Breast CancerFoRtitudeNCT03384992
Targeted eHealth Intervention to Reduce Fear of Recurrence Among Breast Cancer Survivors
A study testing Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Cognitive restructuring and Scheduled worry practice in people with Breast Cancer and Fear of Cancer, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences.
Trial summary
The FoRtitude trial aims to evaluate an eHealth intervention designed to teach breast cancer survivors strategies to manage anxiety about cancer recurrence. The eHealth intervention includes educational content and interactive tools, designed to teach coping strategies and/or inert content, depending on the study… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Fear of Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Cognitive restructuring and Scheduled worry practice
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 215 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to 5 Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Female
- Diagnosis of breast cancer, non-metastatic, stage I-III
- Completed primary treatment for breast cancer (surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, current hormonal treatment allowable)
- No current evidence of disease
- Greater than 1 year post treatment (for phase I interviews and usability testing)
- Between 1 and 10 years post-treatment (for Phase I field testing and Phase II)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Good overall functional status as evidenced by ECOG Performance Status < 3
- At least 18 years of age (for Phase I only)
- At least 19 years of age (for Phase 2 only)
- Able to speak and read English
- Able to provide informed consent
- Clinically significant FoR, measured by the 9-item FCRI severity scale using established cut-off
- Patients may be eligible for Phase I and Phase IV of the study regardless of their FCRI score
- Cellular telephone with SMS messaging capability and access to a computer with broadband Internet access
- Self-reported familiarity with the Internet per Internet Usage Patterns Measure
- For Phase III, participants must have participated in Phase II
- For Phase IV, participants must be a self-identified African American breast cancer survivor that is willing to review site content and provide feedback in addition to meeting inclusion criteria above (with exception of FCRI severity scale score)
Who cannot join
- Visual, hearing, voice, or motor impairment that would prevent completion of study procedures
- Diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, dissociative disorder, or other diagnosis for which participation in this trial is either inappropriate or dangerous
- Hazardous substance or alcohol use
- Suicidal ideation, plan, intent
- Dementia
- Or if the participant is deemed ineligible by the investigators for reasons not otherwise specified.
About this study
Official title: Targeted eHealth Intervention to Reduce Fear of Recurrence Among Breast Cancer Survivors: The FoRtitude Trial
The FoRtitude trial aims to evaluate an eHealth intervention designed to teach breast cancer survivors strategies to manage anxiety about cancer recurrence. The eHealth intervention includes educational content and interactive tools, designed to teach coping strategies and/or inert content, depending on the study participant's randomization assignment. The FoRtitude study will examine whether three coping strategies (relaxation training, cognitive restructuring, worry practice) are more effective than general health-related content in reducing fear of cancer recurrence.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the FoRtitude trial is to develop and evaluate a targeted eHealth intervention designed to teach breast cancer survivors (BCS) coping strategies to manage fear about cancer recurrence (FoR). FoRtitude, a web-based program with interactive text messaging capabilities, was created to deliver a targeted intervention for BCS with moderate to severe FoR. FoRtitude consists of didactic content presented in written and video-based formats and interactive tools, designed to teach coping strategies. Commonly used cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) techniques were tailored to the management of FoR and included diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, cognitive restructuring, and scheduled worry practice. Participants are encouraged to use the FoRtitude site several times per week over a period of 4 weeks. The investigators employed principles of user-centered design to create the FoRtitude website and incorporated feedback from 17 BCS to refine site content and improve FoRtitude usability.
After refining the FoRtitude site, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to individually evaluate three coping strategies; each coping strategy will be compared to health management content. Inert content includes general health information and managing comorbid illnesses, information on general nutrition, and information on nutritional topics of interest to BCS. Half of the participants will be randomized to receive telecoaching, which included 3-4 telephone-based brief sessions with a motivational interviewer, aimed at improving adherence to use of the FoRtitude site. Participants will complete questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks (immediately after completing the FoRtitude site) and at 8 weeks.
