Breast Cancer FemalePhase 4NCT03360214
PEMF and PEC Blocks in Mastectomy Reconstruction Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device and Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a prospective randomized controlled double-blind interventional study comparing the effect of pulsed-electromagnetic field device (PEMF), pectoral interfascial block (PIB), and placebo on postoperative pain control. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Female
- What is being tested?
- Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device and Ropivacaine Hydrochloride
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Jul 2017to 7 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must be female
- Subjects must be 18 years or older
- Subjects must be undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with tissue expander reconstruction
Who cannot join
- Allergy to all narcotic medications
- Intake of any chronic opioids or pain medications preoperatively for a chronic condition or chronic use.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) and Pectoral (PEC) Interfascial Blocks on Postoperative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Tissue Expander Reconstruction
This is a prospective randomized controlled double-blind interventional study comparing the effect of pulsed-electromagnetic field device (PEMF), pectoral interfascial block (PIB), and placebo on postoperative pain control. This study has the interdisciplinary cooperation of the regional anesthesia group, and the breast and plastic surgery divisions. All female patients with breast cancer evaluated at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) who are undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with tissue expander reconstruction will be offered enrollment in this prospective study.
Read the detailed description
Chronic pain after mastectomy, or breast tissue removal, is very common with almost half of women experiencing some type of residual pain and even 13% characterizing it as severe. Poor acute postoperative pain control is not only associated with development of chronic pain, but has also been shown to be associated with delayed wound healing. Therefore, optimization of postoperative pain control is paramount not just for patient comfort, but to decrease immediate and long-term postoperative complications.
There are two adjunctive modes of perioperative pain control currently in use at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). The first mode uses pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and consists of a noninvasive device placed over dressings around the surgical site. The second is a regional anesthetic and -the pectoral interfascial block (PIB) in which a long-lasting local anesthetic (bupivacaine/ropivacaine) is injected into the surgical dissection area. Both of these techniques for postoperative analgesia have been shown to be effective in different types of breast surgery, but there is no current literature comparing the two modalities in their efficacy in reducing postoperative pain. There is also no current literature in their efficacy in the mastectomy and tissue expander patient population. The proposed trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of these two modalities of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing mastectomy and tissue expander reconstruction.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Being tested
- Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, Placebo Drug, Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device, Placebo Device, Ropivacaine Hydrochloride
- Keywords
- Mastectomy, Tissue expander, PEMF, PIB
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bupivacaine HydrochlorideDrug
Also called Marcaine, PIB
For active drug, 0.25% marcaine, will be used.
Placebo DrugOther
Also called Saline
For sham drug, 0.9% saline, will be used.
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) DeviceDevice
Also called Sofpulse, Torino II
The pulsed electromagnetic field signal will consist of a 2-m sec burst of 27.12 megahertz (MHz) radiofrequency sinusoidal waves repeating at 2 bursts/second.
Placebo DeviceOther
Sham devices will appear identical to and will be used in exactly the same manner as active devices but will produce no electromagnetic field.
Ropivacaine HydrochlorideDrug
Also called Naropin, PIB
For active drug, 0.25% naropin, will be used.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active PEMF + Treatment PIB | Other | Participants will receive an active device (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device) and active drug (Bupivacaine Hydrochloride or Ropivacaine HCl). Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride; Device: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device; Drug: Ropivacaine Hydrochloride |
| Active PEMF + Sham PIB | Other | Participants will receive an active device (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device) and placebo drug. Receives: Other: Placebo Drug; Device: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device |
| Sham PEMF + Treatment PIB | Other | Participants will receive a placebo device and active drug (Bupivacaine Hydrochloride or Ropivacaine HCl). Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride; Other: Placebo Device; Drug: Ropivacaine Hydrochloride |
| Sham PEMF + Sham PIB | Other | Participants will receive placebo drug and placebo device. Receives: Other: Placebo Drug; Other: Placebo Device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention
Pain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number "0" indicates no pain and number "10" indicates terrible pain.
Measured: 1 hour post-intervention
Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention
Pain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number "0" indicates no pain and number "10" indicates terrible pain.
Measured: 3 weeks post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention
Quality of recovery will be measured using QoR. QoR is a 15-item self-reported questionnaire, with each response on a scale of 0-10 pertaining to patient's comfort, support system, pain, well being, and ability to carry out daily activities. The total score range is 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of recovery.
Measured: 1 hour post-intervention
Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention
Quality of recovery will be measured using QoR. QoR is a 15-item self-reported questionnaire, with each response on a scale of 0-10 pertaining to patient's comfort, support system, pain, well being, and ability to carry out daily activities. The total score range is 0 to 150, with a higher score indicating a better quality of recovery.
