CirrhosisNCT03363412
Tips Underdilatation in Patients With Cirrhosis
A study testing PTFE-covered stent grafts in people with Cirrhosis, run by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding, refractory ascites and vascular diseases of the liver. The major drawbacks of this procedure are shunt dysfunction and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cirrhosis
- What is being tested?
- PTFE-covered stent grafts
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2010to 30 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- diagnosis of cirrhosis determined on the basis of clinical history, histological examination, morphological characteristics of the liver at ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging;
- TIPS placed to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding or to control refractory ascites, according to current guidelines.
Who cannot join
- placement of two or more coaxial stent grafts;
- refusal to consent to have TIPS dilated to a small diameter and/or to attend follow-up visits;
- TIPS placed in the setting of acute variceal hemorrhage either as "early" TIPS or as salvage TIPS for continued bleeding or early rebleeding.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Florence
Florence
Francesco Vizzutti, MD, +39 055 275 ext. 8020, francesco.vizzutti@unifi.it
- Recruiting
Filippo Schepis
Modena
Filippo Schepis, MD, +39 059 422 ext. 5664, fschepis@unimore.it
About this study
Official title: Covered Tips Under-dilatation to Less Than 8 mm: Feasibility and Clinical Efficacy.
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding, refractory ascites and vascular diseases of the liver. The major drawbacks of this procedure are shunt dysfunction and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE). The availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stentgrafts (PTFE-SGs) has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, the incidence of PSE remains a threatening complication in about 50% of patients.
The Investigators hypothesized that under-dilated PTFE-SGs would not self-expand to nominal diameter and their under-dilation would be safe and could reduce the rate of post-TIPS encephalopathy, while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Aim of this proof-of-concept exploratory study is to determine whether "under-dilated TIPS" is a feasible procedure that reduces the incidence of PSE while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Read the detailed description
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding, refractory ascites and vascular diseases of the liver. TIPS is no longer viewed solely as a salvage therapy or a bridge to liver transplantation and is currently indicated for a number of conditions related to portal hypertension with positive results regarding survival, particularly when used to treat high-risk patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. The major drawbacks of this procedure are shunt dysfunction and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE), reported in 30-70% and 23-55% of patients with cirrhosis within the first year, respectively. The availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (PTFE-SGs) has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, the incidence of PSE, that has apparently decreased with a more careful selection of patients, remains a threatening complication in about 50% of patients.
Current guidelines for TIPS placement recommend that the post-TIPS porto-caval pressure gradient (PSPG) should be reduced to less than 12 mmHg, particularly in patients with variceal hemorrhage as an indication. However, there is not enough evidence to support the use of available 10 mm rather than 8 mm nominal diameter PTFE-SG aiming to achieve this hemodynamic goal and the best control of variceal rebleeding and/or ascites. A step-wise procedure based on the progressive dilation of 10 mm diameter PTFE-SG by using balloon catheters of increasing diameter (i.e., from 8 to 10 mm) at the time of TIPS positioning has been proposed. However, if a larger diameter, leads to a higher decrease in PSPG, the higher amount of portal blood diverted to the systemic circulation and the lower residual portal perfusion of the parenchyma markedly increase the probability of post-TIPS encephalopathy.
It is conceivable that balloon dilation of TIPS to diameters smaller than those currently indicated (to 7 mm or lower) would allow for a sufficient PCG decrease in patients without a high post-TIPS portal inflow (i.e., relatively small spleen, lack of extensive portal collateralization, relatively hypodynamic circulation). However, currently no tools allow a pre-procedural definition of the ideal stentgraft diameter in individual patients. Moreover, PTFE-SGs that are specifically designed for TIPS are presently available as 8 or 10 mm and are not considered permanently under sizeable/adjustable for their intrinsic tendency to expand to nominal diameter. On the other hand, dilating PTFE-SGs far below the recommended diameter may increase the risk of TIPS thrombosis, a complication that would require prompt re-intervention.
The Investigators hypothesized that, within the cirrhotic parenchyma, under-dilated PTFE-SGs would not self-expand to nominal diameter and their under-dilation would be safe and could reduce the rate of post-TIPS encephalopathy, while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Aim Aim of this study is a) to determine whether "under-dilated TIPS" is a feasible procedure and b) to verify if this strategy reduces the incidence of PSE and other complications while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Study design This study is an exploratory proof-of-concept study analyzing feasibility and clinical outcomes of under-dilated TIPS in unselected consecutive cirrhotic patients in whom TIPS is indicated clinically and who agree to participate in the study. Initially, our strategy will be to under-dilate TIPS to 7 mm in 15 patients and, if the procedure won't lead to shunt occlusion, the rest of the patients will receive a TIPS under-dilated to 6 mm or less.