Study hypotheses:
- BCS randomized to Relaxation training will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to inert (health management) content
- BCS randomized to Cognitive restructuring will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to inert (health management) content
- BCS randomized to Scheduled Worry practice will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to inert (health management) content
- BCS randomized to receive Telecoaching will demonstrate higher adherence to using the FoRtitude site and will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention compared to BCS randomized to no Telecoaching
- BCS randomized to a higher number of coping strategies will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to receive all inert content or fewer coping strategies (dose-response effect)
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Fear of Cancer
- Being tested
- Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Cognitive restructuring, Scheduled worry practice, Telephone coaching, Usual care
- Keywords
- Fear of Cancer Recurrence, ehealth interventions, PROMIS, FoR
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Pathophobia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxationOther
Education on physiological effects of anxiety, instructions in diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation techniques, and audio-recordings 5-15 minutes in length that provide guided relaxation exercises (autogenic, imagery-based and progressive muscle relaxation).
Cognitive restructuringOther
Education on the thought-emotion connection and exercises designed to better understand cognitions associated with increased anxiety and tools to evaluate and replace anxiety-generating cognitions. Includes an interactive tool (thought record) participants complete to facilitate this process.
Scheduled worry practiceOther
Education on the association between avoidance and increased anxiety, and instructions on actively thinking about feared events to reduce avoidance and engage healthy coping strategies. Interactive tool includes a video-based guided worry practice session and an interactive worksheet and timer.
Telephone coachingOther
BCS will receive 5 TeleCoaching calls over a period of 4 weeks, to include one introductory phone call, followed by 4 calls focused each week on the current CSM; if the participant is not randomized to a CSM, TeleCoaching will provide reflective listening and encouragement.
Usual careOther
Includes general health, diet-general information and diet-BCSS (breast cancer survivor-specific) information.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: general health for week 1, diet-general information for week 2, and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Telephone coaching; Other: Usual care |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the one of the following usual care conditions: general health for week 1, diet-general information for week 2, and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Receives: Other: Usual care |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Telephone coaching; Other: Usual care |
| Group 4 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Receives: Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Usual care |
| Group 5 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: scheduled worry practice for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Scheduled worry practice; Other: Telephone coaching; Other: Usual care |
| Group 6 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: scheduled worry practice for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Receives: Other: Scheduled worry practice; Other: Usual care |
| Group 7 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, worry practice for week 2, and General Health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Scheduled worry practice; Other: Telephone coaching; Other: Usual care |
| Group 8 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, scheduled worry practice for week 2, and General Health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Receives: Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Scheduled worry practice; Other: Usual care |
| Group 9 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, general health for week 2, and Diet - General and BCSS for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Telephone coaching; Other: Usual care |
| Group 10 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, general health for week 2, and Diet - General and BCSS for week 3. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Usual care |
| Group 11 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, cognitive restructuring for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Telephone coaching; Other: Usual care |
| Group 12 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, cognitive restructuring for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Usual care |
| Group 13 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, worry practice for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Scheduled worry practice; Other: Telephone coaching; Other: Usual care |
| Group 14 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, scheduled worry practice for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Scheduled worry practice; Other: Usual care |
| Group 15 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, worry practice for week 2, and cognitive restructuring for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Scheduled worry practice; Other: Telephone coaching |
| Group 16 | Experimental | Participants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, scheduled worry practice for week 2, and cognitive restructuring for week 3. Receives: Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation; Other: Cognitive restructuring; Other: Scheduled worry practice |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI) total score (minus Coping and Reassurance subscales)
Questionnaire aims to better understand the experience of worries about cancer recurrence. Scaled from 1-4 with 4 being "all the time" and 1 being "never". The FCRI is the only FoR measure validated using interview to define 'caseness' and has demonstrated reliability and validity with English speaking survivors. FCRI total score to be calculated without including the Coping and Reassurance subscales defined a priori and determined by FoR theoretical model.
