Metabolic SyndromeP2S2NCT03370419
The Pick Two to Stick To Habit Development Intervention
A study testing Treatment in people with Metabolic Syndrome, run by Wayne State University.
Trial summary
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a leading risk factor for chronic disease among African American/Black populations. Fostering habit development offers a promising new approach to improving the effectiveness of lifestyle programs for people with MetS, yet this approach remains understudied. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Metabolic Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2016to 30 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Two of the following three MetS risk factors (waistline > 40 inches for men and > 35 inches for women; blood pressure > 130/85; HbA1c of 5.7%-6.4%)
- Adults who present to the ED with non-life threatening conditions
- English-speaking subjects who will be discharged to home from the ED
Who cannot join
- Pregnant patients
- Previous diagnosis of resistant HTN
- Steroid-dependent asthma or emphysema
- Cirrhosis or hepatic failure
- Cardiac event within the last 30 days
- Chronic kidney disease on renal replacement therapy
- Cancer (terminal or undergoing active chemotherapeutic or radiation therapy)
- Taking medications for weight reduction or already being involved in a weight reduction program.
About this study
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a leading risk factor for chronic disease among African American/Black populations. Fostering habit development offers a promising new approach to improving the effectiveness of lifestyle programs for people with MetS, yet this approach remains understudied. The long-term goal of this line of research is to test and disseminate an affordable and effective intervention for reducing MetS. The objective of the proposed project is to evaluate the feasibility of a novel, occupational therapist-delivered habit-development intervention targeting dietary and physical activity habits in up to 100 African American/Blacks with MetS ages 40+ recruited from an emergency department in Detroit, MI. The specific aims are to (a) evaluate intervention feasibility and acceptability and (b) estimate intervention effect sizes for primary outcome measures of habit development and weight loss and secondary outcomes of blood pressure, BMI, and waist circumference. Through the 8-week intervention, indicators of intervention feasibility (e.g., time, effort, costs, participant recruitment and retention, satisfaction) will be tracked. Measures of habit development will be taken biweekly over the 8-week active intervention period and anthropometry measures will be collected at baseline and week 20.
Read the detailed description
Together, diabetes and cardiovascular disease cost the U.S. economy a staggering $557.6 billion annually and are the leading chronic diseases of African Americans. Maintaining a healthy body weight by being physically active and eating a healthy diet are the best means of reducing cardio-metabolic risk factors. Despite decades of behavioral research, however, lifestyle interventions targeting activity and diet have made little progress in effecting widespread and enduring health behavior changes in the populations most at risk for developing these conditions. Addressing the role of habits, defined as behavior patterns operating below conscious awareness that are acquired through context-dependent repetition, would significantly improve the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions. Most simply, habits develop when repetition of a behavior (e.g., walking for 10 minutes) occurs in connection with a stable situational cue that supports the behavior (e.g., while on a lunch break). Once established, habits are cued by the characteristics of a specified recurring situation rather than by intentions. Recent research suggests that habit development may prevent relapse and aid maintenance of behavior changes beyond the duration of the intervention because the performance of habitual behaviors is less vulnerable to changes in motivation, mood, or extraneous circumstances. Emerging evidence also suggests that habit-development strategies are (a) effective across a range of behaviors (e.g., dental flossing, physical activity, and dietary behaviors); (b) effective in low doses; and (c) deliverable via multiple formats (e.g., paper or electronic). Such strategies could therefore be feasibly implemented in a range of settings to target the development of healthful physical activity and dietary habits. Nonetheless, these concepts and methods have yet to be fully tested to determine their feasibility as a treatment modality for promoting healthful lifestyle behavior changes.
The long-term goal of the larger research project of which this is a part is to disseminate an affordable and effective intervention adaptable to a variety of healthcare settings for fostering healthful physical activity and dietary habits, thereby reducing the burden of related chronic diseases on affected individuals and society. The short-term objective of the proposed research is to test the feasibility of a habit-focused intervention in a sample of 80 African American adults ages 40 and older with metabolic syndrome (MetS). The overarching hypothesis is that a habit-focused approach will be feasible to implement and acceptable to intervention recipients. Rooted in habit theory and informed by the information-motivation-behavioral (IBM) model, the brief 8-week intervention consists of one face-to-face consultation, four bi-weekly individual tele-coaching sessions, and the use of ambulatory momentary assessments (via a smartphone application) to support the development of healthy dietary intake and physical activity habits and improve key health outcomes. The two specific aims of the study are:
- To evaluate intervention feasibility and acceptability. Determine if the intervention used in the proposed project is feasible. By tracking time, effort, costs, adherence to recommendations, participant recruitment and retention rates, and intervention satisfaction, it is expected that we will obtain data that both support the feasibility of the intervention and help improve it for a subsequent study.