The group with under-dilated TIPS to less than 7 mm will be compared to a historical control group composed of patients who had standard TIPS placed prior to initiation of the study.
TIPS placement and hemodynamic evaluation PTFE-SGs (Viatorr® and Viatorr CX®, W.L. Gore \& Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA) will be placed as previously described. Semi-compliant balloon catheters will be used both to pre-dilate the intra-parenchymal tract and to dilate PTFE-SGs after deployment. The intra-parenchymal tract will be pre-dilated to 6 mm or less in all patients. After its deployment, the PTFE-SG will be dilated to 7 (first 15 subjects) or 6 mm (following group) in patients in whom both the procedure and the final TIPS shape will be straightforward. During dilation of the intra-parenchymal tract, balloon pressure will be maintained at the nominal value for no more than 15-30 seconds, even in the lack of a complete flattening of notches at the level of vascular walls. The intra-parenchymal tract and the PTFE-SG will be dilated to 8 mm in patients with a challenging procedure and/or in whom the final TIPS shape will be curved.
For all groups, immediately after TIPS placement, pressures in the portal vein, along the intra-parenchymal tract of TIPS, and in the inferior vena cava will be recorded until a stable tracing will be obtained in each position (45-60 seconds). Permanent tracings will be read with PowerLab computer software (ADInstruments, Inc.). Post-TIPS porto-systemic pressure gradient (PSPG) will calculated by subtracting the inferior vena cava pressure from the portal vein pressure. All procedures will be performed under monitored anesthesia care without intubation and using midazolam and fentanyl as sedative and analgesic, respectively.
- Conditions
- Cirrhosis
- Being tested
- PTFE-covered stent grafts
- Medical subject headings
- Fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PTFE-covered stent graftsDevice
Also called VIATORR, VIATORR CX
Creation of a small diameter intrahepatic shunt between portal and hepatic veins.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Underdilated TIPS | Experimental | Patients will be treated with PTFE-covered stent grafts balloon-dilated to less than 8 mm. Receives: Device: PTFE-covered stent grafts |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The degree of stentgraft dilation
Modification of pressure gradients inside the intraparenchimal tract of the TIPS and/or its diameter at CT scan
Measured: 1 year
The incidence of at least one episode of PSE
West Haven grade II PSE or higher as evaluated by two observers at follow-up
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
The incidence of shunt dysfunction requiring TIPS revision
Invasive TIPS revision will be performed in case of recurrent variceal hemorrhage, continued need for paracentesis and/or if Doppler ultrasonography shows changes in the direction of flow in intrahepatic portal branches. TIPS will be considered as dysfunctional if the porto-systemic pressure gradient will be above the value recorded after the shunt creation.
Measured: 1 year
The incidence of recurrent variceal bleeding and/or recurrent ascites
Variceal bleeding defined following Baveno indications. Ascites defined as the need for at least one large-volume paracentesis by 4 weeks after TIPS placement)
Measured: 1 year
The absolute reduction of porto-systemic pressure gradient attained after TIPS placement;
Values of post-TIPS porto-systemic pressure gradient will be classified as below 12 and 10 mmHg.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2017
- Study start1 Jun 2010
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CirrhosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Florence
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Filippo Schepis, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
- Investigators
- Filippo Schepis, MD, Principal investigator, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03363412
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TIPS/10/17
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 27 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in the Management of Portal Hypertension: update 2009. Hepatology. 2010 Jan;51(1):306. doi: 10.1002/hep.23383. No abstract available.
PubMed 19902484Bureau C, Garcia-Pagan JC, Otal P, Pomier-Layrargues G, Chabbert V, Cortez C, Perreault P, Peron JM, Abraldes JG, Bouchard L, Bilbao JI, Bosch J, Rousseau H, Vinel JP. Improved clinical outcome using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated stents for TIPS: results of a randomized study. Gastroenterology. 2004 Feb;126(2):469-75. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.016.
PubMed 14762784Riggio O, Angeloni S, Salvatori FM, De Santis A, Cerini F, Farcomeni A, Attili AF, Merli M. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2738-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02102.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
PubMed 18775022Casado M, Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Bru C, Banares R, Bandi JC, Escorsell A, Rodriguez-Laiz JM, Gilabert R, Feu F, Schorlemer C, Echenagusia A, Rodes J. Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings. Gastroenterology. 1998 Jun;114(6):1296-303. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70436-6.
