AzTrials
AzTrials

Plantar FascitisNCT03367468

Conservative Therapy Interventions in Plantar Fasciitis

A study testing Exercise and Mobilization in people with Plantar Fascitis and Pain, run by Sulenur Yildiz at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Plantar fasciitis is seen common in clinics and responsible from most of foot related pain problems. There are many treatment modalities in the literature as well as there is no golden standard to treat plantar fasciitis in non-surgical ways. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Plantar Fascitis, Pain
What is being tested?
Exercise and Mobilization
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
63 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
15 Jul 2018to 15 Mar 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Older than 18 years, Baseline Roles and Maudsley score > 2, Accepting and signing consent form Daily usage of insoles which was prescribed by doctor No history of systemic disease and surgery that affects foot biomechanics No history of cognitive, mental, neurological or psychological problems.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of chronic or active infection in treatment site, Not accepting to participate in the study Systemic, neurologic, rheumatologic,and vascular disease history, Pregnancy, BMI > 35 kg/m2, History of foot and/or ankle surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Nilgun BEK, PT, PhD, Professor contact

nilgunbek@gmail.com

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hacettepe University

    Ankara, 06100

    Sulenur YILDIZ, PT, MSc, sulenur.subasi@hacettepe.edu.tr

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Different Conservative Therapy Interventions in Plantar Fasciitis

Plantar fasciitis is seen common in clinics and responsible from most of foot related pain problems. There are many treatment modalities in the literature as well as there is no golden standard to treat plantar fasciitis in non-surgical ways. The aim of this study is to compare intensive physiotherapy program, home based exercise program and control group decide the most effective rehabilitation program in plantar fasciitis.

Read the detailed description

Plantar fasciitis is frequently seen in adult population as a pain related problem of the foot. Pain, as a most prominent symptom, is caused from repetitive microtraumas and inflammation where plantar fascia attaches to the calcaneus. Pain starts from heel pad or medial tubercule of the calcaneus and spreads through plantar fascia and medial longitudinal arch.

Obesity, increased foot pronation, difference in extremity length, long standing duration and Achilles tendon tightness are some of the factors which stress plantar fascia and sometimes cause degenerative changes on it. Weakness of intrinsic muscle is also another factor which is thought to be related with plantar fasciitis.

Diagnosis is mostly depends on history and physical examination. First steps in the morning, walking after long rest, and palpation of medial tubercule of calcaneus are painful.

According to the literature, non-surgical treatment modalities relieve symptoms of patients successfully. Orthotics, night splints, manipulation interventions with conventional methods are effective to decrease pain and improve function. There are various physiotherapy treatment approaches in plantar fasciitis but there is no consensus about most effective treatment program. Stretching of plantar flexor muscles and plantar fascia is one of the core elements of the treatment plan. Strengthening exercises together with stretching were shown more effective than only stretching. Foot orthoses are thought to prevent increased pronation and relieving stress on plantar fascia in patients with plantar fasciitis. Usage of insoles with night splints is found more effective. Taping is also helpful to acute pain control. Short foot exercises as isolated intrinsic foot muscles strengthening helps to providing subtalar foot position and supports plantar fascia and foot arches. Manual techniques improve lower extremity joint mobility and decreases related pain. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy is suggested to try after at least six month ineffective conservative treatments. If symptoms resist more than six months and non-conservative treatments are found ineffective, invasive approaches as steroid injections are applicable.

Treatment of this common problem in population is important to ensure patients returning in earliest period to daily life with full physical capacity. There are many conservative options to treat plantar fasciitis but best treatment program combination was not clear The aim of this study is to compare intensive physiotherapy program, home based exercise program and control group decide the most effective rehabilitation program in plantar fasciitis.

Being tested
Exercise, Mobilization
Keywords
Plantar fascitis, Pain, Exercise, Physiotherapy, Quality of life
Medical subject headings
Pain, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ExerciseOther

    Strengthening exercises ( extrinsic and intrinsic foot muscles) Stretcthing exercises (plantar fascia, plantar flexor muscles)

  • MobilizationOther

    Antero-posterior gliding, talocrural traction, metatarsal mobilization

Study groups in NCT03367468
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Physiotherapy groupActive comparatorStrengthening and stretching exercises,cross friction massage (supervised by physiotherapist) Mobilization techniques Daily usage of prescribed orthotic insole
Receives: Other: Exercise; Other: Mobilization
Home exercise groupActive comparatorStrenthening and stretching exercises Daily usage of prescribed orthotic insole
Receives: Other: Mobilization
Control groupNo interventionFollow ups Daily usage of prescribed orthotic insole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Perception of pain

    Perception of pain with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with palpation, first steps in the morning and after long walk.

