AzTrials
AzTrials

Overweight or ObesityNCT03376685

The Relationship Between Exercise Frequency, Intensity, and Restoration of Cardiometabolic Health

A study testing Endurance Exercise Training (END) and Sprint Exercise Training (SIT) in people with Overweight or Obesity, run by University of Guelph at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Regular physical activity is well established to decrease the risk of cardiometabolic diseases. While research has characterized responses based on exercise intensity, many beneficial effects of exercise are transient in nature, and therefore exercise frequency may play an important, yet currently under-appreciated… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Overweight or Obesity
What is being tested?
Endurance Exercise Training (END) and Sprint Exercise Training (SIT)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
23 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
30 May 2018to 18 Nov 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male, aged 18-70 years
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 25 kg/m^2 (classified as overweight or obese)
  • Sedentary (<100 minutes moderate physical activity per week)
  • Approval for vigorous exercise via physical activity readiness questionnaire (PARQ+)

Who cannot join

  • Prescribed with glucose lowering medications
  • Smoker
  • Not cleared for physical activity

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Guelph

    Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Regular physical activity is well established to decrease the risk of cardiometabolic diseases. While research has characterized responses based on exercise intensity, many beneficial effects of exercise are transient in nature, and therefore exercise frequency may play an important, yet currently under-appreciated, role in improving health. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of 6-week high-frequency endurance (END) or low-frequency sprint (SIT) training with respect to reducing clinically relevant cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight/obese males. It is hypothesized that END, performed at a greater frequency than SIT, will markedly improve cardiometabolic health, while low-frequency SIT will not.

Read the detailed description

Involvement in regular physical activity is known to elicit systemic adaptations and reduce the risk of cardiometabolic diseases, including hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycemia. Traditional physical activity recommendations suggest that 150 minutes of moderate-intensity continuous endurance (END) exercise dispersed over 5 days per week is sufficient to improve physical fitness in adults. However, given the commonly cited barrier of "lack of time," literature has recently focused on time effective sprint interval training (SIT), obtaining equivalent increases in aerobic capacity and acute glycemic regulation compared to classical END exercise when protocols are work-matched. Despite these similarities, END is conducive to daily sessions not feasible of SIT. As improvements in many clinically relevant risk factors are transient in nature following exercise, it remains imperative to assess the implications of variable frequency exercise regimes performed as per general practice (i.e. high-frequency END, low-frequency SIT). Furthermore, improvements in cardiovascular outcomes following END have been shown, in some instances, to be absent in response to SIT, suggesting END may be more beneficial for cardiovascular health. Therefore, the current study aims to assess several markers of cardiovascular (aerobic capacity, blood pressure, arterial stiffness, vascular endothelial function) and metabolic (glucose tolerance, lipid tolerance, body composition) health following 6-weeks of high-frequency END or low-frequency SIT, performed as per general practice. Combined, this research will provide important insight into the under-appreciated role of exercise frequency for improving cardiometabolic health.

Being tested
Endurance Exercise Training (END), Sprint Exercise Training (SIT)
Keywords
Endurance training, Sprint interval training, Glycemic regulation, Lipid homeostasis, Cardiovascular health
Medical subject headings
Overweight, Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endurance Exercise Training (END)Behavioural

    Physical activity will be conducted on cycle ergometers under supervision. Participants will exercise 5 days a week for 30 minutes (Week 1-2); 35 minutes (Weeks 3-4); or 40 minutes (Weeks 5-6) at 60% VO2 peak.

  • Sprint Exercise Training (SIT)Behavioural

    Physical activity will be conducted on cycle ergometers under supervision. Participants will exercise 3 days a week involving a 3-minute warm-up, followed up 4 repetitions (Week 1-2); 5 repetitions (Weeks 3-4); or 6 (Weeks 5-6) repetitions of 30 seconds at a maximal intensity with 2 minutes' rest in between. Exercise will conclude with a 2-minute cool-down.

Study groups in NCT03376685
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Endurance Exercise Training (END)ExperimentalThis group is performing END training for 6 weeks in duration. Intervention: Behavioral: Endurance Exercise Training (END)
Receives: Behavioral: Endurance Exercise Training (END)
Sprint Exercise Training (SIT)ExperimentalThis group is performing SIT training for 6 weeks in duration. Intervention: Behavioral: Sprint Exercise Training (SIT)
Receives: Behavioral: Sprint Exercise Training (SIT)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cardiorespiratory fitness

    Assessed via VO2 peak test, to determine the change in cardiorespiratory fitness following 6-weeks of exercise training

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  2. Free-living glycemic regulation

    Assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), to determine the change in free-living glycemic regulation following 6-weeks of exercise training

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  3. Glucose tolerance

    Assessed via an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to determine changes in standardized glycemic regulation following 6-weeks of exercise training

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Blood lipids

    Blood lipid profile from fasted venous blood sampling, including high-density lipoproteins (HDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides (TAG), free-fatty acids (FFA), and cholesterol/HDL ratio

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  2. HbA1C

    Change in HbA1C assessed via fasted venous blood sampling, following 6-weeks of exercise training

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  3. Post-prandial blood lipids

    Assessed following the consumption of an oral fat tolerance test (OFTT). Blood lipid responses include triglycerides (TAG) and free fatty acids (FFA), assessing the influence of 6-weeks of exercise training on these parameters

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  4. Blood pressure

    Assessed via automated brachial blood pressure (including systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP))

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  5. Body composition

    Assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA); including total and regional lean and fat mass. Assessed via height and weight measurements to determine BMI.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  6. Arterial stiffness

    Assessed via carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV)

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  7. Arterial stiffness acutely post-exercise

    Assessed via carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) following a single bout of exercise in week 1 of each group

    Measured: Acutely pre-exercise vs. post-exercise in week 1 of training

  8. Brachial artery vascular function

    Assessed via brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD) following 6-weeks of exercise training

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)

  9. Brachial artery vascular function acutely post-exercise

    Assessed via brachial artery flow mediated dilation (FMD) following a single bout of exercise in week 1 of each training group

    Measured: Acutely pre-exercise vs. post-exercise in week 1 of training

  10. Daily sedentary/active time

    Assessed via accelerometer

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training), week 1 (of training), week 6 (post-training)

  11. Free-living glycemic regulation during the first week of exercise training

    Assessed via continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)

    Measured: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 1 (of training)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2017
  2. Study start30 May 2018
  3. Primary completion18 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion18 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study is a 6-week exercise training study, with two possible parallel training groups: endurance (END) or sprint (SIT) training.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
23 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03376685
Sponsor's protocol ID
17-08-008
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
6 Dec 2017
Last updated
29 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Petrick HL, King TJ, Pignanelli C, Vanderlinde TE, Cohen JN, Holloway GP, Burr JF. Endurance and Sprint Training Improve Glycemia and V O2peak but only Frequent Endurance Benefits Blood Pressure and Lipidemia. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Jun 1;53(6):1194-1205. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002582.

    PubMed 33315809

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endurance Exercise Training (END) and Sprint Exercise Training (SIT) in people with Overweight or Obesity, run by University of Guelph at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cardiorespiratory fitness (time frame: Baseline (pre-training) vs. week 6 (post-training)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03376685, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in