AzTrials
AzTrials

Weight LossNCT03377244

Healthy Body Healthy Souls in the Marshallese Population

A study testing HBHS, HBHS Policy and WORD DPP in people with Weight Loss and Pre Diabetes, run by University of Arkansas at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary aim is to pilot test a weight-loss intervention for Marshallese adults, referred to throughout as Healthy Bodies Healthy Souls (HBHS). The HBHS intervention includes the Wholeness, Oneness, Righteousness, Deliverance Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention (WORD DPP) implemented at the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Weight Loss, Pre Diabetes, Overweight and Obesity
What is being tested?
HBHS, HBHS Policy and WORD DPP
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
30 Sep 2018to 31 Oct 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Self-reported Marshallese
  • 18 years of age or older
  • To participate in the DPP-LI, have a body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 kg/m^2

Who cannot join

  • A clinically significant medical condition likely to impact weight (cancer, HIV/AIDS, etc.)
  • Currently pregnant or breastfeeding an infant who is 6 months old or younger.
  • Have any condition that makes it unlikely that the participant will be able to follow the protocol, such as terminal illness, plans to move out of the area within 6 months, and inability to finish the intervention, etc.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest

    Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Healthy Body Healthy Souls: A Weight Loss Intervention Using Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention (DPP-LI) With Church Level Systems Change in the Marshallese Population

The primary aim is to pilot test a weight-loss intervention for Marshallese adults, referred to throughout as Healthy Bodies Healthy Souls (HBHS). The HBHS intervention includes the Wholeness, Oneness, Righteousness, Deliverance Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention (WORD DPP) implemented at the individual level, with the additional enhancement of working with Marshallese churches to implement church-level changes to support the individual behavioral intervention of the WORD DPP. We will then compare changes in outcomes with participants in the churches who were exposed to the policy changes but did not participate in the WORD DPP, and with those enrolled in a separate DPP trial who participated in the WORD DPP but were not exposed to church-level policy changes.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale

Disparities in type 2 diabetes, pre-diabetes, and obesity among the Marshallese and Pacific Islanders.

This study focuses on the Marshallese living in Arkansas. The Marshallese are a Pacific Islander population experiencing significant health disparities, with some of the highest documented rates of type 2 diabetes of any population group in the world. Our review of local, national, and international data sources found estimates of diabetes in the Marshallese population (in the US and the Republic of the Marshall Islands) ranging from 20% to 50%, compared to 8% for the US population and 4% worldwide.

While national prevalence data are limited, 23.7% of Pacific Islanders surveyed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2010 reported a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes - more than all other racial/ethnic groups. Our preliminary research, which included health screenings with the Marshallese community in Northwest Arkansas (n = 401), documented extremely high incidence of diabetes (38.2%) and pre-diabetes (32.4%). Our pilot data also revealed similar disparities in obesity, one of the strongest risk factors for diabetes; 90% of Marshallese participants were classified as overweight or obese. Further compounding these significant disparities, Pacific Islanders living in the US are less likely than other racial/ethnic groups to receive preventive or diagnostic treatment or diabetes education.

This study addresses an urgent need for interventions to reduce obesity and diabetes disparities in the Marshallese community and will employ a culturally appropriate, multilevel approach. The scientific premise of our study includes four main points. First, the Marshallese in Arkansas suffer from a significant and disproportionate burden of type 2 diabetes and lack access to effective prevention and treatment due to a dearth of research with Pacific Islanders.Second, the association between weight gain and risk for type 2 diabetes is strong. Overweight/obesity is considered the strongest modifiable risk factor for type 2 diabetes, and even a modest reduction in weight (5-10%) is clinically meaningful. Third, research demonstrates the effectiveness of multi-level lifestyle interventions in reducing weight and the onset and impact of diabetes. Fourth, to be effective among Pacific Islanders, interventions must be developed to address influences at multiple levels and should be culturally adapted to incorporate Pacific Islanders' worldviews and cultural values. Prior research indicates the importance of using a Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach to understand and integrate cultural nuances during the cultural adaptation process and implementation of multilevel interventions. A CBPR approach is also essential to conducting ethical, valid health research in populations whose health beliefs and behaviors have been shaped by historical trauma. Finally, churches are primary social institutions of Pacific Islander health. Faith-based interventions are effective at improving behavioral and anthropometric outcomes within collectivistic communities and therefore hold great promise for Marshallese and other Pacific Islanders.

