AzTrials
AzTrials

Socialised Disturbance of ConductSOCIALSORTINGNCT03379961

Identification and Research of Impacts of Social Categorization Process in Nurse Triage (SOCIAL SORTING)

An observational study of Socialised Disturbance of Conduct, run by University Hospital, Angers at 3 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Social Sorting is a: non interventional, observational, qualitative and multicenter research. It investigates three French emergency units in three French centers (UH of Angers, H of Le Mans, H of Laval). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Socialised Disturbance of Conduct
How many people
504 participants
Where
3 sitesFrance
Study dates
10 Jan 2018to 17 Feb 2018
How long will I take part?
2 Days
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Investigators wish a participation equal or superior to 50 percent of total number of nurses in centers. 504 triage nurses will be include, it represent 168 per center (one an hour during a week), 6 per periods (nights, days, weeks, weekends). We justify this choice by desire to produce qualitative and exhaustive results and necessity to respect constraints, practicability and cost.

Who may be able to join

  • all nurses who accept micro and all patients over the age of majority

Who cannot join

  • all nurses who do not accept micro and all minor patients

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

France3 sites
  • CHU Angers

    Angers

  • CH Laval

    Laval

  • CH Le Mans

    Le Mans

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Identification of Social Categorisation Process Who Intervene During Patient Nurse Triage and Research of Them Impacts in Cares.

Social Sorting is a: non interventional, observational, qualitative and multicenter research. It investigates three French emergency units in three French centers (UH of Angers, H of Le Mans, H of Laval).

It is a research based on nursing sciences and social-psychology and it proposes to study the process of social categorization that intervenes during triage nursing.

Read more

The process of social categorization has developped since the beginning of XX century (LIPPMANN, in 1922, in United States, he gave the first definition of stereotype// DURKHEIM, in France described step by step the individuals and the collectives representations.

During XX century the social psychology developed a lot of studs about group dynamics (social categorization, influence phenomenon, conspiracy theories,...) within several domains : industry, politics, public services as police, social units,... and also in healthcare (but always about a social categorisation in particular and often with a limited study of impacts).

Social Sorting includes all social categorization as possible and search to do a scientific evaluation of their impact.

Read the detailed description

Emergencies units are a special way to access at cares. These units must continually adapt their practice because it is impossible to predict patient's flow, number of hospital's available beds and kinds of emergencies (medical, chirurgical, psychiatric, social). Organization and quality of cares are based on a balance between competences and human attributes.

The first step in medical care takes place thanks to the nurse triage. They must summarize a lot of information about patients ( such as medical letters, firemen's transmission,...) and make a quick clinical exam. This action permits to determine an emergency degree and prioritize it. This activity is based on clinical categorization and clinical tools (scales of triage).

The clinical categorization is a professional competence (nurses learn what categorization is at school and develop it at hospital).In this research social categorization will be confronted with another type of categorization : the social categorization.

The latter it is very different categorization, in fact, it is shared by anybody (nonprofessionals of healthcare and professionals). The social categorization can be described like the phenomenon that permits to simplify the reading of the world. That also permits for anybody to define itself and define the one or more group membership. That process is continually in movement (social prejudices changes according to History, depending on the place of the world htat person lives,...).

The social categorization process has a real impact on action, thinking and relation with the world and the others persons.

The social categorization reveals its process in prejudice (sensitive dimension), stereotypes(cognitive dimension, stereotypes are organized around a central trait and others peripherals traits) and conducts to discrimination (behavior dimension) about origins, diseases, age,....Social categorization provides of naive theorization about social objects. For instance, a man who stereotypes woman with blond hair thinking "she is stupid" when he sees her in the street ( that it is a prejudice, a central trait) and this feeling conducts him to think "she is superficial, she does not work, she watches reality TV show everyday,..."(that it is a stereotype with peripherals traits). If this same man does not accept to help this woman if she needs him, it can considered like discrimination.

A lot of studies in public administrations have shown the important influence of social categorization on power which exists in any relations and the non-personalization as final response. In healthcare domain for instance, the research of WILLIAMS have shown existence of "bads patients".

Our first hypothesis is that process of social categorization exists and it has several faces(potentially negative). We also make the hypothesis that they have impacts on several aspects of medical care like : waiting time, management of pain,....We finally do the hypothesis that exist links between : the presence of process of social categorization in triage nursing and : individual traits (race, sex, age,...), specificities of any contexts.

Social Sorting wishes to identify with scientific measure the presence of social categorization process in triage nursing and it is unprecedented.

Then it is also to describe the impacts of this process on several parts of the medical care.

It could be interesting to improve nursing staff. It could be also interesting to patients because it is the equality of health offer which is asked in Social Sorting. In France, in 2015, 10 billions of patients came in emergency units. The study of feasibility wich was done before Social Sorting has shown that 20 percent of nurses sorting include social categorization nurse.

The results of this research could interest professional of healthcare domain and socio-psychologist.

Keywords
social categorization, nurse sorting, emergencies units

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of patient stigmatized during nurse triage

    It is the percent of patient stigmatised among the 504 contexts of triage nursing observed. To determine that, each situation of triage nursing will be examined by three analysts individually. After this time of individual analysis, there will be a time of collegial analysis. To consider that a nurse triage include social categorization it will take a collegial decision-making. A patient is considered like stigmatized when one or several social traits are mentioned during it triage nursing. For instance, if a fireman brings with a patient with twisted ankle and if he mentions that a patient is homosexual during his transmission. Homosexuality in this situation has not interest to taking care. It would have been different if this same patient were come to treat a sexual infection.

    Measured: 5 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Nature of social categorization

    the description of the social categorization process observed during the triage, its nature (including verbal, non-verbal and written categorization) and themes (sociocultural origin, sex, age...). To determine that, each situation of nurse triage will be examined by three analysts individually. After this time of individual analysis, there will be a time of collegial analysis. For each analysis, analysts will have to define if one social categorization is mentions on verbal only or in non-verbal too for instance.

    Measured: 5 months

  2. Risk factors of social categorization

    The research of links between the social categorization process in triage nursing and the risk factors which may increase the presence of it. The factors examined are : the context of sorting (flow of patients, people who are presents during the triage...) the specificities of any players in care relationship (sex, age, behavior...), the level of aggressiveness ( does it have a link between the presence of a social categorization and the level of aggressiveness ?). To determine that, analysts will compare if, for example, all patients coming for abdominal pain (with same clinical exam, same level of pain) during a sunday night will be sort similarly.

    Measured: 5 months

  3. Links between social categorisation and elements of medical care

    the research of links between the existence of a social categorization process during the sorting and elements of medical care (waiting time, quality and nature of installation, pain support,...). To determine that analysts will compare if all patients, for example, wich coming with dyspnea (with same clinical exam) will be evaluate with the same emergency level or if subsaharan patients will be evaluate diferently.

    Measured: 5 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2017
  2. Study start10 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion17 Feb 2018
  4. Study completion17 Feb 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
504 participants (actual)
Target duration
2 Days
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03379961
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHRIP-16-0206
Acronym
SOCIALSORTING
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
7 Dec 2017
Last updated
8 May 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Pilleron B, Douillet D, Furon Y, Haubertin C, Parot-Schinkel E, Vielle B, Roy PM, Poiroux L. Nurses' moral judgements during emergency department triage - A prospective mixed multicenter study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2024 Aug;75:101479. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101479. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

    PubMed 38936277

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Socialised Disturbance of Conduct, run by University Hospital, Angers at 3 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of patient stigmatized during nurse triage (time frame: 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03379961, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in