Allergic ConjunctivitisPhase 2NCT03368339
Effectiveness of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops Compared to Vehicle for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis
A Phase 2 study testing PR013 (0.045%) and PR013 (0.06%) in people with Allergic Conjunctivitis, run by Realm Therapeutics, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PR013 topical ophthalmic drops (0.045% and 0.06%) compared to vehicle for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis using a modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC®). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- What is being tested?
- PR013 (0.045%) and PR013 (0.06%)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 96 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2017to 28 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- be at least 10 years of age of either sex and any race
- have a positive history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to a perennial allergen (cat dander, dog dander, dust mites, cockroaches) and a seasonal allergen (trees, grasses, and/or ragweed) as confirmed by an allergic skin test within the past 24 months.
- have a calculated visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart
Who cannot join
- have known contraindications or sensitivities to the use of the investigational product or any of its components
- have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, clinically significant blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, pterygium or a diagnosis of dry eye)
- have had ocular surgical intervention within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or during the study and/or a history of refractive surgery within the past 6 months
- have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease
- have the presence of an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit
- use any of the disallowed medications* during the period indicated prior to Visit 1 and during the study
Show all 10Show fewer
- have any significant illness (e.g. any autoimmune disease requiring therapy, severe cardiovascular disease [including arrhythmias] the investigator feels could be expected to interfere with the subject's health or with the study parameters and/or put the subject at any unnecessary risk (includes but is not limited to: poorly controlled hypertension or poorly controlled diabetes, a history of status asthmaticus, organ transplants, a known history of persistent moderate or severe asthma, or a known history of moderate to severe allergic asthmatic reactions to any of the study allergens;
- have planned surgery (ocular or systemic) during the trial period or within 30 days after;
- have used an investigational drug or medical device within 30 days of the study or be concurrently enrolled in another investigational product trial;
- be a female who is currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or lactating
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Principal Investigator
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19148
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops Compared to Vehicle of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis Using Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC®)
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PR013 topical ophthalmic drops (0.045% and 0.06%) compared to vehicle for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis using a modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC®).
Read the detailed description
A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Phase 2 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045% and 0.06%) Compared to Vehicle of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis Using a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC®)
- Conditions
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- Being tested
- PR013 (0.045%), PR013 (0.06%), Vehicle
- Medical subject headings
- Conjunctivitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PR013 (0.045%)Drug
Also called HOCl
PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045%)
PR013 (0.06%)Drug
Also called HOCl
PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.06%)
VehicleDrug
Vehicle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045%) | Active comparator | topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045%) Receives: Drug: PR013 (0.045%) |
| PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.06%) | Active comparator | topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.06%) Receives: Drug: PR013 (0.06%) |
| Vehicle | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Drug: Vehicle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject
The method of assessment for this outcome is the Ora Calibra(TM) Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Ocular Itching Scale
Measured: [Time Frame: Efficacy assessment period (Day 7 through Day 8)]
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the Investigator
Ora Calibra(TM) Ocular Hyperemia Scale
Measured: [Time Frame: Efficacy assessment period (Day 7 through Day 8)]
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2017
- Study start10 Dec 2017
- Primary completion21 Jan 2018
- Study completion28 Jan 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Allergic ConjunctivitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Realm Therapeutics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alessandra Cesano, MD, Study chair, Essa Pharma
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03368339
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 17-100-0007
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops Compared to Vehicle of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis Using Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC®)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03368339
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 17-100-0007
- Conditions
- Allergic Conjunctivitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 96 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Realm Therapeutics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PR013 topical ophthalmic drops (0.045% and 0.06%) compared to vehicle for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis using a modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC®).
Detailed description
A Multi-Center, Double-Masked, Randomized, Phase 2 Evaluation of the Effectiveness of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045% and 0.06%) Compared to Vehicle of PR013 Topical Ophthalmic Drops for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis Using a Modified Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Model (Ora-CAC®)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045%) | Active comparator | Drug: PR013 (0.045%)topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045%) |
| PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.06%) | Active comparator | Drug: PR013 (0.06%)topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.06%) |
| Vehicle | Placebo comparator | Drug: VehiclePlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 10 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- be at least 10 years of age of either sex and any race
- have a positive history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to a perennial allergen (cat dander, dog dander, dust mites, cockroaches) and a seasonal allergen (trees, grasses, and/or ragweed) as confirmed by an allergic skin test within the past 24 months.
- have a calculated visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- have known contraindications or sensitivities to the use of the investigational product or any of its components
- have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, clinically significant blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, pterygium or a diagnosis of dry eye)
- have had ocular surgical intervention within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or during the study and/or a history of refractive surgery within the past 6 months
- have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease
- have the presence of an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral or fungal) or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PR013 (0.045%)Also: HOClPR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045%) | Drug | PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.045%) |
| PR013 (0.06%)Also: HOClPR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.06%) | Drug | PR013 topical Ophthalmic Drops (0.06%) |
| VehicleVehicle | Drug | Vehicle |
Primary outcome
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject
Time frame: [Time Frame: Efficacy assessment period (Day 7 through Day 8)]
The method of assessment for this outcome is the Ora Calibra(TM) Conjunctival Allergen Challenge Ocular Itching Scale
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the Investigator
Time frame: [Time Frame: Efficacy assessment period (Day 7 through Day 8)]
Ora Calibra(TM) Ocular Hyperemia Scale
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2020.
Related trials for Allergic Conjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fel d 1 Monoclonal Antibodies in Adult and Pediatric Participants With Allergic Conjunctivitis Due to Cat Allergy
Allergic Conjunctivitis
Recruiting
Daydrop® Triple Action for Allergic Eye Symptoms
Allergic Conjunctivitis of Both Eyes
RecruitingPhase 3
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Cenegermin Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Vehicle in the Treatment of PCED
Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defect
RecruitingObservational study
Investigating Nasal and Ocular Immune Response to Conjunctival Allergen Exposure
Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment of Ocular Surface Inflammations
Ocular Surface Allergy, Conjunctivitis, Allergic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alessandra Cesano, MD study chair
Essa Pharma
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PR013 (0.045%) and PR013 (0.06%) in people with Allergic Conjunctivitis, run by Realm Therapeutics, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject (time frame: [Time Frame: Efficacy assessment period (Day 7 through Day 8)]). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.