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Secondary outcomes (9)
Impact of Events Scale - Revised
Questionnaire to assess illness-related distress and post-truamatic type anxiety
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Concerns about Recurrence Scale (CARS) - 4 item severity score
Questionnaire to assess concerns about recurrence among BCS
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Anxiety Computer adaptive test
Questions administered using a computer adaptive test-based algorithm to assess overall anxiety
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Depression Computer adaptive test
Questions administered using a computer adaptive test-based algorithm to assess depression
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Computer adaptive test
Questions administered using a computer adaptive test-based algorithm to assess sleep disturbances
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Fatigue Computer adaptive test
Questions administered using a computer adaptive test-based algorithm to assess fatigue
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Global Health
Questionnaire to assess overall health and health-related quality of life
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Applied Cognition Computer adaptive test
Questions administered using a computer adaptive test-based algorithm to assess patient-reported cognitive impairments
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Breast Cancer Self-Efficacy scale (BCSE)
Questionnaire to assess confidence in one's ability to manage breast cancer
Measured: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Dec 2017
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completion5 Dec 2015
- Study completion5 Dec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Wake Forest University Health SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Model description
- FoRtitude includes three CSMs: (1) diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, (2) cognitive restructuring, and (3) scheduled worry practice. The fourth intervention component is (4) telephone coaching. We assigned two levels (yes, no) to each component. Evaluating individual and combined intervention components, each with two levels, results in a classic full factorial design with 16 (2 x 2 x 2 x 2) experimental conditions
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lynne Wagner, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03384992
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00036679
- Other IDs
- 1R21CA173193-01A1
- Acronym
- FoRtitude
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Beeler DM, Jeter E, Leitzelar BN, Price SN, Hall DL, Raper PJ, Levine BJ, Dunsmore VJ, Tooze JA, Duffecy J, Victorson D, Gradishar W, Saphner T, Smith ML, Penedo F, Mohr DC, Cella D, Wagner LI. A qualitative examination of cognitive behavioral therapy strategies and health management content to reduce fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer survivors: Results from the FoRtitude study. J Health Psychol. 2026 Mar;31(3):1164-1178. doi: 10.1177/13591053251354867. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
PubMed 40721359Lucas AR, Pan JH, Ip EH, Hall DL, Tooze JA, Levine B, Mohr DC, Penedo FJ, Cella D, Wagner LI. Validation of the Lee-Jones theoretical model of fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer survivors using a structural equation modeling approach. Psychooncology. 2023 Feb;32(2):256-265. doi: 10.1002/pon.6076. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
PubMed 36468339
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Targeted eHealth Intervention to Reduce Fear of Recurrence Among Breast Cancer Survivors: The FoRtitude Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03384992
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FoRtitude / IRB00036679
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Fear of Cancer
- Keywords
- Fear of Cancer Recurrence, ehealth interventions, PROMIS, FoR
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 215 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The FoRtitude trial aims to evaluate an eHealth intervention designed to teach breast cancer survivors strategies to manage anxiety about cancer recurrence. The eHealth intervention includes educational content and interactive tools, designed to teach coping strategies and/or inert content, depending on the study participant's randomization assignment. The FoRtitude study will examine whether three coping strategies (relaxation training, cognitive restructuring, worry practice) are more effective than general health-related content in reducing fear of cancer recurrence.
Detailed description
The purpose of the FoRtitude trial is to develop and evaluate a targeted eHealth intervention designed to teach breast cancer survivors (BCS) coping strategies to manage fear about cancer recurrence (FoR). FoRtitude, a web-based program with interactive text messaging capabilities, was created to deliver a targeted intervention for BCS with moderate to severe FoR. FoRtitude consists of didactic content presented in written and video-based formats and interactive tools, designed to teach coping strategies. Commonly used cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) techniques were tailored to the management of FoR and included diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, cognitive restructuring, and scheduled worry practice. Participants are encouraged to use the FoRtitude site several times per week over a period of 4 weeks. The investigators employed principles of user-centered design to create the FoRtitude website and incorporated feedback from 17 BCS to refine site content and improve FoRtitude usability.