Measured: 3 weeks post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2017
- Study start5 Jul 2017
- Primary completion7 Mar 2022
- Study completion7 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer FemaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Christine Hsu Rohde, MD, Columbia University
- Investigators
- Christine Rohde, MD, Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03360214
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAQ4708
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMF) and Pectoral (PEC) Interfascial Blocks on Postoperative Pain Reduction in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy and Tissue Expander Reconstruction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03360214
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AAAQ4708
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Female
- Keywords
- Mastectomy, Tissue expander, PEMF, PIB
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective randomized controlled double-blind interventional study comparing the effect of pulsed-electromagnetic field device (PEMF), pectoral interfascial block (PIB), and placebo on postoperative pain control. This study has the interdisciplinary cooperation of the regional anesthesia group, and the breast and plastic surgery divisions. All female patients with breast cancer evaluated at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) who are undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with tissue expander reconstruction will be offered enrollment in this prospective study.
Detailed description
Chronic pain after mastectomy, or breast tissue removal, is very common with almost half of women experiencing some type of residual pain and even 13% characterizing it as severe. Poor acute postoperative pain control is not only associated with development of chronic pain, but has also been shown to be associated with delayed wound healing. Therefore, optimization of postoperative pain control is paramount not just for patient comfort, but to decrease immediate and long-term postoperative complications.
There are two adjunctive modes of perioperative pain control currently in use at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC). The first mode uses pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) and consists of a noninvasive device placed over dressings around the surgical site. The second is a regional anesthetic and -the pectoral interfascial block (PIB) in which a long-lasting local anesthetic (bupivacaine/ropivacaine) is injected into the surgical dissection area. Both of these techniques for postoperative analgesia have been shown to be effective in different types of breast surgery, but there is no current literature comparing the two modalities in their efficacy in reducing postoperative pain. There is also no current literature in their efficacy in the mastectomy and tissue expander patient population. The proposed trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy of these two modalities of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing mastectomy and tissue expander reconstruction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active PEMF + Treatment PIB | Other | Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, Device: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device, Drug: Ropivacaine HydrochlorideParticipants will receive an active device (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device) and active drug (Bupivacaine Hydrochloride or Ropivacaine HCl). |
| Active PEMF + Sham PIB | Other | Other: Placebo Drug, Device: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) DeviceParticipants will receive an active device (Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device) and placebo drug. |
| Sham PEMF + Treatment PIB | Other | Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, Other: Placebo Device, Drug: Ropivacaine HydrochlorideParticipants will receive a placebo device and active drug (Bupivacaine Hydrochloride or Ropivacaine HCl). |
| Sham PEMF + Sham PIB | Other | Other: Placebo Drug, Other: Placebo DeviceParticipants will receive placebo drug and placebo device. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subjects must be female
- Subjects must be 18 years or older
- Subjects must be undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomy with tissue expander reconstruction
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Allergy to all narcotic medications
- Intake of any chronic opioids or pain medications preoperatively for a chronic condition or chronic use.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bupivacaine HydrochlorideAlso: Marcaine, PIBFor active drug, 0.25% marcaine, will be used. | Drug | Active PEMF + Treatment PIB, Sham PEMF + Treatment PIB |
| Placebo DrugAlso: SalineFor sham drug, 0.9% saline, will be used. | Other | Active PEMF + Sham PIB, Sham PEMF + Sham PIB |
| Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) DeviceAlso: Sofpulse, Torino IIThe pulsed electromagnetic field signal will consist of a 2-m sec burst of 27.12 megahertz (MHz) radiofrequency sinusoidal waves repeating at 2 bursts/second. | Device | Active PEMF + Sham PIB, Active PEMF + Treatment PIB |
| Placebo DeviceSham devices will appear identical to and will be used in exactly the same manner as active devices but will produce no electromagnetic field. | Other | Sham PEMF + Sham PIB, Sham PEMF + Treatment PIB |
| Ropivacaine HydrochlorideAlso: Naropin, PIBFor active drug, 0.25% naropin, will be used. | Drug | Active PEMF + Treatment PIB, Sham PEMF + Treatment PIB |
Primary outcome
Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention
Time frame: 1 hour post-intervention
Pain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number "0" indicates no pain and number "10" indicates terrible pain.
Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention
Time frame: 3 weeks post-intervention
Pain level will be measured using the VAS scale. Subjects will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10. Number "0" indicates no pain and number "10" indicates terrible pain.
2 secondary outcomes
Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 1 Hour Post-intervention
Time frame: 1 hour post-intervention
Quality of Recovery Questionnaires (QoR) - 3 Weeks Post-intervention
Time frame: 3 weeks post-intervention
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer Female
Recruiting
Decision Support for Chemoprevention
Breast Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Geriatric Oncology Assessment and Coping Skills Training for Older Women on Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy
Breast Cancer, Hormone Receptor Positive, Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Arthralgia
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of XL309 (ISM3091) Alone and in Combination in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of CG-7321 Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Christine Rohde, MD principal investigator
Columbia University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Device and Ropivacaine Hydrochloride in people with Breast Cancer Female, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Score on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - 1 Hour Post-intervention (time frame: 1 hour post-intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2025.