AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNCT03379610

A Prospective Study of Molecular Detection of Salvageable Early Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma After Radiotherapy

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by The University of Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of EBV and methylation marker genes in body fluids of both plasma and nasopharyngeal brush together for screening of early salvageable local residual and recurrent NPC that are missed by conventional clinical follow-up protocol. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
What is being tested?
Nasopharngeal brush
How many people
426 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2006to Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with nasopharngeeal carcinoma

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosed with nasopharngeal carcinoma
  • will receive radiotherapy after basline NP brush

Who cannot join

  • has received radiotherapy

About this study

To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of EBV and methylation marker genes in body fluids of both plasma and nasopharyngeal brush together for screening of early salvageable local residual and recurrent NPC that are missed by conventional clinical follow-up protocol.

Read the detailed description
  1. Background: Treatment failure can occur at distant sites which have no effective cure yet. Early local residual or recurrent NPC are salvageable with over 50% 5-year survival rate. It is however difficult for clinical detection of early residual or recurrent NPC after radiotherapy by nasoendoscopy in the heavily irradiated nasopharynx with severe nasopharyngitis and inflammatory swelling and crusting changes. Radiologic imaging and nasopharyngeal biopsy have their role, but they are invasive, expensive and cannot be repeated often as routine follow-up screening method. Unfortunately, 50% local recurrences are in advanced rT3-4 stage and 28% local recurrences are not salvageable. Therefore, detection of the early stage residual/recurrent NPC that are missed by our conventional clinical follow-up is important for successful salvage treatment. Non-invasive, inexpensive and repeatable sampling of blood and nasopharyngeal brush/swab for molecular detection of NPC is our research focus for future improvement of treatment result of local failure.

There are two potential molecular markers of detection of minimal residual/recurrent NPC.