Being tested
HBHS, HBHS Policy, WORD DPP
Keywords
Marshallese, Pacific Islanders
Medical subject headings
Weight Loss, Glucose Intolerance, Overweight, Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HBHSBehavioural

    Faith based diabetes curriculum that teaches participants to connect faith and health plus church-level policy changes that encourages participants to engage in healthy behaviors.

  • HBHS PolicyBehavioural

    Church-level policy changes that encourages participants to engage in healthy behaviors.

  • WORD DPPBehavioural

    Faith based diabetes curriculum that teaches participants to connect faith and health.

Study groups in NCT03377244
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HBHSExperimentalParticipants in the Healthy Bodies Healthy Souls (HBHS) arm received the Wholeness, Oneness, Righteousness, Deliverance Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention (WORD DPP) with the addition of church-level policy changes to support the individual behavioral intervention of the WORD DPP. The WORD DPP is a faith-based diabetes prevention curriculum that teaches participants to connect faith and health to have a healthy weight, eat healthy, and be physically active. The WORD DPP includes 16 modules that are intended to be delivered over a 24 week period, each module approximately 90 minutes in length. Church-level changes to support healthier behaviors include improvements in food purchasing and preparation for events, physical activity programs, and increased congregational engagement in health promotion activities.
Receives: Behavioral: HBHS
HBHS PolicyActive comparatorParticipants in the HBHS Policy arm included members of churches enrolled in the HBHS study who did not receive the WORD DPP intervention (ie, these participants were exposed to only the church-level policy changes). Church-level changes to support healthier behaviors include improvements in food purchasing and preparation for events, physical activity programs, and increased congregational engagement in health promotion activities.
Receives: Behavioral: HBHS Policy
WORD DPPOtherParticipants in the Wholeness, Oneness, Righteousness, Deliverance Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Intervention (WORD DPP) arm included participants enrolled in a separate DPP study without the church-level policy changes (ie, these participants received only the WORD DPP intervention). The WORD DPP is a faith-based diabetes prevention curriculum that teaches participants to connect faith and health to have a healthy weight, eat healthy, and be physically active. The WORD DPP-LI includes 16 modules that are intended to be delivered over a 24 week period, each module approximately 90 minutes in length.
Receives: Behavioral: WORD DPP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Percent Body Weight (Pounds) Change

    Mean percent body weight (pounds) change from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). Participant weight (without shoes) was measured in light clothing to the nearest 0.5 lb using a calibrated digital scale.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in Mean HbA1c (%)

    Change in mean HbA1c (NGSP %) from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). A Siemens analyzer (point of care) was utilized to calculate HbA1c levels for each participant.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  2. Change in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)

    Change in mean systolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). Blood pressure was measured with a sphygmomanometer, with participants seated.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  3. Change in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)

    Change in mean diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). Blood pressure was measured with a sphygmomanometer, with participants seated.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  4. Change in Eating Habits Self-Efficacy

    Change in eating habits self-efficacy from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). This self-report measure assessed participants' self-efficacy related to their ability to make healthy eating decisions in the face of real or perceived barriers (e.g. while at social events, while watching TV, etc.). This 7-item measure was adapted from items in the original Weight Efficacy Life-Style Questionnaire by Clark et al (1991) (reference provided in the References in the Protocol Section). Each of the 7 items are measured via 3 response options ("Yes/Completely Sure"=2; "Maybe/Not Sure"=1; and "No/Not Sure at All"=0), giving a possible range of scores of 0-14, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy for making healthy eating decisions in spite of barriers.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  5. Change in Physical Activity Self-Efficacy

    Change in physical activity self-efficacy from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). This self-report measure assessed participants' self-efficacy for exercising in the face of real or perceived barriers (e.g., bad weather, exercising alone, etc.). This 9-item measure was adapted from the Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale by Resnick \& Jenkins (2000) and Resnick et al (2004) (references provided in the References in the Protocol Section). Each of the 9 items are measured via 3 response options ("Yes/Completely Sure"=2; "Maybe/Not Sure"=1; and "No/Not Sure at All"=0), giving a possible range of scores of 0-18, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy for exercising despite barriers.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  6. Change in Percentage of Participants Engaging in Sufficient Levels of Physical Activity Over the Past Month

