AzTrials
AzTrials

Helicobacter Pylori InfectionNCT03361267

Comparison of Bismuth Containing Quadruple Therapy and Based Tailored Therapy for H. Pylori Infection

A study testing Helicobacter pylori PCR test and CLO test in people with Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Compliance, Patient, run by Inha University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

As the antibiotic resistance increases, the eradication rate of triple therapy is decreasing. Recent guideline recommend the use of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in areas where clarithromycin resistance is greater than 15%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Helicobacter pylori PCR test and CLO test
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
30 Dec 2017to 28 Jun 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with peptic ulcer, s/p ESD due to early gastric cancer/gastric adenoma, Maltoma
  • Ability and willingness to participate in the study and to sign and give informed consent
  • confirmed H. pylori infection

Who cannot join

  • Previous H. pylori eradication therapy
  • Less than 18 years old
  • With history of H. pylori infection treatment
  • With previous gastric surgery
  • Major systemic diseases
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Allergy to any of the study drugs
  • Administration of antibiotics, bismuth, antisecretory drugs in 8 weeks prior to inclusion

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Byoung Wook Bang, M.D. phD contact

+82-32-890-2548

bangbu@inha.ac.kr

Hyung Kil Kim, M.D. phD contact

+82-32-890-2548

kimhg@inha.ac.kr

South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Inha University Hospital

    Incheon, 22332

    Byoung WooK Bang, M.D. phD, +82-32-890-2548, bangbu@inha.ac.kr

    Recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Bismuth Containing Quadruple Therapy and Clarithromycin Susceptibility-based Tailored Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori First-line Eradication

As the antibiotic resistance increases, the eradication rate of triple therapy is decreasing. Recent guideline recommend the use of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in areas where clarithromycin resistance is greater than 15%. However, the ideal treatment would be the tailored therapy which choose the antibiotics depending on the antibiotic resistance. This study compared the eradication rates, safety and complicance of tailored therapy compared with empirical bismuth quadruple therapy in the naive patients with H. pylori infection.

Read the detailed description

In order to be eligible for first-line H. pylori eradication therapy, at least 80% of eradication rate should be achieved by intention to treat (ITT) analysis. However, the triple therapy (PPI, clarithromycin, amoxicillin) is losing 1st-line therapy because of increasing antibiotic resistance. The most common cause of failure in triple therapy is clarithromycin resistance.

In the past, clarithromycin resistance was rarely observed in Korea, but the resistance rate has increased rapidly during the last 10 years, up to 37.3%.

As an alternative, Korean guidelines of Helicobacter pylori eradication in 2013 recommend that bismuth-containing antibiotics (not containing clarithromycin) should be considered in areas with high clarithromycin resistance as in Korea. However, there is a lack of research on the efficacy of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as a 1st-line therapy. The aim of this prospectivce randomized study is to investingate the efficacy, conpliance, adverse events and cost-effectiveness between bismuth containing quadruple therapy and tailored therapy in areas with high clarithromycin resistance

Being tested
Helicobacter pylori PCR test, CLO test
Medical subject headings
Patient Compliance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Helicobacter pylori PCR testDiagnostic test

    Clarithromycin resistance (-) Triple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1000mg bid, clarithromycin 500mg bid) for 7 days Clarithromycin resistance (+) Bismuth containing quadruple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg tid, bismuth 300 mg qid, tetracycline 500mg qid) for 7 days

  • CLO testDiagnostic test

    CLO test : negative --> drop out CLO test : postive --> bismuth containing quadruple therapy

Study groups in NCT03361267
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bismuth containing quadruple therapyActive comparatorIf CLO test is positive, Bismuth containing quadruple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, metronidazole 5100 mg tid, bismuth 300 mg qid, tetracycline 500mg qid) are prescribed for 7 days If CLO test is negative, no intervention is needed
Receives: Diagnostic Test: CLO test
tailored therapyExperimentalIf H. pylori PCR is negative, no intervention is needed If H. pylori PCR is positive and mutation is negative, triple regimen (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxacillin 1000 mg bid, clarithromycin 500mg bid) are prescribed for 7 days is given If H. pylori PCR is positive and mutation is positive, Bismuth containing quadruple therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg bid, metronidazole 5100 mg tid, bismuth 300 mg qid, tetracycline 500mg qid) are prescribed for 7 days is given
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Helicobacter pylori PCR test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Helicobacter pylori eradication rate

    Six weeks after completion of therapy, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C-urea breath test or CLO test. Eradication was defined as negative result from urea breath test (<4‰) (4‰ as the cutoff value).

    or negative from CLO test

    Measured: Six weeks after completion of therapy

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Rate of adverse effects

    During the 7-day treatment period, the subjects kept a diary to score any possible side effects or discomforts. The subjects were asked to grade the severity of adverse events according to their influence on daily activities, experienced as "mild" (transient and well tolerated), "moderate" (causing discomfort and partially interfering with daily activities), or "severe" (causing considerable interference with daily activities).

    Measured: within 7 days after completion of therapy

  2. Compliance rate

    Compliance was defined as poor when they had taken less than 80% of the total medication.

    Measured: within 7 days after completion of therapy

  3. Medical cost

    Summation of diagnostic fee, cost of medication and 2-line therapy cost if the 1st line therapy fails

    Measured: two months after completion of therapy ]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Dec 2017
  2. Study start30 Dec 2017 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion28 Jun 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Jun 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03361267
Sponsor's protocol ID
Inha helicobacter study
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
28 Nov 2017
Last updated
12 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Helicobacter pylori PCR test and CLO test in people with Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Compliance, Patient, run by Inha University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Byoung Wook Bang, M.D. phD (+82-32-890-2548, bangbu@inha.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (time frame: Six weeks after completion of therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in