    The Visual Analog Scale is a valid and reliable measure of pain intensity. To rate pain intensity a mark is placed on a 100-mm VAS. The VAS is horizontally positioned with the extremes labeled''least possible pain'' and ''worst possible pain. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 100 mm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. Subjects will be asked to rate pain in three different conditions as palpation, first steps in the morning and after long walk.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Perception of quality of life

    The World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of Life - Bref Questionnaire is a 26-item self-administered instrument consisting of four domains: physical health (7 items), psychological health (6 items), social relationships (3 items), and environmental health (8 items); it also contains QOL and general health items. Each individual item of the WHOQOL-BREF is scored from 1 to 5 on a response scale, which is stipulated as a five-point ordinal scale. The scores are then transformed linearly to a 0-100-scale. Higher score presents better quality of life.

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Dec 2017
  2. Study start15 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
63 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03367468
Sponsor's protocol ID
06144834
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
10 Nov 2017
Last updated
10 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Pfeffer G, Bacchetti P, Deland J, Lewis A, Anderson R, Davis W, Alvarez R, Brodsky J, Cooper P, Frey C, Herrick R, Myerson M, Sammarco J, Janecki C, Ross S, Bowman M, Smith R. Comparison of custom and prefabricated orthoses in the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 1999 Apr;20(4):214-21. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000402.

    PubMed 10229276
  • Goff JD, Crawford R. Diagnosis and treatment of plantar fasciitis. Am Fam Physician. 2011 Sep 15;84(6):676-82.

    PubMed 21916393
  • Podolsky R, Kalichman L. Taping for plantar fasciitis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(1):1-6. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140485.

    PubMed 24867905
  • Thomas JL, Christensen JC, Kravitz SR, Mendicino RW, Schuberth JM, Vanore JV, Weil LS Sr, Zlotoff HJ, Bouche R, Baker J; American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons heel pain committee. The diagnosis and treatment of heel pain: a clinical practice guideline-revision 2010. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010 May-Jun;49(3 Suppl):S1-19. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.01.001.

    PubMed 20439021
  • Martin RL, Davenport TE, Reischl SF, McPoil TG, Matheson JW, Wukich DK, McDonough CM; American Physical Therapy Association. Heel pain-plantar fasciitis: revision 2014. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Nov;44(11):A1-33. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.0303.

    PubMed 25361863
  • Digiovanni BF, Nawoczenski DA, Malay DP, Graci PA, Williams TT, Wilding GE, Baumhauer JF. Plantar fascia-specific stretching exercise improves outcomes in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis. A prospective clinical trial with two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1775-81. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01281.

    PubMed 16882901
  • Sweeting D, Parish B, Hooper L, Chester R. The effectiveness of manual stretching in the treatment of plantar heel pain: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Res. 2011 Jun 25;4:19. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-4-19.

    PubMed 21703003
  • Cheung RT, Sze LK, Mok NW, Ng GY. Intrinsic foot muscle volume in experienced runners with and without chronic plantar fasciitis. J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Sep;19(9):713-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.11.004. Epub 2015 Nov 22.

    PubMed 26655866
  • Moon DC, Kim K, Lee SK. Immediate Effect of Short-foot Exercise on Dynamic Balance of Subjects with Excessively Pronated Feet. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Jan;26(1):117-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.117. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

    PubMed 24567688
  • McKeon PO, Fourchet F. Freeing the foot: integrating the foot core system into rehabilitation for lower extremity injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2015 Apr;34(2):347-61. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2014.12.002. Epub 2015 Jan 24.

    PubMed 25818718
  • Bennett PJ, Patterson C, Wearing S, Baglioni T. Development and validation of a questionnaire designed to measure foot-health status. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1998 Sep;88(9):419-28. doi: 10.7547/87507315-88-9-419.

    PubMed 9770933

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercise and Mobilization in people with Plantar Fascitis and Pain, run by Sulenur Yildiz at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sulenur YILDIZ, PT, MSc (+903123051576 ext. 139, sulenur.subasi@hacettepe.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Perception of pain (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03367468, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in