    Change in percentage of participants engaging in sufficient levels of physical activity (PA) from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). This self-report measure assessed participants' frequency of engaging in both moderate and vigorous levels of physical activity over the past month with two items. Both items used a 4-point response scale: 1) Rarely or Never; 2) Once a week; 3) 2-4 times a week; and 4) More than 4 times a week. Each 4-point scale for moderate PA and vigorous PA was weighted: 0=Rarely or Never; 1=Once a week; 2=2-4 times a week; and 4=More than 4 times a week. The weights were then summed and dichotomized as follows: ≥4 = sufficient PA and <4 = insufficient PA. Items were adapted to include relevant cultural examples of physical activity from the DASH 2 Brief Physical Activity Questionnaire (link to original items provided in the References in the Protocol Section).

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  7. Change in Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption

    Change in participants' sugar-sweetened beverage consumption from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). This self-report measure assessed participants' sugar-sweetened beverage consumption over the past 30 days using two questions from 'Module 14: Sugar Sweetened Beverages' of the CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Participants could respond in number of times per day, per week, or per month. Responses for each question were converted to number of times per day (i.e., self-reported times per week divided by 7 or self-reported times per month divided by 30), resulting in two measures: number times soda was consumed per day and number of times sugar-sweetened fruit drinks, sweet tea, and sports drinks were consumed per day. Per BRFSS guidelines, these two measures were added together to create a total daily SSB consumption rate.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  8. Change in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption

    Change in participants' fruit and vegetable consumption from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). This self-report measure assessed participants' fruit and vegetable consumption over the past three months using three questions adapted from: Shannon et al (1997) (reference provided in the References in the Protocol Section). Each of the three items was scored as Often=2; Sometimes=1; Never=0. Items were summed to create a scale score, giving a possible range of scores of 0-6, with higher scores indicating more frequent consumption of fruit and vegetables.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

  9. Change in Perceived Family Support for Exercise and Dietary Habits

    Change in perceived family support for exercise and dietary habits from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention). This self-report measure was adapted to examine changes in perceived family support for engaging in healthy exercise and dietary habits. This measure consists of a 6-item scale adapted from: Gruber (2008) (reference provided in the References in the Protocol Section). Each of the 6 items are measured via 3 response options ("Often"=2; "Sometimes"=1; and "Never"=0), giving a possible range of scores of 0-12, with higher scores indicating higher perceived family support for exercising and eating healthier.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2017
  2. Study start30 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2019
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Our aim is to pilot test a multi-level weight-loss intervention in the Marshallese community. Changes in outcomes were examined from baseline to 6 months post-intervention (12 months post-initiation of the intervention).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03377244
Sponsor's protocol ID
217566
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
7 Dec 2017
Last updated
29 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Shannon J, Kristal AR, Curry SJ, Beresford SA. Application of a behavioral approach to measuring dietary change: the fat- and fiber-related diet behavior questionnaire. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997 May;6(5):355-61.

    PubMed 9149896
  • Gruber KJ. Social support for exercise and dietary habits among college students. Adolescence. 2008 Fall;43(171):557-75.

    PubMed 19086670
  • Clark MM, Abrams DB, Niaura RS, Eaton CA, Rossi JS. Self-efficacy in weight management. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Oct;59(5):739-44. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.59.5.739.

    PubMed 1955608
  • Resnick B, Jenkins LS. Testing the reliability and validity of the Self-Efficacy for Exercise scale. Nurs Res. 2000 May-Jun;49(3):154-9. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200005000-00007.

    PubMed 10882320
  • Resnick B, Luisi D, Vogel A, Junaleepa P. Reliability and validity of the self-efficacy for exercise and outcome expectations for exercise scales with minority older adults. J Nurs Meas. 2004 Winter;12(3):235-47. doi: 10.1891/jnum.12.3.235.

    PubMed 16138727

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HBHS, HBHS Policy and WORD DPP in people with Weight Loss and Pre Diabetes, run by University of Arkansas at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Percent Body Weight (Pounds) Change (time frame: Baseline, 6 months post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03377244, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in