AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood GlucoseNCT03387345

Barley and Rice Mixture Effects on Blood Glucose

A study testing 100% steel cut barley, 100% barley flakes and 50/50 rice-barley mix in people with Blood Glucose and Dietary Fiber, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this research was to investigate 5 different formulations of whole grain barley and refined white rice against a control of white bread on post-prandial glycemic response, as well as self-reported hunger/satiety in a randomized cross-over trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Blood Glucose, Dietary Fiber, Hunger
What is being tested?
100% steel cut barley, 100% barley flakes and 50/50 rice-barley mix
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
39 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Feb 2017to 18 Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy, English speaking adults;
  • BMI between 18 and 30 kg/m2

Who cannot join

  • History of GI malabsorption diseases, food allergy or intolerance to gluten;
  • Prediabetes, and/or diabetes, and/or treatment with diabetic medications for any reason;
  • Hypertension, hypothyroidism and other chronic disease that affects nutrient metabolism;
  • Any women pregnant or lactating, or expecting to become pregnant during the study;
  • Individuals with a history of bleeding disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Arizona Biomedical Collaborative

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85004

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: β-glucan Rich Barley and Rice Mixes and Post-prandial Glycemia - a Dose Response Study

The purpose of this research was to investigate 5 different formulations of whole grain barley and refined white rice against a control of white bread on post-prandial glycemic response, as well as self-reported hunger/satiety in a randomized cross-over trial.

Read the detailed description

Beta-glucan-rich barley has been shown to improve glycemic response, reduce hunger and increase satiety. Nutrient-dense grain mixtures that include a new cultivar of barley (Sustagrain, Ardent Mills, LLC) with exceptionally high dietary fiber content may help individuals meet their dietary fiber needs while minimizing the rapid increase in blood glucose following the consumption of a refined grain product. The primary objective of this study was to compare the effects of five different test meals containing varying amounts of whole-grain barley and refined white rice to white bread on post-prandial blood glucose concentrations. A secondary aim was to evaluate changes in self-reported hunger and satiety following the consumption of each treatment. This study was a single-site, blinded, randomized crossover trial among 24 healthy adults. Each participant consumed the following treatments: 100% Sustagrain barley flakes, 100% Sustagrain steel cut barley , an 80/20 rice-steel cut Sustagrain barley mix, a 50/50 rice-steel cut Sustagrain barley mix, 100% rice, and white bread.

Being tested
100% steel cut barley, 100% barley flakes, 50/50 rice-barley mix, 80/20 rice-barley mix, 100% rice
Keywords
glucose, dietary fiber, glycemia, whole grain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 100% steel cut barleyOther

    25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via steel cut Sustagrain barley (Ardent Mills, LLC).

  • 100% barley flakesOther

    25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via Sustagrain barley flakes (Ardent Mills, LLC).

  • 50/50 rice-barley mixOther

    25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via a 50/50 mixture (by weight) of Goya medium grain white rice and steel cut Sustagrain barley (Ardent Mills, LLC).

  • 80/20 rice-barley mixOther

    25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via a 80/20 mixture (by weight) of Goya medium grain white rice and steel cut Sustagrain barley (Ardent Mills, LLC).

  • 100% riceOther

    25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via Goya medium grain white rice

  • white breadOther

    25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via Sara Lee Classic White Bread (Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc.)