- To estimate intervention effect sizes for the primary outcome measures of habit development and for the secondary outcome measures of blood pressure, BMI, and waist circumference. Habit development and anthropometry will be measured using the four-item Self-Reported Behavioral Automaticity Index (Gardner et al., 2012) biweekly during the active intervention, weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8.
- Conditions
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Being tested
- Treatment, Usual care
- Keywords
- Metabolic syndrome, Habits, African American, Emergency Medicine
- Medical subject headings
- Metabolic Syndrome, Habits
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TreatmentBehavioural
Lifestyle intervention fostering the development of behavioral automaticity (habit strength) or dietary and physical activity behaviors.
Usual careBehavioural
Usual care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The Pick Two to Stick To | Experimental | Participants are asked to participate in five health-coaching sessions and to return in Week 20 for follow-up data collection. The initial face-to-face coaching session lasts approximately 90 minutes with subsequent telephone sessions lasting approximately 20 minutes. Coaching sessions will include education about MetS, weight loss, dietary and physical activity recommendations, and the principles of habit development, guidance in forming implementation intentions for each self-selected habit, and identifying routines and contextual cues that could be modified to support habit development Coaching sessions are augmented with a participant workbook. Participants' also receive individually tailored study text messages to maintain their motivation. Receives: Behavioral: Treatment |
| Usual Care | Other | Participants receive usual care only. Receives: Behavioral: Usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self-reported Behavioral Automaticity Index
Habit strength, operationalized as changes in behavioral automaticity, were measured using a 1-7-point Likert scale. Participants respond to 4 stem statements. The scale thus ranges from 4-28. Higher score indicated a stronger habit.
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2017
- Study start13 Jan 2016
- Primary completion30 Aug 2017
- Study completion30 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Metabolic SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Two group randomized controll trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wayne State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Heather Fritz, Wayne State University
- Investigators
- Heather Fritz, PhD, Principal investigator, Wayne State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03370419
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1601014563
- Acronym
- P2S2
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 14 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fritz H, Tarraf W, Brody A, Levy P. Feasibility of a behavioral automaticity intervention among African Americans at risk for metabolic syndrome. BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6675-7.
PubMed 30991972
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Pick Two to Stick To Habit Development Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03370419
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P2S2 / 1601014563
- Conditions
- Metabolic Syndrome
- Keywords
- Metabolic syndrome, Habits, African American, Emergency Medicine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wayne State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Dec 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a leading risk factor for chronic disease among African American/Black populations. Fostering habit development offers a promising new approach to improving the effectiveness of lifestyle programs for people with MetS, yet this approach remains understudied. The long-term goal of this line of research is to test and disseminate an affordable and effective intervention for reducing MetS. The objective of the proposed project is to evaluate the feasibility of a novel, occupational therapist-delivered habit-development intervention targeting dietary and physical activity habits in up to 100 African American/Blacks with MetS ages 40+ recruited from an emergency department in Detroit, MI. The specific aims are to (a) evaluate intervention feasibility and acceptability and (b) estimate intervention effect sizes for primary outcome measures of habit development and weight loss and secondary outcomes of blood pressure, BMI, and waist circumference. Through the 8-week intervention, indicators of intervention feasibility (e.g., time, effort, costs, participant recruitment and retention, satisfaction) will be tracked. Measures of habit development will be taken biweekly over the 8-week active intervention period and anthropometry measures will be collected at baseline and week 20.
Detailed description
Together, diabetes and cardiovascular disease cost the U.S. economy a staggering $557.6 billion annually and are the leading chronic diseases of African Americans. Maintaining a healthy body weight by being physically active and eating a healthy diet are the best means of reducing cardio-metabolic risk factors. Despite decades of behavioral research, however, lifestyle interventions targeting activity and diet have made little progress in effecting widespread and enduring health behavior changes in the populations most at risk for developing these conditions. Addressing the role of habits, defined as behavior patterns operating below conscious awareness that are acquired through context-dependent repetition, would significantly improve the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions. Most simply, habits develop when repetition of a behavior (e.g., walking for 10 minutes) occurs in connection with a stable situational cue that supports the behavior (e.g., while on a lunch break). Once established, habits are cued by the characteristics of a specified recurring situation rather than by intentions. Recent research suggests that habit development may prevent relapse and aid maintenance of behavior changes beyond the duration of the intervention because the performance of habitual behaviors is less vulnerable to changes in motivation, mood, or extraneous circumstances. Emerging evidence also suggests that habit-development strategies are (a) effective across a range of behaviors (e.g., dental flossing, physical activity, and dietary behaviors); (b) effective in low doses; and (c) deliverable via multiple formats (e.g., paper or electronic). Such strategies could therefore be feasibly implemented in a range of settings to target the development of healthful physical activity and dietary habits. Nonetheless, these concepts and methods have yet to be fully tested to determine their feasibility as a treatment modality for promoting healthful lifestyle behavior changes.
