CancerNCT03382171
The Impact of a Home Delivered Meal Service in Cancer Patients During Chemotherapy
A study testing FoodforCare at home in people with Cancer and Malnutrition, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Cancer patients receiving treatment such as chemotherapy experience a variety of symptoms that interfere with their appetite and their ability to eat and enjoy meals. Therefore, adapting meals in a way that responds to these symptoms might be a good strategy to improve patient satisfaction, nutritional status and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer, Malnutrition
- What is being tested?
- FoodforCare at home
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 17 Nov 2017to 22 May 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age 18 years or older
- diagnosed with cancer
- receiving chemotherapy according to a minimum schedule of every 2 weeks
- living within a 40 km radius around the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
- written informed consent
Who cannot join
- renal insufficiency (MDRD-GFR (glomerular filtration rate) < 60ml/min and/or proteinuria)*
- dementia or any other condition which makes it impossible to fill out questionnaires correctly
- unable to understand or speak Dutch
- depending on artificial nutrition in the form of Oral Nutritional Supplements, tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition
- swallowing or passage problems
- proteinuria is defined in case of a protein creatinine ratio > 0.5g/10mmol or an albuminuria > 300mg/day. This is checked by default before the start of chemotherapy by the treating physician to decide whether or not the patient is eligible for receiving chemotherapy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Impact of FoodforCare at Home on Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.
Cancer patients receiving treatment such as chemotherapy experience a variety of symptoms that interfere with their appetite and their ability to eat and enjoy meals. Therefore, adapting meals in a way that responds to these symptoms might be a good strategy to improve patient satisfaction, nutritional status and hence, quality of life. In this vein, the investigators hypothesize that meals from FoodforCare at Home will contribute to the quality of life of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy when compared to usual care.
Read the detailed description
Cancer patients receiving treatment such as chemotherapy experience a variety of symptoms that interfere with their appetite and their ability to eat and enjoy meals. Several studies suggest that nutritional intake increases when the patient is satisfied about the quality of the meals. Therefore, adapting meals in a way that responds to these symptoms might be a good strategy to improve patient satisfaction, nutritional status and hence, quality of life. In this vein, the investigators hypothesize that meals from FoodforCare at Home will contribute to the quality of life of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy when compared to usual care. Also, the investigators expect that this strategy will have a positive effect on patient satisfaction, other nutrition-related issues, including nausea and vomiting, on nutritional intake per se and hence, on the nutritional status. Additional benefits might include reduced use of medication, especially anti-emetics.
- Conditions
- Cancer, Malnutrition
- Being tested
- FoodforCare at home
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FoodforCare at homeOther
Five small protein rich meals that will be delivered twice a week for 3 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| FoodforCare group | Experimental | The intervention group will receive meals from FoodforCare at Home. The FoodforCare at Home concept consists of five to six small protein and energy enriched meals that will be delivered twice a week. After an individual intake, the composition of the dishes will be tailored to the needs of the patient in terms of composition, diet, taste, flavor and portion size. Besides the meals, patients in the intervention group will also receive an information leaflet about the importance of protein during treatment and how to reach their protein requirements. Receives: Other: FoodforCare at home |
| Usual care group | No intervention | The control group will continue their usual diet for 3 weeks and have no restrictions to their diet. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Quality of life and overall health status
EORTC-Quality of Life-C30 questionnaire filled in before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and after chemotherapy. This questionnaire consists of 30 questions and a total score ranging from 0-100 is calculated based on these questions. The higher the score, the higher the quality of life of the patient.
Measured: 3.5 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Nutritional intake
2-day food diary filled in before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and after chemotherapy.
Measured: 3.5 months
Muscle strength
Hand grip strength (kg) performed before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and once after chemotherapy.
Measured: 3.5 months
Nutritional status
Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) performed before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and once after chemotherapy.
Measured: 3.5 months
Functional score
Karnofsky scale performed before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and once after chemotherapy. This status is based on 11 levels and ranges from 0, indicating death, to 100, indicating no complaints or evidence of disease.