After refining the FoRtitude site, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to individually evaluate three coping strategies; each coping strategy will be compared to health management content. Inert content includes general health information and managing comorbid illnesses, information on general nutrition, and information on nutritional topics of interest to BCS. Half of the participants will be randomized to receive telecoaching, which included 3-4 telephone-based brief sessions with a motivational interviewer, aimed at improving adherence to use of the FoRtitude site. Participants will complete questionnaires at baseline, 4 weeks (immediately after completing the FoRtitude site) and at 8 weeks.
Study hypotheses:
- BCS randomized to Relaxation training will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to inert (health management) content
- BCS randomized to Cognitive restructuring will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to inert (health management) content
- BCS randomized to Scheduled Worry practice will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to inert (health management) content
- BCS randomized to receive Telecoaching will demonstrate higher adherence to using the FoRtitude site and will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention compared to BCS randomized to no Telecoaching
- BCS randomized to a higher number of coping strategies will report a greater reduction in fear of cancer recurrence from pre-post intervention than BCS randomized to receive all inert content or fewer coping strategies (dose-response effect)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 16
- Model description
- FoRtitude includes three CSMs: (1) diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, (2) cognitive restructuring, and (3) scheduled worry practice. The fourth intervention component is (4) telephone coaching. We assigned two levels (yes, no) to each component. Evaluating individual and combined intervention components, each with two levels, results in a classic full factorial design with 16 (2 x 2 x 2 x 2) experimental conditions
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Other: Telephone coaching, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: general health for week 1, diet-general information for week 2, and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the one of the following usual care conditions: general health for week 1, diet-general information for week 2, and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Telephone coaching, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 4 | Experimental | Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. |
| Group 5 | Experimental | Other: Scheduled worry practice, Other: Telephone coaching, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: scheduled worry practice for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 6 | Experimental | Other: Scheduled worry practice, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: scheduled worry practice for week 1, general health for week 2, and diet-general information and diet-BCSS information (breast cancer survivor-specific) for week 3. |
| Group 7 | Experimental | Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Scheduled worry practice, Other: Telephone coaching, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, worry practice for week 2, and General Health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 8 | Experimental | Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Scheduled worry practice, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: cognitive restructuring for week 1, scheduled worry practice for week 2, and General Health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. |
| Group 9 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Telephone coaching, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, general health for week 2, and Diet - General and BCSS for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 10 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, general health for week 2, and Diet - General and BCSS for week 3. |
| Group 11 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Telephone coaching, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, cognitive restructuring for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 12 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, cognitive restructuring for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. |
| Group 13 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Scheduled worry practice, Other: Telephone coaching, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, worry practice for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 14 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Scheduled worry practice, Other: Usual careParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, scheduled worry practice for week 2, and General health and Diet (General and BCSS) for week 3. |
| Group 15 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Scheduled worry practice, Other: Telephone coachingParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, worry practice for week 2, and cognitive restructuring for week 3. Telephone coaching was given. |
| Group 16 | Experimental | Other: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Other: Cognitive restructuring, Other: Scheduled worry practiceParticipants were exposed to the following conditions: Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation for week 1, scheduled worry practice for week 2, and cognitive restructuring for week 3. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Female
