AzTrials
AzTrials

Thoracic SurgeryNCT03371628

Electrical Impedance Tomography in Evaluating the Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation in Post-Operative Cardiac Surgery

A study testing Non invasive ventilation in people with Thoracic Surgery, run by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

NTRODUCTION: cardiac surgery can lead to pulmonary complications such as hypoxemia and atelectasis. Noninvasive ventilation has been used to prevent and treat such complications. Electrical impedance tomography has been a useful tool in bedside evaluation of ventilation and pulmonary ventilation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Thoracic Surgery
What is being tested?
Non invasive ventilation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
6 Dec 2017to 28 Feb 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Immediate postoperative period of cardiac surgery
  • age between 18 and 65 years
  • BMI between 18.5 and 30 kg / m2
  • Patients still intubated when admitted to the ICU
  • without previous history of severe pulmonary diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or chronic renal failure, or associated neuromuscular diseases

Who cannot join

  • Patients considered to be at risk for extubation failure (hypercapnia, more than failure in the autonomic test, AVM time greater than 72 hours, ineffective cough)
  • Cardiopulmonary bypass time more than 150 minutes
  • Hemodynamic instability (arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, severe hypotension with SBP <90mmHg)
  • Episodes of abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting
  • Hypoxemia (PO2 <50mmHg with FiO2 50%) or hypercapnia (PaCO2> 55mmHg with pH <7.30)
  • Patients who are at high surgical risk according to Euroscore II

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Alita L Novaes, specialist contact

+5581991610199

alitanovaes@gmail.com

Wagner Leite, specialist contact

+5581981410170

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Alita Paula Lopes de Novaes

    Recife, Pernambuco, 50751380

    Alita Paula L de Novaes, 81991610199, alitanovaes@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Use of Electrical Impedance Tomography in Evaluating the Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation in the Post-Operative Cardiac Surgery: Controlled and Randomized Clinical Trial

NTRODUCTION: cardiac surgery can lead to pulmonary complications such as hypoxemia and atelectasis. Noninvasive ventilation has been used to prevent and treat such complications. Electrical impedance tomography has been a useful tool in bedside evaluation of ventilation and pulmonary ventilation. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of non-invasive ventilation with oxygen therapy in cardiac post-operative patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It will be a randomized controlled clinical trial where patients will be divided into two groups: a group that will perform NIV for 1 hour and the group that will only use oxygen therapy. They will be evaluated through Electrical Impedance Tomography and arterial gasometry analysis just before extubation, soon after extubation, during the intervention and after the intervention for a period of 2 hours after extubation. EXPECTED RESULTS: It is expected that the NIV group will present higher pulmonary ventilation and aeration and better gas exchange than the oxygen therapy group, and that the time of therapeutic effect will be higher in the NIV group.

Read the detailed description

The proposal basically consists of Validation of the hypothesis: The use of Non-invasive Ventilation in patients in the postoperative cardiac surgery results in greater ventilation, greater aeration, and improved gas exchange when compared to the oxygen therapy group.

The use of noninvasive ventilation in the postoperative cardiac surgery has been widely used in clinical practice, but the evidence of the benefits of this technique in this population in relation to some criteria have not yet been elucidated in the scientific literature, such as the effect of NIV in ventilation and pulmonary ventilation, and how long does this effect last.

Being tested
Non invasive ventilation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non invasive ventilationDevice

    Non invasive ventilation is a mode of mechanical ventilation that does not require the use of artificial airway.

Study groups in NCT03371628
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group VNI 1hExperimentalIntervention: Non invasive ventilation, applied for 1 hour
Receives: Device: Non invasive ventilation
Group O2No interventionOxygen therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change in electrical impedance measures

    impedance variation data recorded by impedance electrical tomography

    Measured: data recorded 5 minutes before extubation, 5 minutes after extubation, at the first 5 minutes of therapy, 25 to 30 minutes after beginning of therapy, 55 to 60 minutes after beginning of therapy, and 1,5 hour and 2 hours after beginning of therapy

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. change in Blood gases analysis - PaO2 (mmHg), PaCO2 (mmHg), PaO2/FiO2

    Collected by a Laboratory professional

    Measured: recorded 5 minutes before extubation and 1 hour after extubation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2017
  2. Study start6 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion12 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A parallel group study is a simple and commonly used clinical design which compares two treatments. Usually a test therapy is compared with a standard therapy. The allocation of subjects to groups is usually achieved by randomisation. The groups are typically named the treatment group and the control group. Parallel group designs do not require the same number of subjects in each group, although often similar numbers are observed. The design is commonly used in randomised controlled trials. Statistical analysis often boils down to a simple t-test of the between group difference in the outcome, which is usually a mean or a proportion.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
26 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03371628
Sponsor's protocol ID
Tomografia de Impedância
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
20 Nov 2017
Last updated
13 Dec 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Datas relative to the results of the use of electrical impedance tomography, besides blood gases and vital signs.

