biopsy at the end of the procedure.

    Air embolism was defined as an air collection in the left cardiac cavities or vascular systemic structure, visible in at least two consecutive slices, that was not present on the pre-therapeutic CT

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Risk factors of systemic air embolism

    Variables were recorded using a retrospective imaging review of the biopsy procedures. Clinical data was also collected from the electronic medical record system.

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Dec 2017
  2. Study start30 Sep 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
559 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03360084
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL17_0326
Acronym
SAE
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
23 Nov 2017
Last updated
2 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Lung Biopsy Under CT Guidance and Patients Who Presented Systemic Air Embolism After Percutaneous Lung Biopsy Under CT Guidance Depicted at the Time of the Procedure on a Whole Thoracic CT, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of systemic air embolism (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in