- Diagnosis of breast cancer, non-metastatic, stage I-III
- Completed primary treatment for breast cancer (surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, current hormonal treatment allowable)
- No current evidence of disease
- Good overall functional status as evidenced by ECOG Performance Status < 3
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Visual, hearing, voice, or motor impairment that would prevent completion of study procedures
- Diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, dissociative disorder, or other diagnosis for which participation in this trial is either inappropriate or dangerous
- Hazardous substance or alcohol use
- Suicidal ideation, plan, intent
- Dementia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxationEducation on physiological effects of anxiety, instructions in diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation techniques, and audio-recordings 5-15 minutes in length that provide guided relaxation exercises (autogenic, imagery-based and progressive muscle relaxation). | Other | Group 10, Group 11, Group 12, Group 13, Group 14, Group 15, Group 16, Group 9 |
| Cognitive restructuringEducation on the thought-emotion connection and exercises designed to better understand cognitions associated with increased anxiety and tools to evaluate and replace anxiety-generating cognitions. Includes an interactive tool (thought record) participants complete to facilitate this process. | Other | Group 11, Group 12, Group 15, Group 16, Group 3, Group 4, Group 7, Group 8 |
| Scheduled worry practiceEducation on the association between avoidance and increased anxiety, and instructions on actively thinking about feared events to reduce avoidance and engage healthy coping strategies. Interactive tool includes a video-based guided worry practice session and an interactive worksheet and timer. | Other | Group 13, Group 14, Group 15, Group 16, Group 5, Group 6, Group 7, Group 8 |
| Telephone coachingBCS will receive 5 TeleCoaching calls over a period of 4 weeks, to include one introductory phone call, followed by 4 calls focused each week on the current CSM; if the participant is not randomized to a CSM, TeleCoaching will provide reflective listening and encouragement. | Other | Group 1, Group 11, Group 13, Group 15, Group 3, Group 5, Group 7, Group 9 |
| Usual careIncludes general health, diet-general information and diet-BCSS (breast cancer survivor-specific) information. | Other | Group 1, Group 10, Group 11, Group 12, Group 13, Group 14, Group 2, Group 3, Group 4, Group 5, Group 6, Group 7, Group 8, Group 9 |
Primary outcome
Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI) total score (minus Coping and Reassurance subscales)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Questionnaire aims to better understand the experience of worries about cancer recurrence. Scaled from 1-4 with 4 being "all the time" and 1 being "never". The FCRI is the only FoR measure validated using interview to define 'caseness' and has demonstrated reliability and validity with English speaking survivors. FCRI total score to be calculated without including the Coping and Reassurance subscales defined a priori and determined by FoR theoretical model.
9 secondary outcomes
Impact of Events Scale - Revised
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Concerns about Recurrence Scale (CARS) - 4 item severity score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Anxiety Computer adaptive test
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Depression Computer adaptive test
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Computer adaptive test
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Fatigue Computer adaptive test
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Global Health
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
PROMIS Applied Cognition Computer adaptive test
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Breast Cancer Self-Efficacy scale (BCSE)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40721359Beeler DM, Jeter E, Leitzelar BN, Price SN, Hall DL, Raper PJ, Levine BJ, Dunsmore VJ, Tooze JA, Duffecy J, Victorson D, Gradishar W, Saphner T, Smith ML, Penedo F, Mohr DC, Cella D, Wagner LI. A qualitative examination of cognitive behavioral therapy strategies and health management content to reduce fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer survivors: Results from the FoRtitude study. J Health Psychol. 2026 Mar;31(3):1164-1178. doi: 10.1177/13591053251354867. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36468339Lucas AR, Pan JH, Ip EH, Hall DL, Tooze JA, Levine B, Mohr DC, Penedo FJ, Cella D, Wagner LI. Validation of the Lee-Jones theoretical model of fear of cancer recurrence among breast cancer survivors using a structural equation modeling approach. Psychooncology. 2023 Feb;32(2):256-265. doi: 10.1002/pon.6076. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lynne Wagner, Ph.D. principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diaphragmatic breathing and relaxation, Cognitive restructuring and Scheduled worry practice in people with Breast Cancer and Fear of Cancer, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI) total score (minus Coping and Reassurance subscales) (time frame: Baseline to Week 8 change score). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03384992, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2018.