Study groups in NCT03387345
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
bread-50/50-steelcut-80/20-flake-riceExperimental25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via (1) white bread, followed by (2) 50/50 rice-barley mix, followed by (3) 100% steel cut barley, followed by (4) 80/20 rice-barley mix, followed by (5) 100% barley flakes, followed by (6) 100% rice
Receives: Other: 100% steel cut barley; Other: 100% barley flakes; Other: 50/50 rice-barley mix; Other: 80/20 rice-barley mix; Other: 100% rice; Other: white bread
50/50-steelcut-80/20-flake-rice-breadExperimental25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via (1) 50/50 rice-barley mix, followed by (2) 100% steel cut barley, followed by (3) 80/20 rice-barley mix, followed by (4) 100% barley flakes, followed by (5) 100% rice, followed by (6) white bread
Receives: Other: 100% steel cut barley; Other: 100% barley flakes; Other: 50/50 rice-barley mix; Other: 80/20 rice-barley mix; Other: 100% rice; Other: white bread
steelcut-80/20-flake-rice-bread-50/50Experimental25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via (1) 100% steel cut barley, followed by (2) 80/20 rice-barley mix, followed by (3) 100% barley flakes, followed by (4) 100% rice, followed by (5) white bread, followed by (6) 50/50 rice-barley mix
Receives: Other: 100% steel cut barley; Other: 100% barley flakes; Other: 50/50 rice-barley mix; Other: 80/20 rice-barley mix; Other: 100% rice; Other: white bread
80/20-flake-rice-bread-50/50-steelcutExperimental25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via (1) 80/20 rice-barley mix, followed by (2) 100% barley flakes, followed by (3) 100% rice, followed by (4) white bread, followed by (5) 50/50 rice-barley mix, followed by (6) 100% steel cut barley
Receives: Other: 100% steel cut barley; Other: 100% barley flakes; Other: 50/50 rice-barley mix; Other: 80/20 rice-barley mix; Other: 100% rice; Other: white bread
flake-rice-bread-50/50-steelcut-80/20Experimental25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via (1) 100% barley flakes, followed by (2) 100% rice, followed by (3) white bread, followed by (4) 50/50 rice-barley mix, followed by (5) 100% steel cut barley, followed by (6) 80/20 rice-barley mix
Receives: Other: 100% steel cut barley; Other: 100% barley flakes; Other: 50/50 rice-barley mix; Other: 80/20 rice-barley mix; Other: 100% rice; Other: white bread
rice-bread-50/50-steelcut-80/20-flakeExperimental25 g of available carbohydrate was delivered to participants via (1) 100% rice, followed by (2) white bread, followed by (3) 50/50 rice-barley mix, followed by (4) 100% steel cut barley, followed by (5) 80/20 rice-barley mix, followed by (6) 100% barley flakes
Receives: Other: 100% steel cut barley; Other: 100% barley flakes; Other: 50/50 rice-barley mix; Other: 80/20 rice-barley mix; Other: 100% rice; Other: white bread

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-prandial glycemia

    Incremental area under the curve(iAUC) for plasma glucose concentrations were measured at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min using the trapezoidal method to evaluate the glycemic response to each grain treatment.

    Measured: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45min , 60 min, 90 min, 120 min

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Self-reported hunger

    Visual analog scales were used to evaluate self-reported feelings of hunger using the question "How hungry do you feel?" The scale consisted of a 100-millimeter line with anchors "I am not hungry at all" and "I have never been more hungry" at 0 and 100 millimeters, respectively. Lower numbers represent low feelings of hunger while larger values are characteristic of greater hunger. Hunger was assessed at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes to evaluate changes across time for each grain treatment.

    Measured: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min

  2. Self-reported satiety

    Visual analog scales were used to evaluate self-reported feelings of satiety using the question "How satisfied do you feel?" The scale consisted of a 100-millimeter line with anchors "I am completely empty" and "I cannot eat another bite" at 0 and 100 millimeters, respectively. Lower numbers represent low feelings of satiety while larger values are characteristic of greater satiety. Satiety was assessed at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes to evaluate changes across time for each grain treatment.

    Measured: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min

  3. Self-reported fullness

    Visual analog scales were used to evaluate self-reported feelings of fullness using the question "How full do you feel?" The scale consisted of a 100-millimeter line with anchors "Not at all full" and "Totally full" at 0 and 100 millimeters, respectively. Lower numbers represent low feelings of fullness while larger values are characteristic of greater fullness. Fullness was assessed at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes to evaluate changes across time for each grain treatment.

    Measured: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min

  4. Self-reported prospective food consumption

    Visual analog scales were used to evaluate self-reported feelings toward prospective food consumption using the question "How much do you think you can eat?" The scale consisted of a 100-millimeter line with anchors "Nothing at all" and "A lot" at 0 and 100 millimeters, respectively. Lower numbers represent low ability to eat while larger values are characteristic of greater ability to eat. Prospective food consumption was assessed at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes to evaluate changes across time for each grain treatment.

    Measured: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, 120 min

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jan 2018
  2. Study start13 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion4 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion18 Sep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Otherwise healthy male and female adults
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03387345
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00005413
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
19 Dec 2017
Last updated
2 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 100% steel cut barley, 100% barley flakes and 50/50 rice-barley mix in people with Blood Glucose and Dietary Fiber, run by Arizona State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-prandial glycemia (time frame: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45min , 60 min, 90 min, 120 min). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in