PubMed 9609767Riggio O, Ridola L, Angeloni S, Cerini F, Pasquale C, Attili AF, Fanelli F, Merli M, Salvatori FM. Clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created with covered stents with different diameters: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2010 Aug;53(2):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
PubMed 20537753
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Covered Tips Under-dilatation to Less Than 8 mm: Feasibility and Clinical Efficacy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03363412
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TIPS/10/17
- Conditions
- Cirrhosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Florence
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding, refractory ascites and vascular diseases of the liver. The major drawbacks of this procedure are shunt dysfunction and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE). The availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stentgrafts (PTFE-SGs) has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, the incidence of PSE remains a threatening complication in about 50% of patients.
The Investigators hypothesized that under-dilated PTFE-SGs would not self-expand to nominal diameter and their under-dilation would be safe and could reduce the rate of post-TIPS encephalopathy, while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Aim of this proof-of-concept exploratory study is to determine whether "under-dilated TIPS" is a feasible procedure that reduces the incidence of PSE while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Detailed description
The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of portal hypertensive bleeding, refractory ascites and vascular diseases of the liver. TIPS is no longer viewed solely as a salvage therapy or a bridge to liver transplantation and is currently indicated for a number of conditions related to portal hypertension with positive results regarding survival, particularly when used to treat high-risk patients with acute variceal hemorrhage. The major drawbacks of this procedure are shunt dysfunction and portosystemic encephalopathy (PSE), reported in 30-70% and 23-55% of patients with cirrhosis within the first year, respectively. The availability of self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts (PTFE-SGs) has dramatically improved the long-term patency of TIPS. However, the incidence of PSE, that has apparently decreased with a more careful selection of patients, remains a threatening complication in about 50% of patients.
Current guidelines for TIPS placement recommend that the post-TIPS porto-caval pressure gradient (PSPG) should be reduced to less than 12 mmHg, particularly in patients with variceal hemorrhage as an indication. However, there is not enough evidence to support the use of available 10 mm rather than 8 mm nominal diameter PTFE-SG aiming to achieve this hemodynamic goal and the best control of variceal rebleeding and/or ascites. A step-wise procedure based on the progressive dilation of 10 mm diameter PTFE-SG by using balloon catheters of increasing diameter (i.e., from 8 to 10 mm) at the time of TIPS positioning has been proposed. However, if a larger diameter, leads to a higher decrease in PSPG, the higher amount of portal blood diverted to the systemic circulation and the lower residual portal perfusion of the parenchyma markedly increase the probability of post-TIPS encephalopathy.
It is conceivable that balloon dilation of TIPS to diameters smaller than those currently indicated (to 7 mm or lower) would allow for a sufficient PCG decrease in patients without a high post-TIPS portal inflow (i.e., relatively small spleen, lack of extensive portal collateralization, relatively hypodynamic circulation). However, currently no tools allow a pre-procedural definition of the ideal stentgraft diameter in individual patients. Moreover, PTFE-SGs that are specifically designed for TIPS are presently available as 8 or 10 mm and are not considered permanently under sizeable/adjustable for their intrinsic tendency to expand to nominal diameter. On the other hand, dilating PTFE-SGs far below the recommended diameter may increase the risk of TIPS thrombosis, a complication that would require prompt re-intervention.
The Investigators hypothesized that, within the cirrhotic parenchyma, under-dilated PTFE-SGs would not self-expand to nominal diameter and their under-dilation would be safe and could reduce the rate of post-TIPS encephalopathy, while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Aim Aim of this study is a) to determine whether "under-dilated TIPS" is a feasible procedure and b) to verify if this strategy reduces the incidence of PSE and other complications while maintaining clinical efficacy.
Study design This study is an exploratory proof-of-concept study analyzing feasibility and clinical outcomes of under-dilated TIPS in unselected consecutive cirrhotic patients in whom TIPS is indicated clinically and who agree to participate in the study. Initially, our strategy will be to under-dilate TIPS to 7 mm in 15 patients and, if the procedure won't lead to shunt occlusion, the rest of the patients will receive a TIPS under-dilated to 6 mm or less.
The group with under-dilated TIPS to less than 7 mm will be compared to a historical control group composed of patients who had standard TIPS placed prior to initiation of the study.
TIPS placement and hemodynamic evaluation PTFE-SGs (Viatorr® and Viatorr CX®, W.L. Gore \& Associates Inc., Flagstaff, AZ, USA) will be placed as previously described. Semi-compliant balloon catheters will be used both to pre-dilate the intra-parenchymal tract and to dilate PTFE-SGs after deployment. The intra-parenchymal tract will be pre-dilated to 6 mm or less in all patients. After its deployment, the PTFE-SG will be dilated to 7 (first 15 subjects) or 6 mm (following group) in patients in whom both the procedure and the final TIPS shape will be straightforward. During dilation of the intra-parenchymal tract, balloon pressure will be maintained at the nominal value for no more than 15-30 seconds, even in the lack of a complete flattening of notches at the level of vascular walls. The intra-parenchymal tract and the PTFE-SG will be dilated to 8 mm in patients with a challenging procedure and/or in whom the final TIPS shape will be curved.
