AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisorderNCT03378570

rTMS for MDD: 5.5cm Rule vs. F3 Targeting

A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Depression, run by Nicholas Trapp at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of different treatment locations using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat major depressive disorder. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorder, Depression
What is being tested?
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
123 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2018to 13 Sep 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder
  • Age between 18 and 90 years
  • rTMS is clinically indicated as determined by clinical rTMS physician team at University of Iowa

Who cannot join

  • rTMS contraindication such as implanted ferromagnetic material in the head or history of epilepsy with poorly controlled seizures
  • MRI exclusion criteria (if participating in MRI portion of study) including implanted device such as:
  • Pacemaker
  • Coronary Stent
  • Defibrillator
  • Neurostimulation
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Or any of the following conditions:
  • Claustrophobia
  • Uncontrolled high blood pressure
  • Poorly controlled atrial fibrillation
  • Significant heart disease
  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Severe kidney disease
  • Pregnant, trying to become pregnant, or breast feeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Prefrontal Target Location on Outcomes for Major Depressive Disorder

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of different treatment locations using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat major depressive disorder.

Read the detailed description

Currently there is little standardization between rTMS treatment programs as to what is the best way to localize the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, which is the FDA-approved treatment location for clinical rTMS for major depressive disorder (MDD). Different targeting methods yield locations that can vary by up to a few centimeters. By comparing different treatment locations and obtaining neurobehavioral, neuroimaging, cognitive, and neuropsychological measures, this study would provide the opportunity to identify the optimal treatment targeting method when using rTMS for major depressive disorder in a clinical setting. This study will specifically be focusing on comparing the two most common targeting methods: a target 5.5cm anterior to the motor strip on the left prefrontal scalp and the F3 target location on the left prefrontal scalp as identified using the 10-20 EEG system nomenclature.

Being tested
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Keywords
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, rTMS, F3, 5.5cm rule, Targeting, TMS
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationDevice

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation will be targeted to a location in the left prefrontal cortex and delivered according to FDA-approved parameters for the treatment of major depressive disorder, specifically high-frequency 10 Hz rTMS for 3000 pulses, 5 days per week for a total number of sessions as deemed clinically appropriate by the patient's clinical TMS treatment team but usually on the order of 20-30 treatments.

Study groups in NCT03378570
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
5.5cm Rule GroupActive comparatorrTMS will be targeted at a left prefrontal target 5.5cm anterior to the primary motor strip identified on the scalp during motor threshold testing.
Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
F3 GroupActive comparatorrTMS will be targeted at the left prefrontal scalp target identified as F3 according to the 10-20 EEG system.
Receives: Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Assessment Score

    Overall change in total Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Assessment score from pre to post-treatment assessment, comparing results of 2 active groups to assess for superiority of one treatment to the other.

    This assessment measures depression severity at baseline. Total scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent markers for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.

    All 9 items are summed to compute a total score, ranging from 0-27. Higher scores indicate more severe self-rated depressive symptoms. Negative change from baseline implies a decrease in depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

  2. Percentage Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Score

    Overall change in total Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score from pre to post-treatment assessment, comparing results of 2 active groups to assess for superiority of one treatment to the other.

    This scale assesses depression severity at baseline. Scores of 8, 17, and 34 are cut-off points for mild, moderate, severe depression, respectively.

    This 10 item scale is summed to compute a total score, ranging from 0-60. Higher scores indicate more severe clinician-rated depressive symptoms.

    Negative change from baseline implies a decrease in depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

  3. Percentage Change in General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Assessment Score

    Overall change in total General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Assessment score from pre to post-treatment assessment, comparing results of 2 active groups to assess for superiority of one treatment to the other.

    This assesses anxiety severity as baseline. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 are cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively.

    All 7 items are summed to compute a total score, ranging from 0-21. Higher scores indicate more severe self-rated anxiety symptoms.

    Negative change from baseline implies a decrease in anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

  4. Response and Remission Rates on Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Assessment

    Comparison of the response rate (>50% improvement) and remission rate (score <5) for the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Assessment between the 2 groups post-treatment.

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

  5. Response and Remission Rates on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale

    Comparison of the response rate (>50% improvement) and remission rate (score <10) for the MADRS between the 2 groups post-treatment.

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

  6. Response Rates on General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Assessment

    Comparison of the response rate (>50% improvement) for the General Anxiety Disorder 7-Item Assessment between the 2 groups post-treatment.

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score Changes

    Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores from baseline to final timepoint. Reported here as the mean difference in total Montreal Cognitive Assessment score from baseline to endpoint.

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment is used a screen for cognitive impairment, calculated by adding the points from each task, which range from 0-30.

    Higher scores indicate little to no cognitive impairment 26 or above: Normal cognition 18-25: Mild cognitive impairment 10-17: Moderate cognitive impairment Fewer than 10: Severe cognitive impairment

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

  2. Emotion Measures

    T Score Changes in National Institutes of Health Toolbox Emotional Battery A T score of 50 corresponds to the population mean. Scores may range from 20-80 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher T scores indicate a higher endorsement of each domain. Here, we present changes in mean score from pre-treatment to post-treatment. In that way, a positive value represents a decrease in average T score, and vice versa.

    Measured: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2017
  2. Study start1 May 2018
  3. Primary completion13 Sep 2022
  4. Study completion13 Sep 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
123 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03378570
Sponsor's protocol ID
201709834
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
14 Dec 2017
Last updated
3 Feb 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Trapp NT, Pace BD, Neisewander B, Ten Eyck P, Boes AD. A randomized trial comparing beam F3 and 5.5 cm targeting in rTMS treatment of depression demonstrates similar effectiveness. Brain Stimul. 2023 Sep-Oct;16(5):1392-1400. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.09.006. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

    PubMed 37714408

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Depression, run by Nicholas Trapp at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage Change in Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item Assessment Score (time frame: Pre-assessment will be obtained within approximately 1 week of starting rTMS. Post-assessment will be obtained immediately following completion of rTMS course, usually 4-6 weeks later.). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03378570, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in