Measured: 3.5 months
Quality of life caregiver
Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) filled in before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and once after chemotherapy. This questionnaire consist of 24 items in five subscales. All items are statements with a 5-point Likert scale (completely disagree-completely agree). All subscale scores are the average of the item scores, ranging from 1 to 5. There is no total score.
Measured: 3.5 months
Medication use
Diary filled in during 3 weeks between 2 cycles of chemotherapy
Measured: 3 weeks
Symptoms
Symptom diary filled in during 3 weeks between 2 cycles of chemotherapy
Measured: 3 weeks
Patient satisfaction
Questionnaire filled in after 3 weeks of receiving meals. This is a self-developed questionnaire which does not have a total score. Each question will be analyzed separately. Questions consist of grading from 0-10 (the higher, the better the outcome) or with a 5-point Likert scale (completely disagree-completely agree).
Measured: 1 day
Functional status
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) performed before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and once after chemotherapy.
Measured: 3.5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2017
- Study start17 Nov 2017
- Primary completion22 May 2020
- Study completion22 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Manon van den Berg, PhD, Study chair, Radboud University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03382171
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2016-3044
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 9 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Coa KI, Epstein JB, Ettinger D, Jatoi A, McManus K, Platek ME, Price W, Stewart M, Teknos TN, Moskowitz B. The impact of cancer treatment on the diets and food preferences of patients receiving outpatient treatment. Nutr Cancer. 2015;67(2):339-53. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2015.990577. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
PubMed 25664980Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 May 23.
PubMed 17509812Campbell AD, Godfryd A, Buys DR, Locher JL. Does Participation in Home-Delivered Meals Programs Improve Outcomes for Older Adults? Results of a Systematic Review. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;34(2):124-67. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2015.1038463.
PubMed 26106985Dashti HS, Mogensen KM. Recommending Small, Frequent Meals in the Clinical Care of Adults: A Review of the Evidence and Important Considerations. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;32(3):365-377. doi: 10.1177/0884533616662995. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
PubMed 27589258Marin Caro MM, Laviano A, Pichard C. Nutritional intervention and quality of life in adult oncology patients. Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun;26(3):289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
PubMed 17368656Leedo E, Gade J, Granov S, Mellemgaard A, Klausen TW, Rask K, Astrup A. The Effect of a Home Delivery Meal Service of Energy- and Protein-Rich Meals on Quality of Life in Malnourished Outpatients Suffering from Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutr Cancer. 2017 Apr;69(3):444-453. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1283421. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
PubMed 28287324IJmker-Hemink V, Lize N, Beijer S, Raijmakers N, Wanten G, van den Berg M. Lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial on a home delivered meal service in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a pilot study. BMC Nutr. 2021 Feb 16;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40795-021-00407-5.
PubMed 33588932
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Impact of FoodforCare at Home on Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03382171
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2016-3044
- Conditions
- Cancer, Malnutrition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Nov 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cancer patients receiving treatment such as chemotherapy experience a variety of symptoms that interfere with their appetite and their ability to eat and enjoy meals. Therefore, adapting meals in a way that responds to these symptoms might be a good strategy to improve patient satisfaction, nutritional status and hence, quality of life. In this vein, the investigators hypothesize that meals from FoodforCare at Home will contribute to the quality of life of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy when compared to usual care.