For all groups, immediately after TIPS placement, pressures in the portal vein, along the intra-parenchymal tract of TIPS, and in the inferior vena cava will be recorded until a stable tracing will be obtained in each position (45-60 seconds). Permanent tracings will be read with PowerLab computer software (ADInstruments, Inc.). Post-TIPS porto-systemic pressure gradient (PSPG) will calculated by subtracting the inferior vena cava pressure from the portal vein pressure. All procedures will be performed under monitored anesthesia care without intubation and using midazolam and fentanyl as sedative and analgesic, respectively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Underdilated TIPS | Experimental | Device: PTFE-covered stent graftsPatients will be treated with PTFE-covered stent grafts balloon-dilated to less than 8 mm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- diagnosis of cirrhosis determined on the basis of clinical history, histological examination, morphological characteristics of the liver at ultrasound, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging;
- TIPS placed to prevent recurrent variceal bleeding or to control refractory ascites, according to current guidelines.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- placement of two or more coaxial stent grafts;
- refusal to consent to have TIPS dilated to a small diameter and/or to attend follow-up visits;
- TIPS placed in the setting of acute variceal hemorrhage either as "early" TIPS or as salvage TIPS for continued bleeding or early rebleeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PTFE-covered stent graftsAlso: VIATORR, VIATORR CXCreation of a small diameter intrahepatic shunt between portal and hepatic veins. | Device | Underdilated TIPS |
Primary outcome
The degree of stentgraft dilation
Time frame: 1 year
Modification of pressure gradients inside the intraparenchimal tract of the TIPS and/or its diameter at CT scan
The incidence of at least one episode of PSE
Time frame: 1 year
West Haven grade II PSE or higher as evaluated by two observers at follow-up
3 secondary outcomes
The incidence of shunt dysfunction requiring TIPS revision
Time frame: 1 year
The incidence of recurrent variceal bleeding and/or recurrent ascites
Time frame: 1 year
The absolute reduction of porto-systemic pressure gradient attained after TIPS placement;
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Nov 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19902484Boyer TD, Haskal ZJ; American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in the Management of Portal Hypertension: update 2009. Hepatology. 2010 Jan;51(1):306. doi: 10.1002/hep.23383. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14762784Bureau C, Garcia-Pagan JC, Otal P, Pomier-Layrargues G, Chabbert V, Cortez C, Perreault P, Peron JM, Abraldes JG, Bouchard L, Bilbao JI, Bosch J, Rousseau H, Vinel JP. Improved clinical outcome using polytetrafluoroethylene-coated stents for TIPS: results of a randomized study. Gastroenterology. 2004 Feb;126(2):469-75. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.11.016.
- Background: PubMed 18775022Riggio O, Angeloni S, Salvatori FM, De Santis A, Cerini F, Farcomeni A, Attili AF, Merli M. Incidence, natural history, and risk factors of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent grafts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2738-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02102.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
- Background: PubMed 9609767Casado M, Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Bru C, Banares R, Bandi JC, Escorsell A, Rodriguez-Laiz JM, Gilabert R, Feu F, Schorlemer C, Echenagusia A, Rodes J. Clinical events after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: correlation with hemodynamic findings. Gastroenterology. 1998 Jun;114(6):1296-303. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(98)70436-6.
- Background: PubMed 20537753Riggio O, Ridola L, Angeloni S, Cerini F, Pasquale C, Attili AF, Fanelli F, Merli M, Salvatori FM. Clinical efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt created with covered stents with different diameters: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2010 Aug;53(2):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.02.033. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cirrhosis
Recruiting
CirrhosisRx CDS System
Cirrhosis, Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Low Dose Versus Standard Dose Albumin
Decompensated Cirrhosis and Ascites
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment Outcomes and Predictors After Endovascular Intervention for Portal Hypertension-Related Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension Related to Cirrhosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial to Evaluate ALN-CIDEB in Adults With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, MASLD
RecruitingPhase 3
A Pivotal Clinical Study to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of Efimosfermin Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Compensated Cirrhosis Due to Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatohepatitis (MASH)
Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatohepatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Filippo Schepis, MD principal investigator
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PTFE-covered stent grafts in people with Cirrhosis, run by University of Modena and Reggio Emilia at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Filippo Schepis, MD (+39 059 422 ext. 5664, fschepis@unimore.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The degree of stentgraft dilation (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03363412, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Nov 2020.