Publications

  • Jaber S, Chanques G, Jung B. Postoperative noninvasive ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2010 Feb;112(2):453-61. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c5e5f2. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20068454
  • Rahmanian PB, Kroner A, Langebartels G, Ozel O, Wippermann J, Wahlers T. Impact of major non-cardiac complications on outcome following cardiac surgery procedures: logistic regression analysis in a very recent patient cohort. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):319-26; discussion 326-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt149. Epub 2013 May 10.

    PubMed 23667066
  • Zarbock A, Mueller E, Netzer S, Gabriel A, Feindt P, Kindgen-Milles D. Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airway pressure following cardiac surgery protects from postoperative pulmonary complications: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 500 patients. Chest. 2009 May;135(5):1252-1259. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-1602. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

    PubMed 19017864
  • Diodato M, Chedrawy EG. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the past, present, and future of myocardial revascularisation. Surg Res Pract. 2014;2014:726158. doi: 10.1155/2014/726158. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

    PubMed 25374960
  • Niclauss L. Techniques and standards in intraoperative graft verification by transit time flow measurement after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a critical review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jan;51(1):26-33. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw203. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

    PubMed 27298393
  • Yazdannik A, Bollbanabad HM, Mirmohammadsadeghi M, Khalifezade A. The effect of incentive spirometry on arterial blood gases after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016 Jan-Feb;21(1):89-92. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.174761.

    PubMed 26985228
  • Al Jaaly E, Fiorentino F, Reeves BC, Ind PW, Angelini GD, Kemp S, Shiner RJ. Effect of adding postoperative noninvasive ventilation to usual care to prevent pulmonary complications in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Oct;146(4):912-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 11.

    PubMed 23582830
  • Kotani T, Tanabe H, Yusa H, Saito S, Yamazaki K, Ozaki M. Electrical impedance tomography-guided prone positioning in a patient with acute cor pulmonale associated with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Anesth. 2016 Feb;30(1):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2084-y. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

    PubMed 26446805
  • Vogt B, Pulletz S, Elke G, Zhao Z, Zabel P, Weiler N, Frerichs I. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of regional lung ventilation determined by electrical impedance tomography during pulmonary function testing. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Oct;113(7):1154-61. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01630.2011. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

    PubMed 22898553
  • Parolari A, Poggio P, Myasoedova V, Songia P, Bonalumi G, Pilozzi A, Pacini D, Alamanni F, Tremoli E. Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Ready for Prime Time and Outcome Prediction? Front Cardiovasc Med. 2016 Jan 5;2:39. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00039. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26779491
  • Mendes RG, de Souza CR, Machado MN, Correa PR, Di Thommazo-Luporini L, Arena R, Myers J, Pizzolato EB, Borghi-Silva A. Predicting reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation and death in post-coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a comparison between artificial neural networks and logistic regression models. Arch Med Sci. 2015 Aug 12;11(4):756-63. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.48145. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

    PubMed 26322087
  • Kochamba GS, Yun KL, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Khonsari S. Pulmonary abnormalities after coronary arterial bypass grafting operation: cardiopulmonary bypass versus mechanical stabilization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 May;69(5):1466-70. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01142-5.

    PubMed 10881824
  • Chiumello D, Chevallard G, Gregoretti C. Non-invasive ventilation in postoperative patients: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jun;37(6):918-29. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2210-8. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

    PubMed 21424246
  • Glossop AJ, Shephard N, Bryden DC, Mills GH. Non-invasive ventilation for weaning, avoiding reintubation after extubation and in the postoperative period: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Sep;109(3):305-14. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes270.

    PubMed 22879654
  • Perrin C, Jullien V, Venissac N, Berthier F, Padovani B, Guillot F, Coussement A, Mouroux J. Prophylactic use of noninvasive ventilation in patients undergoing lung resectional surgery. Respir Med. 2007 Jul;101(7):1572-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.12.002. Epub 2007 Jan 25.

    PubMed 17257820

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Non invasive ventilation in people with Thoracic Surgery, run by Universidade Federal de Pernambuco at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alita L Novaes, specialist (+5581991610199, alitanovaes@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change in electrical impedance measures (time frame: data recorded 5 minutes before extubation, 5 minutes after extubation, at the first 5 minutes of therapy, 25 to 30 minutes after beginning of therapy, 55 to 60 minutes after beginning of therapy, and 1,5 hour and 2 hours after beginning of therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03371628, which also lists 32 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Dec 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in