The long-term goal of the larger research project of which this is a part is to disseminate an affordable and effective intervention adaptable to a variety of healthcare settings for fostering healthful physical activity and dietary habits, thereby reducing the burden of related chronic diseases on affected individuals and society. The short-term objective of the proposed research is to test the feasibility of a habit-focused intervention in a sample of 80 African American adults ages 40 and older with metabolic syndrome (MetS). The overarching hypothesis is that a habit-focused approach will be feasible to implement and acceptable to intervention recipients. Rooted in habit theory and informed by the information-motivation-behavioral (IBM) model, the brief 8-week intervention consists of one face-to-face consultation, four bi-weekly individual tele-coaching sessions, and the use of ambulatory momentary assessments (via a smartphone application) to support the development of healthy dietary intake and physical activity habits and improve key health outcomes. The two specific aims of the study are:
- To evaluate intervention feasibility and acceptability. Determine if the intervention used in the proposed project is feasible. By tracking time, effort, costs, adherence to recommendations, participant recruitment and retention rates, and intervention satisfaction, it is expected that we will obtain data that both support the feasibility of the intervention and help improve it for a subsequent study.
- To estimate intervention effect sizes for the primary outcome measures of habit development and for the secondary outcome measures of blood pressure, BMI, and waist circumference. Habit development and anthropometry will be measured using the four-item Self-Reported Behavioral Automaticity Index (Gardner et al., 2012) biweekly during the active intervention, weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Two group randomized controll trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The Pick Two to Stick To | Experimental | Behavioral: TreatmentParticipants are asked to participate in five health-coaching sessions and to return in Week 20 for follow-up data collection. The initial face-to-face coaching session lasts approximately 90 minutes with subsequent telephone sessions lasting approximately 20 minutes. Coaching sessions will include education about MetS, weight loss, dietary and physical activity recommendations, and the principles of habit development, guidance in forming implementation intentions for each self-selected habit, and identifying routines and contextual cues that could be modified to support habit development Coaching sessions are augmented with a participant workbook. Participants' also receive individually tailored study text messages to maintain their motivation. |
| Usual Care | Other | Behavioral: Usual careParticipants receive usual care only. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Two of the following three MetS risk factors (waistline > 40 inches for men and > 35 inches for women; blood pressure > 130/85; HbA1c of 5.7%-6.4%)
- Adults who present to the ED with non-life threatening conditions
- English-speaking subjects who will be discharged to home from the ED
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnant patients
- Previous diagnosis of resistant HTN
- Steroid-dependent asthma or emphysema
- Cirrhosis or hepatic failure
- Cardiac event within the last 30 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TreatmentLifestyle intervention fostering the development of behavioral automaticity (habit strength) or dietary and physical activity behaviors. | Behavioural | The Pick Two to Stick To |
| Usual careUsual care | Behavioural | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
Self-reported Behavioral Automaticity Index
Time frame: 2 weeks
Habit strength, operationalized as changes in behavioral automaticity, were measured using a 1-7-point Likert scale. Participants respond to 4 stem statements. The scale thus ranges from 4-28. Higher score indicated a stronger habit.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jan 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30991972Fritz H, Tarraf W, Brody A, Levy P. Feasibility of a behavioral automaticity intervention among African Americans at risk for metabolic syndrome. BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):413. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6675-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Metabolic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The IMPACT Study - Identification of Men With a Genetic Predisposition to ProstAte Cancer
Prostate Cancer, BRCA Mutation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparative Assessment of Inclisiran on Top of Standard of Care Versus Standard of Care Alone for LDL-C Evaluation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Saudi Arabia
Acute Coronary Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Gonadal Tissue Freezing for Fertility Preservation in Individuals at Risk for Ovarian Dysfunction, Premature Ovarian Insufficiency and Clinically Indicated Gonadectomy
Turner Syndrome, Post-menarcheal Adolescents
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Meal Macronutrients on Postprandial Lipids
Nephrotic Syndrome, Lipodystrophy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Heather Fritz, PhD principal investigator
Wayne State University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Treatment in people with Metabolic Syndrome, run by Wayne State University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self-reported Behavioral Automaticity Index (time frame: 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03370419, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2020.