Detailed description
Cancer patients receiving treatment such as chemotherapy experience a variety of symptoms that interfere with their appetite and their ability to eat and enjoy meals. Several studies suggest that nutritional intake increases when the patient is satisfied about the quality of the meals. Therefore, adapting meals in a way that responds to these symptoms might be a good strategy to improve patient satisfaction, nutritional status and hence, quality of life. In this vein, the investigators hypothesize that meals from FoodforCare at Home will contribute to the quality of life of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy when compared to usual care. Also, the investigators expect that this strategy will have a positive effect on patient satisfaction, other nutrition-related issues, including nausea and vomiting, on nutritional intake per se and hence, on the nutritional status. Additional benefits might include reduced use of medication, especially anti-emetics.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| FoodforCare group | Experimental | Other: FoodforCare at homeThe intervention group will receive meals from FoodforCare at Home. The FoodforCare at Home concept consists of five to six small protein and energy enriched meals that will be delivered twice a week. After an individual intake, the composition of the dishes will be tailored to the needs of the patient in terms of composition, diet, taste, flavor and portion size. Besides the meals, patients in the intervention group will also receive an information leaflet about the importance of protein during treatment and how to reach their protein requirements. |
| Usual care group | No intervention | –The control group will continue their usual diet for 3 weeks and have no restrictions to their diet. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- age 18 years or older
- diagnosed with cancer
- receiving chemotherapy according to a minimum schedule of every 2 weeks
- living within a 40 km radius around the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
- written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- renal insufficiency (MDRD-GFR (glomerular filtration rate) < 60ml/min and/or proteinuria)*
- dementia or any other condition which makes it impossible to fill out questionnaires correctly
- unable to understand or speak Dutch
- depending on artificial nutrition in the form of Oral Nutritional Supplements, tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition
- swallowing or passage problems
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FoodforCare at homeFive small protein rich meals that will be delivered twice a week for 3 weeks. | Other | FoodforCare group |
Primary outcome
Quality of life and overall health status
Time frame: 3.5 months
EORTC-Quality of Life-C30 questionnaire filled in before chemotherapy, two times during chemotherapy and after chemotherapy. This questionnaire consists of 30 questions and a total score ranging from 0-100 is calculated based on these questions. The higher the score, the higher the quality of life of the patient.
9 secondary outcomes
Nutritional intake
Time frame: 3.5 months
Muscle strength
Time frame: 3.5 months
Nutritional status
Time frame: 3.5 months
Functional score
Time frame: 3.5 months
Quality of life caregiver
Time frame: 3.5 months
Medication use
Time frame: 3 weeks
Symptoms
Time frame: 3 weeks
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 1 day
Functional status
Time frame: 3.5 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 25664980Coa KI, Epstein JB, Ettinger D, Jatoi A, McManus K, Platek ME, Price W, Stewart M, Teknos TN, Moskowitz B. The impact of cancer treatment on the diets and food preferences of patients receiving outpatient treatment. Nutr Cancer. 2015;67(2):339-53. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2015.990577. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
- Background: PubMed 17509812Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom prevalence in patients with incurable cancer: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jul;34(1):94-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.10.015. Epub 2007 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 26106985Campbell AD, Godfryd A, Buys DR, Locher JL. Does Participation in Home-Delivered Meals Programs Improve Outcomes for Older Adults? Results of a Systematic Review. J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;34(2):124-67. doi: 10.1080/21551197.2015.1038463.
- Background: PubMed 27589258Dashti HS, Mogensen KM. Recommending Small, Frequent Meals in the Clinical Care of Adults: A Review of the Evidence and Important Considerations. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;32(3):365-377. doi: 10.1177/0884533616662995. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 17368656Marin Caro MM, Laviano A, Pichard C. Nutritional intervention and quality of life in adult oncology patients. Clin Nutr. 2007 Jun;26(3):289-301. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 28287324Leedo E, Gade J, Granov S, Mellemgaard A, Klausen TW, Rask K, Astrup A. The Effect of a Home Delivery Meal Service of Energy- and Protein-Rich Meals on Quality of Life in Malnourished Outpatients Suffering from Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutr Cancer. 2017 Apr;69(3):444-453. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1283421. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33588932IJmker-Hemink V, Lize N, Beijer S, Raijmakers N, Wanten G, van den Berg M. Lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial on a home delivered meal service in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a pilot study. BMC Nutr. 2021 Feb 16;7(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40795-021-00407-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Manon van den Berg, PhD study chair
Radboud University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FoodforCare at home in people with Cancer and Malnutrition, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Quality of life and overall health status (time frame: 3.5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03382171, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Oct 2020.