  1. EBV DNA is a molecular marker for NPC. We have reported that only 61% patients with local recurrence undergoing nasopharyngectomy had positive plasma EBV DNA. The sensitivity was lower in local recurrence compared with same stage in pretreatment NPC, 86% T1 versus 38% rT1. EBV DNA in nasopharyngeal brush has been reported to be 96% sensitive and 96% specific for NPC before treatment. EBV DNA in nasopharyngeal swab was reported to disappear after radiotherapy and re-appear with mucosal local recurrence with 100 % sensitivity and 98% specificity in a small case study of 11 patients with local recurrences, the results demonstrate its potential detection of local recurrences that are missed by our conventional follow-up. It however needs further prospective longitudinal study for verification.
  2. Methylation of the CG rich promoter region of many tumor suppressor genes have been found to be a common genetic abnormality in NPC, but not in normal nasopharynx. We have shown that methylated promoter DNA are detectable in peripheral blood and nasopharyngeal swab of NPC patients, but rarely in normal controls. By using combination of 3 methylated genes in plasma, we have found 38% sensitive for detection of local recurrence.
  3. Study objective To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the combination of EBV and methylation marker genes in body fluids of both plasma and nasopharyngeal brush together for screening of early salvageable local residual and recurrent NPC that are missed by conventional clinical follow-up protocol.
  4. Hypothesis tested:
  5. Patients in remission without residual or recurrent tumor after treatment should have persistently negative or very low background level of markers in both nasopharyngeal brush and plasma on follow-up.
  6. Patients with residual or recurrent local or nodal tumors have either persistently high level of markers beyond 8th week or initial disappearance/reduction to very low background level followed by reappearance/increasing level of markers again on follow-up. The temporal change in quantity of markers is important to reflect the tumor load of residual and recurrent NPC before clinical presentation. We hypothesize that these pattern will be observed in those patients with residual/recurrent NPC at their early salvageable stages before clinical presentation.
  7. Methodology of study:
  8. Before treatment
  9. Nasopharyngeal brush of tumor is collected under endoscopic guidance.
  10. NPC biopsy specimen is then collected for histologic section and also freshly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in -80C freezer for subsequent study.
  11. 20ml EDTA blood is also collected for study.
  12. The EBV DNA and methylation markers will be screened in the tumor, nasopharyngeal brush and blood by using methylation specific quantitative PCR method. The laboratory protocols have been reported from our previous publications on EBV DNA and methylation studies.
  13. Post-treatment reassessment of residual NPC
  14. Based on our published results on the study of time of remission of residual NPC after treatment, we have our routine follow-up protocol to perform endoscopic assessment and random biopsy of the nasopharynx at post-treatment 8th week for evaluation of residual NPC.
  15. At the time of endoscopy at 8th week, nasopharyngeal brush and 20 ml of blood will be collected for study of biomarkers. The EBV and specific methylation markers of the patient selected from patient's tumor biopsy findings will be used for each individual patient to screen residual NPC.
  16. Of those patients who have positive biopsy at 8th week, repeat biopsy will be done at 10th week. If the biopsy is still positive at 10th week, salvage treatment of either re-irradiation or nasopharyngectomy as appropriate will be arranged. If the repeat biopsy at 10th week becomes negative, the patient will be reassessed in 4 weeks.
  17. Of those patients with negative findings of both biomarkers and biopsy at 8th week, the patient will be followed-up according to schedule monthly.
  18. Of those patients who have positive biomarkers but negative biopsy at 8th week, further nasopharyngeal biopsies will be performed at 10th week to maker sure there is no missing of local residual NPC from the previous biopsy at 8th week. Radiologic imaging will also be performed at this time. The nasopharyngeal brush and blood tests will also be repeated to keep track of the temporal change with time. Patients who have positive biopsy at 10th week will be given appropriate salvage treatment of radiotherapy or surgery, and these patients are benefited by the molecular screening. Patients who have persistently negative biopsy at 10th week will be followed up according to schedule, and if they have no recurrence at follow-up, these patients have false positive molecular surveillance.
  19. Subsequent follow-up for detection of recurrent NPC
  20. A patient who has negative post-treatment nasopharyngeal biopsy at 8th/10th week will be followed up every month in first year, every 2 months in second year and every 3 months in third - fifth year for total 5 years. It is expected that 11% of them in fact will subsequently develop local recurrence. It is our routine protocol to perform nasoendoscopy to examine the nasopharynx during each follow-up. If there is no suspicious lesion seen in the nasopharynx, biopsy will not be done and the patient will be rescheduled for follow-up.
  21. Nasopharyngeal biopsy will be taken if suspicious lesion is seen during follow-up endoscopy. If the biopsy is proven to be recurrence, the patient will be managed accordingly. If the biopsy is negative, the patient will be rescheduled for regular follow-up.
  22. Nasopharyngeal brush and 20 ml of blood will be collected at follow-up every 2 months for 1st and 2nd year and every 3 months in 3rd to 5th year for study. The EBV and specific methylation markers of the patient selected from patient's tumor biopsy findings will be reassessed for each individual patient to screen local recurrence.
  23. If a patient has negative nasoendoscopic finding and negative molecular biomarker findings in both plasma and nasopharyngeal brush, the patient will be regularly followed up as scheduled.
  24. If a patient has negative nasoendoscopic finding, but a positive molecular marker result is found in at least one of the body fluids or marker, the patient will be thoroughly reassessed for recurrence that are missed during routine clinical follow-up. The patient will have PET/CT/MRI imaging and random multiple nasopharyngeal biopsies to assess for possible local recurrence. Since a positive plasma finding may be due to nodal or distant metastasis, other sites of recurrence or new cancer will be investigated as judged necessary clinically. If the nasopharyngeal biopsy is positive or other site of recurrence is found, the patient will be managed by salvage treatment accordingly as appropriate. These patients are benefited by the molecular surveillance with true positive result. If the search for recurrence are all negative, the patient will be rescheduled for regular follow-up, and if the patient is proven no recurrence on further follow-up, the molecular surveillance is considered false positive.
  25. End point of follow-up Post-treatment 5 years follow-up status will be our end point of study for each patient.
  26. Number of patients recruited and recruitment criteria:

There are 130-150 new NPC patients annually in Queen Mary Hospital. We plan to recruit 350 patients for the longitudinal study starting from January 2006. The patients recruited should be medically fit for curative radiotherapy without distant metastasis before treatment. A total of 350 patients are expected to be recruited in 2008. Of these 350 patients, we expect to see about 35 patients who are found to have no residual local tumor with imaging and biopsy assessment at 8th week after radiotherapy with conventional follow-up, but subsequently develop isolated local recurrence within 5 years of follow-up. We would be able to know how many of these local recurrence will be benefited by early detection with molecular surveillance, their stage of recurrence and treatment outcome. Of these 350 patients, we expect to have about 20 patients with nodal recurrence.

Being tested
Nasopharngeal brush
Medical subject headings
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nasopharngeal brushDiagnostic test

    Also called Nasopharngeal swabs

    1. Baseline nasopharngeal brush before treatment
    2. Post-treatment reassessment of residual NPC

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of EBV and methylation marker genes in body fluids of both plasma and nasopharyngeal brush

    Measured: 12 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2017
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionDec 2018
  4. Study completionDec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
426 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03379610
Sponsor's protocol ID
NP swabs
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
10 Dec 2017
Last updated
30 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by The University of Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of EBV and methylation marker genes in body fluids of both plasma and nasopharyngeal brush (time frame: 12 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in